The UN Plan For Running The World: Global Carbon Taxes, Global Safety Nets And A One World Green Economy

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

Did you know that the UN has a plan for running the world and it is right out in the open?  It is called “sustainable development”, but it is far more comprehensive than it sounds.  The truth is that the UN plan for running the world would dramatically alter nearly all forms of human activity.  A 204 page report on “sustainable development” entitled “Working Towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy, A United Nations System-Wide Perspective” has been published in advance of the upcoming Rio + 20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro.  You can read the full report right here.  It envisions a vast system of global carbon taxes, massive global safety nets and the implementation of a one world green economy.  Many of those that are pushing “sustainable development” on a global level believe that they are doing it for the good of the planet.  In fact, the 204 page report mentioned above even says that the transition “to a green economy requires a fundamental shift in the way we think and act” but that it will be worth it in the end.  What people need to understand is that throughout modern history tyranny has almost always been initially introduced by people that believed that they had “good intentions”.  No matter how much friendly language the UN uses in their reports, the truth is that what they are promoting is an insidious agenda of absolute tyranny on a global scale.


The upcoming Rio + 20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro comes 20 years after the original 1992 UN Earth Summit that adopted “Agenda 21“.  This new summit will be about renewing that commitment to “sustainable development” and moving that agenda forward.

A lot of people out there will not be alarmed by any of this because they know that the UN does not have the power to impose any of their goals on them right now.  But that is not the game that the UN is playing.

The UN is not playing a short-term political game.  The UN is ready to play their game for decades if necessary.  They will just keep coming back with conference after conference and treaty after treaty until they get what they want.

At the moment, the United Nations is operating as something of a “soft global government”.  The UN does not have the power to coerce nations to do their bidding yet, so they rely mostly on cooperation.  The UN will “take what they can get” right now, and they know that someday they will eventually have the power to turn their recommendations into mandates.

One of the things that the UN would love to implement is a global carbon tax scheme.  The power to tax is the power to control, and if the UN is ever given the power to tax the entire globe they will at that point become much more than a “soft global government”.

Right now, the UN is proposing a global carbon tax scheme that would come to as much as 0.6 percent of GDP for participating nations.  The following comes directly from the report….

If, for example, industrialized countries were to use carbon taxes or auctioned emissions permits to reach the GHG emission targets they pledged in the Cancun Agreements, they could raise as much as 0.6 per cent of their GDP or about US $250 billion in revenues per year by 2020 (OECD 2012). In addition, other forms of carbon finance, PES, green stimulus funds, micro-finance, social responsibility investment funds, green bonds and other local financial innovations have emerged in recent years and can open up the space for large-scale green financing. To further scale up the financing for a green economy, public-private innovative financing mechanisms are needed to tap institutional investors’ capital.

The report also envisions the transfer of trillions of dollars a year from wealthy countries to poorer countries.  The UN feels that this is necessary for a couple of reasons.

First of all, the UN says that developing nations do not have the resources to pay for the “green infrastructure” that is needed to participate in the new green economy and therefore wealthier nations should pay for it.

Secondly, the UN believes that massive global wealth distribution is needed in order to bring about global “equity”.

Does that sound like radical socialism to you?

It should.

The UN report also speaks of a “social protection floor”.  So now instead of just supporting tens of millions of Americans that are relying on “the safety net”, U.S. taxpayers will also be expected to contribute to a global safety net that hundreds of millions of people could end up relying on.

The UN also envisions a one world “green economy” where “freer trade” is accompanied by environmental responsibility.  The following comes from the UN report mentioned above….

Freer trade should be tied to important human values, welfare goals and inclusive growth, assisting those developing countries that are marginalized in the global trading system. Trade policy also needs to be accompanied by policies in both the social and environmental spheres.

In this one world “green economy”, prices for things like food and energy will go up dramatically for Americans.  The UN is pushing a concept known as “full-cost pricing”.  What that means is that the “full social and environmental costs” of producing goods and services must be passed on to you so that you will be “motivated” to change your behavior.  The following is another excerpt from the UN report….

Full-cost pricing, which includes full social and environmental costs, is an essential tool for changing investments as well as consumption and production patterns and for motivating innovations.

For example, the UN really does not like that Americans drive their cars so much.  They believe that it is very bad for the environment.  So according to the UN it is going to be necessary to raise the price of gasoline dramatically.

The UN report also envisions massive changes to the global financial system.  This new UN report on “sustainable development” is just the latest in a long string of UN reports that sees an emerging role for “Special Drawing Rights” to play in the international financial system….

Efforts need to be made to explore the potential for an innovative use of Special Drawing Rights, other international reserve assets and pools of concentrated assets to serve the aim of financing green economy investments with attractive social as well as private returns and increasing the provision of global public goods.

The United Nations also wants to change the way that you eat.  This new UN report says that we all need to transition to “sustainable diets”.  For one thing, that would mean a lot less meat for you and your family.

The United Nations also wants to reform public education.  The new UN report says that “climate change education is a particularly important part of quality education”.

Do you want “climate change education” to be pounded into the heads of your kids when they go to school?

If not, you better start paying attention to what the UN is trying to do.

Also, the new UN report speaks of the need for “universal access to reproductive health care and family planning”.  In other words, the United Nations wants to make sure that there is an abortion clinic in every corner of the globe.

As I have written about so many times before, the elitists that are pushing “sustainable development” on a global scale love death.  They believe that humans are the primary cause of global warming, and they also believe that if there were a lot less humans running around that there would be a lot less climate change.

Sadly, there are a whole lot of people out there these days that are advocating very strict population control measures for the entire globe.  They believe that they are trying to “save the planet”, but the truth is that what they are really doing is promoting global tyranny.

Unfortunately, there are now millions upon millions of “true believers” in this “sustainable development” agenda and it is being taught in almost every major college and university in the developed world.

The United Nations is going to keep coming back again and again with this agenda.  They will advance it an inch at a time if they have to.  The elitists that are promoting this will not get tired and they will not give up.

In fact, UN officials have even been drafting an environmental constitution for the world that is intended to eventually supersede all existing national laws.

This document contains a “preamble” like the U.S. Constitution does, it is organized into “articles” like the U.S. Constitution is, and it even sets forth procedures for “amending” the document just like the U.S. Constitution does.

The working title of this document is “Draft International Covenant on Environment and Development” and you can read the entire thing right here.

Most people out there have absolutely no idea how serious the United Nations is about all of this.  The United Nations truly believes that it should be running the world and ushering humanity into a new era of peace, equality and “green prosperity”.

The environment is going to be used as an excuse over and over to further strengthen global institutions such as the United Nations.

If the American people are not really careful, one day our children will wake up in a world where soldiers in blue helmets are standing on our street corners.

It is not here yet, but it is coming.

You better stand up and be heard while you still can.

  • BeenThere

    Maybe so. Certainly the UN is up to no good. But on the other hand look at what the big co-operations so loved by the right wing have done to the world and society. I think it is a case of do you want the Devil in red or do you want him in blue?

    • MargaretBartley

      It’s not a matter choosing either the UN or the corporations. The corporations ARE the UN. The same people that run the corporations also run the UN. Offering a choice between the UN and corproations is like offering a choice between being poked in the eye or in the ear.

      The alternative to globalization, under the auspices of both the UN and giant, multinational corporations, is more personal autonomy and responsibility, less reliance upon money, living lower on the food chain, thoughtfully removing activities from the money arena that can better be done by people organized in local barter/co-op/self-help groups, and more transparency in governance, both corporate and political.

    • knightowl77

      you are comparing a corporation doing things they shouldn’t, with the UN making its own laws and regulations that will subject every person on the earth to comply with????

      There simply is no comparison…the corp can be punished, the executives can be imprisoned, the company fines or broken up…

      Once the UN is in charge, we are all slaves. If you do not see the danger or the difference, then I hope you are happy in your chains….

      • Gay Veteran

        “…the corp can be punished, the executives can be imprisoned, the company fines or broken up….”

        HaHaHaHahaHa, you mean like the banksters?

    • bluezguise

      It’s hard to compare the damage a worldwide organization that extracts trillions of dollars from member states and has the de facto power of creating and enforcing laws with a corporation, regardless of its size. If you don’t like Home Depot, you can trot across the street to Lowes. If you don’t like whatt the UN is doing to local property rights and states’ sovereignty…tough!

    • Chris S

      “The big corporations” are on the exact same side as the UN! Are you really that blind? Do you think the UN’s “Carbon Taxes” and other schemes will affect companies like GE? or Boeing? they will get “exemptions” and “carbon credit allowances”… This is an AGENDA BY THE CORPORATIONS AND BANKS using a QUASI-government agency (the UN) the put a total control grid in place, for YOU, the SHEEP. Not the multi-national corporations who are actually responsible for 80% of the world’s “carbon emissions.” it’s hypocrisy at it’s finest, and they get away with it, because of MASS IGNORANCE.

  • Kevin

    In the end this is a remake of a very old movie. For thousands of years the chosen reaped the rewards of the resources while the masses were denied access to the same. The King had the wealth and therefore the food and lived very well while the serfs toiled in the fields and existed on what remained. The social structure was well established and accepted by the uneducated ignorant masses. Today people are sufficiently educated to reject the former status quo. They now need to believe that their sacrifice depriving them of the comforts available are needed for the good of their global fellows. The powerful and wealthy now use voluntary compliance far more often than the sword but in the end they make as much personal sacrifice as the royalty of ancient Greece, Rome and Egypt.

    The tools and title of tyrants change. The desire and capacity to use whatever means available to control and ultimately enslave others is timeless.

  • mark

    Please tell me what money the UN plans to take? The only money we have is what Uncle Ben prints. I suppose they could take our bankers and wall street types. Most of the corporations are global and they make most of their stuff in third world nations already. They could steal Ipads and give them out to the third world nations. Are they going to steal the food that farmers in the US grow. Good luck, if they were to try that I think that most farm equipment would just sit in the shed. Since they are going green they can’t steal natural resources since mining is not allowed. They can’t steal cows since raising them will be a no-no. I guess they could enslave lawyers since we have more than enough to spare in this country.

  • Stunned

    Wow. Your interpretation of the passage below is utterly terrifying.

    “Also, the new UN report speaks of the need for “universal access to reproductive health care and family planning”. In other words, the United Nations wants to make sure that there is an abortion clinic in every corner of the globe.”

    Again. Terrifying and irrational.

    But then, so is the rationale that refuses to include safe sex and condom education in high schools, while happily increasing the capacity of day care centers inside those schools – day care centers for the students’, not the teachers’, babies.

    This head-in-the-sand mentality, often paraded as morality, is an obtuse refusal to acknowledge the reality of sexually active young people.

    The folks so ardently disgusted by the multitudes who rely on America’s “safety net” of public assistance are the same people contributing to the net’s ever-increasing population.

    Since when does “access to reproductive health care and family planning” translate to “an abortion clinic on every corner?”

    The presumptuous interpretation is as irresponsible – and terrifying – as
    abstinence-only sex education in schools.

    • KW

      Get real! Read Agenda 21 and tell me that the UN’s goal isn’t depopulation. Planned parenthood is about abortion and they do want it to be on demand. People like you and them don’t value the sanctity of life and think all of this is justifiable. Secular atheism and humanism leads to atrocities, mass murder and tyranny. It’s sick. No different than eugenics and very dangerous.
      Let the UN try it here. They will be crushed.

    • LiberalsNEEDnotAPPLY

      Hey “Stunned”, you sound like you think you’re a smart person. You are sadly mistaken LOL. You are a left-wing immoral liberal. A young person who exercises sexual control is a sophisticated member of the human species. A person who “screws” multiple partners and must always be sexually active from a young age is an animal. Our power to reason is what separates us from animals. Before I had my cat spayed all the “tomboys” would come around when she was in heat to make more kittens. Sounds like our liberals are in heat and can’t control it with sophistication and mind power. Liberals are primal and unsophisticated beings in their thinking which is the opposite of what they falsely pride themselves on. They want to give out as many government programs as possible to keep blacks and other minorities dumbed-down and dependent. Liberals are a very offensive, smelly, selfish, arrogant bunch. Thanks to the conservatives that many black families are now succeeding and able to afford to live anywhere they choose to live, where in the past, was reserved for whites only. You liberals are not fooling anyone anymore, we’re all on to you and the minorities are no longer buying your lies as they are much smarter than you give them credit for and have access to technology to read about your scams and indecencies. You liberals just insult the intelligence of all those you consider “below you” for your own self-interests, NOT because you want to help the poor as you proclaim. As the old, but very effective, saying goes

      — a conservative wants to TEACH a capable man to fish so he eats for a lifetime, thus becomes INDEPENDENT, a liberal wants to GIVE a capable a man a fish so he eats for a day, thus remains DEPENDENT and under your control as your reap the rewards of someone else’s labor through deceit just like the masters did back in slave days. Sad, but true.

    • ” “Also, the new UN report speaks of the need for “universal access to reproductive health care and family planning”. In other words, the United Nations wants to make sure that there is an abortion clinic in every corner of the globe.”

      Again. Terrifying and irrational.”

      What the ************* is “[t]errifying and irrational” about “speak[ing] of the need for universal access to reproductive health care and family planning”?

      I sure am glad that we, unlike a lot of poor b******* living in other parts of the world or who lived in other times of history, have access to it!

  • Huey
  • Huey

    never mind

  • AngryCitizen

    To: United, Nations; Whom it may concern

    Dear Sirs:

    I am a bit confused regarding the marking o your military personnel helmets…

    – On the side of the helmet, there are two letter which identify who’s wearing this helmet: a UN soldier/officer.

    – But on the front of the helmet, there is a weird-looking target image. I would suggest that the UN put a good old **************** on their troops’ helmets: it will make it a bit easier on our American *************.

    Thank you.

    Yours very sincerely,
    We, the 48% of American households who have guns at home.

  • LC

    “Global Warming” and “Climate Change” are just this century’s version of “throw a few more virgins into the volcano so that it won’t erupt this year.” Of course, I’ll be the “priests” made sure no real virgins were thrown into the volcano, and dead “virgins” tell no tales. If the UN actually cared about the environment, we’d focus all of the world’s resources on fixing Fukushima, but since they don’t, you know they are really after the one world government control grid. Very simple to see.

    • Gay Veteran

      then why is the northern range of plants moving further and further north?

  • Chris

    As I have written about so many times before, the elitists that are pushing “sustainable development” on a global scale love death. They believe that humans are the primary cause of global warming, and they also believe that if there were a lot less humans running around that there would be a lot less climate change.

    Actually Michael I doubt they believe humans are responsible but in Global Warming/Climate Change they have found an excellent way to promote their global population reduction strategy and grab more control. Whether it is true or not doesn’t matter to them, it’s a very useful tool.

    Great article though. Thanks.

  • Benjik

    “US comeuppance as it defends itself against UN human rights complaint”

  • The U.N. is the greatest threat to liberty that exists today. A treaty needs only the president’s signature and 67 senators to have the same force of law as our Constitution. We have bans on DDT and freon, for example because of treaties we’ve signed, even though these chemicals have never been proved to be harmful. Agenda 21 is much more dangerous and will result in an international takeover of our country. Tell your congressman to get us out of this wasteful, immoral, hypocritical, tryrannical organization!

  • Linda

    The UN already sucks up multi billions in dollars from the United States and other countries. Why would any country agree to yet another revenue sucking law? I suggest that the terrorists hit the wrong buildings on 9/11. Sounds harsh, I know, however, the UN has not solved a problem in all the years it has been around, and has caused more problems. I think if Obama is allowed to stay on, that he and all the left wing radicals with which he has infiltrated the government through appointment will destroy this country, through their own agenda, and also by abettign the UN.

  • Steve

    This is not the complete list; it was taken from the 45 Communist goals that found their way down the halls of our great Capitol back in 1963.

    Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963 Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, January 10, 1963 .

    3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

    15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

    26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.” 

    (Leviticus 20:13If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.)

    27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.”
    30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
    31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

    Luke 10:18And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.
    In ancient Hebrew the word for lightning is barack, the word for heaven or the
    heights is bama and to connect the words either an “a” or an “o” is used.

    “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” – Barack Hussein Obama – Audacity of Hope

    2 Thessalonians 2:3 (King James Version)
    3Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

    Political Correctness a term first seen in Mao’s Little Red Book, a communist engendered abomination that is instituting censorship little by little.

    “If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”- George Washington

    Carl Marx, once wrote that, the goal of the Communists was to quote,. “enter into men’s minds and cast God down from his throne.”

    Matthew 12:31Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.


    In ancient Babylon their economy was based on usury.
    “If you lend money to one of my people among you who is needy, do not be like a moneylender; charge him no interest. Exodus 22:25
    Hath given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase: shall he then live? he shall not live: he hath done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon him. Ezekiel 18:13
    Usury is unlawful; expressly prohibited by GOD!
     Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution clearly states that only the Congress can print and coin money! 

    The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped thru congress during the Christmas break with the majority of it’s members absent. 

    The Federal Reserve is self serving and privately owned in violation to the Constitution, charging interest on illegally printed money. Money printed from nothing!
    In America On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. Five months later A UNITED STATES PRESIDENT, PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY was MURDERED BY COMMUNIST! 

    Our own US Congress voted themselves a raise. (But vetoed a raise for those on Social Security) A member of Congress only have to be in Congress one time to receive a pension that is more than $15,000 per month. And most are now equal to being millionaires plus.  If some one in the military stays  in for 20 years (providing that they are not killed in combat before that) and gets out as an E-7, they may receive a pension of $2,000 per month, and the very people who placed them in harm’s way receives a pension of $15,000 per month.

    “If you lend money to one of my people among you who is needy, do not be like a moneylender; charge him no interest. Exodus 22:25
    Hath given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase: shall he then live? he shall not live: he hath done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon him. Ezekiel 18:13
    Usury is unlawful; expressly prohibited by GOD!
    In ancient Babylon their priest sacrificed babies to their gods baal, and molech.  
    In America the communist under their socialist programs have sacrificed over 50 million American babies to their god satan!
    Leviticus 20:2-5
    2Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel , Whosoever he be of the children of Israel , or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel , that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones.
    3And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name.
    4And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man, when he giveth of his seed unto Molech, and kill him not:
    5Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people.
    Luke 22:35-36 Then Jesus asked them, “When I sent you without purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?” “Nothing,” they answered. 36 He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.
    Jeremiah 50:16Cut off the sower from Babylon, and him that handleth the SICKLE in the time of harvest: for fear of the oppressing sword they shall turn every one to his people, and they shall flee every one to his own land.
    Jeremiah 50:23How is the HAMMER OF THE WHOLE EARTH CUT ASUNDER AND BROKEN! how is Babylon become a desolation among the nations!
    Jeremiah 50:14 “ Put yourselves in array against Babylon all around, All you who bend the bow; Shoot at her, spare no arrows, For she has sinned against the LORD.

    All nations compassed me about: but in the name of the LORD will I destroy them. Psalm 118:10

    “The thing that separates the American Christian from every other person on earth is the fact that he would rather die on his feet, than live on his knees!”. George Washington

      2 Timothy 2:15   Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. 

    Jeremiah 48: 10Cursed be he that doeth the work of the LORD deceitfully, and cursed be he that keepeth back his sword from blood.

    Revelation 18:21 And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying , Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down , and shall be found no more at all.



  • “The UN Plan For Running The World: Global Carbon Taxes, Global Safety Nets And A One World Green Economy”

    Rather “Ruining” than “Running”, don’t you think?

  • Steve

    Mention the Federal Reserve (FED) and most people, including Americans, will think that you are talking about the financial arm of the US government.

    That assumption, however, would be well off the mark.

    The Federal Reserve is in fact a private company.

    Many Americans also believe that the FED is part of their Constitution.

    However, that assumption is also far from true. In fact, Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution actually outlawed such an entity from ever existing –

    ‘only Congress shall have the power to create money and regulate the value thereof’.

    In stark contrast to this statement, the Federal Reserve Bank is owned and run by private individuals and international bankers.

    These international bankers have the power, through the United States Treasury, to print money by simply adding ink to worthless pieces of paper.

    What is more, they also control it’s value and even loan it to the US’ and other governments around the world, charging interest for the privilege.

    This ability affords the Federal Reserve huge amounts of power, despite the fact that their very existence violates the US Constitution.

    With that in mind is the Federal Reserve the greatest, and most overt, financial crime of all time?

    The Federal Reserve was originally begun with approximately 300 individuals and banks backing it.

    Each bought a number of shares at a cost of $100 each.

    As these shares are never publicly traded one can only wonder how much each is worth today!

    Collectively, the shareholders in the Federal Reserve make up the strongest financial cartel in history.

    Each year the Federal Reserve collects billions of dollars in interest payments alone, distributing the profit between it’s members.

    The Federal Reserve is allowed to print as much money as it chooses yet pays no interest, fees or charges to the US government.

    This ability to literally print as much money as it wants was bestowed upon the FED in 1913, despite it being quite illegal.


    The FED creates money and then lends it to individual, companies and governments throughout the world.

    Through the banking sector they then turn a huge profit by charging interest on these loans.

    The basic tenants of supply and demand dictate that the endless printing of new bank notes will cause inflationary pressures.

    This means that the FED could manipulate the money flow in order to drive up inflation and therefore interest rates.

    Any other organisation with that sort of power would be under constant surveillance in order to ensure that it wasn’t abusing it’s power in order to commit fraud.

    In stark contrast, the FED’s dealings are often concluded behind closed doors and with little to no supervision.


    Back in 1913 there had been many failed attempts to get the Federal Reserve Act through Congress.

    At this point in time the bankers elected to fund Woodrow Wilson’s attempt to gain the presidency of the United Sates, in return for his continuing support of the FED.

    Just before Christmas that year, when most other Senators were away on holidays, one Nelson Alrich managed to get the Federal Reserve Act through with little resistance.

    Nelson Aldrich, incidentally, was a grandfather to the Rockefellers.

    After his election to the Presidency Woodrow Wilson passed the Federal Reserve Act, only to later comment, “I have unwittingly ruined my country”.

    There are a great many commentators who believe that US presidential candidates are now carefully selected and funded by the FED, so that they can guarantee that every new president will be sympathetic to their cause.


    Whilst there may still be some smaller shareholders in the FED, it is believed that the Federal Reserve is owned and controlled primarily by the following Central banks –

    1.  Rothschild Bank of London
    2.  Warburg Bank of Hamburg
    3.  Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
    4.  Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
    5.  Rothschild Bank of Berlin
    6.  Lehman Brothers of New York
    7.  Lazard Brothers of Paris
    8.  Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
    9.  Goldman Sachs of New York
    10. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy


    On June the 4th 1963 one brave man attempted to remedy the situation by stripping the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the government at interest.

    President John F. Kennedy signed an Executive Order – No. 11110 – that instantly gave the U.S. government the right to issue currency without going through the Federal Reserve.

    This was achieved by granting the Treasury the power ‘to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury.’

    In other words, for every ounce of silver held in the U.S. Treasury’s vault, the government could print a certain, and limited, amount of new money.

    Under Executive Order 11110, Kennedy was responsible for introducing around $4.3 billion of notes into circulation.


    Executive Order 11110 could have been a hugely significant turning point in U.S. history.

    In an instant President Kennedy almost consigned the Federal Reserve Bank to oblivion.

    If  silver certificates had continued to be issued then there would soon have been a total lack of demand for Federal Reserve notes as the former were backed by silver and the latter backed by absolutely nothing at all.

    Executive Order 11110 had the potential to slash national debt as no interest would be payable.

    Eventually the government would have repaid all it owed to the Federal Reserve and at that point the Bank would have ceased to serve any kind of useful function.


    Just 5 months later and President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas in what many believe was a grand conspiracy.

    Could Executive Order 11110 have cost Kennedy his life?

    After all, the Executive Order has never repealed by any subsequent U.S. President and could be enacted at any time.

    Why hasn’t any President followed Kennedy’s lead in returning to a monetary system backed by silver?

    Perhaps JFK’s assassination sent out a message that was well understood by his successors?

    Your income is taxed to pay the the Federal Reserve what they charge for printing money that is illegal and unconstitutional in the first place!

    Income taxes are unconstitutional
    Originally income taxes were illegal because the Constitution required all taxes to be apportioned among the states proportional to their populations, not their incomes.
    The 16th Amendment, which permits federal income taxes, was not ratified in the same language by three fourths of the United States as required by Article V of the Constitution and is therefore invalid. The approved wording was different in different states and therefore they ratified different amendments! (“Is Income Tax Un-American and Illegal?”, July and August, 1993, pp. 14-16).
    The courts refuse to cast down the 16th Amendment even though it was not legally ratified.

    The Federal Reserve is also a monopoly–in a country where monopolies are supposed to be illegal.  The IRS deposits people’s income tax checks directly in the Federal Reserve banks–not in the united States Treasury.  Therefore, the IRS, an unconstitutional entity, is merely the collection agency for the international banksters.  Over the years the IRS has become a tool of the elite banking families to financially attack and/or imprison people who expose the Federal Reserve.  It is also a tool used by the D.C. elite to attack people who expose government corruption.