The Rapture Verdict Seed Vault Get Prepared Now Preppers Blueprint Life strawBeginning Of The End
Gold Buying Guide: Golden Eagle Coins

Recent Posts

The Book Of Mysteries
Legacy Water

There Is A Mainstream Media Conspiracy To Hide Hillary Clinton’s Rapidly Failing Health

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

Hillary Clinton - Picture by DonkeyHoteyIs Hillary Clinton healthy enough to serve as president if she wins the election? Over the past couple of weeks this has become a major issue, and the mainstream media is actively conspiring with the Clinton campaign in a desperate attempt to cover up the truth. For example, the Washington Post, which has essentially become a mouthpiece for the Clinton campaign at this point, has been publishing an article “debunking” claims about Clinton’s health almost every day recently. One of their headlines that really caught my attention was “Don’t believe everything you read about Hillary Clinton’s health on Google“. By the way, there were three Hillary Clinton campaign ads on that one page alone. But CNN took things to an entirely new level this week when it published an article entitled “Clinton’s health is fine, but what about Trump?” I was so flabbergasted by that headline that my wife came into my office to see what all of the commotion was about. No, Hillary Clinton’s health is not “fine”, and we will get to that later in this article.

Despite the fact that Clinton opened up a jar of pickles that was supposedly sealed on Jimmy Kimmel Live the other night in a ridiculous attempt to prove that she was healthy, the facts keep coming out, and the more Americans talk about her health issues the more her poll numbers go down.

As I have previously documented, the mainstream media isn’t even pretending to be objective in this race, and they have shifted into panic mode as they try to stop the damage to their favored candidate. One writer for the New York Times even went so far as to suggest that search engines should manipulate the results that they show to the public to help hide Hillary Clinton’s health problems.

But these aren’t just rumors. Her extended coughing fits have become increasingly difficult to explain. Even worse for her campaign is the fact that she has gone into seizures while on camera. She has been falling down with alarming regularity, and she also has a huge unexplained hole in her tongue. Clinton should just be honest with the American people about all of these things.

And even though her personal doctor claims that she is in good health, he has also confirmed that Clinton has been diagnosed with hypothyroidism and is being treated with a drug known as Armour Thyroid

The Internet is awash with rumors about Hillary Clinton’s health, but there is one medical condition she is actually known to have.

That is hypothyroidism, a condition affecting about 10 million Americans in which the thyroid is underactive, resulting in a variety of symptoms including fatigue, weakness and weight gain.

For most patients, the symptoms can be significantly reduced or eliminated with the use of hormone therapy. Clinton is being treated with a medication called Armour Thyroid, according to her doctor, who has issued a letter saying she’s in “excellent” physical condition and is fit to serve as president.

In addition, it has been documented that Clinton has taken the drugs Lovenox and Coumadin as well. The following comes from an excellent article on Clinton’s health by Bob Eschliman

The Clinton campaign has frequently pointed to the July 28, 2015, letter from her personal physician, Dr. Lisa Bardack, in which she refers to the Democratic presidential nominee as being in “excellent health.” The report is supposedly based upon a May 21, 2015, examination, but, if you actually read the letter, the doctor notes Clinton has had a number of issues.

According to the letter, Clinton has been on anticoagulation medication since 1998, not since her 2012 fainting incident as has been widely reported. And, both of her parents had histories of cardiovascular issues—her father died of a stroke, and her mother died of congestive heart failure.

Following her first deep vein thrombosis—a blood clot in the leg—in 1998, she was told to take Lovenox, a short-term blood-thinning drug, whenever she planned to take long-distance flights. After her fall, concussion, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis—a blood clot in the brain—in 2012, she was permanently placed on Coumadin due to her family’s health history.

In addition, we can learn more facts about Clinton’s health from her personal emails which have been leaked to the public.

For example, a 2011 email chain discussed a condition known as “decision fatigue”

Clinton sent an email to close confidante and advisor Cheryl D. Mills on August 19, 2011 featuring the text of an article entitled Do You Suffer From Decision Fatigue?

The article talks about how people in positions of power and influence can suffer from “decision fatigue” that causes them to be “low on mental energy” and prompts the sufferer to “become reckless” and “act impulsively”.

The article also explains how “decision fatigue” could explain why “ordinarily sensible people get angry at colleagues,” which is possibly a nod to Clinton’s infamous temper tantrums that have left her staffers in tears.

Considering how many important decisions a president must make each day, this is quite alarming.

In a subsequent email chain, Clinton was sent information about a drug that is used for “excessive sleepiness in patients with Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and multiple sclerosis”

In a separate email sent two months later, Hillary received information from her top foreign policy advisor Jacob Sullivan about a drug called Provigil (Modafinil), which is used to treat “excessive sleepiness in patients with Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and multiple sclerosis,” as well as “excessive sleepiness caused by narcolepsy”.

And of course so much has already been said about the head injury Clinton suffered a number of years ago. But what most Americans do not know is that one of Clinton’s assistants actually reached out to the commissioner of the NFL to inquire about how to treat her “cracked head”

Hillary Clinton Cracked Head - Wikileaks

So what are we to make of all of this?

Are we supposed to ignore the facts that are laid out in these emails?

Just yesterday, CNN published an article entitled “The new birthers: Debunking the Hillary Clinton health conspiracy” that sought to demonize anyone that would dare to question Clinton’s health.

But meanwhile, reporters in the mainstream media continue to publish some of the most outrageous and ridiculous rumors imaginable about Donald Trump. They do this because they desperately want him to lose.

These days, one of the easiest ways to discredit a position is to label it a “conspiracy”, but the truth is that the pundits in the mainstream media are some of the biggest “conspiracy theorists” of them all.

There are legitimate questions about Hillary Clinton’s health, and the American people deserve the truth.

Unfortunately, they aren’t going to be getting it from the mainstream media.

  • A.S.

    It said “Be the first to comment,” so am I?

    • RageHard84

      Seems like it. If you don’t mind me asking, r u Jewish?

  • K

    The elite love this kind of situation. No real President in the way. They get everything they want. Just another bobblehead in the chair. An evil bobblehead, but still a bobblehead. All that time ago, decision fatigue? Kinda signals she does not expect to be making very many decisions. And even if she wins, she will not be running the Government.

    • kfilly

      So, it will not be a change from the previous bobble heads or current one in office. I also realize you are smart enough to already know that.

      • K

        Correct, no change at all.

    • iris

      yep. The elite families and their world banks around the world run most of it. They don’t realize, however, that they’re even bigger bobbleheads, and can only do what God allows them to get away with in the first place.. So much has changed in the last 3 decades around the world, and quite noticeably, every few years. It was incremental for many decades, not so, now.
      Christ will be returning sooner than we think.

  • chriscas

    The Ted Baxters in the media are determined to destroy this country. They are truly “useful idiots”!

  • Ray S.

    If she’s in such great health then why isn’t she flying on her broom?

  • Kim

    Why won’t Cankles do a live press conference? How many days now since she has done a live press conference? 270?

    Just wait till the debates. She better get double shots of the diazepam, and no extra long bathroom breaks like at Bernies debate.

    • Patricia Gallagher

      She’s just not good at extemporaneous speaking. The less she shows her face in front of a microphone the better, and she and her advisors know it. The simplest explanation is usually closest to the truth. HRC is letting the media do her campaign “appearances.”

      That said, the debates will be interesting.

  • RageHard84

    With Hillary Clinton’s health in this state, it might be useful to learn more about her Vice President…

    • Patricia Gallagher

      What “state” is that? Nothing’s been proven. Everyone nearing their 70s is, naturally, closer to death than those who aren’t!

      • RageHard84

        Why is she having seizures? Why is she behaving weirdly?

        • Patricia Gallagher

          She IS weird. That’s why she’s behaving weirdly…

          Seriously, HRC’s various reactions to stimuli caught on camera (e.g., big eyes, gaping mouth at the confetti/balloon drop at the DNC, head-jerking when being interviewed by a crowd of reporters) seem exaggerated. Why would she do these things? I have no idea, but these “manifestations” are unusual for anyone and new for her.

          Only a bona fide EEG report would prove that *any* person has a seizure disorder. In HRC’s case, no authoritative source has published verifiable clinical signs and/or laboratory findings to explain the phenomena observed (aka “symptoms”) that I mention here.

          If there is any medical evidence explaining these oddities, it has not been released by her or anyone else. Pop diagnoses by the public, politicians, or talking heads prove nothing and are just plain *stupid* and irressponsible. Uh, IMHO.

          Drawing a conclusion that HRC has a primary neurological disorder (persisting sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury such as post-concussion syndrome or seizures, or another organic brain disorder) or a primary mental disorder (psychosis, depression, anxiety personality disorder, phobia, etc.) is irresponsible speculation.

          • RageHard84

            OK, if it takes an actual medical report to verify a seizure, then we’ll need a look at one. Unfortunately, she’s refused to release that information.

          • Patricia Gallagher

            Given the high stakes, it is especially reckless to hold out as fact, or to even suggest, that any candidate has a condition that would affect his/her performance as president *without probative evidence*.

            Conversely, for any candidate to deliberately withhold information about medical (physical or psychological) illness preventing the performance all duties of office is to perpetrate a fraud on the electorate.

            It would be political suicide for a candidate to conceal a serious health issue. It’d be safer to assume that nothing can be hidden forever and to reveal — and explain — the truth.

            Ideally, each voter will fairly evaluate the known *facts* regarding a candidate’s fitness for office, decide whether any unknowns or ambiguities are material to his choice, and vote his conscience.

            Unfortunately, liars can win office, and voters may not give a rat’s posterior about “the facts.”

            But it’s the process we have.

    • Gay Veteran

      why? he is also a neo-conservative war-mongering psychopath

      • RageHard84

        Because he might end up being the president because she might die.

        Neo-conservative? I don’t really see Hillary Clinton as a neo-conservative, but I can’t really argue against her being a war-mongering psychopath.

  • Kim

    She had another coughing fit today and when she finally recovered she couldn’t speak. At first (the first time I saw her have one of these fits) I thought she was faking it to avoid answering the questions but now I can tell she isn’t faking. It’s bad, whatever it is. I wonder about her ability to appear on live television to debate the Donald for two hours. I will be surprised if she goes through with it.

    • Patricia Gallagher

      Repeated coughing can be caused by a sliding hiatal hernia in combination with gastroesophageal (acid) reflux. An irregular campaign-trail diet of high-fat foods can cause GERD. Antacids can be helpful with symptoms but do not control these conditions.

      • Kim

        Well geez, she needs something cause it keeps happening. And these coughing fits aren’t the normal run-of-the-mill coughing fit. I mean she can’t seem to make it stop. Today she looked like she was gonna pass out.

        • Patricia Gallagher

          It’s nothing that will kill her, or interfere with anything but public speaking. If my suspicions are close to accurate, she’s just eating poorly. Notice that she doesn’t cough *every* time she speaks.

  • Mistanick

    The “mainstream media” is dead. Once someone you used to trust begins lying over and over again, trust is broken and cannot be repaired. A liar is a liar.

    This election has destroyed mainstream journalism likely forever. We can never again believe what we read in news or hear on radio or TV in a world dominated by mainstream media.

    It is incumbent on us to unplug ourselves from the lying cheat that mainstream media has become. This would include national and local news shows. They all repeat the same story given to them. TV ratings should crash, newspaper subscriptions cancelled, anything produced them must be ignored. The future lies with alternative media and that is why Clinton and the establishment is declaring war against it.

    • Patricia Gallagher

      Whatever “news and opinion” we read and hear and view is what “the powers that be” — in government and media — decide to make available.

      Government has manipulated media since the invention of the printing press. Publishers since Gutenberg, who developed a number of printing innovations in the 15th century, have long selected what to publish to their readers. The development of electronic media have only made all this easier.

      Media and government conspire against the truth more often than we want to admit, whether well-intentioned or for good or evil. (Withholding info on troop movements during war is a ” good.”)

      It is almost impossible to truly know what is going on in the world, who is behind it, and why. If you think you “know,” it’s most likely that you are wrong.

      • Mistanick

        Well, I would tend to disagree. Take 9-11 for example. The mainstream media reported a false narrative about the whole event. Alternative media, thanks to the internet, gave a voice to over 2000 engineers and architects who said the twin towers would not collapse into their footprint the way they seemed to have done without rigged explosives on its structure. Building 7 is the smoking gun. It was imploded and such a rigging would have taken several months to accomplish, especially in secret. Bottom line, alternative media can get truth out that managed news will never do. The masses followed the mainstream media lies. A remnant followed truth. That is the way of history. A remnant is there to search for the truth.

        • Patricia Gallagher

          I have studied the evidence presented by “Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth,” and find it horrifyingly convincing. Regardless of political philosophy, practically media outlet and government official have succeeded in rendering this as “conspiracy theory.” It proves my argument.

          • Mistanick

            Well you have fallen for the trap. It was a conspiracy and telling about it is the speakers theory. The words have been twisted to make them a bad thing. Many a mobster has gone to prison for conspiring to commit felonies.

          • Patricia Gallagher

            I’m confused by your replies.

            This isn’t the place to debate the facts of 9/11 but…

            There was plenty of opportunity to set up 9/11 in secret. The media appears to have cooperated in the commonly-accepted version.

            Nano-thermite (melting steel, as jet fuel cannot) at Ground Zero is irrefutable fact.

            The “vaporizing” of the WTC planes and the contents of the buildings — including people’s bodies — but preservation of a single jet engine (that doesn’t match the jets in question) and the passports of the “perpetrators” found *intact* at the scene: incredible — as in “not credible.”

            The *total absence* of *any* debris at the Pentagon and Shanksville, PA (let alone the absence of identifiable debris), consistent with crashed airliners full of passengers are irrefutable fact.

            These facts trouble me greatly.

          • Mistanick

            My point: Establishment, main stream political deceit has been part of our history for a long time. 9-11 just one example but a good one. Government controlled media telling the story their are told to tell. Who are they supporting this election cycle? Mrs. Clinton is a part of a power brokered elite that is global. She is their puppet candidate. War has been declared against Mr. Trump, not because he was a bad husband twice, but because is is not playing their game. Trump is a crass rich businessman, not a pc politician at heart. Pick between the two and there is no other choice but the business anti establishment guy.

          • Gay Veteran

            doesn’t matter if 9/11 was a false flag attack or not, Bush used it as America’s equivalent of the Reichstag fire

      • MEP325

        Very true. Look up “Operation Mockingbird” Starting in the 50’s, the CIA secretly worked to influence the media.

    • MEP325

      You are correct. America does not have a media. The so-called “media” in America is a propaganda machine that spews false information and biased narratives. The rise of alternative media will continue to grow and I hope at some point, garbage networks like MSNBC will be obsolete because they have lost all viewers.

      FOX is as close to any kind of real “media” America will ever have but there is plenty of garbage on there too. Like when they trashed Ron Paul because he had the guts and courage to go against the status-quo.

  • Patricia Gallagher

    I will be voting for Trump. I believe that HRC is a criminal who should be nowhere near the Oval Office. I think it hurts the anti-HRC cause use frivolous arguments. For example:

    (1) The “hole in Hillary’s tongue” is a digital artifact, a shadow in the original picture that, when enlarged looks odd. To suggest that HRC may have “tongue cancer” is ridiculous.

    (2) It is irresponsible speculation to assert that HRC had an “on-camera seizure.” The jerking is certainly odd but not characteristic of a “seizure,” and there is no medical evidence that HRC suffers from a seizure disorder.

    (3) Hypothyroidsm is not an uncommon condition. It can be difficult to manage at times, but thyroid hormone replacement is standard. Armour Thyroid is an “old” thyroid hormone replacement medication. If it was uneffective, her MD would have to find another medication. It’s probably working, absent evidence to the contrary.

    (4) Coumadin? Same argument as No. 3

    (5) (5) Armour Thyroid and Coumadin are “old.” There are lots of “old” medications still in use: aspirin for inflammation and pain, digitalis for cardiac arrhythmia, cholchicine for gout …

    (6) Emails with incidental mention of symptoms and/or medications are not “evidence” of health problems.

    Using arguments like these are laughable. Use confirmed facts instead of speculation. Clinton’s *real* vulnerabilities are ripe for the picking.

    • Your statements are very sane and measured.

      Hillary Clinton is no one’s favored candidate, she is going to be voted in because of the anti-Donald sentiment. It’s frankly surprising that someone with a level head (you) would consider voting for Donald Trump. I can only hope it’s a “Never Hillary” vote, and not a “Yippee Donald” vote.

      • Patricia Gallagher

        Unfortunately, you are correct. I can only hope that, if elected, Trump will surround himself with, *and listen to*, conservative advisors who favor traditional American values.

        I’m Catholic and a “constitutional conservative.” I finds sanity in Mark Levin’s “Liberty Amendments” and the concept of an Article V Convention of States to rein in an extra-constitutional central government that resembles nothing like our brilliant Founding Fathers put in place.

        Short of that — and our country is FAR short of that mark — I resort to prayer and fasting. I recommend it. We are in God’s hands.

      • Mistanick

        I imagine you have told a lie or two in your lifetime. I have too. Mr. Trump? Only he knows his own lies and perhaps his close confidants and family. Don’t tell me you do.

        You are prepared to vote for a woman who has murder in her past? Do some research on the Mena drug incident and the two young men who were shot in the head and put on railroad tracks by drug runners given cover by Mr. Clinton. Many other stories out there, but whoa, you put Mr. Trump through a looking glass that you will not put the Clinton’s through.

        The voter needs to look beyond personalities to core values. Are you pro life? If not, you belong with Hillary in her pit. Mr. Trump is pro life. Yes, he did not always take that position, but something about maturity, it tends to bring wisdom to the surface and truth too.

        • I have the luxury of living in a state that has voted STRONGLY for the same political party for longer than most people have been alive. To vote one way would be to go along with the way my state for DARNED certain is going to go, or to vote any other way is to have my vote wasted. You are assuming I am voting for Clinton simply because Donald Trump is (verifiably) to egregious to vote for.

          • Mistanick

            You are a very angry woman. I am sorry for you. Have a nice life.

          • That’s an issue between you and your mirror, bub.

            I do have a nice life, and I’ll continue to have one for the foreseeable future. Actually, on a super-bad day, my life may sink all the way down to just “nice”. Most days I could add an expletive to how [bleeping] awesome my and my family’s life is :D

            Get that projection looked at, sooner, rather than later. Your life can become awesome too if you drop the whole diagnosing-others-with-your-own-issues thing.

          • Patricia Gallagher

            Carrie, “egregious” is an adjective that emphasizes a negative descriptive noun.

            “The teacher’s relationship with her student was an egregious abuse of her authority.”

            “His philandering was a particularly egregious given his staunch support among feminists.”

            “Her egregious abuses of high public office for financial gain disqualifies her as a candidate for the presidency.”

            “His egregious use of negative ethnic stereotypes made him a pariah in polite society.”

          • I used to think that too.

            While working my way through college, I found a phenomenal side gig as a proofreader and fact-checker. I was delighted to learn that egregious was (in addition to a simple prepositive adjective) a perfectly usable postpositive adjective as well.

            And correct you are — “Donald” is the negative noun that “egregious” describes.

          • Patricia Gallagher


          • Patricia Gallagher

            >>When YOU lie or when I lie, we recall having lied and it was generally something to make our lives easier (“Oh, that outfit looks great”, “My alarm was on the fritz”, “I loved your kid’s school play!”, etc.)<<

            These are "little white lies."

            I''ve been guilty of worse, to save myself embarrassment, at least, or some other relatively serious consequence. I think it is the extremely rare human being who has *never* done that.

            Donald Trump's frequently hyperbolic turns of phrase get him into big BIG trouble.

            For example, he recently said that Obama "founded ISIS" and insisted as much when that assertion was immediately challenged. He wouldn't back down. Foolish thing to say in the *first* place. I cringed, as I have at many things he says.

            It'd be enough to say that Obama's withdrawal of troops from Iraq and highly-restrictive rules of military engagement in Afghanistan made the region *ripe* for the development of ISIS.

          • Gay Veteran

            American troops should have NEVER been in Iraq, our war of aggression was a massive war crime.
            and like his fellow psychopaths, Obomba will not pull all of our troops out of Afghanistan. The great American military machine cannot beat a bunch of goat herders.

          • Gay Veteran

            Hiligua is responsible for war crimes in Iraq, Libya, Syria, etc.

            Hiligua is a neo-conservative war-mongering psychopath

          • I cannot think of a recent U.S. President who has not been called responsible for war crimes. Can you?

            “[Secretary of State Clinton] is a neo-conservative war-mongering psychopath”

            So is Draft-deferrin’ Donald. What was your point, exactly? Google “Trump Clinton Hit ler Psychopathy Scale”. Crooked Donald ranks higher than Secretary of State Clinton in any Psychopathy test. Putting aside that women have a much smaller burden to meet to achieve clinical psychopathy, Lyin’ Donald still beats her in the psychopathy game. I wonder if they even took into account Veteran-bashin’ Donald’s demands to know what the purpose of nukes are if we aren’t going to use them against other countries.

          • Gay Veteran

            “I cannot think of a recent U.S. President who has not been called responsible for war crimes….”

            oooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, so we should just give Hiligua a pass

            “…Google “Trump Clinton Hit ler Psychopathy Scale”. Crooked Donald ranks higher than Secretary of State Clinton in any Psychopathy test….”

            gee, did Hiligua pay for that study?
            and Hiligua got a LOW score, right?
            hey junior, Hiligua has PROVED she’s a neo-conservative war-mongering psychopath

            “…Veteran-bashin’ Donald….”

            Hiligua CREATED disable veterans who commit suicide every day

          • Yup, rage spittle duly noted and catalogued.

            The addition of paranoiac fantasies of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “paying for” the psychopathy tests falls flat, as she also registers on the scale. Women, by the way, need only do a fraction of psychopathic actions to qualify as highly as men do to make it onto the scale. So if she were male and therefore graded as a male, she likely would not have made the psychopathic level.

            Just another ten-ton weight attached to The Woman Card™.

          • Gay Veteran

            “Yup, rage spittle duly noted and catalogued….”

            really, is that all you got? pathetic


            guess you forgot about this one:
            when asked by CBS about the murder of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya [a country she helped destroy], Hiligua responded “we came, we saw, he died, tee hee hee”
            She should have been dragged out of the room in a straight jacket and taken to the nearest mental hospital.

          • “She should have been dragged out of the room in a straight jacket and taken to the nearest mental hospital.”

            [shrug] I guess that’s one way for you to meet her.

          • Gay Veteran

            you two could share a room

          • MEP325

            Yea, I was particulary disgusted by her cheeriness and glee when talking about Gaddafi. Hillary Rotten Clinton is a hypocrite (among many other things) in the highest form. Her policies have led to more instability and more deaths of Muslims; Libya is a perfect example. And she has the audacity to be critical of Trump’s proposals on Muslim immigration.

          • Gay Veteran

            “…And she has the audacity to be critical of Trump’s proposals on Muslim immigration.”

            because of the economy we should NOT accept ANY immigrants, especially from war-torn countries where it is IMPOSSIBLE to vet them

          • MEP325

            Agree 100%

          • Gay Veteran

            awwwww, the poor women, if only they were in charge.
            war-mongers just like men

      • Gay Veteran

        if Hiligua wins it will be because the corporate media are acting as her cheerleaders

        • Her victory will be 100% because Ol’ foot-in-mouth Donald’s constant, unrelenting faux pas paving her way.

          Dimwit Donald could be running against recently-released John Hinckley, Jr. and still hand the Presidency over.

          • Gay Veteran

            her victory will also be due to the Corporate Media, Wall Street banksters, and mega-billionaires supporting her 100%.

            welcome to neo-feudal America, where the economic elites and political nobility don’t have to obey the laws we peasants have to obey

  • “But meanwhile, reporters in the mainstream media continue to publish some of the most outrageous and ridiculous rumors imaginable about Donald Trump.”

    Such as?

    I mean, which “rumors” about Donald Trump have not been rigorously backed up by irrefutable facts? I agree much of what is being said about Crooked Donald IS outrageous and otherwise ridiculous… but neither of those adjectives mean the claims are false. So I ask again — WHICH claims — specifically, not nebulously — are false? Is there more than one such claim? Are there more than two such claims? How many falsehoods are being said about him, and very specifically, what ARE those falsehoods?

    • All of my other comments on this site are getting replies, so I know that people are on here… yet this comment of mine sits alone, waiting, longing even, for some of these mendacious statements against Donald.

    • Gay Veteran

      how many people has Trump murdered?

      Hiligua is a neo-conservative war-mongering psychopath, responsible for the deaths of MILLIONS in Iraq, Libya, Syria, etc.

      • “how many people has Trump murdered?”

        I don’t know how many he’s killed, do you? His policies have made sure that people couldn’t afford their rent and consequently got thrown out onto the streets, that workers who relied on payment from him did not get payment from him, and the underage girl(s) who threatened to sue him got their families’ lives threatened, perhaps even killed. I am not his biographer, so technically I do not know how many he has killed.

        As for Secretary of State Clinton, only Congress and the President can cause war. Or did you used to descend into hysterics at the mention of [Secretaries of State] Colin Powell’s, Condoleezza Rice’s, and Madeleine Albright’s names too?

        I wonder who President Clinton will select as her Secretary of State, and will s/he be dovish enough to keep every last human on Earth happy?

        • Gay Veteran

          “…As for Secretary of State Clinton, only Congress and the President can cause war….”

          ROFLOL, yeah, and SENATOR Clinton voted for the war of aggression against Iraq.
          And Secretary of State Clinton advocated attacking Libya and Syria.

          “…Or did you used to descend into hysterics at the mention of [Secretaries of State] Colin Powell’s, Condoleezza Rice’s, and Madeleine Albright’s names too?….”

          hysterics? no, just DISGUST at war criminals

          “…I wonder who President Clinton will select as her Secretary of State…”

          probably Victoria Nuland, the neo-conservative war-mongering bitch who advocated the neo-Nazi backed coup in Ukraine

  • Michael Reed

    I predict she will be a drooling half wit before the elections get here! God is dealing with her, personally!

  • Patricia Gallagher

    I agree, the behavior was strange. But I think it’s important to note that a serious medical doctor has not yet attempted an explanation. So, best to concentrate on other issues which render her unfit.

  • Rebel w/out a Cause

    You won’t get the truth. HRC isn’t going to be the next “POTUS”, she’s going to be the next PUPPET. No different than our present PUPPET/POTUS. She doesn’t need a functioning brain to read her speeches off the teleprompter. I refer you to BHO as an example. They’ll keep her under wraps – no press conferences, as in NOW – her press corps will cover for her, and we’ll continue to see our nation dismantled systematically. Just my take on our current and future situation.