The Rapture Verdict Seed Vault Get Prepared Now Preppers Blueprint Life strawBeginning Of The End
Gold Buying Guide: Golden Eagle Coins

Recent Posts

Michael and Meranda The Watch

Michael’s Latest Video

Legacy Water

They Want To Use ‘Hate Speech Laws’ To Destroy Freedom Of Speech In America

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

Censored - Public DomainHate speech laws are going in all around the world, and progressive activists in the United States want to use these kinds of laws to destroy free speech in America.  You see, the truth is that these hate speech laws that are being implemented all over the planet are not just about preventing speech that promotes violence or genocide against a particular group of people.  Instead, these laws are written in such a way that anyone that says something that “offends” or “insults” someone else is guilty of “hate speech”.  Even if you never intended to offend anyone and you had no idea that your words were insulting, in some countries you can be detained without bail and sentenced to years in prison for such speech.  Today, there are highly restrictive hate speech laws in Canada, in Mexico and in virtually every single European nation.  The United States is still an exception, but the truth is that our liberties and freedoms are being eroded every single day, and it is only a matter of time until “hate speech laws” are used to take away our freedom of speech too.

If you don’t think that this could ever happen in America, you should consider what the American Bar Association has to say on the matter.  This is the national organization that represents all of our lawyers, judges, etc.  So when the ABA speaks on legal matters, it carries a significant amount of weight.  The following is how the American Bar Association defines “hate speech”

Hate speech is speech that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits.

Did you catch that?

If I say something that offends or insults you, there is a very good chance that I have just committed “hate speech” according to the ABA.

And support for these kinds of laws is growing.  In fact, one survey found that 51 percent of all Democrats now support hate speech laws.  It is only a matter of time before progressives start pushing for them in a big way.

Sadly, many of these progressives don’t even understand that our Constitution protects free speech.  Just consider what CNN anchor Chris Cuomo recently had to say about this

Hate speech is not the same thing as free speech, wrote CNN anchor Chris Cuomo on the ultimate forum for public discourse: Twitter.

Amid debate about free speech after a shooting at an anti-Muslim protest in Texas , a user tweeted at Cuomo: “Too many people are trying to say hate speech (doesn’t equal) free speech.”

In response, Cuomo, who has a law degree, said, “It doesn’t. Hate speech is excluded from protection. Don’t just say you love the Constitution … read it.”

No, I think that it is Cuomo that needs to read the Constitution.  The fact that he gets to deliver “the news” to millions upon millions of Americans is absolutely frightening.

But without a doubt, we do need to have a conversation about “hate speech” in the United States.  If I offend or insult you, that does not mean that I “hate” you.  And if I disagree with you, that does not mean that I “hate” you either.

Some of the things that are considered to be “offensive speech” these days are absolutely ridiculous.  For example, just consider the following excerpt from a recent article by Paul Joseph Watson

Here’s an actual list of things that according to the University of Wisconsin are racist:

– Asking someone where they are from or where they were born.

– Telling someone they speak good English.

– Telling someone that you have several black friends.

– Saying that you’re not a racist.

– Complimenting an Asian person by telling them they are very articulate.

– Asking an Asian person for help with science or math.

– Uttering the phrase “There is only one race, the human race.”

– Saying that you think America is a melting pot and that when you look at someone you don’t see race.

– Believing that the most qualified person, regardless of race, should get the job.

– Thinking that every person, regardless of race, can succeed in society if they work hard enough.

– Telling a black person who is being too loud to be quiet.

– Telling an Asian or Latino person who is too quiet to speak up.

– Mistaking a person of color for a staff member when you’re in a store.

– Calling something “gay”.

– Doing an impression of someone’s dialect or accent.

Could you imagine going to prison for any of those “offenses”?

But this is where our country is heading if we don’t stand up for our rights.

Right now, the progressives are on a roll.  In the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision on same sex marriage, some progressives are already talking about going after the tax exemptions of churches that oppose it.  In fact, the New York Times recently published an article entitled “Now’s the Time To End Tax Exemptions for Religious Institutions“.

But of course the ultimate goal is far more insidious.  In the end, they want to shut down all speech that offends them in any way

The American Unity Fund is a heavily funded new super-PAC looking to blanket the country with LGBT anti-discrimination laws. In effect, those laws aim to wipe out any alternative voice to the LGBT agenda. The effort is being spearheaded by billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Singer and another wealthy hedge fund manager, Tim Gill. Gill’s operations—the Gill Foundation and Gill Action—have been dedicated to “nonpartisan” gains for the LGBT lobby on the legislative and judicial fronts.

Those that do not believe that this could ever possibly happen in “the land of the free” should consider what has already happened in our neighbor to the north

Anyone who is offended by something you have said or written can make a complaint to the Human Rights Commissions and Tribunals. In Canada, these organizations police speech, penalizing citizens for any expression deemed in opposition to particular sexual behaviors or protected groups identified under ‘sexual orientation.’ It takes only one complaint against a person to be brought before the tribunal, costing the defendant tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees. The commissions have the power to enter private residences and remove all items pertinent to their investigations, checking for hate speech.

Of course the same kind of thing is already happening over in Europe as well.  For instance, one Christian pastor in Northern Ireland is being prosecuted for calling Islam “a doctrine spawned in hell”

An evangelical pastor in Northern Ireland is under fire and will be prosecuted after calling Islam “satanic” and claiming that its doctrine was “spawned in hell” during a controversial 2014 sermon that streamed over the Internet.

Pastor James McConnell, 78, of Whitewell Metropolitan Tabernacle in Belfast, Northern Ireland, made his comments — which included calling Islam “heathen” — in a sermon delivered last May, the BBC reported.

“The Muslim religion was created many hundreds of years after Christ. Muhammad, the Islam Prophet, was born around the year A.D. 570, but Muslims believe that Islam is the true religion,” he preached. “Now, people say there are good Muslims in Britain. That may be so, but I don’t trust them.”

McConnell continued, “Islam’s ideas about God, about humanity, about salvation are vastly different from the teaching of the holy scriptures. Islam is heathen. Islam is satanic. Islam is a doctrine spawned in hell.”

Once such laws are in place in the United States, it won’t be difficult for the government to find you if you are committing “hate speech”.  As I have written about repeatedly, the U.S. government already monitors virtually everything that is said and done on the Internet.  The following is an excerpt from an article that was recently authored by Micah Lee, Glenn Greenwald, and Morgan Marquis-Boire

The sheer quantity of communications that XKEYSCORE processes, filters and queries is stunning. Around the world, when a person gets online to do anything — write an email, post to a social network, browse the web or play a video game — there’s a decent chance that the Internet traffic her device sends and receives is getting collected and processed by one of XKEYSCORE’s hundreds of servers scattered across the globe.

In order to make sense of such a massive and steady flow of information, analysts working for the National Security Agency, as well as partner spy agencies, have written thousands of snippets of code to detect different types of traffic and extract useful information from each type, according to documents dating up to 2013. For example, the system automatically detects if a given piece of traffic is an email. If it is, the system tags if it’s from Yahoo or Gmail, if it contains an airline itinerary, if it’s encrypted with PGP, or if the sender’s language is set to Arabic, along with myriad other details.

And as I wrote about yesterday, western governments are already using paid trolls to identify and combat “extremists” on social media websites such as YouTube, Facebook and Twitter.

We are rapidly becoming a “Big Brother” society, and if we don’t stand up for our freedoms and liberties now, it is inevitable that we will eventually lose just about all of them.

Unfortunately, most of the population is absolutely clueless about all of this.  In fact, as Mark Dice demonstrated the other day, many Americans don’t even know what we are celebrating on the 4th of July.  As a society, we have become extremely “dumbed down”, and we have lost connection to the values and principles that this country was founded upon.

So is there any hope for us?  Please feel free to tell us what you think by posting a comment below…

  • Mike

    Jesus Christ is our only hope. I don’t see it getting better. I believe we are witnessing the birth pains that lead up to the end.

    • Amen, mike. Everyone thinks God will soon judge America. I believe he will withhold that judgment until the whole world falls under the spell of secular humanism. Americans get too wrapped up in our self importance and don’t realize God is dealing with the condition of all human hearts.
      We must endure to the end and preach the Gospel to all who will hear it and be saved by faith in Christ without seeing to overt hand of God.

  • K

    With such laws, having any kind of forum on the internet, would be insane. Which I am sure is part of their goal.

    • rmc9

      …let’s stay insane…

    • IsReal

      They will likely turn to thought crimes and machines reading people’s thoughts. The minute your aggressive thoughts are detected, you will likely be incarcerated or executed in the new world order.

  • In north Korea they have free speech. Everyone is free to say they love dear leader. In Germany right before Hitler completely clamped down all the “cool” people wore the party pin on their collar to show everyone how progressive they were.

    • Gay Veteran

      “…In Germany right before Hitler completely clamped down all the “cool” people wore the party pin on their collar to show everyone how progressive they were.”

      uh, you do realize that Hitler came to power in a conservative coalition?

      • I didn’t mean it in the spirit of what is today called progressivism. I meant it as in the political movement that caught everybody in that society into the idea that their society would progress if everybody would just shut up and get with the new program.

        • Gay Veteran

          what we have in AmeriKa is fascism (the merger of state and corporate powers)

      • I guess if I know what’s good for me I’ll rainbow my Facebook page.

        • Gay Veteran

          only if you want to

          • I agree with a lot of what you say. However I believe the progressive movement is starting to try to push those who don’t agree into the margins. Instead of fostering an environment of intelligent conversation they are trying to shape the minds of youth into thinking religion is a manmade crutch, guns are bad, there is only one way to interpret unproven scientific theories and the founding fathers were racist and there ideas of government are out dated. Once an idea becomes the only way to progress and all other thinkers are holding us back we are on the slippery slope to tyranny.

          • feduppianoman

            It’s not a slippery slope. Progressives are marching relentlessly towards tyranny. It’s what they do.

          • afchief

            And lying is their defining characteristic.

          • Gay Veteran

            just like conservatives

          • Gay Veteran

            here’s some clues:

            democrats=republicans

            “liberals”=”conservatives”

            Clinton=Bush=Obama

          • Gay Veteran

            well in the late 1700s I’m sure most of the founding fathers were racist, but that does NOT automatically mean their other ideas are bad.

            we now live in a fascist country (and fascism is the merger of state and korporate powers)

          • Why did you say Hitler was conservative? He might have played some cultural conservative cards to appeal to a culture that was more traditional but what really gave him the edge was the chicken in every pot and car in every driveway get you out of the depression through government bennies. He was fascist which when you push the right or left to there limits they become the same. He was no more a traditionalist than saddam was a Muslim. Saddam was a baathist and didn’t start playing Mr Muslim until the gulf war to convince the people they were fighting for Allah against Israel. All politicians are all things to everybody. Real freedom comes from a solid constitution .

          • Gay Veteran

            I didn’t say Hitler was conservative. I said he came to power in a conservative coalition.

      • I believe in God as my king and the constitution as my source of freedom. Statists of the right or left believe in humanism and government as the overseer of what is right. That my friend is the real dividing of beliefs in this country not the fake right/left divide and conquer political trap people are falling for.

        • Gay Veteran

          democrats=republicans

          and the Constitution merely recognizes your rights

          • Syrin

            No, the Constitution states that our rights do not come from the state. Liberals have changed that to the detriment of everyone.

          • Gay Veteran

            “…the Constitution states that our rights do not come from the state….”
            our rights do not come from the state, but where does the Constitution state that unless you refer to the 9th amendment

          • VigilanteCaregiver

            Merely RECOGNIZES our rights? Now I know you never studied. The US Constitution acts as a holding pen for the government. Those laid out in the bill of rights was for the government to recognize our rights – not the other way around. Progressive insurrectionists such as yourself have told this tall tale in hopes that others will believe it. It’s not true; never was.

            Besides, we are free regardless of your opinions.

          • Gay Veteran

            sigh, the point being that our natural rights do not come FROM the Constitution.

          • VigilanteCaregiver

            Which is what I said. Try reading what people write, please.

            In addition, they are UNALIENABLE rights – we have them regardless of government or your permission.

          • Gay Veteran

            yes, try reading what people write, please:

            the Constitution merely recognizes your rights

      • feduppianoman

        The National “SOCIALISTS” came to power under a conservative coalition… Whatever you say chief.

        • Gay Veteran

          look it up!

          they were Socialist about as much as the Federal Reserve is federal (the Federal Reserve is a PRIVATE bank)

          • Don

            Agree, Hitler was a Christian conservative. We were told nothing but lies about this good man.

          • Gay Veteran

            ???

          • krinks

            Gov’t control of everything is socialist there pervert. Shouldn’t you be off trying to find a teen age boy to have your way with like the rest of your gay brethren?

          • Gay Veteran

            thanks for contributing to the discussion about Hate Speech

          • krinks

            Truth hurts. See Ryan Sorba hidden camera.

          • Gay Veteran

            thanks for contributing to the discussion about Hate Speech…

          • VigilanteCaregiver

            Just watched it and did some name checking and such. Seems genuine.

          • krinks

            Former Homosexuals such as Joe Dallas who has been happily married to a woman for nearly 40 years has said the same thing. No one is born that way. Childhood trauma causes it.

          • Gay Veteran

            guess childhood trauma caused your stupidity

          • krinks

            That may well be but the fact remains that on hidden camera it is nearly universal that homosexuals admit they were not born that way, being molested as a child led to this conduct, with a near universal desire for the age if consent to be lowered to 13 so that gays can molest children legally. As such the days of homosexuality being criminal conduct was with merit.

          • Gay Veteran

            the lies and stoopidity are strong with this one.
            what a sad pathetic bigot you are

          • krinks

            Insults when confronted with facts. How telling. I’d ask you the same questions Ryan asked in the gay bar but you’d probably just lie anyway.

          • Gay Veteran

            what facts?!?!?!?
            you know what, it is a total waste of time arguing with a BIGOT like you

          • Gay Veteran

            you think one person represents an entire minority? jeez, you’re more brain dead than I thought

          • krinks

            That is more than one person as he says many times and other such as Joe Dallas who has run an ex gay ministry for nearly 40 years.

          • Gay Veteran

            ROFLOL, yeah, all those “ex-gays” who go back to being gay. wonder why
            monon, using your “logic”, YOU could choose to be homosexual. well, you can’t because you aren’t human

          • krinks

            Only gay men lie about the fact that they became gay when they were molested as children lie about these fellow who came out of the sick and sad lifestyle/deathstyle more like it through therapy and the Lord’s help. Again see Ryan Sorba’s interviews where this was admitted en mass.

          • Gay Veteran

            “…Again see Ryan Sorba’s interviews where this was admitted en mass….”
            so 1000s and 1000s of people admitted it?
            man, you REALLY need to get back on your meds.
            and interesting how obsessed with Gays you are
            self-hating?

          • krinks

            Between Ryan Sorba, Joe Dallas, and many others too numerous to mention they all tell the same story. No one is born gay. So yes the number that have admitted this is in the thousands.

            The fact is it is sad to see people like you. If you truly are gay you know full well I am telling the truth. The only place where people are born gay and they are faithful/monogamous/only having relations with each other as normal people do is on a TV show and you know it.

          • Gay Veteran

            ROFLOL, wow, gone full retard, eh.

            your self-hating is truly amazing

          • VigilanteCaregiver

            They were National Socialists. It was in their name “National Socialist Worker’s Party”. You didn’t call Hitler a conservative, but you tried to link him to American Conservatives without any evidence apart from your opinion.

            Trying to rewrite history again? Here’s free speech for you – you don’t like our way of life or our liberties, then leave! No one’s stopping you!

          • Gay Veteran

            “…You didn’t call Hitler a conservative, but you tried to link him to American Conservatives without any evidence apart from your opinion….”

            where did I write that? WHERE?

            “…Trying to rewrite history again? Here’s free speech for you – you don’t like our way of life or our liberties, then leave! No one’s stopping you!”

            It is obvious that you are totally ignorant about how Hitler came to power. Education, it’s a powerful tool. Use it.

            “…you don’t like our way of life or our liberties, then leave! No one’s stopping you!”
            lately YOU are the one who doesn’t like our liberties

          • VigilanteCaregiver

            I love how the troll does this nit-picking responses.

            I’m gonna do it back:

            “where did I write that? WHERE?
            “Thou shalt not bear false witness””

            You don’t believe in God and His scripture, so quoting it is kinda hollow for someone who blasphemes our faith often – especially when it’s not accurate. Read several lines up, you said: “no one here called Hitler conservative, merely that Hitler came to power in a conservative coalition” You’re trying to connect Hitler to US Conservatives. If you meant European conservatives you should’ve mentioned that earlier. What are your intentions other than to indirectly tie Hitler to US Conservatives?

            “It is obvious that you are totally ignorant about how Hitler came to power. Education, it’s a powerful tool. Use it.”

            This is not an argument in favor of your position. This is being a troll. Cite your source(s).

            “lately YOU are the one who doesn’t like our liberties”

            Desperate. My record on Disqus proves you wrong. Looking at your record… not good.

          • Gay Veteran

            “…You’re trying to connect Hitler to US Conservatives….”

            AGAIN, where did I try to connect Hitler to American conservatives? WHERE?

            “…If you meant European conservatives you should’ve mentioned that earlier. What are your intentions other than to indirectly tie Hitler to US Conservatives?….”

            oh, now you’re a mind reader.
            hey Einstein, Hitler came to power in a conservative coalition in GERMANY.
            Not France.
            Not Belgium.
            And not America.
            would have thought that was self-evident

            “…Cite your source(s)….”

            one was Der Spiegel.

            and interesting that you have provided NOTHING to show that Hitler did NOT come to power in a conservative coalition.
            what’s the problem? got nothing?

        • harrietfordypa

          < At last!! you'll be able to create more cash in part-time at your home on net on laptop computer and you'll be able to earn Profit in same time doing different jobs… Last Monday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail,,,,,……

          ►►►►►►► W­W­W.e­a­s­y­c­a­s­h­1­0­.C­o­M

          ——————————-

        • krinks

          Funny isn’t it how Progressives can call Socialists Conservative with a straight face?

          • Gay Veteran

            no one here called Hitler conservative, merely that Hitler came to power in a conservative coalition

          • krinks

            He was always a socialist.

          • Gay Veteran

            riiiiiiiiiiiiight, and General Electric is a general

          • that_guy

            The politics of 30’s and 40’s Europe was VERY left wing. Hitler himself admitted that National Socialism and Communism were basically the same thing. Maybe you should spend less time being “gay” and more time actually studying up on things you make uneducated comments about on the internet.

            Media Matters is not a library.

          • Gay Veteran

            Media Matters???

            try Der Spiegel:

            from Der Spiegel (and I think the Germans know there own history):

            “…President von Hindenburg had never been terribly convinced that democracy was the way to go. Indeed, the World War I hero and his supporters had long yearned for a strong leader free from parliamentary meddling — and they were especially wary of the Social Democrats [SOCIALISTS], the one party that had thrown all of its support behind the Weimar democracy from the beginning…

            Franz von Papen, who had already had his turn on the chancellor merry-go-round in June, wanted a second chance and beseeched von Hindenburg to give his backing to a coalition of Hitler’s Nazis, independent CONSERVATIVES, and the arch-nationalists from the DNVP. Other von Hindenburg advisors likewise pleaded for the solution, arguing that, by hemming Hitler in among those who had long been in Germany’s political elite, they would be able to control the wannabe dictator. In January 1933, von Hindenburg gave in….”

          • that_guy

            Whatever, sock puppet.

          • Gay Veteran

            whatever? you a Valley Girl?

          • that_guy

            If I was, you’d be jealous of my clothes and hand bags, would you?

          • Gay Veteran

            no, but your dad would be

          • Gay Veteran

            ouch, brilliant retort! not

          • sally_dice
          • Gay Veteran

            “…Hitler himself admitted that National Socialism and Communism were basically the same thing….”

            I don’t think there were any corporations in the USSR. Whereas the big corporations (Krupp, I.G. Farben) prospered under Hitler.

          • that_guy

            So…I guess there are no corporations in socialist or communist countries? A government run corporation is still the government.

            Save your breath, dude. You’ll need it later to blow up your date.

          • Gay Veteran

            were Krupp and I.G. Farben run by the government?

            Save your breath, dude. You’ll need it later to blow up your blow-up doll (female, of course)

          • that_guy

            So…you’ve got nothing?

          • Gay Veteran

            were Krupp and I.G. Farben run by the government? NO

      • VigilanteCaregiver

        No, he came to power during a communist/liberal/socialist battle royale during an economic collapse.

        • Gay Veteran

          oh yeah, no conservatives were involved, ROFLOL

          wow, you’re consistent, consistently WRONG!

          from Der Spiegel (and I think the Germans know there own history):

          “…President von Hindenburg had never been terribly convinced that democracy was the way to go. Indeed, the World War I hero and his supporters had long yearned for a strong leader free from parliamentary meddling — and they were especially wary of the Social Democrats [SOCIALISTS], the one party that had thrown all of its support behind the Weimar democracy from the beginning…

          Franz von Papen, who had already had his turn on the chancellor merry-go-round in June, wanted a second chance and beseeched von Hindenburg to give his backing to a coalition of Hitler’s Nazis, independent CONSERVATIVES, and the arch-nationalists from the DNVP. Other von Hindenburg advisors likewise pleaded for the solution, arguing that, by hemming Hitler in among those who had long been in Germany’s political elite, they would be able to control the wannabe dictator. In January 1933, von Hindenburg gave in….”

          • VigilanteCaregiver

            Took me a few minutes, but I found the article you’re quoting “The Story Behind Hitler’s Rise to Power” published 2008. (Next time, add citations to what you’re quoting.)

            You’re once again taking a lengthy article out of context.

            The identity of what is called conservative in this story usually means in European circles as Nationalists and democrats. Not the same as sharing US conservative ideals. Communists were considered the Left, Social Democrats in the middle. The Free Corps (nationalists) on the Right. Hitler brought together the right and parts of the center to create the National German Workers Party under the ideology of National Socialism.

            The article’s author calls them conservatives as Germany today does have a German Conservative party, and Der Spiegel is obviously left-wing.

            Since you don’t like to research documents, try a well-researched miniseries called “Hitler: The Rise of Evil.” It’s very basic, but a good start.

          • that_guy

            Absolutely correct, but even by todays standards the politics of that era were very much left of center. Even the ones considered “conservative” or right wing.

            Libs don’t want to admit that about the Nazis. It ruins their narrative.

          • Gay Veteran

            from Spartacus International:

            “…In the 1877 General Election in Germany the SDP won 12 seats. This worried Otto von Bismarck, and in 1878 he introduced an anti-SOCIALIST law which banned Social Democratic Party meetings and publications….”

          • Gay Veteran

            Communists were not considered THE left.

            from German Bundestag, The Weimar Republic (1918 – 1933):

            “…the party system of the Weimar Republic showed a remarkable continuity in relation to the imperial system. The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), with its roots in the labouring classes, was the strongest political force from 1919 to 1932…The Centre Party (Zentrum) saw its role as the political representative of the interests of the Catholic population…The German Democratic Party (DDP), a liberal party of the Centre-Left, known from 1930 onwards as the German State Party (DStP), had a great influence on the shaping of the Weimar Constitution and was also represented in most governments in the period up to 1932…

            One of the fiercest opponents of the Republic was the German National People’s Party (DNVP). As the representative of the conservative monarchist camp, it fought the democratic system from the outset. The same applied to the Communist Party of Germany (KPD), which sought the establishment of a Socialist soviet dictatorship modelled on that of the USSR. At the start of the 1930s, the nationalist, racist and anti-Semitic National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP) benefited from the insecurity and social misery that afflicted broad sections of the population during the Great Depression to become the largest party in Parliament in 1932, although it was unable to attain an overall majority….”

      • that_guy

        You don’t realize the government before Hitler was considered a conservative republic. Hitler was a left wing fascist.

        • Gay Veteran

          if that was true then he would have come to power in a left-wing coalition of the Social Democrats and Communists.
          he did NOT

          • that_guy

            wrong again.

          • Gay Veteran

            where’s your proof?
            put up or shut up

          • that_guy

            I believe another poster here tried to educate you and all they got was *crickets* Why should I bother with a derpster like you?

          • Gay Veteran

            nice excuse for not being able to defend your own positions.
            now run along

      • Crystal7852

        If you are looking for extra cash on the side averaging $50 to $300 daily for freelancing on your computer from home for few h each day then read more here…

    • T.

      At the End of the Church where we are now – This is the method used by satanic influenced and possessed men, by means of ungodly and evil Laws.

      Psalms 94:20 – Shall the throne of iniquity have fellowship with thee, which frameth mischief by a Law? 21 – They gather themselves together against the soul of the righteous, and condemn the innocent blood.

      The righteous and the innocent blood are – christians.

    • dcfla

      YUP! & this is WHY I SAY.>>GO Ahead & INDENTIFY YOURSELVES, DO NOT THINK YOU ARE IN MY WAY! GET UP Front, Loud & Proud, and FIRST IN LINE!! GO ahead..Please!! SO Hypocritical! Don’t say this & Don’t say that, But wait, THEY CAN DO & SAY what ever in HELL THEY WANT?! UH NO! WORKS “BOTH” WAYS! They’re all too dumb to GET THAT! Hitler got AWAY with HIS ATROCITIES because there were SO MANY who Allowed themselves to TURN AWAY< be INTIMIDATED, OR JUST TOO STUPID & VOID OF "ANY" COMMON SENSE..Just as we Now HAVE TODAY! In ANOTHER REIGN/REGIME! Think there has NOT been ANOTHER GENOCIDE? THERE HAS! Been going on & ALLOWED & ASSISTED BY OUR CURRENT "REGIME"! While NO ONE has Done a thing to SAVE THOSE who Have been SLAUGHTERED, MURDERED, ACROSS THE ENTIRE GLOBE! WE "USED" To be the NATION that would ANSWER THE CALL to Save these People, these CHRISTIANS, who have been totally Left to be persecuted & Murdered & yes, even WORSE…BUT HEY< NO BOOTS ON THE GROUND!! NO! The AFTER Effect of THAT IS, the TERRORISTS & BARBARIANS, NO MATTER "WHAT" THEY "CALL" themselves, they ARE ALL THE SAME! WITH ONE GOAL! WORLD DOMINATION…and IT here Gave them Everything THEY NEEDED TO GAIN Power, Money, and DO THEIR BARBARIC ACTS..while Seizing Territories and CLAIMING Victory over Entire SOCIETIES! What "IT" has ALLOWED & ASSISTED has Not just been OUR DESTRUCTION, BUT THEIRS TOO! OUR OWN NARCISSISTIC NERO/HITLER/CASTRO…& ON & ON & ON! DIVIDE & CONQUER.Yet as in the REIGN OF HITLER & “OTHERS” No One WISE Enough or STRONG Enough or IN NUMBERS LARGE ENOUGH…CARE, But YOU WILL< & WHEN YOU DO?? IT'LL be TOO LATE!

  • rmc9

    “… I searched for a man among them who would repair the wall and stand in the gap before Me on behalf of the land so that I might not destroy it, but I found no one. So I poured out My indignation on them and consumed them with the fire of My fury. I have brought their actions down on their own heads This is the declaration of the Lord GOD” Ezekiel 22;31

  • Avner

    Say what you want to say anyway. Hell with them. People need to DEFY them at every opportunity.

    • Gay Veteran

      amen

  • Gay Veteran

    I totally oppose any Hate Speech law.

    The only exception to free speech should be threats, slander, and the proverbial screaming of “fire” in a theater which is not on fire.

    • Syrin

      You should even be allowed to do that since no one would actually be harmed by this often quoted example.

      • Gay Veteran

        that person would be interrupting the quiet enjoyment of the movie by those who purchased tickets, so distrubing the peace

        • Jodie Lynn Gaeta

          Not to mention causing bodily harm , possibly, from the resulting stampede to the exit

          • Gay Veteran

            very true

      • VigilanteCaregiver

        The example comes from an era before the invention of the autonomous fire alarm.

        You’re right – shouting fire in a theater today is kinda ridiculous.

    • afchief

      Except when someone sees a “rump ranger” in the men’s bathroom someone should yell, “cover your butts!!!!

      • Gay Veteran

        thanks for contributing to the discussion about Hate Speech.

        • afchief

          That’s not hate. That’s a fact!

          • Gay Veteran

            thanks for contributing to the discussion about Hate Speech.

          • afchief

            Saying homosexuality is a sin is not hate speech. It is truth!!!

          • Gay Veteran

            ..thanks for contributing to the discussion about Hate Speech.

          • afchief

            Your welcome!

          • VigilanteCaregiver

            ..thanks for contributing to the discussion about Hate Speech.

        • IsReal

          Are you sure you oppose hate speech laws? Are you being honest with yourself?

          • Gay Veteran

            yes.
            yes.
            are you being honest with yourself?

    • VigilanteCaregiver

      Hypocrite. Every time someone won’t bow to your ideals – you do threaten, slander, and demean them!

      • Gay Veteran

        threaten? jeez, go back and read some of your own posts!
        slander? the truth is not slander
        demean? yeah, if someone deserves it

  • akcalo

    That’s what I’ve been saying. This whole thing with Trump for example. They’re trying to make it offensive to say ANYTHING against ILLEGAL immigration. That’s why they’re making this massive assault. Look at the Confederate Flag, now it will be the American Flag. They’re actually tearing down monuments! What country is this anymore??!!

    • felicityva

      Wait for it. Eventually they will ban the alphabet, the source of all words.

      • Larry

        It’s all part of their agenda to dumb us all down, including the future generations.

    • Gay Veteran

      those who believe in southern heritage so much should have stood up when the Klan started using the confederate flag

  • Arizona

    AMERICA has TWO groups in it now,The ones who will survive the WAR,and the ONES who will die in the WAR,(about (90%),this country has poisoned the world,THEIR AWAKE NOW,and when the attack starts,THE GREAT CULLING will begin,the chinese will come out on top,and america is still sound asleep,to drunk to care,ITS all about to change,HOPE your close to the LORD,if you leave without him,you won’t like were your going to end up at,FOR a thousand years,but satan will…………

  • felicityva

    Just point me in the direction of the nearest FEMA camp because what I’m thinking right now may be considered a hate crime against lawyers.

  • Alleged Comment

    This is ironic because as soon as you are against free speech as hate speech that is HATE SPEECH, and thus, by their own admission cannot be allowed.

  • Drina2

    The purpose of the First Amendment is to protect offensive speech. If offensive speech is not protected, then there is no reason for the First Amendment.

    In the Soviet Union, Stalin and his Communists also believed in free speech—as long as the speech was in line with what the Communists allowed to be spoken. If you said something “offensive”, there were severe consequences for offending the Communist (extreme left) ideology.

    Of course, this is exactly what the progressives (also known as leftists) want in the United States.

    • Gay Veteran

      here’s some clues:

      democrats=republicans

      “liberals”=”conservatives”

      Clinton=Bush=Obama

  • Besides the oppressive hate speech laws the other thing that’s coming is tax by the mile. 28 states are planning to rob people for each mile they drive. One method is to require a GPS tracker in every car.

  • Charlie

    How would someone write a satire, especially a moralizing satire, without offending a particular group? Can comedians not satirize overweight persons any more? Anyone could say they take offense to anything, so maybe no one should say anything—including our awful media outlets!

  • GetReal4U2

    I’m glad my state dropped “affirmative action” years ago…oooops…I might have gotten flagged…(wink)

  • Larry

    I do not feel very optimistic about our future. My gut feeling tells me that we will lose all our rights if we do not unite to fight for the American spirit. It seems to me that the American public will end up learning a hard lesson on what it means to have freedom, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

  • barbarakelly

    They keep say they—–who is they????Gov., Gays.??, muslims,???

  • IsReal

    This means we’re headed back to the 1950’s with golly gee and very polite speech. We’ll all have to train ourselves to speak of all people respectfully.

    • Gay Veteran

      1950s? the decade when Black protestors for civil rights were routinely beaten

      • IsReal

        I’m referring to speech since this article’s focused on it. People used polite respectful language in the 1950’s in general. I know because I watched the film Pleasantville ;-)

        • Gay Veteran

          “…As a war veteran, you were involved in murdering innocent citizens of another nation….”

          uh, no, but odd you automatically thought that.

          “…I’ve learned hypocrisy is an inherent trait of self-righteous morally correct liberals….”

          agree with you there, conservatives actually believe their BS.

          “…You should repent and turn to God for salvation because your title as a war veteran isn’t a ticket to heaven, nor is your labeling yourself as such going to do much for you in eternity.”

          you should go F yourself with a rusty chainsaw, pharisee

  • IsReal

    Interesting, so I posted something here that was non-offensive and this site censored me! I wrote that Christians are being targeted this way for future extermination.

  • Sean Stout

    Obama did promise he was going to fundamentally transform America into Amerika. This country got what it wanted. Be careful what you ask for, you just might get it. Now communists infest every square inch of power in this country….from the presidency to the Supreme Court to the Marxist Media to academia. They are a small minority, but are in all key strategic places of power to control the majority. Talk about tyranny.

  • krinks

    Hate Speech Laws were how Hitler was initially arrested and how he galvanized support for his party. The Nazis then used Hate Speech Laws to hide the Holocaust to the bitter end. Were not truly free unless we are free to disagree.

  • David Swanson

    Constitutional law is supreme law of the land. If they want to change free speech, congress must amend or repeal the 1st amendment. No statute law written can suspend constitutional law. It is forbidden and unenforceable. This applies to all statutes, public laws, policy, codes, orders or whatever right down the line. My opinion.

  • afchief

    Well said! Where have you been lately? I used to read a lot of your posts with that idiot “gary2” that were spot on. You have a lot of good insight into what is happening in our country today.

  • Gay Veteran

    ROFLOL
    “liberal” = “conservative”

    • VigilanteCaregiver

      Gay Veteran = totalitarian

      • Gay Veteran

        project much?

  • Gay Veteran

    you need to study some German history, because he did NOT come to power in a coalition with the Social Democrats or Communists.

    “…Papen’s policies failed on another front: His authoritarian rule alienated his supporters, and he too was forced to resign. He then made common cause with Hitler, persuading President Hindenburg to appoint Hitler chancellor and himself vice-chancellor. He promised the president that he would restrain Hitler’s worst tendencies and that a majority of the Cabinet would go to non-Nazis. As Hindenburg’s current chancellor could no longer gain a majority in the Reichstag, and Hitler could bring together a larger swath of the masses and a unified right/conservative/nationalist coalition, the president gave in. In January 1933, Hitler was named chancellor of Germany….”

  • Indiana Conservative

    Federal hate crimes legislation was signed into law in October 2009.How soon we forget

    • Gay Veteran

      what was the rationale for that law involving actual violence? too often local authorities REFUSED to bring the violent criminals to justice

  • VigilanteCaregiver

    The 1st Amendment says you have the right of free speech – not the right to be heard.

    Time to thoroughly practice this.

    • Gay Veteran

      WOW, finally got something right!

  • Gay Veteran

    If Hitler was on the left then why didn’t he come to power in a coalition with the Social Democrats [socialists]???

    In fact, Hitler prohibited the party in 1933 under the Enabling Act and Social Democratic officials were imprisoned, killed or went into exile.

  • Gay Veteran

    btw, here’s some clues:

    democrats=republicans

    “liberals”=”conservatives”

    Clinton=Bush=Obama

  • Annie8749

    If you could use extra income averaging 50-300 dollars every day for doing jobs from your house for few hours a day then read more here…

  • Gay Veteran

    project much?

  • VigilanteCaregiver

    Exactly – the conservatives (that the author is wrongly calling them) were actually nationalists. They didn’t share the same ideology as US Conservatives. Calling them liberals by US standards is very accurate.

  • Patricia56988

    If you are looking for extra payment from $50-$300 each day for freelancing on your computer from home for 3-4 h daily then check this out…

  • Sonokar

    I’m a white man and I am sick and tired of being called “privileged”. I wasn’t born a racist but I’m sure being conditioned as such. Nonwhites need to man up. Just because you are an underachiever and lazy does not make it MY FAULT! F**K!

  • Gay Veteran

    odd that the Nazis were such socialists but the big corporations (Krupp, I.G. Farben) prospered.

    • that_guy

      Not proof.

      • Gay Veteran

        brilliant retort! not

  • Gay Veteran

    “…Hitler came to power by turning the working class, unemployed, and academic elite against the CONSERVATIVE republic….”

    and those conservatives persuade President Hindenburg to allow Hitler in a conservative coalition to rule Germany

    • that_guy

      Really? Maybe conservative in an very left wing political environment. That’s like comparing Hillary to Obama. One of them would have been called “conservative” in 1933 Germany. If you actually knew the difference in the political spectrum it might sink in, but you don’t seem very educated and are stick on “presentism” as your gauge of the politics of early 20th century Europe.

      Even today conservative in Europe or Australia is not a center-right or even far-right politician– not even centrist would describe them. Sorry, but it means left of center just like Hitler and Stalin. You leftards need to give it up.

      Don’t you know anything other than your sexual preference and the fact that you are a veteran of the local butt darts league?

      • Gay Veteran

        maybe you should provide us with info from your Master’s thesis on European politics in the early 1900s.

        butt darts? what, you get hit in the head?

  • Gay Veteran

    awwwww, poor Syrin, you STILL don’t get it, do you?

    “liberals” = “conservatives”

    democrats=republicans

    Clinton=Bush=Obama

  • Gay Veteran

    “If the demonic elite allow CIA controlled ISIS/Muslims to take over here….”

    ROFLOL

  • Guest

    I’m watching PBS, a program called Black Indians: An American Story. Most of their stories have probably been heard by all of us — namely that not too long ago in American history both Blacks and Native Americans were treated like second class citizens (and much worse).

    There were blatant laws on the books that expressly prohibited “coloreds” from mingling with whites, and even where laws were not specific, dark people were most definitely still frowned upon by goodly whites. This of course made the lives of these people quite restrictive, but the majority, those in power, did not care that the “undesireables” had to live under such oppressive laws.

    My somewhat existential question is this: if we whites didn’t mind oppressive, restrictive laws that severely inconvenienced other people, then do we have a foot to stand on now that it looks like WE are going to be the ones who have to learn to follow restrictive, oppressive laws that we don’t like?

  • Gay Veteran

    yeah, weren’t no mobs (lynch) in the conservative south pre-1964

  • VigilanteCaregiver

    You are. The only difference in ideology between and Nazi and you is you’re against your own nation.

    • Gay Veteran

      I’m against our current fascist government. Are you?

      • VigilanteCaregiver

        For all I know, you’re part of this usurper federal government.

        • Gay Veteran

          I work for USDA, but I oppose empire abroad and the national security/surveillance state at home

          • VigilanteCaregiver

            That explains aboslutely everything.

          • Gay Veteran

            yes, and let me repeat:

            I oppose empire abroad and the national security/surveillance state at home

  • dale ruff

    This article is very deceptive: the list of “microaggressions” which is given to new faculty is from an article in the American Psychologist. None is given as a rule but as example of how ordinary language often conveys stereotypes when talking with a person of color.

    Many of the examples in this article are taken out of context.
    For example, it is not a microaggression to ask where are you from unless you ask it of a person born in the US and by from you mean which country, which conveys the impression you see the person as a foreigner.

    Another example is telling a Latino-American they speak good English,which in the above list omits the fact that the statement is only insulting if you say it to someone who is an American.

    Context is everything. This article suggests a list from a magazine article which is meant to help new faculty avoid making comments which would create discomfort to a person of color, when talking to them, is anything but a teaching tool; it also omits many of the details which make the suggestions reasonable. Telling a person from abroad who keeps apologizing for their English “Your English is quite good,” is far different from telling an Asian-American or African-American “You speak good English.”

    The one comment on the list I feel is misunderstood is “There is no such thing as race.”

    This is a scientific fact, confirmed by geneticists. It does not mean there are no historical effects of the belief in race (such as discrimination, oppression, etc) nor does it deny cultural differences.

    There IS no such thing as race but there are many different cultures and conditions which create differences, some good, some bad, among people.

    For the most part, thinking about the assumptions or our comments concerning race or when used when talking to people of race is a good exercise.

    As for hate speech, it is not protected because it incites discrimination and violence, which harms the rights of the person or people targeted.
    Hate speech laws in nations that have them only punish language which incites discrimination or violence, as acts designed to curtail the rights of others. Hate speech is the prelude to hate crimes, and those who use hate speech (Mexican immigrants “are rapists.” “I have to kill you because you black people are raping our women.”) are initiated acts of destroying the rights of others.

    Tolerance of intolerance is repressive of human rights

  • krinks

    National Socialist. ‘Nuff said child.

  • Dale Barry

    I’m sure this comment will hit the data page. I’ve been actively hitting their trolls for years. If you don’t stand up for something you will fell for anything. That statement supports some truth however the things you stand for are of great consequence. It cost most of the apostles their lives but whats its worth in the scheme of things. Fight the good fight!