The Rapture Verdict Seed Vault Get Prepared Now Preppers Blueprint Life strawBeginning Of The End
Gold Buying Guide: Golden Eagle Coins

Recent Posts

The Book Of Mysteries
Legacy Water

What Is That? Could This Bizarre Winged Creature Be A Fairy, An Alien Or A Locust From The Book Of Revelation?

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

The Winged Creature - L.A. MarzulliI wasn’t going to write about this.  I was trained as an attorney and I am skeptical by nature, and so I generally don’t like to write about things that I can’t prove.  But in the case of this bizarre winged creature, a couple of factors changed my mind.  First of all, we actually have physical evidence which has been scientifically tested.  When it comes to things like this, people are always crying out for some real physical evidence, and now we have some.  Of course the existence of evidence does not mean that we can necessarily find answers to all of our questions, but at least we have something to work with.  Secondly, a highly respected researcher named L.A. Marzulli has spent a great deal of time extensively investigating this case.  I have personally interacted with L.A. Marzulli, and I have followed his work for years, and so I know how credible he is.

Earlier today, I visited L.A. Marzulli’s blog, and I was astounded by what I saw.  There in living color was a bizarre winged creature that doesn’t bear any resemblance to any animal that science currently knows about.  You can view it for yourself on his blog right here.

The Winged Creature - L.A. Marzulli

L.A. Marzulli did not personally discover this creature.  Rather, it was originally discovered on the side of a highway by a 13-year-old Mexican boy who didn’t know what it was.  He ultimately turned it over to a well known Mexican investigative journalist named Jaime Maussan.  Since that time this creature has been x-rayed, and the x-rays enabled researchers to see that the creature possessed a full skeletal structure.  The x-rays even showed that the creature’s left leg had been broken at one point.  In addition, DNA testing was done, and the DNA did not match any known animal.

This amazing discovery is featured in L.A.’s new documentary entitled “Watchers 10“, and a 9 minute clip featuring analysis of this creature has been posted to YouTube right here

So the big question that we need to ask is this…

What in the world is that thing?

At this point, there appear to be three main theories.

Many people are calling this winged creature a fairy.  These days a lot of people out there believe in “fairies”, and YouTube is loaded with footage that people have supposedly captured of “fairies” flying around outside at high speed.  Videos are very easily doctored, and the hard evidence that these “fairies” exist has always seemed to be lacking.  And this winged creature doesn’t appear to fit the bill anyway.  This winged creature is certainly small, and it certainly does have wings, but it doesn’t really fit the description of what you might expect a “fairy” to look like.  Instead, it looks quite gruesome and evil.  It has pointy ears like a gargoyle, and the body of the creature looks to me like it resembles an insect more than a person.

Secondly, some people are calling this winged creature an “alien”.  But of course that label is almost instantly applied to any strange creature that pops up these days.

The most common form of “alien” that people encounter are known as “the greys“, but there is only a slight resemblance between this creature and “the greys”.  From what people have reported, “greys” don’t have long pointy ears, they don’t have wings, and they don’t have tails.

Of course it is always possible that this creature could be another type of “alien” or demonic entity.  But I don’t know we could conclusively prove that.

Thirdly, L.A. Marzulli and others have pointed out that this winged creature that was discovered in Mexico does seem to have some similarities to the “locusts” that are described in Revelation chapter 9.  The following is what Revelation 9:7-11 says in the Modern English Version

The shape of the locusts was like horses prepared for battle. On their heads were something like crowns of gold, and their faces were like faces of men. They had hair like the hair of women, and their teeth were like the teeth of lions. They had breastplates like breastplates of iron, and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots with many horses running to battle. 10 They had tails like scorpions and stings in their tails. Their power was to hurt men for five months. 11 They had as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, and in Greek his name is Apollyon.

Does this creature have a face like a man?

I think that you could say that.

I don’t see any hair, but it is always possible that it could have had hair at one time.  I do see some frightening looking teeth, and it definitely has very prominent wings.

The detail that is most intriguing though is the stinger at the end of the tail.  On Marzulli’s website, you can see a closeup of the tail and the stinger.  Obviously the stinger has a function, and at this point we can only speculate because we don’t know enough about the creature.

Ultimately, there is always the possibility that this could be some sort of an elaborate hoax, but the scientific examinations that have been done so far have cast doubt on that explanation.  But I am certainly not willing to totally rule that out at this point either.

In the end, I don’t know what that creature is.

I was highly intrigued when I saw it, and after thinking about it I decided to share this bit of news with all of you.

I would encourage you to look into this for yourself and come to your own conclusions.

If we are indeed living in the last days as described in the Bible, then our world is going to get very, very weird in the years ahead.  The Book of Revelation describes all sorts of bizarre creatures and strange events, and the more I read it the more I am convinced that the period just before Jesus comes back is going to look a whole lot more like an extremely wild science fiction movie than most people would dare to imagine.

So yes, a strange winged creature that looks like something from another world may be hard to swallow, but this might just be the tip of the iceberg.

By the time it is all said and done, we could very well see things in the years ahead that will completely blow all of our minds.

  • Rhialto the Marvellous

    If Hussein Obama had a son, it would look like this…creature…thing…whatever it is…

    • Jack Mccarthy

      These may have been the weapons of mass destruction bushcheney used to invade iraq

    • Jim Davis

      It kind of looks like Moochelle.

  • horse777res

    It is some species of a bat!

  • Tatiana Covington

    Pokemon is going tangible!

  • michael malachi

    There is likely 3 explanations; first, the beast is fake. plain and simple. Second, the beast is some type of bat and that is not a stinger, dna ad other tests could be faked or contaminated. Third, The beast is some form of demon or the like.
    Oh there could be another explanation: science experiment gone wrong. We do know that the U.S. government as well as many others have played around with genetically modified organisms. A possibility?

    • Michael,

      Your “Who Are the Sons of God?” thread recently closed, but I don’t believe you’ve yet addressed this dilemma I presented to you, concerning your stance that the “sons of God” in Job 1 & 2 were actually the sons of Job.

      I’m reproducing my reply to you here.

      Can you address the dilemma presented?

      In Job the term sons of God is not referring to angels or fallen angels; it is referring to the sons of Job who came before the Lord. This is not happening in heaven as you likely think.

      Sons of Job, eh?

      Does Scripture agree with your interpretation here?

      Let’s find out:

      Job 1:17-19
      …(17)While he yet speaking, there came also another, and said, The Chaldeans made out three bands, and fell upon the camels, and have carried them away, yea, and slain the servants with the edge of the sword; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee.

      (18)While he yet speaking, there came also another, and said, Thy sons and thy daughters eating and drinking wine in their eldest brother’s house: (19)And, behold, there came a great wind from the wilderness, and smote the four corners of the house, and it fell upon the young men, and they are dead; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee…

      Verse 19 reveals that Job’s sons died after their eldest brother’s house fell upon them.

      …but if this is the case — then why are the sons of God listed again in the very next chapter?

      Job 2:1-2
      …(1)Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the LORD.

      (2)And the LORD said unto Satan, From whence comest thou? And Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it…

      How can this be?

      If, as you say, the sons of God spoken of here in Job were actually Job’s sons — then why are they mentioned again in Job 2 when they died in Job 1??

      • michael malachi

        You sure are stubborn. You expect me to address something that I have already addressed multiple times, including in my teaching. You will not even speak to the points that I brought up. Pretty dishonest. The fact is that you can not argue against my points because they are clear and Biblical.
        As for Job, The sons of God spoken of in chapters 1 & 2 can not be fallen angels because the fallen angels are I chains – in Hell until the day of judgment.
        Job 1: 2 We see that Job had 7 sons
        1:4 We see that each so had his day to have a feast at his own house (possibly honoring the feast days) At each feast the brothers ad sisters were all gathered together.
        1:5 Job is continually offering sacrifices for the sins of his children.
        1:6 The sons of God (sons of Job) presented themselves before the Lord. Satan enters the picture and the story of Job’s testing begins.
        1:13 the sons of Job were eating and drinking
        1:19 The sons of Job were killed.
        Job 2:1-3 This is a repeat, almost word for word of the account give In 1:6-8 This shows that the account here in chapter 2 is the same time as In chapter 1. I chapter 1 we see that the animals and children were killed, but in chapter 2 we have the account that it is still on the same day that satan asks for permission to hurt the body of Job.

        There is also the possibility that the sons of God in chapter 2 are the true followers of God that are on the earth celebrating the feast days. The account of the sons of God would refer to any and all who were true believers I God – just like it is today.

        I have given you the correct understanding of Job 1&2. The account give speaks to Genesis 6 and the sons of God spoke of there also. The term sons of God is used throughout the Bible and the Bible is the Word of God. Any understanding that the term sons of God carries the same meaning no matter where the term is found In the Bible, referring to the true followers of God.

        When you take Hebrews 1 into account, and Jude 1:6 & 2 Peter 2:4 – there can be no possible way that the sons of God could be referring to fallen angels.
        .
        Another consideration is: How could fallen angels (demons) be called sons of God? This is the Word of God and if your accout is taken seriously, then one would have to believe that God called the fallen angels his sons! I do not think so.
        .
        Another consideration is that if fallen angels did corrupt God’s creation by interbreeding with humans, wouldn’t that show that God’s creation was faulty or that God’s ability to have his plan of his creation carried out, then to be molested and destroyed by satan; This can not be true. By admitting that satan could corrupt God’s creation to the point that God would need to destroy the earth and all In it would show that satan won. Impossible.
        .
        Another thing to consider, In the Genesis 6 account there is no speaking of angels, only the term sons of God. If you read the full account of Genesis 6 with the understanding that the sons of God were men of the line of Seth, the story makes much more sense and becomes more real. Pay attention to the Genesis 6 account, there is continuous mentions of the sin in the world and the evil of the heart of mankind. The passage is very clear that the sin is the reason for the flood. –
        IN your account – when you consider that the angels were the ones who sinned – why is there no punishment spoken of for the angels? Why would men be punished for the sin of angels? And if you want to take it a little further, If you account were true, then it was the angels and women that sinned, but the men who were punished. That is not justice. That is not God’s way.

        I may not be a great writer, but I do think that my teaching was pretty clear on all of these points and if you would have taken the time to read my teaching, you may have had a better understanding of my argument.

        • Long, detailed post — but you didn’t refute the dilemma that I presented regarding your “sons of Job” theory.

          (underline emphasis mine)

          Job 2:1-3 This is a repeat, almost word for word of the account give In 1:6-8 This shows that the account here in chapter 2 is the same time as In chapter 1. I chapter 1 we see that the animals and children were killed, but in chapter 2 we have the account that it is still on the same day that satan asks for permission to hurt the body of Job.

          Not at all, sir.

          Scripture makes plain and clear that the account given in Job 2 occurs on an entirely different day:

          Job 2:1-2 (underline emphasis mine)
          …(1)Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the LORD.

          (2)And the LORD said unto Satan, From whence comest thou? And Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it…

          “Again there was a day…” That’s denoting a new day — not the same day that was recorded in Job 1 (otherwise, it would have stated something clear, such as “Later on that day”, etc.).

          ^ So, as I addressed in my prior reply to you, your “sons of Job” theory here is contradicted by Scripture.

          The sons of God can’t be Job’s sons…since Job’s sons were killed in chapter 1 verse 19, when the house of the eldest brother fell upon them.

          Your doctrinal claims simply do not match up here.

          • michael malachi

            Again, you are totally ignoring the scriptures that I bring as evidence, therefore your lack of dealing with these shows your dishonesty.

            The fact that Job 2:1 uses the word “again” does not infer that this is a different day, but AGAIN refers to the day spoken of In the previous chapter. That is why the verses I chapter 2 are near exact to those In chapter 1.(and even if it was proven to be a different day, you ignore that I wrote to you that this term sons of God may refer to all true followers of God alive at that time.)

            You may continue In your blatant willful ignorance if you like, but I am not playing kindergarten teacher any more. I have written much and you ignore that which I prove, and you just pick at the thing that you think is the weakest link . You can not refute 2 Peter 2:4 or Jude 1:6. So you chose to ignore them and try to win a debate in a dishonest way. I am not here to debate, but to teach. If you want to win a debate and you do not care about being honest or acknowledge my points, then I am wasting my time on you.

        • Gregge K Johnson

          Powers and Principalities of the unseen creation ,no man has seen —– but we do sense ,feel , hear, smell ,taste,fear and love from the “affects “.

  • Mr. Cipher

    If that thing landed on my shoulder I’d sh** myself.

  • Russ Miller

    Did the fairy have boots? Just curious. :b

    • Maximus

      Never too early for a classic Black Sabbath reference…

    • Jim Davis

      Maybe it was a war pig AKA neocon.

      • Russ Miller

        Or maybe one of Hillary’s foreign policy advisors…

  • Maximus

    It looks like a malformed bat. Lets not lose our collective minds over yet another freak of mature…

    • RageHard84

      Must be very malformed then. It doesn’t really look like much of a bat at this point. Poor thing if that’s the case.

    • Bill

      Yeah I agree! It’s just a deformed bat (or hoax) until proven otherwise…

  • Lazarovic

    How about an article on: Silver coins, antibiotics, colloidal silver, home defense or something useful to your readers? Something that has to do with preparation? Every time I see one of these ridiculously stupid topics, I get despondent; what a waste of time and energy, when you could be doing good in the world. C’mon man…

  • Chris Gerber

    Gotta be careful with this information. Speculation is fine, but making assertions about it runs the risk of damaging credibility, despite the physical evidence.

    • Chris Gerber

      I’ll recommend putting this on the back burner for awhile. See if something else turns up or another specimen. That would lend to the credence of it’s actual existence. It would be interesting to know where this specimen came from and I don’t mean geographically on a linear basis, necessarily.

  • It’s a BAT!

  • Athanasios1

    These fairies emerge from the rectums of media executives at ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS and the BBC. Some of these creatures metamorphisise into liberal Democratic voters for Hitlary or Black Lives Matter activists’ however most of them fly off to the middle east and become Muslims.

  • Hillary4Prison

    Hoax. Confiscated DNA…uh huh. Lab looks like someone’s basement, the figure looks like something easily made by hand, no mention of bone density, etc etc etc..

  • john folger

    that is hillarys first baby ,before bill

  • dbosch

    dang paraquat…

  • SantosGarcia
  • Linda

    John did say in Revelation that there would be things coming down from the sky that would make men’s hearts stop.

  • Jim Davis

    It’s a cuckoo bird, like many here.

  • Johnny Rebel

    It is either a Demon incarnate or a hoax. I’m going with hoax. When thousand show up all over the world…then let’s talk.

  • GV

    what’s next? a report on the alien autopsy at Area 51?
    this website is going full re tard