You are about to read about a 3 year old girl named Amelia that was denied a kidney transplant because she is considered to be “mentally retarded”. The doctor that made this decision felt as though Amelia would not have a good enough “quality of life” to justify the procedure. Unfortunately, this is yet another example of eugenics in action and this is the kind of thing that starts happening when human life becomes cheap. When a society decides that life is not precious, all sorts of nightmarish things begin to occur. Women start aborting babies that are discovered to be less than “perfect”. Life support systems are terminated for those that are considered to be “vegetables”. Medical procedures are denied to elderly patients because they would be a “waste of resources”. Terminally ill children are regarded as “not worth saving”. We often look back in horror on the human sacrifices of past civilizations, but many of the things that we do today are extremely barbaric as well. And as the population control agenda of the global elite continues to be promoted in the classrooms of thousands of colleges and universities around the globe, the value placed on human life is going to continue to decline.
The following comes from an account by Amelia’s mother of what it was like to hear a doctor tell her that her daughter was being denied a kidney transplant because she is considered to be “mentally retarded”. You can read the full account right here. After dropping this bomb on Amelia’s mother, the doctor and the social worker that were talking with her just got up and left the room. Unfortunately, scenes like this play out all over America every single day….
I am beginning to realize I want this over with so I can move onto the next person who will help me with the transplant. So I say the words and ask the questions I have been avoiding.
“So you mean to tell me that as a doctor, you are not recommending the transplant, and when her kidneys fail in six months to a year, you want me to let her die because she is mentally retarded? There is no other medical reason for her not to have this transplant other than she is MENTALLY RETARDED!”
“Yes. This is hard for me, you know.”
My eyes burn through his soul as if I could set him on fire right there. “Ok, so now what? This is not acceptable to me. Who do I talk to next?”
“I will take this back to the team. We meet once a month. I will tell them I do not recommend Amelia for a transplant because she is mentally retarded and we will vote.”
“And then who do I see?”
“Well, you can then take it the ethics committee but as a team we have the final say. Feel free to go somewhere else. But it won’t be done here.”
They both get up and leave the room.
Fortunately, there has been a great outcry over this story and this decision is being reconsidered. But the eugenics agenda has been promoted so hard for so long in this country that there are a lot of voices out there that are actually supporting the decision to deny the kidney transplant to Amelia.
For example, the following is from a Huffington Post editorial that supports denying a kidney transplant to this little girl because it would be “a waste of an organ”…..
The stark reality then, is that a kidney that goes to one patient means it does not go to another. Giving a kidney to Amelia means that someone, whose name you will probably never know, but who will be loved just as fiercely as Amelia is, won’t get one in time.
Which is why there are rules — unemotional, clinical, detached rules — for a situation that is none of those things. And it is why there are forms like the ones placed in front of Amelia’s parents. Amelia is not being denied a donor transplant because she is, as her mother writes, “mentally retarded.” She is being denied a donor transplant because she has a cascading syndrome that will shorten and limit her life, meaning that kidney will not “save” her in the way that it might someone who starts out healthier. In cold clinical terms this means that everything it takes to undergo a transplant — the medications, the repeated biopsy procedures afterwards, the constant monitoring and machinery — are difficult and sometimes impossible compared with a child who is less impaired. The less mobile a patient is, the far greater the likelihood that she will develop an infection, or pneumonia, or a host of other complications that make it probable that the transplant will eventually fail. Which, in those same cold clinical terms, would make it a waste of an organ.
If you feel like losing your lunch after reading that, it is perfectly understandable.
Somehow, millions upon millions of Americans have been convinced that just because a child is sick or disabled that they are not going to have a good enough “quality of life” to be worth saving.
In other instances, decisions about medical care come down to money.
The goal of health insurance companies is to make as much money as possible. When they can get away with refusing to pay for expensive treatments and procedures that increases their profits.
Anyone that has ever had a claim denied by a health insurance company knows what I am talking about. They will gladly take your money, but when the time comes that you really need them many of them will do whatever they can to wiggle out of paying.
Many health insurance companies even treat our injured veterans very badly. The following example comes from CBS News….
John Woodson, a 51-year-old contractor from Oklahoma who was featured on ABC’s 20/20 in 2009, lost an eye and a leg when the truck he was driving hit a roadside bomb in Iraq. He is covered by an AIG government benefits program for employees of U.S. contractors working in Iraq and Afghanistan. But AIG refused to provide him with the new plastic leg his doctor had ordered, and even fought against paying for a wheelchair and glasses for his remaining eye. (He has only 30 percent vision in his remaining eye.) The insurance company eventually provided him with a better artificial limb made of replacement parts, but not the one his doctor ordered, according to ABC.
Can you believe that?
But at least that solider did not end up dead.
Other “health insurance victims” are not so fortunate.
This next example comes from a Huffington Post article….
Hilda and Krikor Sarkisyan went to CIGNA’s Philadelphia headquarters, along with supporters from the California Nurses Association, to confront the CEO Edward Hanway over the death of her 17-year-old child.
In 2007, Nataline Sarkisyan was denied a liver transplant by the company, on the grounds that the operation was “too experimental” to be covered. Nine days later it changed its mind, in response to protests outside its office. It was too late: Nataline died hours later.
“CIGNA killed my daughter,” Nataline’s mother Hilda told security. “I want an apology.” Sarkisyan was not able to speak to Hanway; a communications specialist talked to her instead. After their conversation, employees heckled the group from a balcony; one man gave them the finger. CIGNA called the police and had the family and their friends escorted from the building.
The health insurance system in America is completely and totally broken. At some health insurance companies, employee bonuses have actually been based on who can deny the most claims.
Hopefully you are with an ethical health insurance company. If not, you may not have the coverage that you think that you have. If there is the smallest thing wrong on your health insurance application, they will find it. And when they find it they will use it as justification to deny your claim.
We live in a very cold-hearted society.
Even the government is cold-hearted.
If something has gone wrong with your health insurance and you are slowly dying at home, the government is not going to save you.
But the government is very concerned about making sure that your kids get pumped full of toxic vaccines.
After all, they have to do what they can to increase the profits of the pharmaceutical companies, right?
Recently, the CDC has been ramping up efforts to put even more pressure on parents across the United States to vaccinate their children.
Unfortunately, that is probably going to mean that we are going to see even more healthy children become disabled or die. The following example comes from VacTruth.com….
It has been reported a fit and healthy 7-year-old girl died unexpectedly before Christmas after a flu vaccine. Kaylynne died in her mother’s arms four days after she was given a flu vaccine by her doctor at her annual check up.
Officials are now investigating Kaylynne’s death and an autopsy report is due in a couple of week’s time. Kaylynne’s mother is positive the vaccine killed her daughter and told reporters, “We’re just waiting for an answer,” “but we believe in our hearts that it was the flu shot.”
State officials however, are not convinced that the flu vaccine was the cause of the girl’s death.
What is even worse is when pregnant mothers get injected with vaccines. The immune systems of their babies are simply not developed enough to be able to handle the toxic vaccines and many of them die.
For dozens and dozens of stories of miscarriages that were caused by vaccines, please see this article and the comments that follow.
So why isn’t the government doing more to protect us?
Well, that becomes easy to understand when you realize that most of the people in our government and most of those that make up the “global elite” actually believe that the world is massively overpopulated.
That is why they spend so much money promoting “family planning” programs around the globe. They are obsessed with finding ways to get us to have less children.
In fact, the global elite promote their population control agenda all over the world in dozens of different ways. If you are interested in learning more, please see the following articles….
#1 From 7 Billion People To 500 Million People – The Sick Population Control Agenda Of The Global Elite
#2 Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control
#5 The Dangerous Myth Of Overpopulation
#7 Hillary Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy
#8 New U.N. Report: We Must Reduce The Population To Fight Climate Change
If we do not stand up for what is morally right now, in the future it will become “normal” to routinely deny kidney transplants to “mentally retarded” children because their lives will be considered “not worth living”.
We look back in horror at the eugenics programs of the Nazis in the 1930s and 1940s, but most Americans don’t realize that the Nazis got most of their ideas about eugenics from America.
Now many of those same concepts are being repackaged for a new generation.
If we do not value human life, our society will fail.
It is as simple as that.
Throughout human history, whenever the value placed on human life in a society declines dramatically, mass death has usually never been far behind.
So what do all of you think about the 3 year old girl that was denied a kidney transplant because she was considered to be “mentally retarded”? Please feel free to leave a comment with your opinion below….
