The Elite Are Not Even Trying To Hide How Much They Hate The U.S. Constitution Anymore

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

In the United States today, it is becoming increasingly fashionable to openly trash the U.S. Constitution.  Many among the elite are not even trying to hide how much they hate the U.S. Constitution anymore.  As the Patriot movement and the Tea Party movement call for a return to the principles that this nation was founded upon, many among the elite and in the mainstream media are responding by publicly dumping on the U.S. Constitution.  The level of vitriol that we are seeing for our founding fathers and for our Constitution is unprecedented.  It turns out that the U.S. Constitution does not fit very well with the benevolent futuristic “Big Brother” totalitarianism that they want to impose on all of us.  All of that talk about “freedom” and “liberty” in the Constitution does not exactly square with the centralized global planning that the elite have in mind.  The ruling elite believe that the “rights of the individual” must be greatly restricted for the “good of society” and for the “good of the environment”.  Right now the “constitutional revival” that is happening in the United States is a direct threat to what the elite are trying to accomplish, so they are responding by openly attacking the Constitution.


At more than 90 percent of the law schools in the United States today, the U.S. Constitution is portrayed as a hopelessly outdated document that is in desperate need of revision or it is portrayed as a “living, breathing document” that we are free to alter as society “progresses”.  In law schools across the country, law students are being taught that our founding fathers were racist, sexist, homophobic bigots that did the best that they could at the time.

Keep in mind that a very large percentage of our politicians and all of our judges go through these law schools.  I personally sat in law school classes and listened to law professors trash the U.S. Constitution.  This is really happening.

But these days it is apparently not enough to just poison the minds of law students.

Now the mainstream media is launching a major attack on the U.S. Constitution.

The latest issue of Time Magazine, the number one political magazine in the United States, has a picture of a half-shredded U.S. Constitution on the cover with the words “Does It Still Matter?” emblazoned across it.

This front page article was authored by Richard Stengel and unfortunately the article is not a defense of the U.S. Constitution.

Rather, Stengel insists in his article that the U.S. Constitution “must accommodate each new generation and circumstance.”

That is exactly the kind of thing that is constantly being pushed down the throats of law school students all over the country.  Stengel also declares in his article that we must not allow the Constitution to be “an obstacle” that will keep us from making the “progress” that we need to make as a society….

“We can pat ourselves on the back about the past 223 years, but we cannot let the Constitution become an obstacle to the U.S.’s moving into the future with a sensible health care system, a globalized economy, an evolving sense of civil and political rights.

This is typical of what the elite will do.  They will applaud the Constitution as being a good document “for the past” but then they will talk about how we “need to move forward” because people are so much smarter now than they were back then.

The reality is that many elitists love to denigrate the circumstances under which the Constitution was drafted and they love to talk about how much more “sophisticated” we are today.

In an article entitled “Is It Time To Update The U.S. Constitution?” CNN’s Fareed Zakaria recently declared that it was time to reexamine our founding document that was created in a “cramped room” that had “shades drawn over the windows”….

By contrast, any talk of revising or revisiting the U.S. Constitution is, of course, seen as heresy. The United States Constitution was, as you know, drafted in a cramped room in Philadelphia in 1787 with shades drawn over the windows. It was signed by 39 people.

But Zakaria was kind compared to a lot of the other pundits out there.

On an ABC News political talk show over the weekend, Georgetown professor Michael Eric Dyson declared that there are “some gaps, some holes, lacunas, gulfs, abysses” in the Constitution and he went on to make the following statement….

“When it makes the transition from parchment to pavement, there again is the rub. The reality is when I talk about the document being living and vital, I’m talking about the interpretation of it. I’m talking about the meaning of it.”

Do you know why elitists love to talk about the Constitution being a “living” document?

It is because they feel like they have permission to change and “reinterpret” a document that is “living and breathing”.

Elitists love the idea that the U.S. Constitution “evolves”, and of course they believe that it is the role of the ruling elite to direct this “evolution”.

James Altucher, managing partner at Formula Capital, expressed his opinion of the U.S. Constitution in his recent article entitled “July 4th Is A Scam“….

Most importantly, lets not view the Constitution as gospel. Countries, people, systems, technology evolves. As they do, its important to see what from the past is good and what can be discarded.

What can be “discarded”?

Absolutely disgusting.

But there are others out there that go even farther in trashing the Constitution.

So far we have examined quotes from elitists that show at least a few shreds of respect for the Constitution.  They desperately want to change it and reinterpret it, but at least they acknowledge that is has played a beneficial role in American history.

There are others among the elite that are not afraid to openly declare hate for the U.S. Constitution.

For example, Michael Klarman of Harvard University Law School delivered a Constitution Day lecture at Johns Hopkins University last September 16th. His lecture was entitled “A Skeptical View of Constitution Worship“, and it was a blistering assault on the U.S. Constitution.

Klarman made four major points about “constitutional idolatry” in his speech….

I have four points I want to make today against constitutional idolatry, which is my label for our misguided tendency to blindly worship the Constitution, giving it credit for all the things we love and honor about our country.

(1) The Framers’ constitution, to a large degree, represented values we should abhor or at least reject today.

(2) There are parts of the Constitution with which we are still stuck today even though we would never freely choose them and they are impossible to defend based on contemporary values.

(3) For the most part, the Constitution is irrelevant to the current political design of our nation.

(4) The rights protections we do enjoy today, the importance of which I do not minimize, are mostly a function of political and social mores, which have dramatically evolved over time and owe relatively little to courts using the Constitution to protect them.

Remember, this is not some nutjob that was making this speech.

This was a professor of law at Harvard University.

Barack Obama went to the law school at Harvard University.  Hordes of our future politicians and judges and law professors go through that place.

Klarman is not someone to be taken lightly.

Klarman’s remarks were noticed over at The Economist.  It is an open secret that The Economist is a mouthpiece for the global banking elite and they were quite taken with what Klarman had to say.  They published an article supporting Klarman’s ideas that was entitled “The Perils Of Constitution-Worship”.

In that article, those who love and support the U.S. Constitution were described as “infantile”….

Indeed, there is something infantile in the belief of the constitution-worshippers that the complex political arguments of today can be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th century.

In the United States today there is a tug of war over the U.S. Constitution.  Either the “constitutional revival” being spearheaded by the Patriot movement and the Tea Party movement will eventually win, or the ruling elite and the mainstream media will eventually win.

The stakes are incredibly high.  Just consider what Alex Jones has to say about the matter in the video posted below….

So will you stand up for the U.S. Constitution?

Great tests for this nation are coming.  We are standing right on the verge of the economic collapse of America, and that will be a great time of challenge for the United States.  Our loyalty to the Constitution will be pressed to the limit as society descends into anarchy.

Our politicians are supposed to take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.  But sadly, most of our politicians today seem to think that the Constitution should be serving them.

In fact, this very attitude was clearly expressed in the Time Magazine article mentioned above….

“The Constitution serves the nation; the nation does not serve the Constitution.”

The inference, of course, is that once we have made enough “progress” we will be able to toss aside the U.S. Constitution like some sort of used rag.

Well, the reality is that there are tens of millions of red-blooded Americans that are not ready to give up on the U.S. Constitution.

If you are an American that still believes in liberty and freedom, don’t be afraid to let your voice be heard, because if none of us stand up the America that so many of us grew up loving will soon cease to exist.


  • Colin

    The greatest threat that we face as a nation is the rewriting of our history for political reasons. The delegates to this convention, and the Declaration, believed in a strong, representational, powerful, balanced government that was in a contractual relationship with the people.

    The Tea Party, who I think you admire, believes the Founding Fathers were against this form of government. I believe they are ignorant, vitriolic people who have been misused by the elite to further their agenda.

    Here is an article on this issue:

    I do agree with you however that the elites don’t support democracy. They have in the past used our government and its agents, the military and the intelligence services, to overthrow governments unfavorable to corporations. The coup in Iran in the mid-1950’s is one such example. (Article –

    • Ben Dover

      Do some research.

      They wanted a WEAK central government so it could not trample on the states or the people within those states. They most feared a government like we have now. If they could see USA in 2011 they would think they had failed. But then some advocated periodic revolutions to keep such a government at bay.

    • Pat Henry

      please do some research and wake up. The Tea Party is not against a representative republic, they are for a centralized government with limited powers and checks & balances. The politicians today are the modern day royalty class that pass sweeping legislation without even reading the 2000 plus page laws. I hope you realize soon that you belong to the serf class and that any hope of you moving up will be curtailed by the PTB. Enjoy your trickle down poverty.

    • Gary

      Colin-the tea baggers are simply cannon fodder for their rich corporate masters.

      Their masters could give 2 shits about their social conservative agenda such as abortion or gay marriage.

      As you can see with the debt ceiling etc they will throw these low information dolts under the bus in a new york minute.

      I really believe the tea baggers are mentally ill as there is no other way to understand middle to low income folks clearly voting against their own self interests.

      Attn tea baggers-you ain’t gonna be rich, go back to your double wide and vote for people who will help you (dems) and not hurt you (repubes). Please grow a brain cell and turn off rush and associated trash tv/radio.

  • Excellent article!!

  • Ben

    The Fourth Turning. It’s happening right now.

    • Guido

      Great book, isn’t it?

  • mondobeyondo

    Went to one of the many fireworks shows in Phoenix this evening. Stitched in between the obligatory “1812 Overture”, “Stars and Stripes Forever”, and “Firework” by Katy Perry (That’s a new one! Ha!) – was Lee Greenwood’s “God Bless the USA”.

    “If tomorrow all the things were gone I’d worked for all my life
    And I had to start all over with just my children and my wife
    I’d thank my lucky stars, to be living here today
    Cause the flag still stands for freedom, and they can’t take that away…”

    Sorry, Mr. Greenwood, but yes, they can. And they will take our freedom in a heartbeat. If we aren’t vigilant, our enemies will burn our flag in their public squares, and our freedoms will go bye-bye. It’s almost a cliche, but – freedom is not free.

    But there are enough true patriotic Americans, who will “stand up, next to her, and defend her still today”. Why? “Cause there ain’t no doubt, I (we) love this land”.

    God Bless the USA.

  • The U.S. was never designed to be a democracy. It was designed to be a Constitutional Republic. It has devolved into an empire on the verge of ruin from overreach.

  • Terry

    They despise it now but the arbitrary power will not be used on the little folk it will be used on the interlectuals.
    Hey,if they’ve done nothing wrong they should have nothing to fear.

    After the Russia’s new leaders were finished with their interlectuals they put a bullet in their treasonous heads. The thinking being they would/might turn against the new masters.

    • Sue

      if you talk about them you should know how to spell what you are talking about it’s intellectuals.

  • maybe this will be the trigger that makes us have a ******** in the US. All the brainwashed/dumbed down people vs. US constitution supporters.

  • Notalways

    Do your part home owners, those of you who are struggling to pay these ridiculous loans back to the banksters and their skanky families. Walk away from your payments. Hand the keys back to the banks.
    Even if you can afford to continue payments, why bother, your house is worth s@#t and the banksters are getting rich off of your blood and sweat, default now, it is totally in vogue and fashionable to strategic default, rather then continue to pay these banksters.

    • Gary

      Also for your credit cards-run up a big debt, get several payday loans and then file for bankruptcy.

      After all the notices are mailed out to your creditors informing them of your filing most of them will write off your unsecured debt. You can then rescind your filing and will find that most of the companies are so disorganized that they never come after you as they never figure out you resided your bankruptcy filing.

      I have with my own eyes saw people do this with a fairly high success rate. Screw the banks, time to get yours.

      Now this is what I call financial planning for the 21st century.

    • paulie

      Why not stay in the house till the sheriff shows up. Rip all the copper out. And destroy the house.

  • Brian

    “Educate and inform the whole mass of the people… They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.” – Thomas Jefferson

  • Luis

    I agree 100% with this article. If you want to know who controls the “elite”, I suggest reading “The Secret Terrorists” and “The Enemy Unmasked” by Bill Hughes (you can read both books online for free). He does an excellent job of exposing who they are, and yes, they do hate the U.S. Constitution. exposes their ultimate agenda.

    • noneya

      Sorry Luis, but there won’t be a Sunday law. That is silly.

      • Luis

        Noneya, how you could have read all three online books I recommended and concluded a Sunday Law is a “silly” impossibility is beyond me. The history of the U.S. is full of Sunday Blue Law closings. In 1886 Senator Blair, of New Hampshire, introduced a “National Sunday Rest Bill” before Congress. It did not pass, but Bible prophecy predicts someday a similar bill will.

        There is TERRIBLE trouble coming. Once it arrives and sticks around for a while, there is going to be a huge ‘we have got to get America back to God’ movement. I suspect you are going to be very surprised at what people will go along with to get the peace and security they so desperately need.

  • C P Wendt

    Scarcity increases value. Over-supply decreases it
    Anarchy is the result of flooding the market with
    too much authority. It’s why militarized police
    are needed. The only law is “Who sez”

    The people who remember the constitution:

    And, those who don’t:

    To be divided is to be conquered.

  • Thomas

    “Indeed, there is something infantile in the belief of the constitution-worshippers that the complex political arguments of today can be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th century.”

    There is something even more infantile in thinking that the complex arguments of today can be settled by simple fidelity to a book written millennia ago…Part One around 1000 years BCE, Part 2 written around 300 CE. Or that other book, written around 500 CE.

    • jim

      BCE? CE? What do these terms mean?

    • aerie

      Excellent rebuttal.

  • Jennifer

    Only stupid bumpkins describe smart people as elitist. I hate to break it to you, but our founding fathers were racist and sexist. How else to you explain that they thought it was ok to own other human beings, rape them at will, not give any rights to women and people of color? Oh, and if you want to talk elitist, let’s not forget that they also didn’t give any power or rights to the uneducated or those that didn’t own land.

    • Michael

      I don’t think I accused the elite of being smart.


    • Kevin

      All the things you have mentioned have been addressed in the ammendments to the constitution….thats all history and no one living today can really have a right to complain about it…The only people that really have a complaint anymore is the Native American…..

      • larrt

        Anyone who is on a sex offender registry and was convicted before that registry existed has a legitimate complaint. That is unless article one section nine is outdated.

    • Gary

      I fail to see why there is such an infatuation with the founding fathers. They are dead and rotted away and I for one do not want my life dictated by some old white guy from the 17 hundreds. (18th century?) (and I am an old white guy)however, with the republicans in charge their policies are right out of the 1700’s so I guess there is little difference.

      • mondobeyondo

        The founding fathers expressed the ideas that they wished the new Republic to follow. It’s true, they’re long since dead and buried. And so are the ideas they wished. (at least, on the surface it appears to be so.)

    • A Dodgy Bloke

      It’s I’ll informed rants like this one that is starting to convince me being a liberal is a mental disorder. You cannot apply 21st century standards to 18th century men. Views evolve we no longer burn witches in the US, we no longer have public drinking cups, and women have the vote and can inherit property. The founders where not prefect, but I would prefer Jefferson, Hancock, Washington, and the others to the self important dimwits bent on creating another hell on earth.
      The Elites you have such a fondness for wouldn’t care if you and everyone else reading this blog lived or died, if our lives got in the way of their grandiose plans. That is not smart lady that’s psychopathic.
      Below are a couple if nice tidbits.

      • Guido

        Dodgy, I agree completely! I enjoy reading your posts for their logic and thoughtfulness.

        You can’t look at Washington’s life and consider him to be some evil racist, sexist, bigot, homophobic Hitler bad guy. It’s just insane. The man exhibited a profound character throughout his life that serves as an example to others.

        The so-called “elite” founding fathers were some of the most conscientious, thoughtful, intelligent men this nation ever produced. If they were such elitist scum, how come so many of them lost everything on the Revolution? Most of them lost their homes, their wealth, and, in some cases, their lives. Had they stayed out of it, the Revolution would not have happened and they would have remained prosperous and powerful.

        Their ideas are not old and outmoded, either. They’re the best of several thousand years of political thought and experience. How can anyone attempt to discredit the idea of representative government, limits on power, decentralization of power, and protected freedoms?!? It’s insane.

        In case some of you haven’t noticed, government was the leading cause of death in the 20th century. I found an interesting website devoted to the term, “Democide,” or death by government. Here are a few stats put together by the author.
        262,000,000 (revised for PRC and Colonies) Murdered: Summary and Conclusions [20th Century Democide]

        61,911,000 Murdered: The Soviet Gulag State
        35,236,000 Murdered: The Communist Chinese Ant Hill
        20,946,000 Murdered: The Nazi Genocide State
        10,214,000 Murdered: The Depraved Nationalist Regime

        5,964,000 Murdered: Japan’s Savage Military
        2,035,000 Murdered: The Khmer Rouge Hell State
        1,883,000 Murdered: Turkey’s Genocidal Purges
        1,670,000 Murdered: The Vietnamese War State
        1,585,000 Murdered: Poland’s Ethnic Cleansing
        1,503,000 Murdered: The Pakistani Cutthroat State
        1,072,000 Murdered: Tito’s Slaughterhouse

        1,663,000 Murdered? Orwellian North Korea
        1,417,000 Murdered? Barbarous Mexico
        1,066,000 Murdered? Feudal Russia
        262,000,000+ people killed by government in 100 years. That is incredible. The Black Death is estimated to have killed maybe 75-100 million by comparison.

        This is just an estimate-the actual #s must be much, much higher. The author doesn’t take into account the US fedgov and state/local actions, like the vicious attack on the Bonus Marchers, or the police/fed/private security attacks on unions in the early 20th century, Kent State, as well as other appalling acts, like the roasting of the Branch Davidians or the Philadelphia Move house bombing in 1985.

        With 262,000,000 kills, clearly, anything that limits government must be a wonderful thing, indeed! It’s just a shame so many people like Gary and Jennifer and others want to scrap liberty and freedom for tyranny and totalitarianism and mob rule.

        To those of you who seem to hate the founding fathers and the ideas they represent, which are the founding doctrines and bedrock ideals of this nation, why don’t you leave? Why not go to a nation closer to your own ideals? England has a great social welfare state, why not go looking for succor there? Or Russia? I understand they still have some die-hard communists there. You would fit right in! Cuba is still Socialist and would, no doubt, welcome you. Chavez could probably make room for you, too.

    • lone survivor

      If you don’t like it here, go to some other country, say like North Korea or China or Iran and complain about the government and see what happens. You will be sent to a reeducation (brainwashing) concentration camp.
      You aren’t even worthy to lick the boots of the founding fathers of this great country!
      There was slavery all around the world well into the 1800’s. In the Ottoman Empire in the 1850’s you could buy white people at auctions!
      Lots of countries today, one does not have any rights! In China you are property of the government and they can do to you whatever they like.
      And Jennifer, if that is really your name, probably some lazy guy living in his parents basement smoking pot and playing video games and masterbating.
      If you don’t like the USA, pack up your shit and move to some other country! Why do you think some people in other countries risk their lives to come to America to escape dictatorships?

      • Guido

        Yeah, Lone Survivor! Look up the Jannisaries-the Turks kidnapped Christian whites and forced them to be their cavalry. And in China, they sell prisoners’ organs to Western medical tourists.

        Slavery, in fact, did not officially end in the world until Sudan was forced to renounce it in 1969 by the UN, however there was some evidence it may have persisted in the Arab world for some time in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere. The Saudis still seem to have some issues with the concept of individual liberty and human dignity. Anyone hear about that Prince who killed his manservant in the UK last year?

        The Arabs spread slavery all over the world. There’s a great book about the slave trade written in 1838 by a Cpt. Cannot, a Corsican who went to sea as a cabin boy and ended up as a slave ship captain. He went to Africa where he bought slaves from slave-trading tribal leaders. His observations are especially interesting, since he was involved pre-Civil War.

        America was originally settled with huge numbers of white slaves, although you may not know that, since social studies teachers call it “indentured servitude.”

        Read Redneck Manifesto, by Tom Goad, to learn a little bit about these white slaves and their wonderful experiences in the Americas. According to him, the Brits took thousands of Scotts to their deaths in the Caribbean to work on sugar plantations, where they died of Malaria and other diseases.

        Indebted Brits were deported and put to work for TPTB for about 7 years at a hitch. Once the whites managed to complete their term of slavery, they were forced out of the local economy by the presence of other slave labor and, later, the import of black slaves.

        Interestingly, he states the white slaves were treated worse than the black ones, since their masters knew they only had a period of time to get as much work out of them as possible, while black slaves were a large capital investment and, thus, required actual care. History is so much fun!

        The Brits might have made a stink over slavery, but they didn’t give up white slavery, even after the Revolution. The War of 1812 was triggered by their forced impressment of American sailors into the British Navy. They kidnapped them right off US ships. That’s why our ships flew a flag that read SAILOR’S RIGHTS!

    • Guido

      What?!? Where did you learn history, Jennifer? How, exactly, were the founding fathers racist and sexist? Can you cite actual proof, or is this more ignorant knee-jerk historical revisionism?

      You might also learn to interpret history through a period-appropriate lens instead of trying to apply 20/20 hindsight. I might add they inherited the institution from their British masters. You might be even more interested to look into white slavery some time, which is how many early Americans arrived.

      Actually, I don’t mind limiting voting rights to land-owners. Do you want to know why? Because it means people with skin in the game are going to be voting, as opposed to people who might not think first. Plato said something to the effect that, “He who wears the boot knows best where it pinches.” I think in this case, the land owners would be a reliable pool to grant the franchise.

    • Pete

      Hate to say this, but yr a stupid bitch. You’re probably part of the half-educated, ideological, maternalistic rubbish that inhabit and have half-ruined our society.
      Number one, idiot, the words of the constitution are separate from what were mainstream societal norms at the time.
      If you read the document you won’t find any racist, sexist or homophobic comments.
      It just happens to be one development in a huge developing concept from early European (Roman/Greek/British) philosophy, and mainly developed from Anglo-Saxon (like Magna Carta, you ever heard of it?), political developments.
      Your own political elites have long forsaken the ideals of an earlier age, and have been trashing you and your society for the last 40 years.
      Maybe that’s why you are so angry, that you can’t get a job now with a degree in sociology with perhaps a major in gender studies. haha Pete.

  • Gary

    What would you expect in a country with a few rich and a lot of poor and a disappearing middle?

    Lois Brandise said you can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few or you can have a democracy, you can’t have both.

    When we have the top 400 people having more wealth and income than the bottom 155 million, and a party in congress-republicans solely devoted to your needs to the point of shutting down the country in order for you to not have to pay a little more in taxes, any semblance of a democracy/republic whatever no longer exists.

    I do not think you could find anyone who says the gov governs in the interests of regular ordinary people. By the rich for the rich is this countries motto!

    Unless the disparity in wealth and income is addressed nothing will change.

  • Ron

    As has been noted before she was even voted on, Elena Kagan’s :

    record strongly suggests that Kagan would be quite willing to fashion her legal arguments to attain her liberal/left policy goals, and that is exactly what her other writings show. Her 1993 article “Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V,” (60 University of Chicago Law Review 873; available on Lexis/Nexis) indicates someone who is entirely on board with seeking ways to circumscribe free speech in the interests of multicultural virtue… She acknowledges that the Supreme Court is unlikely to alter its stance that speech based on viewpoint is protected by the First Amendment, but she sees that as subject to change with a different majority… Clearly, she does not see the protection of viewpoint-based speech as a principle worth preserving or set in stone. Rather, she believes that a new majority could rule that “all government efforts to regulate such speech” would be constitutional. All government efforts.

  • nick

    Wasn’t protection of state rights the reason for the American civil war? Constitutions are constantly evolving. How many amendments are there now? To suggest that you don’t touch the constitution but you can subvert it a la patriot act is, as an outside observer, hilarious. The constitution is only as good as its people. Rights are not enshrined. They always exist. Privileges are enshrined.

  • Dan

    John Dickinson, Gouverneur Morris, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Thomas Paine, Edmund Randolph, James Madison, Roger Sherman, James Wilson, and George Wythe would all be ashamed if they saw what our country has become.

    In case you’re wondering, these are the men who are responsible for drafting the Constituton; James Madison being the one who hand scripted the final document.

    The elite and their corporate fascist media will tell you this document is nothing more than paper and ink. History shows it wasn’t written with ink. It was written with blood!

    Documents can be destroyed, ideas cannot!

    The American Revolution Part II is coming…

  • Prophet

    The US Constitution was inspired by God. The elites are following Satan’s plan to take away the God given agency of man.

  • Gerald Parker

    Alex Jones expresses, in his video, the common ideas about the perfection of the U.S. Constitution. Personally, although I believe that the Constitution of the U. S. of A. is a flawed document, I abhor any attempt to displace it in the United States themselves. That is because the elites will replace it with something much, much worse, not with something that is better.

    The basis of Western democracies is Parliamentary governance and the rule of law, not the U.S. Constitution. The fundamental documents are the constitutions of parliamentary democracies, beginning with the unwritten, but nonetheless authoritative, constituion of the United Kingdom. The major precedent is not the American Revolution, but the Glorious Revolution in England and Scotland, which limited executive control (there, the monarchy of pre-1688) and the two British declarations of freedoms that shortly ensued (and which are the basis for the American Bill of Rights). The Settlement of the new order of things under the House of Orange is what counts, not a distorted echo of it in revolutionary America.

    What is crucial to maintain democracy is the utlimate authority of the people, which elective assemblies represent and enforce. In parliamentary systems, parliament is supreme, and individual parliamentary regimes are part of parliament itself, not separate from it. The attempt to have a “division of powers” is illusary. Setting up the Presidency and the Judiciary as completely separate arms of the government, which is what the U.S. Constitution does, results in their usurping of power without the check of a parliament to hold them in reins.

    So, the U.S. system ideally should establish Congress as its American parliament, abolish the separate role and functions of the presidency, and hold even the Supreme Court responsible to parliamentary and constitutional restraints.

    However, if the U.S. Constitution today is trashed, it will not be a parliamentary body’s supremacy that replaces it, but rather the rule of elites and oligarchies, and that is something to abhor and abominate. So, as defective as the U.S. Constitution is, IT MUST PREVAIL in the U.S. NOW AS IT ALWAYS SHOULD HAVE.

  • Gods Creation

    “I do agree with you however that the elites don’t support democracy.”

    To the contrary, the elites LOVE democracy. That is what they purposely established by the corporate 17th amendment. The states were no longer represented in the United States government and the US became a democracy instead of a republic.

    It’s all a part of the scam of 1913 during which the bankers took control over the money supply, and then the government itself, claiming ownership of everything.

    When the ignorant masses quit supporting the corporate democracy, maybe the constitution can be revived.

    Until then, there is no hope for those who believe in the rule of law. All you can do is print and sign a copy of the State constitution and file it in the public records for use in your defense in the corporate courts when the corp violates the law.

    Here is the difference between the forms of government

    Monarchy – King or Queen holds all sovereignty, and gives it to its subjects as it sees fit.

    Democracy – Sovereignty resides in the people AS A GROUP, resulting in Mob Rule. A majority, no matter how small, controls the minority, no matter how large. Law is used to protect the group at the expense of the individual.

    Republic – Each Man is sovereign on his own, and the law protects the INDIVIDUAL rights of all members of the Republic through application of the law.

    If you don’t know what you are fighting for, stop fighting for anything.

    • Guido

      Plato called democracy one of the worst forms of government. HE called it mob rule, rule by the poor. He ranked it in the top 6 evil forms of government. It’s funny how many idiots talk about democracy today.

      BTW-how come we’ve gone around the world trying to force Western freedom and government on other nations, but we have never just handed them a copy of our constitution and told them to go to work. If we believe in our system, let’s hand out our founding document instead of shoddy, tottering cobbled-together political systems like we did in Iraq?

      • Pete

        Haha! Ho Chi Min believed in democracy, and was impressed with US-style government. Pity what you lot did to his country and his desire for freedom.
        Maybe there is some justice coming back to you for Agent Orange, you can never justify trashing a country’s biosphere, never! The on-going deformities and medical problems. If they launched a class action the US would be even more economically unviable than it is now under your socialist government!
        On the other hand this is NOT a criticism of the guys who were sent there. I admire them, not the people who sent them and the undercover me in black.

  • Barton

    Really Colin? Do yourself a favor
    Get out of my country

    • joe hammond

      Why don’t you leave. Its my country too and I want you out…..Hate mongers must disappear…so disappear!

  • goodspkr

    There is a way to alter the Constitution. The problem the elites have is that politically they don’t have the backing to even get a governing majority much less the super majority needed to amend the Constitution. It needs to be a living document they can interprete, because they don’t have the arguments to make the case to have the people support what they see as the progressive way to govern.

  • Fonestar

    Any student of history, even a crappy student should understand that humans have not evolved at all. Not in 10,000 years and definitely not in the past 240 years!

  • Skip

    There goes your theroy of evolution!

  • William

    How about the elites who want to “fundamentally change America” just go find somewhere else on the planet that may already be closer to their utopia and give THAT place the “HOPE” and “CHANGE” that they may already be searching for. I liked The United States and the Constitution the way it was before it started becoming AMERIKA. If our founding fathers did it 235 years ago then someone with REAL vision can do it today. David Koresh tried with the Branch Davidians, maybe someone like B.O. could do it too.

  • The function of the Constitution is to empower a compulsory government to usurp our rights and our freedom. It does not protect our inherent rights to life, liberty and property, it only threatens them. Here are some useful articles on the truth about the Constitution:

  • JJB

    The Constitution (plus Amendments) defines the three branches of our government and it delegates and restricts powers to those branches. It was never intended to enumerate the rights, responsibilities, privileges, and benefits of the people. It does not “grant” rights… it PROTECTS them. The so-called “elite” who despise and ridicule the Constitution should offer a replacement and let it be debated in public — except that would reveal their ignorance of history and their contempt for liberty.

    God bless our “Charter of Negative Liberties.”

  • berylak47

    What these goobers who wrote all that crap forget is that the Founding Fathers put in place a system to change the Constitution through amendments. We don’t need a re-write or anything else. We need judges and public officials who uphold and defend it, not try to work around it.

    It was written for the common man in the plain language of the times. We don’t need Harvard professors or lawyers to “interpret” it for us.

  • Sam

    The constitution is was the American society was built on and the bases to how Americans live today. However i have found that the government have completely discarded this when it comes tho their needs rendering it a false face on how the government operates as to how they really operate. A new constitution would only play into their hands benefiting the government and how they work.

  • JR

    The fascist left makes me vomit.

  • Joe Stalin

    The Cosmopolitans work day and night to destroy the citizen’s gun rights. True citizens need to work tirelessly to find out where all these gun controllers live and to “make plans” for “The Day” so none of them escape. In the meanwhile, US citizens need to start acquiring the skills and equipment needed to engage the “domestic enemies” efficiently; I recommend you enroll yourselves in “Project Appleseed” of the Revolutionary War Veterans Association (

  • Bob Marshall

    look at how the Federal Reserve was agreed on in secret and approved when most members of congress where on vacation. I will take what 39 men signed in a dark room with drawn shades anytime. Everyone know now what the Federal Reserve has done to this nation. The patriot Act and the Patriot Act II is the second worst act by congress.

  • Bob Marshall

    Dec. 10 2005 06:02 George Bush on the Constitution: It is just a God_____ piece of paper.

  • Georgiaboy61

    Jennifer, re: “I hate to break it to you, but our founding fathers were racist and sexist. How else to you explain that they thought it was ok to own other human beings, rape them at will, not give any rights to women and people of color?”

    Perhaps you ought to learn some history before trying to comment upon it. Slavery has been a part of every human civilization; it is still being practiced in the Islamic world (albeit quietly), and slavery was “abolished” only in 1962 in Saudi Arabia. The United States and Great Britain were uni

  • Georgiaboy61

    Jennifer, re: “I hate to break it to you, but our founding fathers were racist and sexist. How else to you explain that they thought it was ok to own other human beings, rape them at will, not give any rights to women and people of color?”

    Perhaps you ought to learn some history before trying to comment upon it. Slavery has been a part of every human civilization; it is still being practiced in the Islamic world (albeit quietly), and slavery was “abolished” only in 1962 in Saudi Arabia. The U.S. and Great Britain were unique insofar as they outlawed the practice on moral grounds, despite steep economic costs for doing so. More than half a million whites perished in the Civil War, one of whose aims was to abolish human enslavement.
    What you call “sexism” is pure ahistorical fantasy. You are trying to apply a late 20th century term to people more than two centuries ago. Had you used to word then, no one would have understood it – or you. As for the franchise, a very good argument could be made in today’s America that unless one pays taxes, no should not be accorded the vote. Why? Because we have today a nation inwhich fully 50% of the people pay no income taxes, but may vote themselves benefits (via the govt.) from those that do. Alexis de Tocqueville warned us of such a situation – do some reading, it is all there in his original words from early in the life of our republic. The U.S. Constitution is far from a perfect document, but it stands as one of the finest expressions of self-government and wisdom yet revised. The words of the founders are still revelevent today, because while the founders themselves and their times are long-past, humans remain unchanged and just as imperfectable and flawed as they were two centuries ago. Concerning a replacement for the document, be careful of that for which you wish – its “replacement” is likely to condemn you to tyranny.

    • Our Founding Fathers were not perfect, but they were not as raciest as many have been falsely taught. For example did you know:

      Note: (1) The word slavery was never used in the original Constitution. George Mason, who is known as the architect of the Constitution, said: [Slavery is a] slow Poison, which is daily contaminating the Minds & Morals of our People. Every Gentleman here is born a petty Tyrant…. And in such an infernal School are to be educated our future Legislators & Rulers.

      (2) Visiting a black college had a profound effect on Ben Franklin. Several years later he joined an abolition Society. Franklin came to believe that slavery should be ended, and eventually freed his own two slaves.

      (3) We actually had black Founding Fathers and elected black representatives in Congress. President Woodrow Wilson (who was not one of the Founding Fathers, and who was a segregationist) had them all kicked out. The American people were outraged.

  • troll hunter

    Gary, you’re such a troll. Thank goodness no one has been sucked in yet by your rhetoric.

    • Guido

      There are a few useful idiots and fellow travelers who support Gary completely. It’s surprising to see the ignorance these commies spew here and how many agree with it.

  • In this world that seems out of control and headed for total economic collapse…

    I’ve learned to focus on controlling what I can control. I can’t control the actions of others, but I can prepare so that I can protect my family and my money.

  • Corruption of the courts has reached the level of a constitutional crisis, the like of which has not been seen since the Civil War. The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property, with no due process of law.
    Joseph Zernik
    Human Rights Alert (NGO)
    [1] 11-06-14 Corruption of the Courts and Failing Banking Regulation in the United States: Dred Scott redux?
    [2] 11-06-24 Time Magazine – 4th of July Issue: Does the Constitution Still Matter?

  • It COULD use some revision. Here is my rough draft:
    We the People of the States United , in Order to improve the climate for Freedom within a sphere of elected government, provide a climate for Justice, improve domestic Tranquility, provide for the individual defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    Article I
    Section 1. All legislative Powers of any nature herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
    Section 2. The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.
    No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the one of the several States, and who shall, when elected, be an Inhabitant for a continuous period of 4 years of that State in which he shall be chosen.
    Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by counting the whole Number of Persons who have achieved legal majority. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every one hundred Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative.

    When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies within three days of such vacancy being created.
    The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of instituting Bills of Impeachment for all federally elected, hired or appointed employees.
    Section 3. The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.
    Immediately after they shall be assembled in Consequence of the first Election, they shall be divided as equally as may be into three Classes. The Seats of the Senators of the first Class shall be vacated at the Expiration of the second Year, of the second Class at the Expiration of the fourth Year, and the third Class at the Expiration of the sixth Year, so that one third may be chosen every second Year; and if Vacancies happen by Resignation, or otherwise, during the Recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof may make temporary Appointments until the next Meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill such Vacancies.
    No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of one of the several States and who shall, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for the preceding 4 years for which he shall be chosen.
    The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.
    The Senate shall choose their other Officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the Absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the Office of President of the United States.
    The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members.
    Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall fit the crime. But in any case, the usual restrictions for Double Jeopardy shall not apply.
    Section 4. The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.
    The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, and such meeting will expire no sooner than the day preceding the following session, nor shall there be any breaks or recesses for any reason other than foreign invasion or natural catastrophes affecting the capitol building itself.
    Section 5. Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a ¾ Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; and will/shall be required to compel the Attendance of absent Members under penalty of death.
    Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, financially punish its Members for disorderly Behavior, but without the concurrence of every other member, not expel a member.
    Each House shall keep a public Journal of its Proceedings, and daily publish the same, and nothing of the Public’s business shall ever be kept secret; and all votes shall be recorded the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on any and all questions shall always be entered on the Journal.

    Section 6. The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason or Felony, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
    No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed or entertained for any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time: and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.
    Section 7. All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
    Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States who will/shall be limited to either signing it intact or vetoing it intact; if he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall only be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. The president, upon sanction of impeachment, shall make his/her determination of approval in his/her own hand or the veto of same within ten days of presentment.
    Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be re passed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill and consist of a single one page item written to express the will of the Congress in language understandable by any person having achieved a sixth grade education in understanding of the day.
    Section 8. The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the States United;
    To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;
    To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States;
    To establish an uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
    To non exclusively coin Money, but regulate the Value of its own coinage, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures with regard to any and all prevailing systems thereof;
    To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;
    To establish uniform rules for Private Post Offices;
    To constitute an adherence to the findings of Private Law consisting of arbitration capable and cognizant of both civil and criminal matters up to and including the seizure and trial of all public officers not actually in session
    To define and act in private law to bring to justice Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;
    To raise and support the Militia which shall consist of able-bodied persons who share an interest in defending their homes and the homes of their neighbors withing the several States United but which shall be otherwise self regulating.
    To exercise exclusive Legislation and Authority over all Places purchased by the specifying Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be limited exclusively to, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;–And
    To make only such Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and only Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the States United, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
    Section 9.
    The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended.
    No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
    No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid.
    No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.
    No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear or pay Duties in another.
    No Money, meaning none at all under any circumstances whatever, of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular and open to the public Statement and Account of Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published daily including all sums and all responsible persons disbursing and receiving.
    No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, domestic person/company or foreign State.
    Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
    No State shall lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the States United.
    No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
    Article II
    Section 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:
    Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
    The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom both shall be Inhabitants of the same State. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately choose by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner choose the President. But in choosing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall choose from them by Ballot the Vice President.
    The Congress may determine the Time of choosing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the States United .
    No Person except a natural born Citizen, meaning only such persons shall be eligible to the Office of President who shall be verified to be the issue of two parents who are, by birth, citizens of one of the States United, all any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen previous Years a constant Resident within the States United .
    In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office for any period of time exceeding two days, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
    The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished except by inflation during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the States United, or any other source.
    Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:–“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and all of the laws thereof.”
    Section 2. The President shall be chief advisor to the Militia of the several States, when and only when occasioned by foreign invasion of the States United; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices.
    He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties provided that no sovereignty of either the individual citizens or of the individual States or of the States United is surrendered or compromised in any way, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law.
    Section 3. He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union consisting of all records created or generated by the performance of his/her official duties with NOTHING kept secret which comes from payment given by the public treasury which, during the time of such employment by the citizens, be the entire of his/her emolument, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care and be fatally responsible that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.
    Section 4. The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office or other suitable punishment on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other Crimes and Misdemeanors and embarrassments to the dignity of the States United
    Article III
    Section 1. The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in Private Courts which shall publish the opinion of all decisions involving crimes amounting to permanent injury to any citizen and civil cases amounting to the decrease in wealth greater than 50 % of the average of any citizen withing the several states or 20% of any person having passed the age of 60 years
    Section 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and in Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;–to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;–to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;–to Controversies to which the States United shall be a Party;–to Controversies between two or more States;–between a State and Citizens of another State;–between Citizens of different States United ;–between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
    In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the Private Courts shall have Jurisdiction. All parties to controversies shall/will have opportunity and leave to vie for choice of arbitrator of any controversy except that a time period of 30 days shall be the maximum for the alleged perpetrator of a crime of justicable controversy to be granted leave to participate in the choice of arbitrator. Otherwise the victim may exercise exclusive choice. In no case will/shall a victim lose his/her place in the choice of arbitrator by the deceit of a perpetrator or the passage of time not attributable to undue delay.
    The Trial of all Crimes that are requested to be reported shall be by Jury whose cost shall be taxed to the loser of said trial; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the victim of said crime may by Law have directed.

    Article IV
    Section 1. Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records, and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.
    Section 2. The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
    A Person charged in any State with Felony meaning bodily injury to another or economic harm to another amounting to , or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having cognizance of the Crime.
    Section 3. No New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union.
    Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government in which the respective Rights of minorities shall not be abused or endangered by any majority, and shall protect each of them against Invasion.
    Article V
    The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year Two Thousand twelve shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
    Article VI
    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be advised thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwith-standing.
    The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
    Article VII
    The Ratification of the Conventions of thirty-nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.
    Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord two thousand twelve.

    Congress OF THE United States,
    begun and held at the City of New-York, on
    Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

                                                      THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added; And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.
                                                      RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three-fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.
                                                      ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

    Article the first …… Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the peaceful exercise thereof; or abridging or interfering with the free expression of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances and the obligation of Congress to quickly and responsively respond thereto is inherent in this enumerated obligation/restriction on the power of Congress. The power of Petition shall thus not be encumbered by any law or other means of law or custom
    Article the second….. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
    Article the third ……. No soldier or armed agent of the two branches of legitimate governmentshall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
    Article the fourth …… The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Government representatives shall be personally responsible for all injurious conduct which violates the rights of citizens not guilty of common law crimes who are impacted by the careless of misfeasance/malfeasance of government agents acting under color of law.
    Article the fifth .. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb except public servants subject to impeachment; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use.
    Article the sixth … In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a public trial within thirty days or as accomodating to the needs and sensibilities of the victim/s of crime, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed by public announcement avaiable to 80% of the residents of said district, of the nature and cause of the accusation; to have the opportunity to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to be offered compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
    Article the seventh .. In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed t50% of the mean monetary income of the district in which said conterversay except where the victim of said conterversary has, at the time of said conterversary, achieved the age of 60 years the amount of 20% of said mean income of said district, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court in the States United, than according to the rules of the common law.
    Article the eighth ….. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted without creating a contrevening common law conflict chargable to the triar of fact and law.
    Article the ninth …. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people which shall be numerous and plenty as natural Rights, given by God, are bound to be.
    Article the tenth … The powers not delegated to the States United by the above Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively in retrograde, or, especially, to the people.”

    Amendment XI

    1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude including punishment for any State or States United law claimed violated by either shall exist within the States United, or any place subject to their very limited jurisdiction.
    2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
    Amendment XII
    Section 1
    All persons born or naturalized in any of the States United, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the of the State wherein they reside and, also of the States United. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the States United; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    Section 2
    The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
    Amendment XIII
    Section 1
    The right of citizens of the States United over the age of 18 to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the States United or by any State on account of anything, period.
    Section 2
    The Congress shall have obligation to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
    Amendment XIV
    Section 1
    The Congress shall have no power or perogative to regulate the property right inherent within every God-created human being of majority age being at or over the age of 18 years, to decide for him/her self what nutritive of non nutritive substances to be consumed or injested except that those introduced into commerce may subject the introducer to common law remedies for the actual harm they may cause.

    Section 2
    The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation except that no derogation of the property rights of any individual may be inferred or introduced by legislation enacted by Congress and that any deleterious effects of legislation may be charged against the persons voting in Congress for such legislation.

    Amendment XIV

    No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than once, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
    Amendment XV
    Section 1
    In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death, impeachment or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.
    Section 2
    Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
    Section 3
    Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.
    Amendment XVI
    No pension or emolument or benefit shall or may acrue or be awarded to ANY former officer, employee or appointee or otherwise public servant of the States United who has not been publically employeed by such in various accumulated positions of cumulative 320 day years for 35 cumulative years that amounts to greater that 35 percent of his/her highest 5 year average pay.

  • a true patriot

    In defence of the Constitution the following quotes will express what
    true Americans are faced with..

    In 1936, William Dodd, the US Ambassador to Germany, said:
    “A clique of US Industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to
    supplant our democratic government and is working closely with
    the fascist regime in Germany and Italy.”

    James Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who passed the Federal Reserve Act
    of Dec. 23, 1913 while congress was in recess over the Christmas
    holiday, and is also the nephew of Max Warburg who helped finance
    Hitler. His statement before the US Senate on Feb. 7, 1950.
    “We shall have a one world government, whether not we like it. The
    question is whether world government will be achieved by conquest or

    James MacGregor Burns, Council on Foreign Relations member, 1954.
    “Lets face reality, the framers of the Constitution, have simply been to
    shrewd for us. They have outwitted us. The designed separate institutions, cannot be unified by mechanical linkages, frail bridges,
    or tinkering. If we are to turn the founders upside down… we must
    directly confront the Constitutional structure they erected.”

    Dwight D Eisenhower 1961 Farewell Address
    “In the council of government, we must guard against the acquisition of
    power of unwarranted influence whether sought or unsought by the
    military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of
    misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never allow the weight
    of this power endanger our liberties or democratic processes.”

    George W Bush, Dec. 9, 2005 in the oval office in regards to the Patriots
    Act was reported to have said, “Stop throwing the Constitution in my
    face, it’s just a god damned piece of paper.”

    James Madison, author of the Bill of Rights
    “If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of
    fighting a foreign enemy.”

    “The Constitution is timeless and must be protected by the people
    against those who advent the culture of corruption in our government.”

    • Guido

      Look up USMC Gen Smedley Butler-he was approached by that cabal and promised an army if he would march on the White House to depose Roosevelt. From what I read, at least 1/3 of the documents Congress had on the matter have vanished.

  • Bill Randolph

    I’ve read some of the diatribe written by ignoramuses who believe our Constitution is outdated & that the founders were ‘racist & sexists’. I guess we could eliminate their freedom of thought since they don’t seem to have any ability to think; we could also do away with their freedom to express their opinions, like they are doing here, since that is so antiquated; oh, & we can eliminate their right to a trial by jury; & their right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty; & their right to speak their minds–if they can prove they have one; & their right to believe or not believe in a religion; & their right to protect their families from those who would do them harm; & their right to travel; & their right to be free to do as they please, etc., etc. Maybe they could elucidate the areas they feel the Constitution restricts their rights & freedoms. I guess maybe they would be better off under the Communist Manifesto & Darwinism (i.e. those who believe in evolution, the tooth fairy, Santa Claus & the Easter Bunny). We are already a socialist country. Secular Humanism is your constitution (read Humanist Manifestos I, II & III for details of your belief system). Perhaps they would prefer to go back to feudalism. If everyone were a saint, we would not need government. It is, at its best, a necessary evil. That’s why our Republic was established to limit government & its power, not to limit the individual. All other forms of government are going to LIMIT YOU!!! The fact that those we elect are liars, cheaters & adulators does not change the fact that our Constitution was meant for a righteous people & not fit for any other (paraphrasing one of our founders who was obviously a racist). So, now that we are so immoral, lets do away with the only thing that keeps us from being slaves, well, at least as far as freedom to move about is concerned. Our economic freedom has been removed so we are economic slaves. Try not paying your taxes & you’ll be put in the equivalent of “debtors prison”. Have fun while you can because the government you get when you dismantle this one you will like even less.

  • Dogwood

    The Constitution is the pact between the Federal Government and We the People, in which the People cede certain powers to Federal control for the purpose of effectively governing. If the Federal Government fails to respect its statutory limitations, then it is a criminal government, and our political leaders are traitors. In a just and sane world, they would be prosecuted and punished as such. However, it seems the We the People have degenerated, and we mostly don’t realize that we’ve lost our most precious heritage. We’re like Esau in the Bible, forfeiting our birthright for a bowl of stew. It’s a terrible tragedy that such a thing should befall a great nation and a great people.

  • Thank You Bill Randolph! Apparently “John Adams said ‘Our Constitution was made only for a moral and righteous people. It is wholly inadequate for the governance of any other.'”:

    Other sources speak on the subject and it’s requirement for self-government (and that it is the lack thereof that necessitates the intervention of the outer government). The Constitution easily comes under attack now because it has been virtually separated from the other three Organic Laws that support it!:

    There is a lot to recover here – and the true desiny of America is worth every effort we make!

  • How about the 14th amendment of the constitution which says the US shall always pay its debt?

    Why doesn’t the Tea Party/GOP seem to care about that? Why are they now actively trying to subvert the constitution by forcing the US to default on its debt?

  • Eskimo Joe

    I am a Canadian who loves visiting the USA. I pray that you can get your act together, before China is the dominant military power in the world.

  • Georgiaboy61

    “The Elite Are Not Even Trying To Hide How Much They Hate The U.S. Constitution Anymore” The thesis of this title is proven easily. How? By simple reference to the fact that we have an unconsitutional chief executive in office who is probably guilty of committing one or more felonies, and a lawless and corrupt Congress who put him there, as they trampled the constitution underfoot. Americans who make reference to that document are labeled “terrorists” by the DHS. Quod erat demonstrandum, or “the evidence speaks for itself”…

  • MKGandhi

    Since 2011, NO ONE has commented?! All that is required for evil to prevail is that good people do nothing to stop it.

    I do NOT “worship” the Constitution. I have studied it, and the collected letters and articles for and against it (Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers).

    I’ve also studied the original Articles of Confederation. I’m convinced that the seeds of doom for this country were sown into the Constitution by Hamilton and his bankster gang. The Constitution was designed so that power could be centralized and the States’ sovereignty could be undermined. Only the Bill of Rights, which was required as a condition of ratification, has saved our Republic until now.

    Today, given the poor quality of government-run schools, people do not know their rights; do not understand the differences between natural rights, statutory rights and Constitutional right; they do not know how to exercise their rights; and they don’t even know the difference between laws and codes. It is precisely this vast level of ignorance which has enabled the banksters to rob us all blind and destroy the USA by dissolving our rights bit by bit.

    The solution is to stop feeding th Beast; to begin exercising our rights, and publicly and peaceably disobeying codes which limit or usurp our rights. Civil diobedience done en masse makes tyranny downright inconvenient for TPTB.

  • Al

    If they destroy the government, they destroy themselves. The Constitution is the law and the government is suppose to protect it and abide by it. If they transgress this law, we don’t have to obey them.