Proposed UN Environmental Constitution For The World Would Establish An Incredibly Repressive System Of Global Governance

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

Most people have no idea that the United Nations has been drafting an environmental constitution for the world that is intended to supersede all existing national laws.  This document has a working title of “Draft International Covenant on Environment and Development” and you can read the entire thing right here.  Work on this proposed world environmental constitution has been going on since 1995, and the fourth edition was issued to UN member states on September 22nd, 2010.  This document is intended to become a permanent binding treaty and it would establish an incredibly repressive system of global governance.  This “covenant”, as it is being called, claims authority over the entire global environment and everything that affects it.  Considering the fact that everything that we do affects the environment in some way, that would mean that this document would become the highest form of law for all human activity.  This proposed UN environmental constitution for the world is incredibly detailed.  The U.S. Constitution only has 7 articles, but the UN document has 79 articles.  If the U.S. eventually ratifies this treaty, any national, state or local laws that conflict with this covenant will be null and void.  This is potentially one of the greatest threats to our national sovereignty that we have ever seen and we need to warn the American people about it.


Essentially what this proposed environmental covenant does is it takes the sustainable development principles underlying Agenda 21 and turns them into global constitutional law.

All parties to this new constitution would be forced to turn their nations into centrally-planned societies where all decisions about everything are evaluated within the framework of sustainable development.

If the United States became a party to this treaty, America would become a paradise for control freaks.  Basic decisions about what you eat, about what you wear, about where you live, about how big a family you can have and about what activities you could engage in on a daily basis would be dictated by the mandates in the global constitution.

If you doubt this, just read the document.

Let’s take a closer look at some of the wording in this proposed constitution for the world….

In documents such as these, drafters have learned to never use the term “global government” because it sets off alarm bells for people.  So they often use the more politically-correct term of “governance”.  On page 36, we are told that proper governance includes the creation of governing institutions on various levels “from the local to the global”….

“Governance is the process of decision-making and the process by which decisions are implemented (or not implemented). It also can be defined as the rational organization of society in order to achieve the objectives emerging from its common concerns emerging from material, economic, historical and cultural foundations and needs. Governance includes the creation and the functioning of institutions and of norms at various levels from the local to the global.”

In the forward to the document, we are told that the covenant is a “living document” that will serve as a blueprint for an international agreement that the authors hope will eventually be adopted by all members of the United Nations….

“The Draft Covenant is a blueprint for an international framework (or umbrella) agreement consolidating and developing existing legal principles related to environment and development. The intention is that it will remain a “living document” until – as is the hope and expectation of those who have been involved in the project – it is adopted as a basis for multilateral negotiations.”

This project was originally focused almost entirely on the environment, but the authors acknowledge that there has been an increased focus on the “social and economic pillars” in this latest edition….

“Special care was taken to update it with respect to the ‘social and economic pillars’ and thereby avoid falling into the trap of concentrating solely on the ‘environmental pillar’.”

In the preamble we are told that a “global partnership” is necessary in order to “achieve sustainable development”….

“…the belief that humanity currently stands at a decisive point in history, which calls for a global partnership to achieve sustainable development”

Article 3 of this proposed global constitution declares that the global environment should be under the “protection” of “international law”….

“The global environment is a common concern of humanity and under the protection of the principles of international law, the dictates of the public conscience and the fundamental values of humanity.”

Later on in the document, things start becoming more specific.

In Article 16, we are told that all member nations must integrate environmental conservation into all of their national decisions….

Parties shall, at all stages and at all levels, integrate environmental conservation into the planning and implementation of their policies and activities, giving full and equal consideration to environmental, economic, social and cultural factors. To this end, the Parties shall:

(a) conduct regular national reviews of environmental and developmental policies and plans;

(b) enact, periodically review, and enforce laws and regulations; and

(c) establish or strengthen institutional structures and procedures to integrate environmental and developmental issues in all spheres of decision-making.

In Article 20, we are told that parties to this treaty will be required to “mitigate the adverse effects of climate change”.  That means that if this treaty is ratified in the United States, the national debate about climate change will be over and our national, state and local government institutions will all be required to actively fight man-made global warming whether it actually exists or not….

Parties shall take precautionary measures to protect the Earth’s climate system and mitigate the adverse effects of climate change. To these ends, they shall cooperate internationally inter alia to:

(a) Measure their emissions and implement nationally appropriate mitigation actions;


(b) Establish risk management and implement adaptation measures to enable climate-resilient development.

In Article 31, there is a requirement to eradicate poverty.  Yes, everyone should work hard to eliminate poverty, but what this document envisions is a worldwide socialist system where wealth is redistributed on a global scale….

Parties, individually or in partnership with other States, international organizations and civil society, in particular the private economic sector, shall adopt measures aimed at the eradication of poverty, including measures to:

(a) legally empower people living in poverty to exercise their rights including the right to development;

(b) respect, ensure, promote and fulfill the rights of vulnerable and marginalized persons, in particular to food, water, housing and other basic needs;

(c) enable all individuals to achieve sustainable livelihoods, in particular by increasing access to and control over resources, including land;

(d) rehabilitate degraded resources, to the extent practicable, and promote sustainable use of resources for basic human needs;

(e) provide potable water and sanitation;

(f) provide education, with a particular focus on, and with the participation of women and girl children, indigenous peoples, local communities, and vulnerable or marginalized persons; and

(g) support microcredit and microinsurance schemes and the development of microfinance institutions and their capacities.

In the end, socialism always makes everyone poorer, but unfortunately the United Nations has apparently not gotten that memo yet.

In Article 32, there is a requirement to recycle “to the fullest extent possible“.

If the U.S. ratifies this global environmental constitution that means that there will be a lot more government agents snooping through our trash cans to make sure that we are recycling properly like is already happening in Cleveland, Ohio.

In Article 33, countries are required to determine “the size of the human population their environment is capable of supporting” and to implement measures to make sure that the population does not exceed that level….

Parties shall develop or strengthen demographic policies in order to achieve sustainable development. To this end, the Parties shall:

(a) conduct studies to estimate the size of the human population their environment is capable of supporting and develop programmes relating to population growth at corresponding levels;

(b) cooperate to alleviate the stress on natural support systems caused by major population flows;

(c) cooperate as requested to provide a necessary infrastructure on a priority basis for areas with rapid population growth;

(d) provide to their populations full information on the options concerning family planning;


(e) provide for long-term resettlement of persons displaced by changing environmental conditions.

As I have written about previously, the elites that are pushing sustainable development are obsessed with population control and they love death.

Article 33 is definitely one of the most chilling parts of the entire document.

In Article 34, nations are required to maintain “an open and non-discriminatory international trading system”.  This document affirms the emerging one world economic system and sets out rules for how to participate in it in an environmentally responsible way….

1. Parties shall cooperate to establish and maintain an open and non-discriminatory international trading system that equitably meets the developmental and environmental needs of present and future generations.

To this end, Parties shall endeavour to ensure that:

(a) trade does not lead to the wasteful use of natural resources nor interfere with their conservation or sustainable use;

(b) trade measures addressing transboundary or global environmental problems are based, as far as possible, on international consensus;

(c) trade measures for environmental purposes do not constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade;

(d) unilateral trade measures by importing Parties in response to activities which are harmful or potentially harmful to the environment outside the jurisdiction of such Parties are avoided as far as possible or occur only after consultation with affected States and are implemented in a transparent manner; and

(e) prices of commodities and raw materials reflect the full direct and indirect social and environmental costs of their extraction, production, transport, marketing, and, where appropriate, ultimate disposal.

In the commentary on Article 34, we are told that a one world economic system that respects the environment is “an essential component of sustainable development”….

Paragraph 1 sets out the duty to cooperate to establish and maintain an international economic system that ensures inter- and intra generational equity, giving effect to the principles enunciated in Articles 5 (Equity and Justice) and 10 (Right to Development) of the Draft Covenant. This duty has been recognized in recent international instruments as being an essential component of sustainable development.

In Article 41, nations are instructed to integrate sustainable development principles into all decisions regarding “infrastructure and town and country planning”….

Parties shall establish and implement integrated physical planning systems, including provisions for infrastructure and town and country planning, with a view to integrating conservation of the environment, including biological diversity, into social and economic development.

In Article 51, we learn how all of this is going to be paid for.

It turns out that we will be required to finance the implementation of all of these repressive new requirements….

1. Parties undertake to provide, in accordance with their capabilities, financial support and incentives for those national activities aimed at achieving the objectives of this Covenant.

2. Parties shall pursue innovative ways of generating public and private financial resources for sustainable development.

In Article 52, it even tells us how much of our national GDP we will be required to contribute….

Parties, taking into account their respective capabilities and specific national and regional developmental priorities, objectives and circumstances, shall endeavour to augment their aid programmes to reach the United Nations General Assembly target of at least 0.7 percent of Gross National Product for Official Development Assistance.

In Article 69, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea are essentially designated the “judicial branch” for this global governance scheme….

1. Parties shall settle disputes concerning the interpretation or application of this Covenant by peaceful means, such as by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and judicial settlement, and where appropriate, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or by any other peaceful means of their own choice.

2. If Parties to such a dispute do not reach agreement within one year following the notification by one Party to another that a dispute exists, the dispute shall, at the request of one of the Parties, be submitted to either an arbitral tribunal, including the Permanent Court of Arbitration, or to judicial settlement, including by the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea as appropriate.

Those that try to claim that this is not a proposed constitution for the world are simply being delusional.  Article 71 even gives us detailed procedures for “amending” this constitution.

If this document is not intended to be a constitution, then why does it have a “preamble” like the U.S. Constitution does, why is it organized into “articles” like the U.S. Constitution is, and why does it set forth procedures for “amending” the document like the U.S. Constitution does?

And notice that the word “shall” is used constantly throughout the entire document.  This proposed constitution does not contain “suggestions” that the authors hope will be followed.  Rather, it contains commands which are intended to be obeyed.

This document would establish a very repressive system of world governance.  The global elite believe that we are not smart enough to think for ourselves and that they need to run the entire planet like a tightly-controlled prison in order to save the environment.

If you have a few moments, go look the document over, and then come back and leave a comment with your opinion of it….

  • Virginia

    I know this agenda sounds horrible but we are a nation out of control and the rest of the world is not far behind. Nothing is working anymore, our government consists of people that have no clue and don’t give a hoot, the American family is in shambles, our schools are dangerous places to be, healthcare is a joke and there are no jobs anymore and our laws protect the criminal. If anyone understands the problems we face, it is people who read this forum. Someone or something needs to take this bull by the horn. This global governance thing as severe and harsh as it sounds is trying to do just that.

    • 1stVArifleman

      You obviously don’t understand the entire picture here. The group (the ROTHSCHILD CABAL) who funds the UN, are also the same people who fund or funded the following: OWS, the Tea Party, Al’Qaeda, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Round Table Groups (Royal Institute of International Affairs, RIIA, Cecil Rhodes), the Tri-Lateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the Bohemian Club, the Soviet Union/Warsaw Pact, NATO, the NAZIs/Axis Powers, the Allies, all sides of WWI, the Union and Confederacy in the American Civil War, Wellington, Napoleon, the British in the War of 1812 (a war at Nathan Rothschild’s request: “Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.” “Teach those impudent Americans a lesson. Bring them back to colonial status.”) and the Hessians. The goal of most of the global elite since the days of Adam Weishaupt has been a border less global government run by an “omnipotent” elite (read Plato’s “Republic” and you shall know their inspiration).

      If you really are a true Virginian, then your loyalties first and foremost are with her and the CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. Under no circumstance would a true Virginian ever give up his/her liberty to an international government. Especially, when you state in your comment that our government is out of control. The last way to ever fix a tyrannical government is by making it an even larger and more complicated; in addition to, subjugating it to an international government. No offense, but that is either pure ignorance or insanity.

      If you truly want want to fix our government then we must restore our nation to her original intentions under the CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, that is the only way. To do that first we must take back the Congress by electing only those loyal to the Constitutional Republic. Second we repeal the 16th and 17th Amendment, abolish the Federal Reserve System, and create a new Amendment that limits members of the House to 4 terms and members of the Senate to 2 terms or 1 nine year term (realize that by appealing the 17th Amendment, Senators will be nominated by the State Legislators again, this will give the States a lot more authority in the Federal Government, while reestablishing a true mixed government once again by re-creating what John Adams referred to as the natural aristocracy.) It will not be easy, and if we fail we always retain the option of nullification (look to Thomas Woods fairly new book on this), secession, and if necessary armed defense.

      “A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.”
      George Washington

      “The strongest reason for the people to retain to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”
      Thomas Jefferson

      “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.”
      Patrick Henry

      “Americans have the right and advantages of being armed – unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms”
      James Madison

      No matter what anyone tells you the 2nd Amendment was put in place to allow American citizens to defend themselves against a deadly threat which would include their own government. The founders knew you can never trust any government no matter how benevolent it tries to appear. For the reason that George Washington describes so accurately, “Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” Don’t be so hasty in giving up our Constitutional Republic, 1000s gave their lives and ideas, and 1000s of years passed before a mixed government ever existed. On paper our Republic still is the only mixed government ever in recorded human history. We must defend it at all costs!

      “I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past…. Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us…. it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable–and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come….Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace– but there is no peace. The war is actually begun!….Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
      Patrick Henry

      “Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, you should never wish to do less.”
      Robert E Lee


      • Hurray for you VArifleman, now if the uninformed knew and believed. There is NOTHING and certainly no puke politician/”employee” treaties or laws that supercedes this REPUBLICS CONSTITUTION NOTHING even their treasons starting with the 11th Amendment means NOTHING. Except to the sheep who believe they are ruled by “employees”. How come it takes Vets and military men & women to educate the mass of ignorant people who still don’t understand,no turd in DC or for that matter state tells their “EMPLOYERS” what will be. Since when do “employees” tell their “employers” what to do? WAKE TH HELL UP PEOPLE YOU ARE THEIR LEADERS AND LAWMAKERS. They make no laws worth the paper on which they write (oops they can’t read or write) have written for them. They know this so they make crap like Patriot Act, NDAA HR347 Treasons yes laws we must follow hahahahaha. NOT ME and MY BROTHERS IN ARM. The politician/employee may kiss our collective asses

      • mark

        Great ideas, but let’s limit them to one two year term and then they must go home. We do not need a pro. congress.

      • Virginia Rifleman: Why do you believe the TEA party is anti American? Everyone i know including me that support their views believe strongly in our Constitution to me it was given to us by our Creator God. I’m against big Government. Tell me were i am wrong in believing what Taxed Enough Already people believe in.Liberalism is truely a mental disorder, which talk show host Dr.Michael Savage has proven. Please reply.

        • 1stVArifleman

          The avg member of the tea party are not involved with this cabal and I support them. The people at the top of the Tea Party, like Sarah Palin, possibly even people like Glenn Beck, and financiers behind the scenes manipulate the tea party for their globalist agenda. Without a doubt the Neo-Cons (fascist wing and controllers of the Republican Party) have subverted the tea party and it is no longer a true “grass-roots” movement anymore.

          Also, what you call “liberalism,” you should really call
          progressive-ism/socialism/marxism/communism. True liberal are Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, followers of FDR usurped the title liberal through the corporate media and the name has stuck with the progressives ever since.

          • Kay

            Why do you include Sarah Palin? Seems to me she was not the most well versed on foreign relations and global issues. Just wondering, because I would never have tagged her as a globalist.

      • simoner1

        Excellent commentary. It is amazing that so many people do not grasp the concept of freedom and personal liberty. Have so many Americans become so dependent on government that they are willingly becoming mindless serfs?

      • willi

        Just curious, why do you include OWS (or the Tea Party for that matter) in that list of truly evil entities? Neither one should be, in my opinion. Unlike the others, they’re not bent on world domination. I don’t know much about the Tea Party, but OWS is, at least, trying to wake people up to the massive criminality in DC and Wall Street. Forget the communist/socialist bullshit you hear from the MSM, most SANE OWS supporters don’t ascribe to those ideologies. Although I feel that you veterans are about as patriotic as anyone could be, my question to you is, what the fuck are you waiting for? America’s biggest enemy is firmly entrenched in DC. The “domestic enemy” you swore an oath against is already here, has been for awhile. What’s it going to take? What will our “elected leaders” have to do before you guys realize this? For the record, I’m not one of the “dirty hippies” squatting down at Zuccotti. I’m just a fifty-something blue-collar guy.

    • Gregory Romeu

      It starts with US Virginia. Just one of US.

    • Paula

      The answer to your concern is not more government, at any level, but less governmnent. Look at the history of this country. When did we start having serious social and economic issues? When the Progressives began tinkering with lives and with custom. When they started denying Americans the right to practice what has worked for millenia. (Please do not swallow the tales of horror the Progressives trot out. Remember: there’s two sides to every story.)
      Instead, we would do well to remind the BIG GOV’T groupies that government interferance in the lives and livelihoods of ordinary citizens has led to the shambles you describe.
      The operating mode of any large entity is central control. The only means a large entity has to impose itself is rigid rule making and a big stick, ie bureaucracy, police and military. To pay for the large entity and its controlling arms, the pro-one world government crowd wants to grab more control over the money and the lives of its citizens.
      Now the Central Planning crowd have discovered the limitations of trying to control individual nations; that limit is the treasuries of those individual nations such as France, Germany, etc…the usual culprits for crack-brained ideas.
      So their solution is ONE WORLD government. They know it’s crack-brained, not to mention morally questionable, which is why they’ve been doing this under the guise of environmentalism. So their solution is to convince us that only through a larger government, and more money (ours), will they be able to save the planet.
      Of course the environment is excuse #1. Excuse #2 & 3 are women and children. The truth is darker. The One world crowd simply craves power. Whoever its menbers are, they are not enlightened. They have not, or do not care to consider how they would implement their scheme without resorting to violence against us.
      So, if you seriously want the chaos to end, Virginia, pray for less. If you dislike a do-nothing Congress, support Congressmen who would rather stay home and plant beans, only coming out to vote on significant bills. If you’re dismayed how your kids can spend twelve years in public school and not have no idea how to do long division or write an essay, then home-school. If you don’t like seeing crime taking over this country-again, stay home. Be there when the kids get home. Do what mothers are supposed to do.
      If you haven’t got my drift, virginia, the ultimate answer to all your complaints is this – women do have power. Women provide the glue to civilization. Women are the
      teachers of the next generation. When women abdicate that role, failing as the central pillar in a child’s life, then other influences take over a child’s life: gangs, violence, drugs, destructive ideologies.

  • ME

    The UN will be disbanded after the next world war (which it will be largely responsible for, just as the League of nations was largely responsible for the last global conflict). These bodies NEVER help humanity, they always cause vast human misery. Just look at the UN commission on human rights– a who’s who of despots. The world would be a much better place without the UN.

  • mondobeyondo

    Ewwww. The vice grips get tighter, and tighter…..

  • mark

    The UN has been wasting our tax dollars for a long time. Give them the boot and let them go back to Europe. Socialism will make most of us very poor unless you are the chosen few. Sorry to tell you Gary2, you are not one of the chosen few. You and all the other supporters of this type of document are what is refered to as useful idiots. Man needs freedom to be creative. These control freaks that want to rule over us would put into a cage called a city. I have followed Agenda 21 long enough to know that I have no wish to live under it. We need to go back to what our Founding Fathers had in mind. Every election in the next few decades will be very important to keep the supporters of this stuff out of power. If we do not do this we are toast.

    • gary2

      I never said I support this document and in fact think every country should be free to choose their form of government. I just want our country to go left!

      • mark

        Gary2,Your left turn will take you into the realm of the socialists. They will drag you into the quicksand that will sink most of your freedom. The government that you support wants to take most of the wealth from someone that earned it and give their wealth to those that have not earned it. If they have that power, they then have the power to enforce Obama care and then in turn enforce any of their ideas that they think are good for you. The left has long supported Agenda 21 and has many NGO’s within the local political systems. Piece by piece, little by little, the left is installing the policys of that document into our building and zoning codes. This is why you could be refered to as a useful idiot for wanting to make that hard turn to the left. When if ever are you going to figure out that the left is full of a bunch of control freaks?

        • I agree Mark with your statement concerning Gary.Any sane person knows if it weren’t for our Constitution America would be under the rule of Communism. I believe that most people in this country think America is a Democracy instead of a Republic, the framers knew Democracies were short lived and always imploded when the masses learned they could get a pay-check from the public treasury,sounds like what is happening to the U.S now. as the old saying goes more people riding the wagon than are pulling the wagon.

  • RevBryan

    Welcome to the “Prison Planet”. Thanks Michael and God’s peace be with you.

  • jackier

    These statements are very broad and general. They can be interpreted in any way someone sees fit.
    We see how our govt works so well, now we can depend on the fact that this will be run just as well.

    • DebB

      My fear is its unenforceability. Let explain. I am not fearful that it can’t be enforced. I am fearful that before long following its ratification, the “Parties” will realize the impossibility of implementing such a broad sweeping set of “convenants” and realize the need for a pervasive bureaucracy, international in composition, which will become entrenched in our society. America will cease to exist in any meaningful way.

  • Chris

    It’s a document drawn up by global socialists, feminists and control freaks to manage everything and create a system which would have a world president in control of it all. The emphasis on educating women and girl children is not actually because they really like females but because they believe this will be a way to lower population through encouraging western style abortion etc. Fake concern over the environment will be used presumeably to actually plan the job path and reproductive capacity of every individual and what they will be allowed to eat (probably only vegetable based food). Will a country exceeding it’s reproductive target have to undergo a cull? Having lost the ability to choose what to eat, wear, believe, work as, number of children desired presumeably the individual will also be required to hand over all their body organs at death for sale or reuse. No one excepted, apart from the elite of course.
    This would be a system of global slavery and eugenics. In a world of such controlled resources and lifestyles would anyone be allowed to be born disabled? Would a parent told that they can only have one child allow a non perfect human to be their only offspring?

    • S Rubicon

      You hit the nail on the head. Notice that average citizens, from ANY country, were included in its development. This is a global socialists dream come true. Whether they use Climate Change, global taxation or any other format, the intention is a world socialist order whic those with power & wealth control. Those creating this are idealists who fail to realize they also will become ‘subjects’ of this new world order. And once in place these clowns think they can control all. So long as there are fools to support them, they can. But sooner or later documents & actions like this, will only lead to the greatest conflagartion mankind will ever experience. War will result as many seek to restore their personal individual freedoms. This is no panecea, this is a global human indenture that would enslave all mankind. No thanks!!


    NDAA, Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, Drone Attacks, Secret Memos, Secret Jails, Rendition, etc., I can’t see how it can get any worse.


    You want war? You want religious theocracy? Heck, I say tighten the screws on you big government rightwingers in the democrat and republican wings of the war party. This stuff is right up your alley.

  • Global warming is real, you humans are the bad guys! Kakakakakakaaa!!!

    • Schwepp Mimeo

      …. less than one tenth of a degree, average worldwide, since 1998. Over 30,000 scientists say it is not happening. If you believe in HCGW, I have another tidbit for you: Excrement is not brown, it’s bright Pink; there is a causal relationship between the earths atmosphere and the wavelengths of light humans see in that makes it look brown. Oh….. and don’t forget about Hydrogen dioxide; it’s everywhere, in our water, our bodies, everywhere, worldwide. Pass the word.

  • Ryan

    Good luck enforcing it… the local gun store i regularly visit says they have never sold so much hardware in their history, something tells me this is the case across the USA, a large percentage of troops are just trying to pay for collage or just joined because they cant find a job, a large percentage of troops are conservatives, and most are pushovers that act tough in uniform but could easily be bluffed. I am not talking trash on our troops, Im just stating that if there was armed opposition most troops would say I didnt sign up for this and bail, especially when the people they are supposed to fight are willing to die for their cause. And i doubt most troops would fire on an American flag. I dont think stuff like this so called constitution is a threat, they could never make it happen, I for one would rather die fighting than live in slavery… and I dont think I am alone.

  • Dan

    Since Agenda 21 has been so ingrained in local and state governments it’s not much of a reach to ratify this constitution. The question is do enough people really understand and are there enough that really care?

    When our economy collapses I am sure the plan is to implement this constitution.

  • B

    Of all those who commented above, and all those who have read this, have you contacted your elected member, have you informed others of this document? In short, have you actually taken any action?

  • laura4basics

    This has nothing to do with saving the earth, They do not give a damn about the earth. The global warming agenda was trumped up by them with Biden and their voice box to accuse the average Joe of being a polluter and force restrictions on him. They blatantly ignore sciencetist and go so far as to eliminate agitators to their evil cause. This is nothing more than a super power grab over mankind. They are power freaks. Be afraid, very afraid.

  • i’vegivenup

    IMO The UN has been pretty worthless since it’s beginning. This just further proves my belief…

  • Gregory Romeu

    Articles like are probing tools for global elitists to try to guage the resistance against them.

  • Gregory Romeu

    Obama just stated on the news Friday or Saturday that he was attebnding the MAYORAL CONFERENCE in Chicago. Don’t people realize THAT is the gathering of mayors from across the country that gather ON TAXPAYER DOLLARS to be spoon-fed their marching-orders to be in compliance with Agenda 21?

  • Gary2

    Here with sources is why the right is going down hard. I love seeing the right fail in their destruction of this country:

    When I consider what the GOP wants to do to our country and how much it differs from what Americans want
    for our Country I start to wonder if the GOP really believes in democracy
    The GOP opposes taxing the rich
    The American people want to tax the wealthy
    The GOP wants to eliminate woman’s access to birth control
    The American people want to allow women access to birth control
    The GOP opposes the Dream Act to allow undocumented a path to citizenship
    The American people favor the Dream Act
    The GOP oppose unions for public employees
    The American people favor the right of public employees to form unions
    The GOP wants to ban gay marriage
    The American people favor gay marriage
    The GOP wants war with Iran
    The American People are opposed to war with Iran
    The GOP wants to eliminate Planned Parenthood
    The American People support Planned Parenthood
    The GOP wants less restrictive gun control laws
    The American people want more restrictive gun control laws
    The GOP opposes raising fuel economy standards
    The American people want better fuel economy standards
    The GOP wants to privatize Medicare
    The American people like Medicare the way it is
    The GOP supported the Citizens United Ruling that opened the flood gates to the ultra wealthy and big
    business spending unlimited funds in elections
    The vast majority of the American People oppose the Citizens United Ruling
    So who exactly to the GOP represents? It sure as heck isn’t the American people.

    Email from my OFA group.

    Michael-you should use this as a guest post by me to give this site much needed balance. We put this together in our OFA (Obama For America) group where we regularly discuss how to defeat the right.

    People think I am wrong and accuse me of not providing sources. Here they are. This is for anyone to use anywhere as we want to get the word out about republicans destroying our country and state of WI.

    did you notice the republicans lost control of the WI senate over the weekend???

    • soljerblue

      Not a single “source” cited by this poster could be considered onjective, or even balanced. Each one is either in the tank or a water carrier for the fascist new left. The article is exactly correct when it accuses a certain segment of our so-called ‘elites’ of being anti-life. They go from hating freedom, to hating the exercise thereof by anyone but themselves. First they marginalize and destroy the institutions that underpin American traditional values, then they descend on the individual American. When we are all isolated, divided by tribes, and under their “governance”, they will start to kill us off. First the unborn. Then the newborn. Then the retarded, the deformed, the sick and the elderly. They hate Israel — and try to define what constitutes acceptable Jewishness. Now they’re after the Catholics. Actually, they hate all religion, escept their failed Marxist utopian pipe dream. If you defend the Constitution, they claim you’re trying to impose your morality on others. But it is they who are forcing their twisted beliefs on the rest of us. The tide is rising, the water is heating up. There will be a reckoning.

      • Gary2


        • Gary2

          Business week??

          NY Times???

          if anything they are right wing biased.

          • Schwepp Mimeo

            Gary2: there’s no hope for you. You don’t have a rational bone in your body, and only go by what have been taught in (government run) school or college. I suppose you believe that Fascism is on the Right? Go back to Huffpost, or wherever you came from; you are making a mockery of yourself.

    • Gary2 what a mook, you use socialist and marxist links to back your claim you are the useful idiot. Either you are one of these or you are related to a box of rocks. NOBODY believes anything these Rothschild shills say except you who wish to be a slave.

      • Dan Morgan

        The only ‘useful’ thing about an idiot is compose material.

    • Oh and Dem or Repub their is no difference except for the D or R next to their name their are only 4 in the house who despite the D or R by their name can even call themselves Americans. The rest can only be called TRAITORS. it is the politician who are the Criminals those who side with this sicko UN and their inbred designer

    • DebB

      We’re off to see the Wizard, the Wonderful Wizard of Oz….

  • Kevin

    Guaranteed there will be exceptions to compliance with the developing world. Like the exemptions given for carbon to atmosphere for China all that is accomplished is for the developed world to use less of everything so more is available for global development. In the end the standard of living declines in the developed world and rises in the developing world.

    Environmentalism is just another tool in the globalist inventory to get masses of sheep to willingly do their bidding. In the end more resources are used globally and more pollution occurs. All of this is reserved to the developing world with an “Out of sight, out of mind” mentality. The masses in the developing world believe they are “Saving the planet” by doing without while the upper crust (see Al Gore) lavishly use resources too expensive for the common person to afford.

  • Beverley

    Gary2, you are delusional and must slowly but surely back away from the koolaid before its too late. Just look at your sources??!!!! The Repubs aren’t perfect, but they at least know and care what the Constitution is.

    • Gary2

      “The Repubs aren’t perfect”

      Well you got one thing correct so I guess its true that even a blind person will get a bulls-eye from time to time.

  • soljerblue

    Adolph, wherever he is, is chuckling and repeating, ‘I told you so’ — as are his toadies, Himmler, Mengele, and the rest. We rid the world of him once, but apparently not his ideas. Perhaps it’s time for another “crusade”.

  • Nothing Hitllary Clinton and her UN does supercedes the Constitution. It is the Constitution that will see any politician still alive ********** for their TREASON. And it will be our military men and women who bring it to them. I predict before 2013 hide an watch. Treason still carries Hanging as the punishment for it. This is why our “employees” keep passing these treasonous laws in the hopes we the bosses of them will believe their Treasons. I am not fooled or amused.Run them all out of our Capital, not wait to vote them out. The Constitution says it is our right and our duty to abolish this government of traitors and hang them for their crimes against us, and this REPUBLIC.

    • Hillary has a powerful personality that some might think is almost supernatural. Her achievements in practically all of her political challenges, and her poise in her delivery of those difficult-to-express opinions from which others, male or female, would shrink. She does seem to have a magical quality of getting things done. Perhaps Hillary has a psychic spirit that guides her. In any case we hope and pray that Hillary always places America first in peace and last to go to war.

      Before closing, the public should hear Hillary’s response to a lingering question about yosur employees. WHY, Hillary, was the wife of ex-Representative Weiner’s Muslim wife one of your closest assistants in the State Department? What was her actual, real, honest, transparent reason for her existence as your close assistant?

    • Kay

      Patrick, I am a firm believer in hanging the treasonous lot of them. Why have none of the poison pushers been arrested and put on trial. Soros would be a great start, because he is the point player and financier of the unrest.

  • Kahsim

    Gary2 – You make a strong case, but wow… you still only see a very small part of the picture bud. You should really try to look past the whole left right thing. You’ll realize that what’s going on has nothing to do with conquering the right. The agenda to shred the constitution republic is the whole aim of extreme leftism. And the right is no different because they’re no longer committed to the republic, they’re committed to protecting the freedoms of international corporations. Neither have the welfare of the people in mind.

    • Gary2

      Gary2 – You make a strong case—Which is more than can be said for most of the posters who like to call things names they do not understand.

  • jh

    This will be an the most important Presidency… If they allow the illegals .. I counted more than 70 million .. going back to Reagan’s amnesty and gestamating yearly .. using the numbers a few border agents spoke of.. but not allowing the tunnel’s .. etc.. so how many more would you add to that number.. brought here by this left government ..Bezmenov talks about.. just for the purpose as an election base..and will legalize that base.. sealing them in.. and I don’t know about Peruto Rica’s.. I just bring in such a big number that can then if they are made a State.. get into every legislative branch from the White house on down.. Do we know.. them and even if we think we do.. and they ‘seem’ like they would defend this Constitution.. will they change.. ?.. After .. This!.. happening now with.. just .. Illegal’s!..We should not allow it.. They get good benefits.. from us now.. they should use them and fix Puerto Rico! need’s a lot.. of work.. And would any of three candidates .. be unsavey about the Communism.. which is the root.. from the Fabian school to the Rothchilds..all of it.. and should all be taught .. how controlling and stealth it is.. and all the bad..that Ella..has witnessed.. her self.. to add to the documentation’s we have.. honestly.. they are ‘the’ agitator’s.. world wide.. to stir up trouble and chos..and they will use any one.. each one depending on a payback ..just like we ‘SAW’! this administration Do!.. Allowing them to think .. they will be the end..or even a place! but the ones running it now.. if they win
    America and the few we protect.. we won’t be able to keep them out of Offices.. they will own the offices and businesses..The difference even now.. is when the government gets involved in any thing like the car business.. making it sound so safe and benign.. they are changing free interprize State Owned. . business..and they are really the ones in control and decide every thing.. and no one can change it then…Bankrupcy laws are important.. they are a safety net…of free and fair market .. with ethical and fair rules and regulations.. and rule of law.. It is hard to understand that ..for some American citizens to understand..And if they don’t know anything about the ones who are trying to change it and why..they think they are benign..and ‘helping’..but they are not.. They Want Control of it.. Is the Prime Minister of England aware.. does he support this One World Order Group… Is Romney… Is Gingrich… even Santorum.. Not so much aware but.. understand.. and or agree with them..Perry is a good Governor…and man…but I am glad he isn’t running…He he went to Turkey and gave a speack to them.. and they are helping him now with the State of Texas..via name recognition.. And the way his wife talked it sounded like she did not know or understand who these prople are?.. So what do you do.. Understand it and when we take back our legilatures and schools.. and churches! . . I have heard them say they are moving in on churches.. but I also read they already have some churches.. and not necessarity just the ones like Wright’s church.. So.. now is the time..What these poor people don’t understand.. now that are or want to stay on government assistance.. and I don’t mean the victims of this Administration’s manipulation of our economy .. for the purpose of putting tons on welfare.. and even have incorporated how to get on in one of the new Spanish speaking shows.. but the one’s who want to be there for…forever.. is it will not be even close to meeting their ‘needs’ if this communist presidency wins.. they should look at the poorest nations and see.. and wake up.. I don’t know who is who and I for one will not go there..and what do you say to people who don’t know how bad it can get?.. We have already seen the environmental agency.. absolutely Destroy people now for and I mean putting people in Jail for Years! for what .. one man for doing what he has always done .. fishing for lobsters and selling them.. and one man cleaned up a dump .. on His Land!.. This is the year… and pray for our next president to be enlightened and stong against them.. They have been here in America for years now and this administration has brought out the ‘sleeper’ Bezmenov spoke of.. Thanks for listening.. I mean if you have one doubt about just one thing.. and here it is the presidency,, you can see all the dot’s.. and people who compile them.. but like the guy said.. we have to change things.. now .. and the only ones who will are Honest Fiduciaries of This Nation!..and tht means not only in Washington.. but States.. Counties, town’s , schools.. organizations and churches.. it is not like we have a multitute of choices.. it is one or the other.. and second.. don’t let them into our educational system.. I believe the Government’s and State’s would save more money.. if they prodvide vouchers for private school’s.. and not more public schools..and vouchers for private health insurance.. companies tht.. they lose their business.. they depend on.. if they do thing’s unfairly or unethically..and vouchers to help with other costs.. and let the private market.. go and do for America and American’s.. I donn’t claim to be savvy.. up front.. that being said.. why can’t people buy supplemental.. insurances and or multi insurances and let them divide the cost’s they pay.. it is cheaper fo pay a premium.. than it is to have insurance and not be able to pay the rest of the bill that Dr’s require.. I there is competition.. I don’t know of any other way to drive cost’s down.. Governmnt sure won’t.. and corruption is hard to address there.. Forgive me for going on and on.. and thanks again for allowing me to put in my thought’s J

  • The root of all environmental extremism is atheism. When you don’t believe in God, you don’t believe there is an intelligent design in the universe, and therefore everything we see around us has no purpose. It then logically follows that if the universe was not created by a Supreme Being with purposeful will and intent, then we must be just one big incredibly fortunate series of cosmic accidents. And if that is the case, then we must be delicately balanced on the precipice of another catastrophe waiting to happen at any moment. This is why many enviromentalists are so incredibly unreasonable, because they’re convinced that their efforts are really needed to save the planet. On the other hand, the elite international power brokers, i.e. the ones who really pull the strings, and could care less about the environmental cause, are just using these “true believers” as useful idiots to accopmplish their goal of a one-world government.

  • That was an excellent, excellent article about conservation, growth and development. The author of this “suggested” constitution is also the author of Agenda 2. His name is Maurice (“Morris”)Strong. He is recognized worldwide as a and ruler of the UN, powerful personality, Mr. Maurice Strongand the subject of your fine articleUN constitution , the UN’s creator and mentor, Maurice Strong in the constitution ssuch as sustainability and those hundreds and hundreds of shades of gray in tshe entire evil document…. Yes, evil.

    A documented videotape I prepared in 1988 is on my site and Youtube. It has the documented proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that the late Baron Edmund de Rothschild, noted philanthropist and banker, decreed the germ of this very unacceptable piece of paper into existence at that meeting. It’s on You Tube,etc.
    I was an Official Host at that significant congress and created a 1988 videtape followed by about five more documentaries about the secret meeting which I accidentally attended. I have been threatened to shut up, or else. Yous can’t shutso others early videotapes with complete, adequate facts, proving what the UNCED committee (“unsaid”>=United Nations Committee of the Environment and Development) and Baron Rothschild’s international banking confedracy . mittee and the international banking confederacy (Rothschild) were up to. What I heard and saw and copied on tape on certqain videos, s29 feet in front of the Baron, is written down in the constitution they are proposing. We must read it and take it seriously. The answer to what theys were up to? Read the constitution they are proposingittee hypocritical environmental laws any of these decrees at the 4th World Wilderness Congress at the YMCA camp in Estes Park, Colordo. I was able to get a complete tape of the meeting in which Baron Rothschild’s actual voice can be heard putting AGenda 21, conservation, susstainable development, everything wrapped up within the clever speech of a clever family. Pardon my boldness, but please see my site and tshe videostape at Ogden Utah or the preacher and me on my original 1988 videotape absout on thebring up the in his clever, Maurice Strong and otherthe ‘s ssproposed alundefinitions

    • Saq

      you need to proof read before you post because i didn’t understand most of what you said

    • Mai

      Thank you George W Hunt for your tireless work for more than 20 years on exposing the UN Agenda 21 and it’s implecations!

  • Lora

    Capitalists: how can I explain capitalism to my teens. Some of them come from broken families and will not get the support of the bank of mom and dad to succeed. Now the children are suffering because their parents did not work hard enough? How do these children get back into the race? When I was growing up, the country was being built and tourist destinations were sought so there was lots of employment for anyone who wanted it. Now we are at a wall.
    Thanks for any answer.

    • Jim

      Have them knock on doors of people and businesses all day long until somebody needs their help and hires them.
      Have them save at least 10% of everything they make.
      Have them watch what others are doing to become prosperous.
      Have them learn about investing.
      With this experience, and continual hunger and effort to improve, they will learn and prosper with capitalism.
      I did.

    • DebB

      They already know it, in some form. Talk about the difference between grading on a curve and grading on individual performance. Curves seem like a good idea, but they (I hate this made up word, but) disinsentivize investment in learning and undermine the group by encouraging students not to “outperform” their peers. Curves create a collectivist learning environment, not to be confused with a cooperative or collaborative one, where poor performance is rewarded and excellence is penalized. And curves create a terrible temptation to compromise one’s work ethic and intellectual honesty or curiosity. A ready parallel to market economics.


  • Tom Sherman

    The UN needs to saturate the USA with its abscence. As far as Agenda 21 and any propoesed constitution is concerned, The UN or the NWO can take turns sticking these proposed documents where the sun does not shine. If the reader does not have the message by now the authors of this document and the perpetrators of sme are purveyors of grabage.

  • bulldustin


  • Jack

    VArifleman – you had me till you suggest the CABAL funds the TEA Party. The est of your post is rendered irrelevant as a result of that faux paux….

  • Tom Massey

    The main purpose for the United Nations (U.N.) is to resolve issues between countries through diplomacy before countries resort to military force and before conflicts escalate. Unfortunately, the U.N. has consistently failed this goal and will continue being useless for these several reasons.

    First, the United Nations is primarily a forum for debate. As a result, the U.N. is an international organization where countries send representatives to argue for or against issues. These representatives are typically just spokesmen for their country’s agendas and are relatively powerless in their own country. Furthermore, countries governed by non-peaceful dictators and regimes typically use these debates to delay and obfuscate issues in their favor. Over the fifty years that the United Nations has existed, these debates alone have not resolved a single issue.
    Second, the United Nations is unable to take direct and independent actions without support from its members. In other words, the U.N. is completely powerless and pacifistic. In a world filled with war-mongering dictators and suppressing regimes who know the U.N. lacks any real power, regimes are almost completely free to do whatever they want.
    Third, the United Nations has five nations that can veto any resolution that the majority of the U.N. members agreed upon. The countries with this veto power are China, France, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union), the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. These countries have this power because they were the founding countries of the United Nations that wrote the rules for the U.N. after World War 2. Unfortunately, this non-democracy fails for several reasons. First, only a true democracy among nations is unbiased and fair.
    The fourth and final reason why the United Nations is useless is terrorism. The U.N. does not formally recognize any country as a terrorist state. Furthermore, terrorists are not interested in the politics of debating in a public forum, such as the United Nations, to discuss and work out their issues. Therefore, the U.N. does not get involved in politics with terrorist groups. As a result, the United Nations is completely blind to terrorist groups, has no plans of address terrorism, and has no intentions of changing. The fact that the United Nations, as the largest international organization that promotes peace, is completely unable to address terrorism is further proof that the U.N. is ineffective.
    The United Nations has proven itself as a failure for its entire history and will continue being useless. Maybe if peaceful countries withdraw their membership and stop participating in the United Nations in protest, will force the United Nations to abandon its old methods of dealing with non-peaceful and non-humanitarian nations. One more year after President Barry Hussein leaves office and the US will leave the United Nations.

  • Alex

    That’s it!

    Step 1. UN out of New York. They can go to Europe, Africa, Asia – doesn’t matter any more.
    2. US should pull out of UN, UNESCO, etc.

    If it is not possible right away for whatever reason, then we should do a simple math:
    According to their official data, there are 193 nations UN members. US contributes 22% to their budget. WHY??? We should contribute only 1/193 part of the budget and not a penny more! China – 3.189%, Russia – 1,602%.
    And they vote against us!!!
    In any private business if you have more shares (pay more) you have more votes!

    And I agree with Rick Perry: if a country votes against US, then no any financial aid, period!

  • Maxx

    Having read this;

    I would agree and but amend VArifleman. An amendment to set the number of years any person shall hold office in the Congress and/or Senate to a total of 8. (After 8 years in office, you are done in D.C.) Upon completion of 8 years, an independent financial audit of any such person shall be conducted to ensure that no monies received nor possessed shall be deemed excessive or improper through any action of acquisition. (Like the insider trading fiasco). Any persons serving in said office who is found guilty of such violations will be liable for said monies payable to the Federal Treasury upon discharge from office with a grace period not to exceed 30 days. (or you go to jail). Just to start; of course…

  • Like Rush Limbaugh always says, “If you don’t believe in God, you’ll believe anything.” It starts with atheism. If you don’t understand that an Intelligent Being and an intelligent design is responsible for all we see around us, then you’ll always be worried that there’s some crisis waiting to get us. You’ll be duped into thinking our earth is in such a delicate balance that we have to nurture it to the point of deifying it. Therein lies the problem, and explains the fanatacism of the enviro-wackos.

  • Shake

    Not to worry the earths natural elements will last for ever and polluting the atmosphere is impossible to do. WE HOPE

  • pragmatist

    The broader issue here is the U.N. hidden agenda to make the U.S. the last nation to be forced into the circle of global socialism. Our president’s every calculated move is designed to achieve that very end state. If the call for Americans to stand and take back the the control of this last great bastion of personal freedoms from the president, socialist democrats and progressives we will lose everything. Hitler was an armature when it comes to the lies, misinformation and twisted, divisive propaganda of the Obama coven.

  • Mai

    Thank you to the Honorable George W Hunt has his extensive 20 year research on the Agenda 21 info.on
    See also Water Water ( the NWO/ UN plan to take over/privatize of all world water.
    Also See

    Also see the NWO directive for the UN :

    The UN has power over the US Military as annonced the other day: Fact of matter: The UN=NWO/NATO/CIA/WHO/D.C./MIC ( DC/US Military a city/state/corp/ owned by The British Crown Corp) US President has just handed Water rights over to the US Military which means to the United Nations!!! It is time to wake up. The UN Agenda 21 and an end to all PIVATE PROPERTY with the exception of the few narrow elite. There has been given an order: Chapter 14: “Immediate depopulation of the world by any means necessary”. You will find detailed info on this George W Hunts website.

  • Mattwm

    I will not abide by any constitution except our own. I can see the 2nd Amendment coming into play here, and the EPA NAZIs will be on the other end of it. The UN has no teeth here, and if the Federal Government ratifies this, then the Federal Government become obsolete. Civil War II will then begin.

  • Mattwm

    how can anyone abide by laws that were created based on false data and lies? the only thing any of these laws will help are the so-called scientists who get funding to keep up their fraudulent work.

  • Dave with Rick Wiles. and
    The PowerHour with Joyce Riley.

  • JP

    Anyone interested in helping upset the apple cart and help alert a sleeping public? I would like to challenge a RINO who works with the very people he claims to be protecting us from. I would like to challenge a political party that claims to be fighting for us, while they sell us out. I would like to reach lots of Christians who are unaware in my district. I would like to reach lots of non-Christians with the gospel in the process. I would like to fight for freedom peacefully while I still can. However, time is short. Just found this website. If anyone, including the owner of this website, is paying attention, would you please look at this now, vote on my webpolls, and share with all you know.

    Only 2 weeks to decision time. If no support comes my way, I will not get on the ballot. I’m tired of reading articles and posting blogs. Anyone interested in taking back the seats of power or at least trying to do so and educating the rest of our fellow Christians and Americans in the process?

    Please help and do it fast if you agree:

    This is not a one man show. It may not be your district, but it is your Congress and your America…at least for now.

    Thank you,

  • In legalese, “shall” means “may”

  • Melissa

    People should be allowed to protect the environment. Notice I said people should be ALLOWED, not people should be told to. What a lot of people don’t seem to understand is that there has to be a balance. Our planet was designed to maintain life. You abuse it too much, yes, there could be deadly consequences but if you go too much toward protecting the planet you threaten the livelihood of many people, so again, you run into the same ditch. Forcing people to do one extreme or the other will be a disaster.

  • The United Nations unleashed all the demons from the river Euphrates and now is forced to marry the beast as it refuses to step down from power and admit failure, tax was never supposed to be used, it was supposed to be tithings and controlled by chosen men of God, no politics. Property purchased was never supposed to be sold so as to preserve the family’s trust. Children were not supposed to be born without God’s consent. Governments just keep re-masking its face to stay in power as its trust is tax money, i.e. wickedness, the only thing that will cause them to vacate their seats is lava and sun flares and this power is given to Moses and Elijah the last two witnesses for the East, (the sun has already set in the West). The United Nations and The Hague have no idea what execution means, the 2000 year wrath of God will speak as they and their roots blinded the human race by denying The Power of God as their laws reveal. Moses and Elijah are given that Power which ends sin once and for all, and a new day begins – THE GREAT AND TERRIBLE DAY OF THE LORD – as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in the end and this time the earth is destroyed by fire. Planet earth are the children’s inheritance it was never specifically created for sinners and their wicket laws, and it was supposed to be understood that way but the beast confused everybody and the UN is obliged to marry it, thereby imprisoning the human race as its children in the history of the end of time – vials – drinking dead man’s blood. The laws of the United Nations are impotent and the laws of God are potent, denying God’s Power is blasphemous and it will never be forgiven, not in this world nor the world to come ! The prophecies – California sinks into the ocean, Hollywood the sexual trash can of the world ends – America experiences a massive explosion which turns it into rubble, smoke, debris and craters ! The opposite side of the world – prophecies – gruesome rape and murder and killings – they a poor sight of the image to the beast.

  • o_O

    Personally, i don’t see this as bad at all.

    While for people who have it all this sounds bad, you HAVE to admit that the population problem along with the environmental crisis has the potential of wiping us out.

    Sustainable development along with recycling and population control will be required for us to survive and this is something that we just HAVE to accept.

    Most people are living in poverty, we have a huge population starving, everyone is unhappy and yet the biosphere is already dying out.

    If we don’t die we might be able to fix things up, and become a true community, with endless potentials in technology and stuff. We COULD even TRY to love ourselves and be happy.

    We can’t keep ignoring our problems, this NWO thing looks fishy alright, but i don’t think this constitution is misplaced, as a global whole we have to do something, even if it means having to let go of extreme consumerism, reproducing without worries and all that.

    While we type here people and the rest of the beings of earth are starving and dying because we consume to much, something just needs to change. We have to TRY at least.

    If this NWO thing doesn’t happen or whatever we will still have to eventually set aside our lifestyle to save the planet.

  • Jon-Anders Grannes

    Its just the old Marxism rebranded.