Let’s Be Clear – A Vote For Warmonger Hillary Clinton Is A Vote For World War 3

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

World War IIIIf you want to see war without end, vote for Hillary Clinton. It is tremendously ironic that Hillary Clinton and the mainstream media have attempted to portray Donald Trump as “dangerous” and “temperamental”, because it is Clinton that actually has a long history of being emotionally unstable. She has a temper that is absolutely legendary, and she has been cussing out the men and women in her security detail for decades. Hillary Clinton played a key role in starting the civil war in Syria, thanks to her Libya is a post-apocalyptic wasteland today, and now she is picking a fight with the Russians before she has even won the election. Of all the candidates there were running for president this election cycle, there was nobody that was even close to as dangerous as Hillary Clinton, and if she wins the election I am fully convinced that World War 3 will begin before her time in the White House is over.

 

Someone that shares this opinion with me is Donald Trump. According to Reuters, Trump recently stated that we are “going to end up in World War Three over Syria if we listen to Hillary Clinton”…

On Syria’s civil war, Trump said Clinton could drag the United States into a world war with a more aggressive posture toward resolving the conflict.

Clinton has called for the establishment of a no-fly zone and “safe zones” on the ground to protect non-combatants. Some analysts fear that protecting those zones could bring the United States into direct conflict with Russian fighter jets.

“What we should do is focus on ISIS. We should not be focusing on Syria,” said Trump as he dined on fried eggs and sausage at his Trump National Doral golf resort. “You’re going to end up in World War Three over Syria if we listen to Hillary Clinton.”

In order to have a no-fly zone in Syria, you would have to enforce it.

And in order to enforce it, you would have to be willing to shoot at the Russians.

According to National Intelligence Director James Clapper, that could have dire consequences…

Russia could shoot down a U.S. aircraft if a no-fly zone were imposed over Syria, National Intelligence Director James Clapper said Tuesday.

“I wouldn’t put it past them to shoot down an American aircraft if they felt that was threatening to their forces on the ground,” Clapper said, speaking with CBS’ Charlie Rose at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York about several national security issues.

Of course Clapper is not alone in that assessment. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Joseph Francis Dunford, says that imposing a no-fly zone over all of Syria “would require us to go to war”

“Right now, Senator, for us to control all of the airspace in Syria it would require us to go to war, against Syria and Russia,… That’s a pretty fundamental decision that certainly I’m not going to make.” (Senate Armed Services Committee, September 22, 2016, emphasis added)

But Hillary Clinton is unwavering in her position that this is what she wants.

You see, the truth is that Hillary Clinton wants to win the war that she started in Syria. Back in 2011, she spearheaded an effort along with Saudi Arabia and Turkey to try to use the Arab Spring uprisings in the Middle East as an opportunity to try to overthrow President Assad in Syria. If it wasn’t for her meddling, millions of refugees would not be pouring into Europe and elsewhere, and there would be no “humanitarian crisis” in Syria at all.

Thanks to Russian intervention, the war in Syria is not too far from being over, but the Obama administration is desperate to keep it going. They understand that if Assad is victorious that all of their efforts for the last five years have been wasted, and that is why they are so determined to keep Aleppo from falling. Without Aleppo, many of the jihadist rebels that the Obama administration has been supporting won’t have anywhere to hide.

So the Obama administration has actually been considering direct strikes against the Syrian military, and the Russians have already said that they will not allow this to happen. If Obama is insane enough to order airstrikes against Syrian forces and the Russians start shooting back, that could set off a chain of events that could rapidly spiral completely out of control.

One recent survey found that current American leadership has a 1 percent approval rating in Russia right now, and the Russians dislike Hillary Clinton even more than they dislike Barack Obama. The Russians know that if Hillary Clinton is elected that it is quite likely that they will have to fight a war with us, and that is why they desperately want Donald Trump to win in November. You can see this outlook reflected in comments that Russian President Vladimir Putin recently made about the two candidates

“Mrs. Clinton has chosen to take up a very aggressive stance against our country, against Russia. Mr. Trump, on the other hand, calls for cooperation – at least when it comes to the international fight against terrorism,” Putin said.

“Naturally we welcome those who would like to cooperate with us. And we consider it wrong, that we always have to be in conflict with one another, creating existential threats for each other and for the whole world,” Putin noted.

Anyone that watched the three presidential debates could see that Hillary Clinton is absolutely seething with animosity for Russia. The thought of her finger on the nuclear trigger is almost too terrible to contemplate, but it may soon become a reality.

And even now, the Obama administration and our NATO allies are shifting forces into position for a confrontation with Moscow. This week it is being reported that NATO troops will soon be sent to Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania

Nine hundred US troops are to be sent to eastern Europe next year as America’s troubled relationship with Russia enters new, uncertain territory.

A US-led battle group of NATO allied soldiers will be sent to Poland as part of the multi-nation operation.

British forces will lead one of the four battle groups in Estonia, Canada will spearhead the presence in Latvia and Germany will be present in Lithuania.

In addition, Infowars is reporting that U.S. Marines will soon be stationed in Norway near the border with Russia…

After accepting a Pentagon proposal, Norway will host US Marines at a base near the Russian border as Russia deploys nuclear-capable ships to Kaliningrad.

A rotating force of approximately 330 Marines will be stationed at an airfield in the city of Vaernes, just outside Trondheim, beginning in January. Norway and Russia share an 122-mile border in the Arctic.

“The US initiative to augment their training and exercises in Norway by locating a Marine Corps Rotational Force in Norway is highly welcome and will have positive implications for our already strong bilateral relationship,” said Norwegian Defense Minister Ine Eriksen Søreide.

Most Americans aren’t aware of any of this, nor do they really care about our relationship with Russia.

But in Russia things are completely different. The possibility of war with the United States is the biggest news story over there these days, and feverish preparations are being made for a potential nuclear confrontation

Russian authorities have stepped up nuclear-war survival measures amid a showdown with Washington, dusting off Soviet-era civil-defense plans and upgrading bomb shelters in the biggest cities.

At the Kremlin’s Ministry of Emergency Situations, the Cold War is back.

The country recently held its biggest civil defense drills since the collapse of the U.S.S.R., with what officials said were 40 million people rehearsing a response to chemical and nuclear threats.

I know that I have been writing about this over and over, but the truth is that we are on a path to war with Russia, and the election of Hillary Clinton would greatly accelerate the march toward war.

In my controversial new book, I expressed my belief that war with Russia is coming, but at the time that I wrote it I didn’t know how the election would turn out.

At this point it looks like Clinton is very likely to win on November 8th, and that would be absolutely disastrous for our relationship with Russia.

If you are reading this and you are considering voting for Hillary Clinton, please don’t do it. We simply cannot afford to have an emotionally unstable warmonger with a violent temper in the White House at this critical time.

If the American people do choose Hillary Clinton this November, I believe that it will be a choice that they will bitterly, bitterly regret in future years.

About the author: Michael Snyder is the founder and publisher of The Economic Collapse Blog and End Of The American Dream. Michael’s controversial new book about Bible prophecy entitled “The Rapture Verdict” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com.*

   
  • Brian

    Hillary and Obama are INSANE and they should really be careful what they wish for because Putin is not a PUNK that can be BULLIED!!!

    • Seen2013

      “Two bullies on the same block. Sooner or later, they’re going to fight”

  • greanfinisher .

    A vote for Hillary will certainly be a vote for the total disarmament of the American public. In fact, she would be certain to issue a whole slew of EOs that would undermine the Second Amendment to a degree as to make it meaningless. Hillary would likely impose ‘safe storage’ for all firearms meaning: “You don’t keep them, but we do”. Obviously, she would also require ‘expanded background checks’ which would effectively curtail the private sale of firearms. A complete ban of all semi autos and associated ammo would be a certainty, and also the 1000% tax that she would likely impose on all other firearms and ammunition. In addition, she would predictably expand the so-called ‘government terrorist and no-fly lists’ which should cover 150 million Americans easily. There would just be no end to that woman’s tyranny.

  • JB

    It’s certainly in the realm of possibilities this could light the fuse to WWIII with the entire world clamoring for a world leader and global governmental control in the aftermath to ensure the use of such weapons never happens again. Enter the anti-Christ (who comes riding on a white horse with a bow representing false peace).
    Scary times indeed, but for the Christian, we have faith that God can orchestrate all the evil of mankind to the triumph of His Son. Men’s hearts will fail them for the things coming upon the earth, but God doesn’t give His people a spirit of fear. Now is the time to draw close to Jesus.

    • Be Still

      Amen JB.

  • John Sith

    greanfinisher .you make a very valid point. But I think hitlary
    underestimates the resolve of the TRUE American people, thinking that we
    will just roll over and let her trample us into the ground. If she
    started a war with Russia they would hit us hard and aim to end the
    conflict quickly. The USSA is poking the Russian bear with sharp sticks.
    You provoke a bear long enough and he will swing around and dig his
    claws deep into your face and rip it off. If that doesn’t happen and hitlary pressed her ternary here in the USSA she would most certainly kick off another revolutionary/civil war and wake once again the sleeping giant that are the patriots.
    If Putin saw this he would no doubt wait for America to become more
    weakened than we already are with Waring against its own people then at
    the right time I could see him hitting fast and hard, aiding the patriots that would be fighting to rid this land of the corrupt tyranny. Either way you look at it, there will be blood shed and MEANY will die. There are many in America that are awake and there are many more who are still asleep caught up in their face book and instagrams and social justice boxes. Now is the time to draw close to God, be vigilant and be the sword in the darkness against this evil.

  • watchmannonthewall

    When we look at past events where someone on their side has shown utter contempt for a position taken by supporters, ex. Bill Clinton and NOW, we always find they are willing to overlook such actions. This would be no different.

    Therefore we know the positions taken by their supporting organizations have nothing to do with standing up for the rights of those who are “weak and helpless”, of being an advocate for them. It must be somethig else they are really after. Perhaps power and money, acquired through the politics of division?

  • MEP325

    Despite all the warnings from people like Michael and others, plenty of stupid morons will still vote for the rotten hag. She will most definitely get the vote from militant feminists only because of her genitalia. I have my issues with Trump but when it comes to foreign policy and international affairs, he is much more level-headed than her.

    “Anyone that watched the three presidential debates could see that Hillary Clinton is absolutely seething with animosity for Russia.”

    Trump nailed it in the third debate. He pointed out to Hillary how Putin outsmarted her and refuses to be pushed around by her so it’s no wonder the witch is stewing with anger toward Putin. That depraved, shrieking witch is out of her mind. Her stupid and insane policies will shake down businesses, shake down industry, exponentially increase the size of the government and centralize more power to it, appoint liberal PC totalitarians to the Supreme Court, wage war against free speech and religious liberties. She will turn America into a third-world, authoritarian hell-hole. Rest assured, America will regret a Hillary Clinton presidency.

    • People know that nuclear war is impossible because everyone else they know feels that way. The occasional person saying otherwise is ignored.

      So pretty much 99% of likely Hillary voters will ignore the message of nuclear war.

      Once Hillary is elected then people should prepare themselves for nuclear war within the next year or two. Your other option is to do nothing and just die when war comes. Most people would rather just die.

      • MEP325

        The average Hillary supporter seems to only care about what’s in between her legs and that she’s a Democrat. Many of them are too stupid or too blind to see how much of a danger she poses to America and abroad. I abhor that woman so much because she is a corrupt fraud that will do and say anything to get power.

        I certainly hope you’re wrong about nuclear war. Part of me wants to think that she’s not crazy enough to go nuclear, even though she is out of her mind.

  • Seen2013

    Keynesian economics think-tanks have advocated wars against unconventional warfare and small conventional forces do not provide the so-called ‘glass man multiplier’ for spending which under old school measurements are already over 80% of GDP is already dependent on deficit to debt spending that deficit to debt spending is what props up public-private partnerships and Too Big To Fail banking institutions as the catalyst for both wealth effect and wealth redistribution socialism has advocated for since Otto Von Bismark catalyzed his Bismarkian policies in Germany prior to both World War I.

    Furthermore, China has entered the Syria along with Iran and Russia, and it is impossible to enforce a no-fly zone without firing upon Russo-Sino forces who have military pacts with each buffer zone nation of their national interests: Eastern Ukraine, Syria, Iran, Pakistan, and North Korea. The War College has run war-game scenarios against Russia, China, and Russo-Sino that is an epic fail specifically citing the US shift to unconventional warfare to fight the war on terror.

    Russia and China beginning in 2009 have economically and militarily formed pacts that weaken the US Dollar and US influence. Heck, most people don’t even know between 2010-11 Venezuela-Sino formed a pact that would enable China to deploy tactical warheads that were estimated to be fully installed between the end of 2016-mid 2017.

    The generic definition of a world war is a war expanding 3 or more continents. Europe, Asia, Africa, and Americas are 3 or more continents.

    Unfortunately, most Americans presume no other nation can strike the US in conventional warfare, so they fear nuclear war more than conventional invasion. According to the war college, this is not true anymore.
    The Russian mineral rich Arctic deployment is within striking distance of Alaska.
    Russia repudiated Cuban Soviet era debt for access to Cuban bases that is being weaponized and designed to gather intelligence on the US mainland primarily Florida that Cuban bases are within striking distances of as well as every Gulf of Mexico State.
    Under international law, the militarization of law enforcement carries the penalty of also making law enforcement military targets.

    Go ahead and search War College: War-game (and search Russia, China, and Russo-Sino/Russia and China).

  • Seen2013

    I agree with wachmannonthewall. The anti-war are only anti-war when it’s for hawkish reasons but under Dovish justification; they become full blown war-hawks.

    Most Americans who want change of course as the Let It Burn movement believes collapsing the Dollar collapses the government ignoring or omitting the currency can be changed, and politics tends to be enforced use of force.

  • kfilly

    Yes, well said.

  • MK

    Can you think of a presidential election when the Republican candidate led in the polls? Ever?

  • Jim Davis

    Thanks for this article, Michael. Much better than the last. We should be scared of Hillary and WWIII. Jack ‘o Lanterns and witches, not so much.

  • seekless

    Emotional Hillary with nukes and starting wars is beyond dangerous,most know this.

  • chris

    Over in the UK the UK State Media, a.k.a the BBC, has been churning out an almost unrelenting stream of anti Trump and anti Russian propaganda for months. The anti Trump propaganda is reaching a crescendo as we speak. The level of bias from a so-called public service broadcaster is breathtaking to behold. According to some if the election is very close it could come down to overseas votes as to who wins. If this is the case the BBC has certainly done its job to get Clinton elected. One can only wonder whether it is the same in the other countries that have a lot of US ex pats. I suspect it is.
    Obama was elected partly on saying that he wanted to ‘reset’ relations with Russia. I think most people took that to mean improve relations with Russia. However we are now closer to WW3 than under Bush or Clinton or Reagan. Hillary Clinton will take us there i feel. Michaels’ analysis is spot on.

    • GetReal4U2

      they probably did the same thing during the “brexit” election…

  • tacoma

    A lot of folks may not like Trump’s personality. Well, he is what he is. Well-known for decades. But he is successful in business. He has broken no laws. He is in today’s situation, a match in the polls against Hillary to win the presidency, NOT because of what he has done. But because of what the establishment of both parties have done for the past 30 years. Hillary is deep in the old establishment that screwed the American people big time.

    If Hillary gets presidential power she will start WW3 with China and Russia. Let there be no doubt about that. She will blame them for America’s troubles, and she has the world biggest and baddest propaganda machine to work for her. She will make GW look like a school boy playing with firecrackers.

    Hillary ambition is epic. But more than ambition, she has a fundamental disorder. She wants to be a man, outdo the world’s biggest male political leader in history. Outdo Billy. Outdo GW Bush. Outdo FDR. She is America’s female Benito Mussolini. This is why she is compelled to go to war with the world’s biggest nuclear power Russia and China. [Let’s remember Mussolini immediately launched an attack on Ethiopia once he became leader – just to show he is a badass bully.]

    Cold War 2 on Russia is Hillary’s idea. Asia Pivot – the containment and war on China is Hillary’s idea. Regime Change 2 – overthrow of legitimate governments in Ukraine, Libya and Syria is Hillary’s idea. Her warmongering makes John McCain – Washington certified warmonger – blush with timidity. She is in fact the Neo-Conservative’s Trojan Horse.

    Stupid voters may fear Trump’s lewd behavior on a few nice looking women, and vote for Hillary. They will get nuked fried by Hillary.

    Russia president Putin is today trying mightily to end the horrific Syrian civil war, a war Hillary helped to inflame and sustain. He is trying to terminate the Islamic State, a gang of extreme terrorists created by Hillary’s Syrian regime-change policy. Let’s hope he succeed, for the sake of world peace.

    But the American public know nothing about a single remark Putin made a few years back, because the unofficial state media of Fox, NBC, ABC, CNN what’s not refused to report it. Here is what he said:

    “If Russia is attacked again, like the crimes of Napoleon and Hitler, we will defend ourselves. But this war, unlike the previous one, will not be fought only on Russia soil. It will be fought on the attacker’s soil. That soil will be unfit for humanity when the war ends.”

  • GetReal4U2

    hildabeast wants a war to line the bankers pockets and get people’ minds off of her scandals…

  • SantosGarcia