Did you know that sterilization will not cost women a penny under Obamacare? A new regulation that goes into effect on August 1st requires that health plans cover sterilization for all women with “reproductive capacity”. That includes teenage girls. According to the new regulation, women must have access to sterilization “without having to pay a co-payment, co-insurance or a deductible.” So women will not have to pay a single penny out of pocket if they want to get sterilized. Of course this sterilization mandate will make health insurance more expensive for all of us, but the social engineers in Washington D.C. feel that increasing access to sterilization is a very important public policy goal. So why are they doing this? They are doing this because they love death. They truly believe that they are saving the planet by reducing human numbers. That is why “family planning” is always at the very heart of the “green agenda”. They want to sterilize women because that will help keep the population down. And if there are less people running around, there will be less of us to ruin “their planet” with all of our pollution.
The new Obamacare regulation requires health insurance policies to offer 100% coverage for all “approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling for all women with reproductive capacity.”
But to fully understand what is going on, you have to look at this in context with what is being implemented all over the globe.
Have you heard of Agenda 21? It is an international effort coordinated by the United Nations to make the world a more “sustainable” place in the 21st century.
To the social engineers at the forefront of this effort, the number one threat to “sustainable development” is overpopulation. That is why population control is one of the central pillars of Agenda 21.
So all over the globe, family planning programs are being pushed and funded by the United Nations. In many UN-funded family planning facilities all over the planet sterilizations are being offered for free.
The United Nations seems absolutely obsessed with population issues. In particular, they seem quite determined to get women in poorer countries to have less children. For example, the March 2009 U.N. Population Division policy brief began with the following statement….
What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?
A statement like that should be setting off all kinds of alarm bells in your head.
Questions like that are only a few steps away from all-out genocide.
But the social engineers at the United Nations are so obsessed with “saving the earth” that the fact that human lives are being destroyed in the process does not seem to bother them.
Many in the environmental movement believe that the number one problem facing the earth is climate change, and many of them also believe that carbon emissions being produced by human activity are the number one cause of climate change.
So that makes all of us the number one enemy of the planet.
This disturbing philosophy was clearly reflected in a 2009 report released by the United Nations Population Fund entitled “Facing a Changing World: Women, Population and Climate“. The following are three quotes that were pulled directly out of that report….
1) “Each birth results not only in the emissions attributable to that person in his or her lifetime, but also the emissions of all his or her descendants. Hence, the emissions savings from intended or planned births multiply with time.”
2) “No human is genuinely “carbon neutral,” especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation. Therefore, everyone is part of the problem, so everyone must be part of the solution in some way.”
3) “Strong family planning programmes are in the interests of all countries for greenhouse-gas concerns as well as for broader welfare concerns.”
So the goal is to reduce the human population by as much as possible in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
That is why those associated with this movement like abortion and absolutely LOVE sterilization.
When a woman has an abortion, she might get pregnant again.
But when a woman is sterilized, her “problem” is gone for good.
And guess what?
Your tax dollars go to pay for abortions and sterilizations all over the planet. The following is an excerpt from an article entitled “The Population Control Holocaust” by Robert Zubrin…..
Of the billions of taxpayer dollars that the U.S. government has expended on population control abroad, a portion has been directly spent by USAID on its own field activities, but the majority has been laundered through a variety of international agencies. As a result of this indirect funding scheme, all attempts to compel the population control empire to conform its activities to accepted medical, ethical, safety, or human rights norms have proven futile. Rather, in direct defiance of laws enacted by Congress to try to correct the situation, what has and continues to be perpetrated at public expense is an atrocity on a scale so vast and varied as to almost defy description. Nevertheless, it is worth attempting to convey to readers some sense of the evil that is being done with their money.
If you have not read the rest of that article yet, you really should. You can find the rest of that article right here.
Developing nations all over the planet are often coerced into participating in these population control schemes through financial aid programs. For example, a recent article by Jurriaan Maessen detailed how the World Bank is actually using “financial assistance” as leverage to get developing nations to implement “family planning programs” in their countries….
According to two subsequent documents put out by the World Bank, its guidelines dictate that in order to qualify for World Bank lending, sovereign nations must implement population reduction objectives as outlined by the World Bank and UN Population Fund. If they refuse, lending will be withdrawn.
Already pre-tested and implemented in Yemen and Niger, these guidelines are destined for global implementation within the next decade, says the World Bank.
In very poor countries, money can be a very powerful motivational tool.
In fact, in some nations money is actually being directly offered to women in an attempt to get them to agree to be sterilized. As I have written about previously, health officials in India are offering motorcycles, televisions and even new cars to women in an attempt to get them sterilized.
In other countries, darker methods of coercion are used.
In Uzbekistan, the government has decreed that “surgical contraception should be provided free of charge” to all Uzbek women who volunteer for the procedure.
That kind of sounds like what the new Obamacare regulation is going to do in the United States.
But what starts off as “voluntary” often becomes “mandatory” eventually.
The following is from an article in the Independent that detailed the horrible forced sterilizations that are going on in many parts of Uzbekistan….
Saodat Rakhimbayeva says she wishes she had died with her newborn baby. The 24-year-old housewife had a cesarean section in March and gave birth to Ibrohim, a premature boy who died three days later.
Then came a further devastating blow: She learned that the surgeon had removed part of her uterus during the operation, making her sterile. The doctor told her the hysterectomy was necessary to remove a potentially cancerous cyst, while she believes he sterilized her as part of a state campaign to reduce birthrates.
“He never asked for my approval, never ran any checks, just mutilated me as if I were a mute animal,” the pale and fragile Rakhimbayeva said through tears while sitting at a fly-infested cafe in this central Uzbek city. “I should have just died with Ibrohim.”
According to rights groups, victims and health officials, Rakhimbayeva is one of hundreds of Uzbek women who have been surgically sterilized without their knowledge or consent in a program designed to prevent overpopulation from fueling unrest.
Sadly, Uzbekistan is not an isolated example. The truth is that forced sterilizations (often funded by the UN) have been happening all over the globe. This was detailed in length in a great article by Jurriaan Maessen. If you have not read it yet, I encourage you to go check it out right here.
Of course one of the biggest offenders of all is China. The Chinese have been enforcing their brutal “one child policy” for many years.
In China, if a woman tries to have a second child she is in danger of being arrested and dragged off to a clinic for a forced abortion. Often a sterilization is done on top of the forced abortion.
As the Epoch Times recently noted, enforcement of this one child policy can be absolutely brutal….
“Pregnant women lacking birth permits are hunted down like criminals by population planning police in China and forcibly aborted.”
One recent case of forced abortion in China made headlines all over the globe. The following is from a story that appeared in a New Zealand news source….
The family of a woman forced to undergo an abortion because she ran afoul of China’s one-child policy has accepted a cash settlement, apparently ending a controversy that caused a public uproar and embarrassed the government.
Feng Jianmei’s husband, Deng Jiyuan, told The Associated Press on Wednesday that the family accepted the settlement of 70,600 yuan ($11,200) because they wanted to return to a normal life.
Feng was beaten by local officials and forced to abort her baby last month, seven months into her pregnancy, because she did not have 40,000 yuan ($6,300) to pay the fine for having a second child.
Local authorities have often violently imposed abortions and sterilizations in an effort to meet birth quotas set by Beijing, but photos of Feng lying on a hospital bed with the blood-covered baby, reportedly stillborn after a chemical injection, set off a public outpouring of sympathy and outrage after they were posted online.
Will we see scenes like this in the United States someday?
The new Obamacare regulation gets us another step closer.
The sad thing is that overpopulation is a myth. If resources were distributed more efficiently and there was not so much evil and corruption in the world, the earth could easily hold a lot more people than it does today.
Unfortunately, the social engineers that are running things do not see things that way.
In fact, this sick population control philosophy is represented at the very highest levels of the U.S. government.
For example, Barack Obama’s top science adviser, John P. Holdren, actually co-authored a book in 1977 in which he advocated mass sterilization of American women. The following is just one of the incredibly shocking quotes in Holdren’s book….
“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”
Please keep in mind that Holdren is the number one “science adviser” to Barack Obama.
So what do these social engineers hope to achieve?
Well, the eventual goal is to reduce the population of the earth from 7 billion to about 500 million.
There seems to be a consensus among the “scientists” that write about these things that a global population of 500 million humans would be a “sustainable” level for the planet.
So how are they going to get rid of more than 90 percent of us and get the population down to just 500 million?
Please feel free to post a comment with your opinion on the matter below….