Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

Imagine going to sleep one night and waking up many years later in a totally different world.  In this futuristic world, literally everything you do is tightly monitored and controlled by control freak bureaucrats in the name of “sustainable development” and with the goal of promoting “the green agenda”.  An international ruling body has centralized global control over all human activity.  What you eat, what you drink, where you live, how warm or cold your home can be and how much fuel you can use is determined by them.  Anyone that dissents or that tries to rebel against the system is sent off for “re-education”.  The human population is 90 percent lower than it is today in this futuristic society, and all remaining humans have been herded into tightly constricted cities which are run much like prisons.  Does all of that sound good to you?  Well, this is what Agenda 21 is all about.


Yes, I know all this sounds like a plot from a science fiction novel.  But it is actually real.  178 nations have signed on to Agenda 21.  “Eco-prophets” such as Al Gore travel all over the world teaching us how wonderful “sustainable development” will be.  This agenda is being pushed in our schools, at our universities, on our televisions and in our movies.

So exactly what is Agenda 21?  The following is how the United Nations defines Agenda 21….

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.

When you start doing deep research into Agenda 21, you will find that describing it as a “comprehensive plan” is an understatement.  Virtually all forms of human activity impact the environment.  The rabid “environmentalists” behind the green agenda intend to take all human activity and put it into a box called “sustainable development”.

One of the key elements of “sustainable development” is population control.  The United Nations (along with radical “environmental” leaders such as Al Gore) actually believes that there are far too many people on earth.

So what is the solution?

Sadly, they actually believe that we need to start reducing the population.

Just this week, Al Gore made the following statement regarding population control….

“One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principle ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children have, the spacing of the children.

You have to lift child survival rates so that parents feel comfortable having small families and most important — you have to educate girls and empower women. And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that happens, then the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices.”

Do you notice how whenever global leaders talk about “empowering” women these days it always ends up with them having less children?

This population control agenda is also reflected in official UN documents.

The following is language from a UN resolution that was adopted by the UN General Assembly that was designed to further the implementation of Agenda 21….

“….population growth rates have been declining globally, largely as a result of expanded basic education and health care. That trend is projected to lead to a stable world population in the middle of the twenty-first century… The current decline in population growth rates must be further promoted through national and international policies that promote economic development, social development, environmental protection, and poverty eradication, particularly the further expansion of basic education, with full and equal access for girls and women, and health care, including reproductive health care, including both family planning and sexual health, consistent with the report of the International Conference on Population and Development.”

Most Americans don’t grasp it yet, but the truth is that the global elite are absolutely obsessed with population control.  In fact, there is a growing consensus among the global elite that they need to get rid of 80 to 90 percent of us.

The number one commandment of the infamous Georgia Guidestones is this: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.”

Unfortunately, a very high percentage of our global leaders actually believe in this stuff.

Sadly, this philosophy is now regularly being reflected in official UN documents.  For example, the March 2009 U.N. Population Division policy brief begins with the following shocking statement….

What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?

Apparently the poorest nations are the primary target for the population control freaks over at the UN.

This agenda showed up again when the United Nations Population Fund released its annual State of the World Population Report for 2009 entitled “Facing a Changing World: Women, Population and Climate“.

The following are three quotes that were pulled right out of that document….

1) “Each birth results not only in the emissions attributable to that person in his or her lifetime, but also the emissions of all his or her descendants. Hence, the emissions savings from intended or planned births multiply with time.”

2) “No human is genuinely “carbon neutral,” especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation. Therefore, everyone is part of the problem, so everyone must be part of the solution in some way.”

3) “Strong family planning programmes are in the interests of all countries for greenhouse-gas concerns as well as for broader welfare concerns.”

If no human is “carbon neutral”, then what is the solution?

To those that are obsessed with Agenda 21 and “sustainable development”, the fact that you and I are alive and breathing air is a huge problem.

The population control agenda is also regularly showing up in our newspapers now.

In a recent editorial for the New York Times entitled “The Earth Is Full“, Thomas L. Friedman made the following statement….

You really do have to wonder whether a few years from now we’ll look back at the first decade of the 21st century — when food prices spiked, energy prices soared, world population surged, tornados plowed through cities, floods and droughts set records, populations were displaced and governments were threatened by the confluence of it all — and ask ourselves: What were we thinking? How did we not panic when the evidence was so obvious that we’d crossed some growth/climate/natural resource/population redlines all at once?

But Friedman is quite moderate compared to many of the “eco-prophets” that are running around out there today.

For example, James Lovelock, the creator of the Gaia hypothesis, stated in an interview with the Guardian earlier this year that “democracy must be put on hold” if the fight against global warming is going to be successful and that only “a few people with authority” should be permitted to rule the planet until the crisis is solved.

A Finnish environmentalist named Pentti Linkola has gone even farther than that.  Linkola is openly calling for climate change deniers to be “re-educated”, for an eco-fascist world government to be established, for humans to be forcibly sterilized and for the majority of humans to be killed.

That doesn’t sound pleasant, now does it?

This agenda is even being taught by professors at our top universities.

The truth is that academia is brimming with nutjobs who want to see the vast majority of humans wiped out.

For example, Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka is a very prominent advocate of radical human population control.

In an article entitled “What nobody wants to hear, but everyone needs to know”, Pianka made the following shocking statements….

*First, and foremost, we must get out of denial and recognize that Earth simply cannot support many billions of people.

*This planet might be able to support perhaps as many as half a billion people who could live a sustainable life in relative comfort. Human populations must be greatly diminished, and as quickly as possible to limit further environmental damage.

*I do not bear any ill will toward humanity. However, I am convinced that the world WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.

Now keep in mind that this is a university professor that is teaching our kids.  People actually pay a lot of money to get educated by this guy.

If those pushing Agenda 21, “sustainable development” and population control get their way, the world is going to be a much different place in the future.

Just watch the video posted below.  It was originally produced by the Forum for the Future, a major NGO funded by big corporations such as Time Warner and Royal Dutch Shell.  In this video, the Forum for the Future presents their chilling version of the future.  Are you ready to live in a “Planned-opolis”?  Are you ready to use a “calorie card” and to have what you eat determined by a “global food council”?  This is the kind of tyrannical future that these radical environmental organizations want to impose on you and I….

Yes, the video is almost comical, but this is the kind of world that the global elite want to push us towards.

In fact, we see radical steps being taken all over the globe even now.

In Europe, the European Commission has unveiled a plan to ban all cars from major European cities by the year 2050.

In Europe, the mantra “carbon dioxide is causing global warming” has become gospel.  This banning of cars from city centers is all part of a draconian master plan to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in Europe by 60 percent over the next 40 years.

Hopefully this plan will never come to fruition, but the fact that the European Commission is seriously pushing it just shows how far things have progressed.

But we don’t have to peer into the future to see how this agenda is going to affect us.

Today, the U.S. government and governments all over the industrialized world have become so obsessed with reducing carbon emissions that now they even tell us what kinds of light bulbs we are allowed to buy.

There are millions of Americans that love the old light bulbs.  But soon we will not have the choice to buy them anymore.

What kind of freedom is that?

In some areas of the United States, government snoopers actually sort through the trash of residents to ensure that environmental rules are being followed.  For example, in the city of Cleveland, Ohio authorities have announced plans to have “trash supervisors” go snooping through trash cans to ensure that people are actually recycling according to city guidelines.

How would you feel if government officials went snooping around in your trash cans?

The world is changing.  The global elite have immense amounts of wealth and power and they are intent on imposing a radical environmental agenda on all the rest of us.

The reality is that many of the wealthiest and most prominent people in the world are absolutely obsessed with the green agenda and with population control.  Just consider the following quotes….

David Rockefeller: “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”

CNN Founder Ted Turner: “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

Dave Foreman, Earth First Co-Founder: “My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”

Maurice Strong: “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”

Michael Oppenheimer: “The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are.”

This radical agenda is even represented in the White House.

John P. Holdren, Barack Obama’s top science advisor, co-authored a textbook entitled “Ecoscience” back in 1977 in which he actually advocated mass sterilization, compulsory abortion, a one world government and a global police force to enforce population control.

On page 837 of Ecoscience, a claim is made that compulsory abortion would be perfectly legal under the U.S. Constitution….

“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

On pages 942 and 943, a call is made for the creation of a “planetary regime” that would control the global economy and enforce population control measures….

“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”

“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

On page 917, the surrender of U.S. national sovereignty to an international organization is advocated….

“If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”

As mentioned earlier, Holdren is the number one science advisor to Barack Obama, and the truth is that the top levels of the U.S. government are packed with people that believe this stuff.

Yes, a lot of what you have read in this article sounds crazy.  But the global elite really do believe in population control and they really are seeking to implement a radical environmental agenda across the entire planet.

They want total control of everyone and everything so that they can impose the measures that they believe are necessary to “fix” the planet.

I have actually written quite extensively in the past about the radical green agenda of the global elite.  If you are interested in learning more, I would recommend the following articles….

*The Green Police

*Governments Around The World Are Eagerly Adopting The Strict Population Control Agenda Of The United Nations

*Yes, They Really Do Want To Reduce The Population – 22 Shocking Population Control Quotes From The Global Elite That Will Make You Want To Lose Your Lunch

*The Dangerous Myth Of Overpopulation

*One Less Child? Environmental Extremists Warn That Overpopulation Is Causing Climate Change And Will Ultimately Destroy The Earth

*Hillary Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy

*New U.N. Report: We Must Reduce The Population To Fight Climate Change

*The Population Control Agenda Behind The Global Warming Movement: For The Environmental Extremists At Copenhagen Population Reduction Is The “Cheapest” Way To Reduce Carbon Emissions

*To The Global Elite The Math Is Simple: Human Overpopulation Is Causing Climate Change So The Solution To Climate Change Is Population Control

So do you have an opinion that you would like to share about Al Gore, Agenda 21 or population control?  If so, please feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments section below….

  • Nexus

    This is the big elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about. It is so bloody obvious that human activity is degrading the planet and the current population is going beyond the carrying capacity of the planet. The notion that technology will save us is a wet dream.

    If humans can’t control themselves then the simple answer of the elites is to take control.

    When you look at the world it is a mess…a small minority live in comfort and the majority are born into poverty…I mean real poverty.

    • ehswan

      Totally agree, too bad so few of us have the guts to say so. And isn’t it strange that those like the author of this article ignore the destruction of the oceans, of top soil, depletion of aquifers, rainforests, radical species extinction, etc! Though I have no love for the elites, on this issue I stand by them.

      • dave

        Have you ever wondered that the elites might be responsible for most of the ravaging that is done to our planet? For instance, examine the cases of Deepwater Horizon, Fukushima, current Mississippi river floods etc. more closely and you will see that there´s more to know there than the elite wants us to know.

        But, why would they intentionally f**k up major parts of our world, where they themselves also have to live in? Doesn´t make any sense? Well, actually it makes a lot of sense if you realize how the problem-reaction-solution scheme works. They create major problems and then offer their solutions (Agenda 21) in order to enhance the so-called new world order.

        They can live with the fact that Japan or Midwest, for example, may become largely uninhabitable. They don´t care because they have immense wealth and resources to protect themselves from the consequences of these man-made disasters. Ordinary people don´t.

        The other thing is that these “climate saints” like Al Gore are total frauds. Flying private jets among other things is not exactly in accordance with their preachings. I wouldn´t believe anything that comes out from these people´s mouths as you can be sure that it´s just another lie designed to fool the people into compliance with their sinister plans.

        We don´t have to wipe out human population to save the planet. The whole concept of saving the planet is false. The planet will exist for many millions of years after we are done, and the perpetual cycle of extinction and incipience of species will continue. It is us who need saving. So, we should get rid of the elites instead. They are the ones that want to cull the people in order to have a more manageable population of slaves under the one world government.

        I would suggest that the planet could house and feed even more people than there are today. There are so many technologies already developed that would enable this. We don´t need to cut down rainforests and kill the oceans. These are only the consequences of the unnatural economic system that is artificially perpetuated by the elites. Poverty, lack of proper education, carelees greed of multinational corporations, corrupt morals and mindless consumption are the real reasons behind our ecolocical problems – and they are present by design. But they are changeable without having to wipe out 90% of the population and creating an Orwellian style regime of eco-technocracy.

        • walking in the spirit

          I agree!

    • A.S.

      Did you ever think that the global elite want Africa, for instance, to remain in constant poverty, because it will be easier to wipe them out once global population control becomes a reality?

    • Have any of you actually taken the time to read Agenda 21? Not articles like this one about it, the actual document. Well, I have. Sure, it’s a long document but I found it rather easy to read. I too was alarmed about this plan to reduce 80 to 90% of the population as a result of reading articles like this and watching videos on YouTube about the subject. Then, I decided I wanted the facts from the horse’s mouth and the best way to do that was to do a search until I could find the actual document, unaltered, at the source. I did. I began to read it anxiously searching for references to reducing the world population. I wanted to use the material to write my own “warning”, “alarmist” article about it and needed to make sure I could copy and paste, cite page and paragraph numbers for my readers. To my surprise, I did not find any reference to reducing the global population. Moreover, as a Christian, when I read their objectives and methods of implementation, I was rather impressed. I was also impressed that they respect the sovereignty of the countries, leave the development and implementation up to each country, each country can formulate its own Agenda 21 to fit the country’s needs, values, and culture. I read other documents by the UN still seeking for this global population control claims. I found none.

      Therefore, my conclusion is that all this fear propaganda against this Agenda 21 new world order and political rhetoric denouncing it as a socialist (btw, Jesus was a socialist) or communist system is the product of the elite in this country trying to get people extremely misinformed and scared so they will oppose their city or region when a local Agenda 21 is proposed. Why? Because the elite will lose their power and control over the people and will have to adjust to the new system, which means giving up their greed for money, power, and control. They will have to actually help underprivileged people to have access to opportunities, tools, and resources for the improvement of their quality of life, resources that only the elite and upper middle class can access in today’s world system. That is very scary to them. All changes are scary. They won’t be able to exploit others to benefit their own greedy interests. They will have to collaborate, not compete. They will have to share, not withhold. They will have to put people, earth, and the environment before profits. Wow, terrifying! Your rights, dignity, and freedom will NOT be taken away! So, people, do yourselves a favor and go read what Agenda 21 is truly about. Then, decide whether you’d like living in that world or remain in this miserable one. Here is the link to make it easier for you: Agenda 21 UN site

      • GreenGardenGirl

        Actually, in going over certain parts of Agenda 21, there are several references to “educating” women and people on “population control and development”. It is all very wordy, politically correct and almost benign-sounding. It depends on how you take it. I cannot believe that anything of this stature that is being encouraged on such a global scale, can be truly benevolent and in the best interest of the world’s people- poor, middle-class or otherwise. Our government (in the US) has proven more often than not to be untrustworthy and corrupt from within, and a proposed global government (which is what the UN really is, duuuhh, not just a bunch of do-gooder humanitarian wealthy countries) can be no better. The “elite” are in control of the world’s corporations and governments, and have no true interest in benefiting the poor worker bugs that infest the planet. Other than to have them serve them to benefit their lifestyle and positions of power, then squash them when they are in the way of their purposes. The current system as it is- the state of the world, wars, (lack of) education, disease, pollution, raping of the planets resources, crime, societal and moral collapse have been carefully manipulated by those in control. We do not(by way of mainstream media, at least) hear or think anything other than what we are “told” by the media, which is controlled by the global elite, which also pulls the puppet strings of our government/politicians. People are being kept ignorant and uninformed for a reason. I bet that most people would love to live in a clean planet with no air, soil or water pollution, but that is not the world that has been created for us, by the elite that have prospered from exploiting this world and it’s people. Personally, I aim to get off the grid and “sustain” myself and family as much as possible, as I do not care to consume what the UNited Corporate States of America is feeding me. If everyone was in a position to do this, it would make a huge difference, but there would be no profits for the elite if people lived this way.
        Read below to get a taste of what “Barb” is babbling about. Whomever composed this UN document was an excellent verbal tap-dancer. It definitely seems to refer to birth/population control without saying it out loud.

        UN Agenda 21 excerpt:
        C. Implementing integrated environment and development programmes at the local level, taking into account demographic trends and factors

        Means of implementation

        C) Human resource development and capacity-building

        5.62. The areas of human resource development and capacity-building, with particular attention to the education and training of women, are areas of critical importance and are a very high priority in the implementation of population programmes.
        5.63. Workshops to help programme and projects managers to link population programmes to other development and environmental goals should be conducted.

        5.64. Educational materials, including guides/workbooks for planners and decision makers and other actors of population/environment/development programmes, should be developed.

        5.65. Cooperation should be developed between Governments, scientific institutions and non-governmental organizations within the region, and similar institutions outside the region. Cooperation with local organizations should be fostered in ordered to raise awareness, engage in demonstration projects and report on the experience gained.

        5.66. The recommendations contained in this chapter should in no way prejudice discussions at the International Conference on Population and Development in 1994, which will be the appropriate forum for dealing with population and development issues, taking into account the recommendations of the International Conference on Population, held in Mexico City in 1984, 1/ and the Forward-looking Strategies for the Advancement of Women, 2/ adopted by the World Conference to Review and Appraise the Achievements of the United Decade for Women: Equality, Development and Peace, held in Nairobi in 1985.
        B) Supporting programmes that promote changes in demographic trends and factors towards sustainability

        5.49. Reproductive health programmes and services, should, as appropriate, be developed and enhanced to reduce maternal and infant mortality from all causes and enable women and men to fulfil their personal aspirations in terms of family size, in a way in keeping with their freedom and dignity and personally held values.

        5.50. Governments should take active steps to implement, as a matter of urgency, in accordance with country-specific conditions and legal systems, measures to ensure that women and men have the same right to decide freely and responsibly on the number and spacing of their children, to have access to the information, education and means, as appropriate, to enable them to exercise this right in keeping with their freedom, dignity and personally held values taking into account ethical and cultural considerations.

        5.51. Governments should take active steps to implement programmes to establish and strengthen preventive and curative health facilities that include women-centred, women-managed, safe and effective reproductive health care and affordable, accessible services, as appropriate, for the responsible planning of family size, in keeping with freedom, dignity and personally held values and taking into account ethical and cultural considerations. Programmes should focus on providing comprehensive health care, including pre-natal care, education and information on health and responsible parenthood and should provide the opportunity for all women to breast-feed fully, at least during the first four months post-partum. Programmes should fully support women’s productive and reproductive roles and well being, with special attention to the need for providing equal and improved health care for all children and the need to reduce the risk of maternal and child mortality and sickness.

        5.52. Consistent with national priorities, culturally based information and education programmes that transmit reproductive health messages to men and women that are easily understood should be developed.

        C) Creating appropriate institutional conditions

        5.53. Constituencies and institutional conditions to facilitate the implementation of demographic activities should, as appropriate, be fostered. This requires support and commitment from political, indigenous, religious and traditional authorities, the private sector and the national scientific community. In developing these appropriate institutional conditions, countries should closely involve established national machinery for women.

        5.54. Population assistance should be coordinated with bilateral and multilateral donors to ensure that population needs and requirements of all developing countries are addressed, fully respecting the overall coordinating responsibility and the choice and strategies of the recipient countries.

        5.55. Coordination should be improved at local and international levels. Working practices should be enhanced in order to make optimum use of resources, draw on collective experience and improve the implementation of programmes. UNFPA and other relevant agencies should strengthen the coordination of international cooperation activities with recipient and donor countries in order to ensure that adequate funding is available to respond to growing needs.

        5.56. Proposals should be developed for local, national and international population/environment programmes in line with specific needs for achieving sustainability. Where appropriate, institutional changes must be implemented so that old-age security does not entirely depend on input from family members.

        I do not think that all of this would be bad if it was based on personal choice, but if government is behind it there very likely would be no choice, it would eventually become mandatory, should the people in power decide that was necessary. Just like mandatory health insurance (US), mandatory family size (China). Think about it. If every couple in the world had only 2 children, they would barely be replacing themselves. If they had 3-4, it might maintain the population accounting for accidental deaths, disease, violent crime, war, etc. There are not many places in the world that are having much larger family sizes with children that all live to adulthood. Most likely, the world is so contaminated at this point with radiation, industrial toxins, pesticides & chemicals, that the current population will be greatly reduced in the next couple of decades without the UN having to implement anything.

  • Aussie Aussie

    It is plain to see that there are too many of us. There is a natural limit – we learnt about it in school – foxes and rabbits.

    There is an elite out there, but trust me, they don’tcare a jot about sustainability, they care about reatining power. They may sometimes use sustainability to retain power, but they also use many other things too.

    We are a wasteful race, and we have the ability to do more with less. We have become ravenous consumers in the last 50 years and have a shocking lifestyle to show for it. Not only that we are literally shitting on our doorstep – our oceans are dying, the air is polluted, our water is polluted, our lands are over farmed and dessertfying, we are killing off huge natural systems, such as the Amazon and Indonesian rainforests – just to live pointless lives where we consume to feel better.

    We are either going to continue and have nothing left, or we are going to accept that we don’t have total freedom, but we have responsibilities to other humans and the Earth in general, and stop consuming stupid products for no reason, by regulation as we wont do it by ourselves.

  • A.S.

    If global warming were really true, those at the top (e.g. all the names quoted in the article) that really believe in it, should commit SUICIDE to prove their point; they should give up their life as a good-faith gesture to show that they are right. Once ALL OF THEM are dead, then I just MIGHT reconsider the fact that global warming is the biggest lie the planet has ever seen.

    • Andy

      Why? If that’s the logic the best thing is for the “believers” to kill as many “non believers” in the process…

  • mohican

    Whatever Al Gore. Why does he expect anyone to listen to him? He is the BIGGEST hypocrite. Four kids, energy guzzling houses … does he bike to his speaking engagements? They are all idiots. One small American family who owns a home with more bedrooms than people and have more cars than drivers will leave a bigger “footprint” than a huge third world family. Why don’t they do us a favor and take themselves out.

    • rEBECCA

      right???!! GOOD POINT!

    • walking in the spirit


  • Brady

    Crazy! I only hope we have this collapse first leading into a post petroleum crunch that forces mankind to find another way to power machinery. Everything will stop when oil prices are too high for people to pay. After that people’s lives will only be determined by how they adapt to a post petroleum world. So I’d recommend some reasearch on life before oil. Use the vast info on the web to your advantage before it’s gone forever.

    • A Dodgy Bloke

      I agree.

  • Mr Carpenter

    Frankly, 95% of the people on planet earth should stick around and the 5% that plan on offing the rest of us should off themselves.

    We’d all be better off without them!

    • Andy

      I guess you belong to the stupid 95%.

  • Here is one of our recent stories of Agenda 21 indoctrination in Mexico…

  • Jim Mack

    Why exactly is curbing the earth’s obvious over-population problem wrong? While I would never advocate mass killings or anything so daft, it is obvious to all but rapture-believing religious nuts that as a species we humans cannot keep doubling in population size every few decades. Arguments that there are plenty of resources if only we would share them better are spurious and propagated by fools.

    • Gil

      If population control equals power control then pro-populationists are pro-hedonists and to Hell with the consequences of their actions.

  • Thank you for posting on Agenda 21. This a terrible terrible agenda and the people of the USA don’t even know about it.

    Please go to to learn more from people who have been trying to expose it for years and who come from a UN test ground for UN Agenda 21, Santa Cruz CA

  • … You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children have, the spacing of the children.

    Agree 1000% with Al Gore on this one. What’s the problem with that?

    • What’s wrong with that?

      When they say “and health care, including reproductive health care, including both family planning and sexual health,” it is just another way of saying we should advise, encourage and provide for abortions.

      Killing the innocent is what is wrong with that.

    • Frances

      World birth rates are already dropping, thanks to depleted uranium weaponry(see the work of Leuren Moret) that is spread world-wide throughout the atmosphere. The biggest growth industry in the U.S. is fertility centers. Gee, I wonder why American women can’t get pregnant? Sperm viability world-wide is less than 50%, thanks in large part to depleted uranium. Chemtrails and GMOs are playing their part in reducing population figures too. And 92% of aborted fetuses in the U.S. are girls. So Al Gore can go take a long walk off a short pier.

    • Franklyn

      The optimist.
      Humans are not robots,,some woman dont want any children, some want 2 some 5 and few 6+,,,its just the balance of nature working here,,,you can thank God your parents didnt believe in the rubbish you do,,other wise i would’nt have to write this response..

      Dont fall for the “world is over populated” crap,
      its just the ruling elite starting to panick over controlling the awakening of a larger mass, they need to keep it nice and manageable.

      • walking in the spirit


  • Paul

    The thing that I find interesting about the people mentioned in this article is that they never say anything about their own families or their own dependents. Nope, this is only for the little people.

    • LibertarianMathProf


      Elitists who believe that humans are destructive and advocate that fewer be allowed to be born, while at the same time believe that they are exempt from this rule is one more case of Orwell’s prediction about totalitarian societies becoming true:

      “All animals are equal
      But some animals are more equal than others.”

  • C P Wendt

    Daniel DeFoe (originally Foe) was an agent provocateur. Approx 1701, “The True-Born Englishman” and “Hymn to the Pillory”:
    “Actions receive their tincture from the times
    And as they change, are virtues made of crimes”
    “Whenever God errects a house of prayer
    The Devil always builds a chapel there
    And ‘t’will be found upon examination
    The latter has the larger congregation”

    True of more than churches. Then, a nation of people who act like cattle will end like them.

  • Michigan

    My aunt was a drug addict and an 6th grade education. She had 7 kids with two different men. Both men went to prison for rape the first for having sex with the under age babysitter and the last for raping and having a child with the firsts 12 year old daughter. All were a developmentally challenged The second one killed himself on bond and they were in foster care. They are all in the twenties with multiple kids themselves now, except the two youngest. All have to rely on the state to pay for everything and I am sure their kids will to. I have one child and will not have more because I cannot afford too. It would be good to educate woman and not have so many come and suffer like my cousins and millions of others. Just because a book of FICTION said go forth and multiple

    • Franklyn

      Hey mentally challenged Michigan
      The bible does indeed state to go forth and multiply,,but it did not say to have sex with children,It states NOT to commit adultery plus many other human laws,,,you blame everything on the holy book and nothing on mental corruption,,,Michigan WAKE UP or get the hell out the way,, you are but a very lost child..

      “I have one child and will not have more because i cant afford to”

      You are a foolish jealous person who places more value on money than human life (faith).

      Some people are destined to have large families some are not,,just like nature and the animal world,,,,the only fiction you have is in your own head…

  • WM

    Michigan…… You will find out in the VERY near future, the book you are calling “FICTION”, which we all know you are referring to the Bible, will only continue to show itself true. I just love it when people sarcastically misquote contextural verses in the Bible. I do not have any children because I can barely support my wife and I. Your family has all of the problems you mentioned due to disobedience to the book of “FICTION” and the commands of the God of the “book of FICTION”. You sound bitter that things turned out so bad. Disobedience to the things of God have consequences….sin bears certain fruits. Fornication, adultery, incest, rape, etc. are all SIN, and a rebellion against the precepts of the living God as revealed to us through his “book of FICTION” as you call it, of Bible as it is called. Just because your aunt bore fruits of rebellion does not make the Bible a “book of FICTION”

    I am sad to hear this, but I heed you and yours to seek the Lord while their is time, and get right with Jesus Christ, before all this global New World Order agenda kicks in.

    • HB

      I agree with you on this point totally! You reap what you sow. It is so sad when others(believers AND non-believers) take the Word of God out of context and twist it to their bidding. It is not easy to live by the word of God, as Satan has his dirty fingers in it all as well, but it is doable and it is something that really should be taken seriously.

      I too am sad to hear such a sad story, but I too believe that she reaped what she sowed as did the others in her life. unfortunately the story will never change and will continue on that path if they just keep on walking down it.

  • Tatiana Covington

    What’s so great about having 7B people as of now, up from 3B so recently as 1962? There’s no clear benefit.

    So… why not let it drop back to something sensible, like 500M or so?

    Prove me wrong.

    • A Dodgy Bloke

      I agree there are 80 million in Egypt do a Goggle Earth view of Egypt out side the Nile Valley there is just brown. I think we’re already in population over shoot, we don’t have 50 years for a natural decline. So who makes the decision who lives and who dies?

    • Terry

      Nature will cull the herd, and it will be brutal. Without our modern technology, we could not all continue to live here.

  • Crystal

    First, I want to say that I do NOT agree with the radical steps proposed for reducing population by these elitists. I believe their motive is to reduce the population by up to 90% because it will be easier to control us.

    However, regarding the part about reducing the population in the Third Word, I agree that the population in these countries is too big compared to the resources that they have within the country or that they can get. This is one of the reasons so many children die there and why there is starvation.

    I believe they need to be educated with logical, rational reasons as to why they need to reduce their childbearing. I do NOT believe in forced sterilization, abortions, outright killing, etc. This would be 100% wrong.

    Also, truth be told, the elitists have been working on reducing the population in the First World countries for decades. This is why the White population is decreasing in numbers. This was a result of telling young women to put careers first ahead of family and that careers were more important than childrearing. I do not agree with this method, but this “instruction” contributed to the decline of White children.

  • JasonD

    Wow Michael, not much agreement on this one by the comment posters

    • Michael

      It just shows how far the eugenics agenda has advanced

      • Andy

        Not really, It’s hard scientific evidence that we are too many humans on this planet. More people = Less quality of life.

        Many of our natural resources are finite, more people means less for everyone.

        Now top soil, fish, oil, metals, etc are becoming more and more scarce.

  • EKugene

    You don’t have to worry about the UN or Al Gore. Long before they can seriously implement any plans, the majority of the population will have painfully perished due to financial/energy/climate/disease/resource war disasters. We wouldn’t want to interfere with that with horrid planning now would we?

    • Ben Dover

      It is laughable that AL Whore et al think they will be the overlords of a eco-utopia. When things get bad, people tend to lash out at rulers.

      Depopulation will happen, but none of us will go quietly into the night. It will be ugly.

  • A Dodgy Bloke

    One of the things about the human species is the ability to indulge in delusion and arrogance. Al Gore and is internationalist ilk are one such group. They have meetings and jet around the world spinning dreams of a sustainable utopia. A world of green jobs, justice, no poverty, war. Progressives drive by emotion, guilt, arrogance and a sense of moral smugness stand up and applaud.
    I believe Agenda 21 exists I believe there are people working to promote it. I believe it will fail like Socialism, Communism, Global Warming and other lefty madness. It will fail not because the like minded banded together to elect sober minded men and women. It will fail simply because the there is no more elasticity in the system, it’s gone used up. The system is too big to complex, and has way too many moving parts, and is starting to break. I would take Brady’s advice and learn what life was like before oil.

  • A Dodgy Bloke

    I know this is off topic a pal at work passed this on. Thought some folks might wat to pass it on.

    “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government – lest it come to dominate our lives and interests”.
    – Patrick Henry –

    I have totally cleaned this e-mail from all other names, sending it to you in hopes you will keep it going and keep it clean. This is something I will fight for and I hope you all read it all the way through. You will be glad you did.

    The 26th amendment (granting the right to vote for 18 year-olds) took only 3 months & 8 days to be ratified! Why? Simple! The people demanded it. That was in 1971…before computers, before e-mail, before cell phones, etc.

    Of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, seven (7) took 1 year or less to become the law of the land…all because of public pressure.

    I’m asking each addressee to forward this email to a minimum of twenty people on their address list; in turn ask each of those to do likewise.

    In three days, most people in The United States of America will have the message. This is one idea that really should be passed around.

    Congressional Reform Act of 2011

    1. No Tenure / No Pension.
    A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.

    2. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security.
    All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.

    3. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.

    4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.

    5. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.

    6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.

    7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective 1/1/12.
    The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen. Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves. Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home and back to work.

    If each person contacts a minimum of twenty people then it will only take three days for most people (in the U.S. ) to receive the message. Maybe it is time.

    If you agree with the above, pass it on. If not, just delete.

    • Terry

      Good ideas, but it will never see the light of day as long as our current form of government exists.

  • joey

    ok eric and other who agree with the concept of population control ;A) you all kill your pets and kids first ,then yourselves; while you are all together in one mass delusional god playing role game ,you can all watch it on your big and little screens. It will also be in the big brains retrieval system recorded along with every-thing else you have said done and thought. And on judge-meant Day these books will be opened ;some think this big brother computer has a big eye; ha-ha there is one much bigger and much more in depth; so fear Him who can not only throw your body into hell but also your soul ;or another way to say to you (god-players) go slip on a cloud….

  • KB

    Some of you ask what is wrong with population control. Nothing is wrong with it if it is a voluntary condition. Forcible population control is and always will be wrong. Look at China. They have eliminated so many females that now rich families are buying wives at birth for their sons because there are not enough females to go around.
    The rich elitists want to get rid of and/or control certain cultures. The most procreative populations right now are Muslim cultures, India, and Hispanic cultures, not to mention China (and that’s just from that culture having been around for so long).
    So how many of those population-control freaks are white anglos? … pretty much all of them, and they’re running scared.
    Bottom line is: The best population control is nature. Nature will make sure that things change when it has had enough through the use of famine or war or illness, and that’s what’s coming down the pike. It has happened time and time again throughout history because people refuse to learn and so they give nature that oomph that starts the chain reaction. I have a real hard time not believing that some of our weird weather isn’t from that oil dispersant they dumped into the gulf, which sunk into the North Atlantic Current.
    And I ALSO think that everything that is happening in our world and with governments is and has been prophesied because it all has to do with taking away free will and forcing dominance on everyone. So who originally thought that up…give you a hint: five letters, and starts with a D and ends with an L.
    So figure it out for yourselves. Do you want to be the first to volunteer for population control? Do you want your children to be the first to volunteer for population control? Your brothers and sisters?
    Bottom line is the NWO can never control 7 billion people — they would have to whittle the numbers down to controllable amounts, i.e. 500,000,000; thus, their depopulation agenda.
    But wouldn’t it be better to be more cautious in the use of our resources? Why is there the need to dump plastics into the ocean, etc? Why not use more wind turbines and solar energy? And it makes way more sense to me to license only one vehicle per name than license one child per name.

  • Stephen Byerly

    “I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just.” –Thomas Jefferson

    Need I say more?

  • Gary

    Every time I drive in rush hour traffic I wish there were a lot less people.

    Think about it, when is the last time you were driving down the road and said “I sure wish there was more cars on this road”

    That’s right never.

  • tommcd

    What is REALLY scary is that many of the comments here actually agree with Al Gore!
    Check out the videos at that Michael posted in another one of his blogs on population.

  • Gary

    I do not bear any ill will toward humanity. However, I am convinced that the world WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.

    I do not think this is debatable. It is simply common sense.

    Just about any problem is made worse by more people.

    • Tim

      So, who gets to decide who lives and who dies? You? God gives life, and He alone has the right to take it, not man. That’s one of the reasons God instituted capital punishment in the first book of His Word. Go read Genesis 9:6.

  • Terry

    Mankind is not capable of destroying this planet. 10K years after we are extinct, visitors will have trouble detecting evidence of our existence.

    Note that the environmental nutcases are not volunteering to snuff themselves in order to “save the planet”. They all think they should be the ones to decide who stays.

    • Andy

      But while we live we don’t need more humans to ******* up the lives of the humans that already lives here.

  • Depopulation is the reduction over time in a region’s census. It can result from many causes including disease, famine, fertility, genocide, mass execution, and war.

    The US industrial base is no longer large enough to support the US population.

    The US congress is owned by globalists and is doing nothing to restore the US industrial base.

    Don’t be fooled by the democratic hoax that entrepreneurs will restore prosperity in America by inventing the next hula hoop. Don’t be fooled by the republican hoax that lower taxes will bring jobs back from China.

    What comes next?

  • To all the eugenicists:

    Numero Uno, we can sustain at minimum 9 billion people.

    Numero Dos, for all those calling for population reduction, you must be the first to volunteer.

    Numero Tres, please sit and listen to this one hour lecture backed by documentation:

    • Andy

      9 billion is possible but then you have to accept a third-world country livestyle.

  • Once people realize that psychopaths run the US and Western Europe the better they will understand political psychology and why things are as they are:

  • mondobeyondo

    There is more than enough room on this planet for everyone. Granted, some places are a lot less desirable than others – I’d rather live in Hawaii than in the Sahara desert. But we’re not running out of space.

    And with all the scientific advances of food technology, genetically modifified foods (chuckle), growing more crops with fewer resources, etc (giggle)… feeding everyone shouldn’t be a problem.

    Population control = getting rid of people you don’t want.

    • Gary

      there is a lot of space that we need to grow food. We can not keep filling it up with people.

      This is simple common sense.

  • Hey, Al Gore! My wife and I just had our SEVENTH child! And we hope all our kids have at least SEVEN each! Gotta problem with that? Well, then, which of my kids do you think we should execute? Or, maybe you’d just like to have ME executed! What a dumbass AlGore is!

    • Gary

      you should be responsible enough to not have so many children in the first place making your question a moot point.

      It borders on immoral to have so many children with the planets population so high.

  • Perry K

    The Agenda 21 is news to me. Very sad. I much prefer my vision of the future which includes mass die-offs due to a pandemic or two, corporate wars, mass starvation, intolerable climate, whatever. We live in a finite ecosystem. Are we really smart enough to replace the massive amount of energy stored in fossil fuels with another source? Unless an extra-terrestrial civilization revisits the earth and teaches use how to power our machinery from dirt or water, I don’t think we are going to make it with the billions currently inhabiting the earth. (Yes, you can put me in your ‘nutjob’ column . . . it’s my story and I am sticking with it!)

    To me, I think the whole light bulb thing is really stupid. The small fraction of energy used for light bulbs in our homes makes the discussion ridiculous. Follow the money. Who is profiting from this retrofit? Do we really need all of that extra mercury in our homes? This is as stupid as the $5 billion a year that we spend subsidizing ethanol production. Remember 30 years ago when you could buy a refrigerator that would last more than 20 years? Not much profit in that. Better to get us to throw those away for a new and improved energy-star appliance that just so happens to be engineered to last 3 years. It is very easy for the wealthy to dream up new ways to take even more of our money making us think that they are doing something good for us.

  • LibertarianMathProf

    So women should control their bodies.

    What if they want to have more children than what the powers be decree that they can have?

    • Gil

      Who do? Most women who have a choice want less children (for some strange reason).

  • LibertarianMathProf

    While “each birth results in….emissions attributable to that person in his or her lifetime”, each birth is also the addition of one human life and the contributions that person will make.

    Human beings are not simply biological creatures. They are part of civilization.
    Whatever or whoever that person is, he or she will make a contribution to civilization that nobody else will, with the history of civilization different from what it would have been had that person had never been born.

    • Gary

      Not all of the contributions are positive IE-crime, immorality and worst of all they could be a conservative republican in which case they are the first two rolled into one.

      • LibertarianMathProf

        But how do we know in advance who will become a criminal and who will be a genius? We don’t. Everyone deserves a chance.

        • Gary

          Given that there are a lot more criminals than geniuses (simply look around) I would be more than willing to miss a genius or two to avoid thousands of criminals.

          This is simply a fact.

  • JR

    2009 article in (UN)Scientific (UN)American that says the exact same thing. By Laurence Krauss

  • liberty4u2

    Goin’ with joey on this one. The Big Surprise is not far off. Some of us reading this will be part of it. Always be watchful and ready.

  • coy uno

    God is just human ego is the one creating all damage in this world like this plan to eliminated human beings what makes you think you will be saved from that?

  • coy uno

    i also know that god is inside of us that we are all divine creatures like all creatures all in existence is god all is one one is all unity.
    So go look for yours divinity because jesus was a human to and find hes divine being like buda and many others.

  • destiny

    The world is over populated, too bad people don’t have the sense to control their reproduction. But we don’t have to do a damn thing about it, nature is self-correcting… it’s already happening, earthquakes, tornadoes, tsunamis, viruses and plagues, many will die of natural disasters and many will starve or die from diseases and viruses.

  • tommcd

    Everyone that still (amazingly!!) seems to believe that the earth would be better off without all of us evil humans really needs to revisit George Carlin’s perspective on saving the planet:

  • felloPatriot

    READ ON !

    This PLANT was grown by all Americans, who sold this MIRACLE PLANT to many to manufacture products to sell, AND MANY MANY AMERICANS became WEALTHY from the HARVEST & SALES of HEMP.

    History of Hemp, and Hemp USE…..

    Ford And Deisel Never Intended Cars To Use Gasoline
    Henry Ford’s first Model-T was built to run on hemp gasoline and the CAR ITSELF WAS CONSTRUCTED FROM HEMP! On his large estate, Ford was photographed among his … – Cached
    Every part of the Hemp plant can be used commercially, CAN TOTALLY REPLACE PETROLEUM USE WORLDWIDE. And is 100% bio-degradable.
    Farming only 6% of North America’s acreage with hemp for biomass would provide all of our gas and oil energy needs.
    Hemp pulp could totally replace wood as a source for pulp and paper.
    One acre of hemp produces four times as much pulp for paper as the same acre of trees.
    Hemp paper can be produced without dioxins and many other pollutants currently used in paper production.
    Hemp is naturally organic and discourages the growth of weeds. It is insect, disease, and drought resistant, and is easy on the soil.
    More than half of all pesticides used in the U.S are for cotton production. There is much evidence suggesting that the extensive use of pesticide chemicals in our environment is largely contributing to many forms of today’s common illnesses AND SERIOUS ILLNESSES CAUSING DEATH such as cancer and Alzheimer’s.
    Hemp could easily replace cotton as the primary material used for our fashion and clothing industry. (The first Levi’s were made from hemp).
    Unlike cotton, hemp can be grown in Canada, and all colder climates.
    Hemp is as good for the planet as it is for human health.
    The seeds and leaves of the hemp plant are nature’s richest botanical source of Omega 3, 6, 9, essential fatty acids, and countless other life giving vitamins and minerals.
    Hemp seeds are high in Vitamin B-17 and IS PROVEN to cure numerous diseases & most cancers, WITH COUNTLESS SURVIVORS WORLDWIDE.

    History of Hemp…..

    Prescription drugs kill, cannabis has never killed anyone, has CURED many …
    Prescription drugs kill, cannabis has never killed anyone September 27, 2006… – Cached


  • felloPatriot

    Take a LOOK at this…..and then say its alright to MURDER your neighbor? YOUR AUNTIE? YOU ??????? Get A GRIP ! AND KNOW THE TRUTH OF THE ELITIST CORPORATE WAR FOR PROFIT MADNESS ! THE TRUTH !!!!

    Overpopulation is a Myth: Plenty of Food and Space Exists …

    Proclamations of overpopulation have circulated for decades. Are they true?

    YouTube – Overpopulation: The Making of a Myth
    The pilot episode of PRI’s POP 101 series, this video takes a fresh, humorous approach to the demographic issues facing the world today.

  • Polarization of the sexes is one of the US policy tools as well as encouraged abortion, those factors aside the domestic policies of the US are basically testing grounds for administrative roles in the future world. Nobody here or in the media openly challenges current administrative legal practices. Education which is one of the most powerful tools for the development of the human race as well as the individual is so dumbed down in the US, it has become like picking off lemmings. Drug wars, family courts, law without accountability and worse as those become acceptable. We readily inform on anyone who doesn’t meet on our world views, I watched a neighbor get hauled off the other day for having cracks in his driveway, I think no matter whther you are a rapturite, biblical puritan or the new batch of metrosexuals. We are all screwed, because we can’t work together as designed.

  • Why do the power elite only mention all of the people that are living and breathing their air? People die everyday of various things including old age, not them, us. David Rockefeller is 93, I think he has breathed enough of my air, same with George Soros, he is in his 80’s and still he is breathing, now that’s nerve. What really firghtens me is the first 3 posts on this board, they actually agree with these nuts. We are not God, George Soros thinks he is but he isn’t, he is no body, he just has money, no one elected him to anything, he has 5 or 6 kids, he is in no position to talk about sterilization or population control, neither is any of the Rockefellers, another bunch of Jack Rabbits. They are the biggest users of resources in the world, As for the planet being crowded it just seems that way when half of the world is dumped into your country, wall to wall people while their country is emptied out, there is no balance there. The US is loaded with incompatible immigrants, the new immigrants are coming here at an alarming rate, Obam just fixed it so 16 million illegals can stay and more can come in, of course the US will be over crowded, what did they expect when they do things like this. First of all, who died and left the power elite boss? why do they have a say in anything that goes on in this country or who lives and who dies, they sound like idiots? If they don’t like it they have plenty of money to leave, we don’t . This world was here for us, we are suited to this planet just as other planets that have life on them are suitable for whomever inhabits it, there is enough air in the atmosphere to let us all breathe, but no, they worry about a cow farting and people taking too deep a breath, let them use their fortunes to buy Oxygen tanks, problem solved. Thir whining is getting tiresome, Al Gore is a jerk and George Soros is just evil and unbalanced, now Oprah Winfrey and Bill Gates have joined the pack and have meetings to discuss depopulation, they should start ith themselves , it would be Utopia without them in this world. They have no more rights than we do, who do they think they are?

    • HB


    • Gary

      But they do have a lot more money so that according to the republicans makes them worth more.

  • duncan

    For clarity, the great lie of the elite’s depopulation agenda is:

    “there are too many people and the world cant sustain them all”

    what they actually mean is:

    “there are too many people in the world for us to maintain our fabulous lifestyles and unlimited greed, the ‘useless eaters’ must go”

    And just so you know, they are already reducing all our populations at an incredible rate, all of the western countries are in negative growth.

    Now you know the real reason behind the elites immigration policies, they are filling the holes beginning to appear in our depleted societies.

    you can see this in our towns, mentally delete the immigrants and look again at the gaps growing in our communities. Very noticeable in the UK because our population is so much smaller.

  • terrez

    How bizarre all the nonsense and the rest of the ignorance is here. Welcome to American education 101. The myth and the lie is inbreed at every turn and most of you have bought it for as true americans and westerners it is always ‘what about me’. Do you think YOU are not a peasant and need to go like the rest, or that these elite psychos give a dam about you? If you think otherwise your delusion is complete.
    1) there is no shortage of oil. 2) there is no shortage of food. 3)there is enough land in australia itself to feed the world. The shortage is manmade for greed and your stupidity about it is complete… and there is death in your water and on your grocery shelves and in your air already courtesy of these same people that will save you, not some schlep who cant do anything about because the greed and corruption, along with you ignorance is complete.
    And you are above it all and matter to these psychos in power; your betters who you look to for the truth? And you would buy this load of death for our own good and divide and conquer as if you are above it all, a part of the oh so wise and educated ones. You think some African peasant is ruining this planet and taking from you. They cant even survive and afford your gas and food that you are being raped for, and nor will you soon enough. This pollution is courtesy of the same people you look to for help and cant see the death at their hands on the march or maybe you do and think you do matter to them and not just a source of profit and taxes, as if. A lack of is only in the eyes of the elites who want it all and you dead or quietly shuffling about for revenue, because you are already dumbed down and ingrained with the lies. And we will be divided and conquered thanks to scared little sheep and educrats doing your work for your own good. And the bible thumpers will hide behind their book and look for an external savior just like the rest letting the gods of green save them. Good luck sheep, and have your slaughter because that what sheep are breed for too.

  • “Beam …
    me up …

    There is
    … no
    … intelligence on
    … this
    … planet.”

  • phil

    All of this, ‘theres too much of us’ is retarded.
    Its how we LIVE day to day thats the problem. Birth rates are declining and we can easily sustain ourselves through the act of SHARING. Remember the grain mountains of the 80’s?
    We don’t need to be culled, the western doctorine of opulance needs culling. I see noone who talks of reduction putting themselves against the wall first, neither the outspoken leaders of the agenda OR their supporters.
    Does it occur to anyone they might be lying aswell? I mean….they have a history of it.

  • earl

    After reading the article and comments I did not see any mention of the “real” elephant in the room. The wealth (resources, land, gold, money, etc) of this planet, has been hijacked by a select few. How can we have a healthy, educated population that is encouraged to create and participate in the advancement of our species when an evil group – top of the pyramid – are in control of our resources?

    We have heard all of the names before….Rothschild, Rockefeller, Windsor, The Vatican, The Crown, Washington, D.C. (the three city states of the world) and on and on. Every move the “elites” make is to push the rest of us into further poverty so they can control and terminate.

    Instead of helping mankind they want to destroy it….Perhaps the theories of alien intervention into our existence have merit. No one really knows. I’m sure Bible thumpers will refute that, but there is far too much evidence of the unexplained to think you know it all….or any. But I digress.

    Point being: there is room for us all to be productive, creative beings. We have to stop the Elite’s control. Perhaps end the monetary system. That is our enslavement. There are many great thinkers who love humanity and want us to exist. The one major problem to overcome is waking humanity up to discover that we all have the power within. To quote one of our teachers, “the power of God is within”.

  • Andy

    Population Control or starvation, what do you pick? The human population is about 11 000 times larger than what it should be. Civilization destroys the ecosystem – the foundation of our lives.

    People that advocates uncontrolled growth of the human population are insane.

    • goodtimes

      Andy loves being “controlled” because he’s so… “sane”.

      I think the term population control is a little off. What’s going on is POPULATION MANIPULATION.

      Funny how little things like the Catholic church and The U.S. Government and their welfare programs have contributed the most to some of these little “population problems”.

      They have been encouraging the poorest, dumbest and most wasteful people to breed out of control for decades. The government will even give you a check and encourage you to keep breeding and breeding… just as long as you stay poor and in the projects.

      They have created the problem and now they are offering the solution.

      In the end, it’s sadly what the herd of cattle known as the human race deserve. To be livestock on a big ol’ farm…

    • Kraiya

      Humanity is out of control. You can even read it in the disparity of these comments. I come from another galactic system, and until the people of this earth are educated to wake up and become conscious of who they are and their place in the universe, humanity is doomed because you’re all equally controlled by massive fear. Change the Gestalt, people.

  • Guido

    If they do go through with it, at least my commute in the morning will be MUCH easier. Kill those goobers off and help me get to work faster!

    Seriously-these arguments have been around since there were maybe 1 billion people on the planet and every time they got to the maximum, we were able to accomodate the multitudes. Well, that may end if the whole peak oil thing is true, but until oil runs out, we can cram more and more people on this rock with no problem. Well, as long as they’re not in Ethiopia or any of the other perennially hungry nations…

  • sean

    I fully agree with pop control!! I fully agree that cars should be BANNED in all major city-centres!! I fully agree that we should re-educte the entire worlds toddlers, and that we should BAN organized religion and BAN porn and fucking well incresae capital punishment for repeat sex offenders and murderers and any other seriously twisted freaks! I also believe that we should bloody-well euthanise ALL new borns that have ANY serious birth defects that will make life harder for them than it already is!! I can go on BUT I will wait until I am ready to act!

    • daniel

      shut up. people like you make me sick.”lets save them from the horrors of life that come with being born with defects”. I have a serious defect. my life has been hard due to it. but I like life. I wouldn’t trade my hardships for a life of ease. my hardships made me stronger and smarter. they made me better.

      what gives you the right to decide who lives and dies. get out of your ivory tower and pay a visit to the real world. if you don’t like it you can go back up there and worship Josef Mengele and Adolf Hitler. you nazi facist

    • Vigilant

      Do not be a fool. To surrender your liberties to an all-powerful, inevitably corrupt, invincible government force would be the end of the entire world as we know it. Life is not worth living if we are not free to determine what choices we make or even if we can keep certain children. There are certainly many things that should be changed, but not through a 1984 Orwellian nightmare. If someone as radical as you on the far-leaning right were able to deceive enough people to following their agenda, I’m pretty sure you’d be throwing a fit over forced “re-education.” Just because someone throws in key liberal loving words like Mother Earth, progressive, empowered, sustainable, etc., doesn’t mean you should surrender your entire sensible capacity.

  • The Lord God Most High (Jehovah) is able to provide for his people. The world’s problems are caused by the worship of false gods in false religions. Those who turn to Jesus and trust him will walk in the blessing. The devil has always tried to kill people. The devil came to steal, kill, and destroy. Jesus came to give life and to give it more abduntanly.

    • Sherry April Bailey

      F.G. Praise the Lord, a man who knows wisdom and knowledge! Amen!!!

  • If they really cared about how many people can live on this earth, then they would lead by example. They would start by killing all but 1 other member of their family tree. Then everyone else can do the same.

  • Kelly

    Jeesh…..I hope all these population control freaks do us all a favor and start by eliminating themselves. So rediculous!

  • Pico Pirandloa

    Well, if we continue to fill th cofers of “we are better than you” likes of Bill Gates (vaccine weapon) then what hope is there for us?

  • Eugenicists all!
    It is the desire of most eugenicist that we are made to feel guilty for being alive and agree to dying so the EARTH is safe.


  • Grey

    The great thing about this all is that eco liberals are voluntarily diminishing themselves through abortion, vaccines and turning their children gay and subjecting them to deadly diseases through their low standard of morals and ethics, it’s kind of like a natural culling process.

  • Pray, We know if the bible is true!!!! It is coming we are closer today than we were yesterday!!! God is our only hope!!!!

  • Sheila

    I think it is so overcrowded on this planet – it totally sucks. It’s polluted, noisy, smelly, and there is no space. Some three fourths of the world population has to live in boxes in the sky crammed into little dinky spaces that are not large enough to cook not do they offer a boundary so it is quiet enough to sleep.

    i am all for population reduction and if you want to do your part start by having no more than 2 children and preferaby one or zero. I had zero children and I am so happy about that decison 40 years later.

    • Jon

      Well then do the world a real favor and **************. The best thing a person like your self could ever do is NOT have off-spring.

    • Lulz

      Good for you Sheila. We need less people like you, or more idiots like you to think like you do so we will have less of them, less of you Sheila.

    • Steve C

      Wow, I’ve always agreed with Shiela, but the poster below is right, there is an awful lot of planet not filled with housing as of yet, BUT in terms of sustaining a human family, it does take quite a lot of territory that isn’t immediately apparent, so I suspect that the truth is somewhere in the middle. The elephant in the room of course is human greed. Most of us like things and machines, and making and maintaing such things makes a huge impact on the ecosphere. It follows therefore that there is a magic number of us that can live a “modern” life, and once we know what it is, then that’s where we would sensibly want to peg our population. Unfortunately, the same bunch of goits that start wars, criminalise some 15% (guess) of our population for smoking one sort of plant whilst legally making revenue from people smoking a different kind of plant, and indulge in all sorts other unpleasantry, (as we all know), DO have access to the most reliable figures and brightest minds. ( a few million$ of tobaccco revenue can buy you some quite clever scientists…) The people behind agenda 21 probably do know the correct figure..
      Scary stuff, eh?



      • Grammar Grandma

        Paris Girl: Your grammar and grasp of the english language is absolutely atrocious. I don’t think you realize how hard it is for people to take you and your arguments seriously when you write in all capitals and spell words like “please” and “your” (or “you’re”…I imagine you don’t know the difference anyhow) without vowels. Grammar is being taught in schools across the country but no one is paying attention to that anymore. This, to me, is much scarier than professors teaching people the kind of stuff they’re speaking about in this article. If a college student can’t even properly record his or her thoughts onto paper in a gramatically correct fashion, how can he or she even begin to comprehend the types of things mentioned in this article? As a people we have aspired to mediocrity and have pursued a life of laziness. It’s a disgrace. Learn to spell properly. Please. That goes for the lot of you, at least proof read before you post. If you read through your comment before you hit the submit button, you may realize what a dolt you are and change some of your silly mistakes. I’ve never had such a hard time reading people’s thoughts as I do on the internet!

    • bob

      That is because these assholes promoting this B.S. have taken control of everything and corrupted all freedoms. We have no freedom at all. Who made them god? who said they get to control everything? There is plenty of room , You need to travel more. The population (fact) levels off naturally through natural death. Anyone who says different is a liar or a fool.

    • Kata

      Hey Sheila if you knew you didn’t want any children in your life 40 years ago and do like pop control, why don’t you start with your family members, perhaps your husband.

  • Its clear that many people have never flown in a air plane and looked down to see the space that the earth has. They only think about the crowed places on earth. After all the crowed places are all we are ever shown on TV. All planned to deceive us.
    Not every one is stupid. There are billions of thinking people.
    The state of Texas has 261,797.12 square miles which is equal to 1,382,288,793.6 square feet.
    I understand that the earth now has 7 billion people on it.
    That means you can put ALL 7 billion people in the state of Texas and give a family of four at least two acres to grow their own food.
    We have been so brain washed that millions have chose to believe the lie of over population.
    Look at the recent world map put out by National Geographic. It shows all the land side by side. There is so much land with water that you could never over populate all that land.

    If you put the worlds 7 billion population in the state of Texas that would leave the rest of the world to grow food and meet the need of the 7 billion people. There is enough water in Texas that would meet the need of all 7 billion people.
    We are all being lied to and why are we being lied to? Control might be one answer.
    You could not over populate the earth if you tried to.
    THINK about it. Not every one is conned by the Globalist lie.

    • Jim Hudson

      Thank you Mary. One of the only few comments that speaks truth and sanity.

    • HI MARY




    • giveandtake

      They want to reduce population by implementing abortions and sterilization and the many contraceptives available today, but they sanction and allow over 30 million illegals into our country and the women have many many babies. Isn’t this a terrible contradiction? Or could it be they do not want white women to have babies, just women of color?

      • Martha Arenas

        Once here

    • John Shanahan

      Mary Hostak, I know that you made this comment about 4 years ago and I am just seeing it now for the first time, 9/6/2015. I have heard this statement made many times in the last 20 years about how the earth’s population could easily fit inside the state of Texas, but I never had the motivation to check it until I saw your post above. I am not sure just exactly how literally this statement was meant to be taken when the claim was made, but let’s take it literally just as you did. I will use as many of the numbers that you did with which I agree and you will see where I disagree with your arithmetic and your final conclusion which vastly overstates the amount of land accorded to a family of 4: it will be nowhere near the 2 acres that you claimed.
      I will use the 7 billion people for the earth’s population just as you did (even though it might be 7.2-7.3 billion now). I did a browser search for the area of Texas in sq. miles and found several references to 266,874 sq. miles, which is not too much different than the number that you used above. One square mile = 5280 x 5280 = 27,878,400sf. Area of Texas in sf = 266,874 x 27,878,400 = 7.440020122 x 10^12 sf.
      Area (sf) per person = 1062.86. This amounts to a rather small space of about 30′ x 35.5′.
      A family of four would be allotted only about 4 x 1062.86′ = 4251sf. Since 1 acre = 43,560sf, 2 acres is 87,120sf. Conclusion: a family of 4 would have nowhere near 2 acres of land, only a little less than 5% of this amount.
      It should be remembered that in order for people to travel out of the state of Texas who are not living on the border, space for roads must be allowed so that people don’t walk or drive over other people’s property. This means that we would probably need some area about double the size of Texas just for people to get in and travel around.
      Since I don’t believe that it is practical or even possible for a family of 4 to grow their own food (vegetables, fruits, cows, chickens, etc.) on 4251sf of land, probably 5 or 6 other states (or more) that already are growing corn and wheat and animals would be required.
      Something on the order of all of the states West of the Mississippi River would probably be required so that 7 billion people could live, and it might take more. Consider that the population of the USA is currently about 340 million, we would have a pretty crowded country if it increased to 7 billion. It could probably be done. A better analysis should be performed by someone who would study the existing population centers already existing in our country and see if they could come to some reasonable estimate as to how much each could expand in order to get to some maximum. By studying existing population centers with existing utilities (water, sewers, electricity, phone/fiber optics, etc.), it should be easier to determine how much the utility infrastructure would have to be expanded in order to accommodate the increase in people in some area.

      • iwfau cotmpaiwku

        I calculate all land on earth divided by the world population would give very roughly 5 acres of land per person on earth now. Vast portions of the earth are not inhabitable like Antarctica, the Sahara, high mountains etc. Even a big portion of Texas has poor access to water limiting how productive it could be. After public areas required there may only be 2 acres of land per person on earth you could hope to subsist on, probably less. Simple math seems to support the theory that the world is overpopulated now. Now consider access to adequate water. Some places have water to spare but most do not have enough to irrigate a crop needed for survival. I live on 30 acres with a family of 5 now and if I had to, I would barely be able to provide for my family due mostly to lack of water but I could do it. I live in the western U.S. With more water and better soil than most other areas in the western United States. I think the planet is full but having been raised in a Christian house, I believe it would be morally wrong to kill people as suggested.

  • Dianne

    I agree with Al Gore that we have to control our lives on this precious planet which not only includes us but other mammals and living creatures as well. We need to be responsible since we’re the ones (humans) doing the biggest harm of destroying this earth before its time. The only time we make changes is when a disaster occurs threatening what we’re use to. We need to step up and do that before to ensure our childrens future and stop being so selfish at the expense of theirs. We all deserve to have children in moderation of 2 per family if that’s what has to be done. We need to do a lot more for the quality of a good life we look forward to and want for future generations.

  • Lulz

    I agree, we need to allow the government to start controlling population. Our global leaders have empowered you with the knowledge necessary to save this planet. This is the answer.

    • TO LULZ,

      2. CLOSE YR EYES.
      5. PLUG YR EARS

  • Bob marshall

    The wars aren’t doing the job so they have to find ways like through vaccines,population control and abortions.Scantions can cause starvation an diseases. Neutron bombs would kill hundreds of thousands and leave cities intact.The US has no problem finding an emeny to attack.

    • garden girl

      this paris girl is really twisted. Why all the fear? I cant believe that we cant have a civil adult conversation about sustainable living and population control. Why cant we all work together to make a sustainable planet for our kids? why Do you all just have to be name calling and exaggerating the truth of agenda 21? Grow -up Paris girl.You really think that God is going to save you when we run out of fresh water, food, and fuel? I am not against the ” word of god”, so dont even start. Pull you heads out of your ass, get the facts, and take some responsibility for your existence, and for the future of humanity on this planet…..oh, that’s right…you think we can just trash the earth, because you will die and go to “heaven”. So sad…all this ignorance.Everyone just wants to keep being selfish, everyone is so afraid of change, lazy, fat, and self-absorbed…why do you need to have more than 2 children? oh. to make more brainwashed ignorant people to trash the earth…..more…more…more…till there is nothing left. fine by me. While Iam living off the land in the mountains, you can all die of starvation when the grocery store is empty, because there is no fuel to bring you all that you needy people need. So fat..and drive that suv baby….Iam sure God will save ya from yourself by letting you parish in the aftermath of the destruction that your ignorance is creating.

  • Sherry April Bailey

    Listen to all these naysayers against the word of God!!! It is not about me, me, me…. It is about He, and We belong to He!!! Oh ye of little faith, did God’s word not tell you that their was plenty and not to worry about what to eat of wear???? This government control of people is out of control, period! All of you naysayers against God’s creation of life, is self centered and ruthless. You think from your mind and not your heart. It is a disgrace to read this outrage! Revelations is upon you, and the government does not care for you naysayers against God or those who give our heart & souls to God. They do not care!!! Wake up, sheeple! If you have no belief, at least have some common sense and logic!!!

  • David

    What I would like to know is do the global elite/powers that be volunteer first for murdering their children and sterilization, in an effort to lead us by example ?
    I somehow think that the powers that be do not figure themselves into these equations of their’s. And is it not them impacting the environment with their big businesses and open cast mines ? Agenda 21 YES for the global elite is a good thing !

    I just have a feeling they don’t fall under the regime rule changes !

  • makinsense

    But no-one in their right mind could argue that banning disgusting polluting health choking motorcars from our cities is a bad thing. Implying that it is sort of undermines verging on rubbishes the rest of your argument.

    • SamZydeco

      Our air today is cleanest it has been for 50 years. Even with millions still smoking cigarettes our average life expectancy continues to increase.

  • Eddy

    Good article, BUT, IMHO a little hysterical.
    There’s not one person alive today, that could claim World population is not a threat to the survival of humanity. NOT ONE, IF people can be HONEST with themsleves. That’s point one.
    Point two, whilst everyone persuing depopulation policies World wide are rich and at the top of our political and Government hierarchies, they have also obtained those richs and power, from the masses of people beneath them, and if they intend to reduce that population base, then they would also reduce their income stream and power base line from whence they obtain the majority of their power.
    In layman’s language, we call such a thing,
    “cutting one’s nose off, to spite your face.
    So just within those two points I highlight serious contradictions to the article.
    Many helpful suggestions have been made within the article by various folks, only to have said suggestions taken out of context by the hysterical ranting of the writer.
    What’s wrong with banning fossil fuel burning vehicles from cities ? The author implies said cities would collapse without said vehicles, totaly untrue and solidly hysterical statement.
    There are also referencs made to food production, and whether readers like it or not, we DO see food becoming more and more expensive every day, IF your lucky enough to even be able to purchase said food in the first place. So YES, it goes hand in hand with over population and the damage we’ve caused to the environment as a consequence.
    Of course the LOONY FUNDAMENTALS in the U.S. who ban abortion or birth control know all about the riches and power obtained from an over populated World, that’s the REAL reason they’ve busted their guts to implement such laws in the first place.
    It is my most humble belief, that the Earth will overule all of us, and take her own action in the near future that will smite us all mightily and take the matter out of our hands entirely. Watch this space. LOL.

  • JC Vaughan

    This over-privileged filth is the major cause of most of the problems of the modern world but like the Wall Street Bankers are permanently in Paris Hilton “I am so damned innocent” mode.

  • Freeme

    The quotes from the notorious is correct but you missed at least two: Bill Gates and Prince Phillip of England, Great Britain, UK…whatever they call themselves now. Youtube has Bill Gates speaking on this subject and is very adament about reducing population, and Prince Phillip said, “If I could come back, I wish it would in a form of a deadly virus to wipe out the population”.

    Has anyone asked WHO does the counting of all the people on the planet? And do YOU believe all the numbers you hear? Just because people in USA flock to big cities, doesnt mean we’re running out of ‘space’. Flying across this country will give you the facts on ‘space’ you need to know before taking ANY one’s word for it. USA IS ONE BIG COUNTRY, and for all the eugenicists here…Maybe YOU should DO YOUR PART TO volunteer AND SAVE THE PLANET…COMMIT SUICIDE. The Vegans will love you for it!

  • MorganJ

    How stupid. You people never see the big picture. There are a few things you need to consider before buying into this global gestapo.

    First, all these people are selfish jerks. They find a beautiful natural setting, build a house there then try to prevent anyone else from moving next door. They only care about population because there are too many people in their way when they want to move around.

    Second, they want to limit new births after they are already born! Have you noticed none of them are willing to reduce the global population by getting rid of their overly large, privileged families, or themselves?

    Also, the planet is not ours to destroy. Nothing man can do or has done can match what has already happened to the world. Yet the world has survived for billions of years without our help.

    A single volcano releases more carbon into the atmosphere in one week than all of the people in the world combined in ten years! Yet the world’s temperature barely changes. (Look up Mt. Pinatubo in the Philipppines for reference.)

    We cannot destroy the planet. The same planet that supported millions of 30+ ton dinosaurs for 100s of millions of years can support tiny, fragile, self-absorbed people for a thousand years more.

    In the end, we are not nearly as important as we think we are. And rich and powerful people are not nearly as smart as they think they are. This is all the Heaven they will ever experience so they want to make it paradise. God has published His opinion on the matter. I’m going to bet that God is right on this one.

    • Kata

      Morgan J, that’s right. It’s all about greed. I think the WDS should beging to work by now. It’s getting too late to act in some ways.If only a few of these jerks all from sudden desappears, some others will reconsider their positions.But I know that this is written in the Bible and what they are doing with their actions is fullfiling the end times prophecies but because they are blind they can’t even understand.

    • Andy E

      “We CANNOT destroy our planet”…………really? not even with hydrogen or nuclear bombs? because that is a very likely scenario of an Earth with a population of 14 billion+ and no course of action to slow down our growth. Actually you may be right in a literal sense….we probably will never completely destroy Earth, but render it completely uninhabitable to life or annihilate it’s major ecosystems? Highly likely if you ignorants dont wake up and get your heads out of your a.sses.

    • giveandtake

      Excellent, thank you.

    • margsview

      But more importantly they are naturally targeting the wrong segment of our global population. They must zero in on, those 1 %-ters- who run corporations that clear-cut our forests, strip mine our lands, exploit our resources leaving lakes of black oil. All the while they dredge our seas of eatable and uneatable fish, etc. Strip our lands of nutrients then adding toxic weed killers and mono-seed crops….Stoke refineries full of 65,000 chemicals, which have yet to be fully tested or reduced before irreversible damage is done to all plant and animal–what hypocrites, who chide China??

    • Rhiannon1223

      Each membe of the greedy inbred elite is probably responsible for several times as much in carbon emissions in one week as a whole Dugger sized family in 10 years. Maybe they should eliminate themselves, since most of them are relatively useless anyway.

  • Leda Mego

    Uh oh. Retired people are the fastest growing segment of society.
    I’m retired and not paying much into the system.
    I guess you think I’m useless.
    Ageism is rampant.
    But please, I’m having so much fun;
    Please don’t kill me.

    • One Million Dreams

      Money is not the issue, population is.

  • Dr. Chicago

    This issue can easily be summed up to a single point. If you believe that we need to reduce human population, step up to be first in line and become an example for the rest of us.

    • Matthew

      You’re a dumbass. In order to reduce population, we don’t need to kill anyone. We just need to stop having so many children, and old people will naturally die off.

  • Rena Keller

    I think this is all well over due! You have to have a licence to fish or drive a car, but anyone can have a kid. Look, we can have great population control and solve endless word problems by fixing all children at birth, then when they turn 25 they can put in an application to have a child if they want one. But they would have to at least appear to be worthy. Think of all the child abuse, kids in foster homes, welfare and everything else that comes with having children you can’t afford, or having them before you have your own set of common sense.

    • SamZydeco

      Thanks for the Keanu Reeves line from Parenthood, but you are nsane if you believe children should be sterilized.

    • deacon_2112

      ” Look, we can have great population control and solve endless word
      problems by fixing all children at birth, then when they turn 25 they
      can put in an application to have a child if they want one.”

      so you’d sterilize children at birth, then allow them to apply to have kids when they’re 25?

      you might want to re-evaluate your logic.

      by your own “worthiness scale”, you’re too stupid to be allowed to breed.

  • JOE

    Maybe Al Gore should be the first to *********************, that should help benfit this world from liers like him. If people listen to him and follow him, it’s like following the pide pipper were he will lead you to death. Al Gore shut up and ************.

  • Rick

    Population control advocates? They should start with themselves!

  • doug


    Too bad your parents did not share your zero population ideas, we could have been spared having you around to tell us your selfish and stupid ideas.

    • Martha Arenas

      Their mentality goes back many generations in a lot of the cases

  • Martin D

    Agenda 21 is a ** BRILLIANT IDEA! ** It is perhaps the best idea to get control of an over indulging and ego-centric species that is hell bent on destroying its self and the world it is in. Plus – the idea of one world government (esp a NON-USA centred one) would only be a natural evolution. People fear nothing more than change itself.

    • $27626823

      “The EU’s “Parliament” Building in Strasbourg has been deliberately designed to represent the Tower of Babel, as per the famous painting by Peter Brueghel, painted in 1563. The logic behind this symbolism is the the EU is seeking to “build the house of Europe” – a task yet to be completed. The building is complete and in use, but is designed to look unfinished, and even has ringed platforms around it to represent scaffolding. When asked by a secular journalist ‘Why the Tower of Babel?’ an EU official replied, ‘What they failed to complete 3000 years ago – we in Europe will finish now.’
      If you are not familiar Babel builders rebel against God and set off to under mind Him..God instead cut them short.

    • rabbit13cam

      It is not a brilliant idea buddy. Its the beginning to the end. IF you wish a future for you and/or your children you need to get informed and oppose progressiveness. There ARE many solutions to our local and national issues, the agenda of the UN is NOT it.

    • deacon_2112

      tell you what, Martin. lead by example, and go off yourself.

      oh, not into dying? guess what, neither are the rest of us

  • smileyanne

    I am just really curious to know why all the people who believe in de-population plans (Al Gore et al as well as “regular” people like those that are commenting here) are still alive? Don’t get me wrong, I don’t believe in killing others or yourself, but obviously some people do, so why don’t they set the example and go first?? Or is it only for “other people”? I see no one taking action on those beliefs………..

  • Brett Bader

    Al Gore should lead by example . Start the population reduction by killing himself and his family . That would make room for more people who want to live there lives as free human beings.

  • Andy E

    You who think people who are concerned with overpopulation are just being greedy or some similar reason are choosing to be ignorant. Take a look at a graph of our population growth since the Industrial Revolution. Can you people not grasp the concept of exponential growth, or do you just choose to ignore it? We need to do something about it now, before our governments are forced to take extreme actions hundreds of years in the future (if that) If they don’t do something about it, it’s okay….the universe has a way of balancing itself out. One way or the other our way of life must change. If we dont do something about it, In the future people will look upon you who were ignorant to overpopulation with disgust, saying things like “and they thought abortion and limiting the amount of children one can bear was immoral?”

    • deacon_2112

      then why don’t the parasites at the top, the 0.5-1% of the people who own/use/control 90% of the planets resources stop being such greedy jerks? ?

      If they didn’t exist, there would be more than enough for everyone.

      but I guess that would go against your eco-religionist dogma, wouldn’t it?

      blame the poor, excuse the rich.

      your self-righteous bullcrap makes me want to puke.

  • they are saying we are destroying the earth just by being alive and breathing dumb ass,the bombs are the same people that want this the vast majority have o control over bombs and other destructive properties. are you the stupid????

  • Gretchen Wilson

    Please include me on any other info. Thank you for posting this.:

  • Anonymous

    They removed the vid. HA GAY!

  • Kim

    Who ever wants to believe this crap “To many people in the world” I say “LET THEM BE THE FIRST ONE IN THE HOLE” PROBLEM SOLVED!

  • shawn

    These are the guys who fly lear jets all over the world everyday. the 1% global elite have more of a carbon footprint than all of us put together. They also caused global warming with chemtrails. God is watching and at the right moment in time they will all be cast to hell. They worship money and satan. submit yourself to jesus. I would rather have my head chopped off in the name of christ than be a slave to evil scum.

  • shawn

    Remember these are the evil bastards who tested over 60 nuclear bombs and killed millions with them. Excuse me who ruined the planet.

  • I’manelitist.

    Having read your entire article, film and all, and by only coming across it by googling ‘futuristic society’ You have persuaded me how good an idea this “Agenda 21” is. It’s a great idea. The removal of cars to tackle CO2, the calorie cards to tackle obesity… however I think the imminent destruction of millions is slightly uncalled for. Instead I would suggest the mass execution of the undesirables… the Elderly, The Criminals, the disabled and so on and so forth… this may not have a very big impact so perhaps mass sterilisation of the lower classes?
    This almost “communist” society is the only way to achieve a green and bright future because humanity is too evil and greedy to democratically produce an ecologically efficient world.

  • zlop

    The blinders that prevent escape — “Brainwashing Techniques Designed to Promote Acceptance of the Coming Genocide”