Hillary’s New Book Now Has A Rating Of 4.9 Out Of 5 Stars (After Hundreds Of 1 Star Reviews Were Deleted)

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

Hillary Clinton’s new book entitled “What Happened” is the hottest selling book in America at this moment, and thanks to the deletion of approximately 800 one star reviews, the remaining reviews make it sound like it is a masterpiece. As I write this article, “What Happened” currently has an average rating of 4.9 out of 5 stars on Amazon. Of course just like Clinton’s campaign, that rating is completely fraudulent, but if this really is Hillary’s “final chapter” I think that it is somehow appropriate that she goes out this way. The Clintons were frauds from the very beginning, and so a fake rating for a book full of lies about a campaign run by con artists is just par for the course.


Now that nearly all of the negative reviews have been scrubbed, the “reviews” section for “What Happened” contains gems such as these…

#1 An amazing book! Hillary Clinton dives into to the 2016 election, and finally we get to hear her side of the story. I have been a supporter of Hillary’s for years and this really is the most open I have heard her. I am so happy she finally got the opportunity to share her thoughts on the election, and our country as a whole, unmuted by the fear of losing.

#2 I got my copy yesterday and plowed through it in less than 24 hours. This is THE most open and engaging political memoir I’ve ever read. It’s not even a little dry or self-aggrandizing. Clinton spends time analyzing her own mistakes, but takes no prisoners when it comes to the people who also deserve blame for her loss. Clinton-haters will refuse to believe this, but the book – like the Secretary herself – is also warm and funny throughout.

#3 An honest assessment of the reality of the 2016 presidential campaign by the winner of the popular vote. Hillary is honest, smart, practical, and above all, strong. “I wear my composure like a suit of armor.” She is an amazing person who should be in the Oval Office right now. Instead we are living in a nightmare. My wish is that she will never be silent.

It truly is chilling to think that Hillary Clinton almost became the president of the United States, and it is also chilling to think that there are still mindless zombies out there that would gush over Clinton in this manner after everything that has been revealed about her and Bill.

I am sure that Hillary is hoping that this book will do very well, and certainly positive reviews from her “readers” will help to a certain degree.

Unfortunately for Hillary, the professional book critics have not been nearly as kind

Reviews of What Happened have been mixed, with some suggesting it Clinton uses it as an opportunity to blame others – such as Bernie Sanders and Vladimir Putin – for her failure, rather than herself. In The New York Times, which supported Clinton’s campaign, Jennifer Senior writes that the book is “a score-settling jubilee”.

In her book, Hillary seems to take a lot of time pointing fingers at people other than herself. Rather than taking responsibility for running a terrible campaign, she told NPR host Rachel Martin that she would have been considered a “genius” if she had won…

MARTIN: “Did you underestimate the way that your familiarity with the American public could negatively impact your campaign?”

CLINTON: “Well, I thought it was pretty revolutionary that I was the first woman to have a realistic chance of becoming president. So, I don’t know how any woman, who is not familiar to people, since we have so many hurdles to over come, could have even been in that position that I found myself. If I had won, I would been seen as a genius, my campaign would have been seen as perfect, I understand all of that.

You can listen to audio of Hillary making these remarks right here.

In her book, Hillary should have been willing to take responsibility for her mistakes. Instead, she has chosen to play the blame game, and her book should be greatly criticized as a result. But instead negative reviews are being removed, and apparently this is not the first time that this sort of thing has happened

Amazon is rarely moved to delete reviews so publicly, although in November negative comments under a book by anti-Trump broadcaster Megyn Kelly appeared to be removed by the retailer.

Speaking to Fortune, a spokesperson from the company said: “In the case of a memoir, the subject of the book is the author and their views. It’s not our role to decide what a customer would view as helpful or unhelpful in making their decision. We do however have mechanisms in place to ensure that the voices of many do not drown out the voices of a few and we remove customer reviews that violate our community guidelines.”

But I did manage to grab one of the negative reviews before it was removed, and this one definitely made me smile…

Picked this book up at Wal-Mart out of sheer morbid curiosity. Returned it, claiming I bought the wrong book.

It appears to be written with the intent of securing a luxurious retirement. I really don’t think she cared much about the substance of the book itself – but merely finding ways to fill pages with content so as to generate a marketable product. At the end of the day, her name is what is selling the book; not the print on its pages. And even if she only sells 1,000 copies, that’s enough to make writing it worthwhile.

But if you’re looking for some kind of meaning or understanding out of this book, I’m afraid that it simply isn’t there. It’s merely the continuation of her meltdown performance, after being denied all other public platforms to on which to do so. It’s littered with baseless claims and accusations . . . a painfully stupid monologue not unlike that which you would see on an episode of The Bachelor.

The only conclusion that you will come to by the time you reach the ending is, “I’ve been had”.

Hopefully this is the last that we will hear from Hillary Clinton.

But the truth is that there are so many other “professional politicians” that are just like Hillary and Bill, and they will be running for office all over the country in 2018.

So it is imperative that we all get involved and help to elect good men and women that aren’t in it for the money, the power or the fame. Personally, I am running for Congress in Idaho’s first congressional district, and I need your help to defeat the “professional politicians” that I am running against up here.

If we stand by and do nothing, the next generation of Hillarys and Bills will take over and continue to lead America straight down the toilet. And we cannot afford for that to happen, because our nation is living on borrowed time as it is.

Michael Snyder is a Republican candidate for Congress in Idaho’s First Congressional District, and you can learn how you can get involved in the campaign on his official website. His new book entitled “Living A Life That Really Matters” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com.

  • Thoughtwrite

    There are still one star reviews on this book… on Amazon. I checked.

    • Yes, of course there are. This site’s author is fond of calling others liars, yet he lies so frequently himself that his name-calling has lost any merit.

      People know whether or not they like former Secretary of State Clinto, and this will dictate whether or not they wish to purchase her book (and whether or not they’ll LIKE her book). Reddit r/donald has decided to have a bunch of people BUY her book so that they may talk 💩 about her in the comments section and then return the book for a full refund.

      The amount of hatred and vitriol this woman manages to elicit in certain men is truly admirable. If only she could have used this power in some beneficial way, not that I can think of a beneficial way to use men’s innate misogyny.

      • Thoughtwrite

        What about your own misogyny?

        • “What about your own apparent misandry [sic]”

          lol? Sure, I keep my apparent misandry right there with my apparent third arm, my apparent Nobel Peace Prize, and my apparent continent of Atlantis. In general I find it’s smartest to keep all non-existent things together.

          But thanks for the nonsensical knee-jerk mention of mythical misandry upon seeing the word misogyny. It was refreshing.

          • Thoughtwrite

            Well, I detect animosity in your comment.. hence, you must have a degree of misandry….. if you’re female that is. The only other option that I can think of is that you’re a troll.

          • If those are the only “detections” you can make, then it merely means you’d never make a detective in real life, that’s all.

            If you’d had anything, literaaly any single thing, you’d have brought it. Alas, you could only bring failed “detections”.

          • Thoughtwrite

            Well, in fairness, I re-read the comments.. I’ll concede that you’re not a troll… and probably are not engaged in misandry.. So, I conclude that I misread your comment. Happens… But, I use common English and the word detect is among those words. Does not mean that I am a detective. You’ve misinterpreted also.

  • GetReal4U2

    your right…the “face” in the photo looks like a pig…errr…wrong article…

  • steve ash

    Hopefully Merkel, Macron, Trudeau will be writing similar books.

  • TheResurrectionistMilitancy

    These zombie Hillary-voters is why I don´t think abortion is always wrong. Any children raisd by parents like that are doomed.

  • Paul Patriot

    This is the fruits of the propaganda/endoctrination koolaide….these reviewers think she’s the greatest Person, and thinks she would be good for America.

    These sheeple are enemies of America in the sense that they want socialism, which eventually can lead to communism. They despise the Judeao/Christian heritage of this nation…..they view conservatives as “intolerant” when they speak put against the genocide of abortion…or have the “intolerant audacity” to proclaim the authority of the Bible, and the “intolerance” to dare speak the truth in warning of the threat that the “religion of peace” poses to this nation, (and also a severe threat to homosexuals, transgenders), and they really despise the Constitution. They wanted their globalist master to get elected, so that government would take care of them and protect the.

    Logically minded people that can think for themselves,
    ( or deplorables as HITLARY calls them) view hitlary and the Clinton’s in general as a threat to Liberty and what makes America different than other nations.

    Yet, all the politically correct, “tolerant” , liberal, progressive, snowflakes just want to hold hands and sing kumbaya to a globalist traitor, who is pro abortion, anti- 2nd amendment, antichristian, antagonistic towards Israel, rejects American sovereignty, AND, supports Planned Parenthood….which is one of the most racist organization in America, yet, the blacks and many Latinos, wet their pants in excitement when HITLARY was running for president.

    This nation is DONE, FINITO, FINISHED, ETC, as long as you have a large portion of the population thinking like and supporting the likes of Obummer, Sanders and HITLARY

  • stellap

    They deleted 1,200 reviews. At first, when you did a search “Hillary Clinton book”, it showed in the summary that there were 1,630 reviews. When you went to the book review, there were only 430 reviews. Now they are allowing reviews from verified purchasers only. They don’t do that for anybody else.

    • She attracts vile kooks. Those vile kooks (who have every right in the world to hate her) neither read her book nor mentioned her book in their “reviews” of her book. They just left nasty, snarky, sometimes disgusting comments about her for no reason other than it was fun to “MAGA” her.

      If Amazon only does the verified purchase thing for her, then it’s because no one else is as hated and despised as she is. (Side note, no way in heck was someone so wildly despised ever going to be allowed to become President!)

  • Jane

    You can’t review a book on Amazon unless you buy it FROM amazon and post a review while signed in. If this article is true I don’t know how they managed to post reviews if they didn’t buy it from Amazon. It seems odd to me but in any case, if people were posting “reviews” & saying they bought them elsewhere rather than from Amazon this would indicate the reviews were not genuine & some sort of “work around the rules” scam occurred. If there was any removal of reviews – which isn’t clear at all – then that would be why. They have strict rules about who can review books specifically designed to prevent stacking one way or the other and that’s why ALL reviews on Amazon are required to be by verified purchasers only.

    • No. One needn’t buy the item from Amazon (or at all). I have left reviews for foods I’ve had at friends’ houses, a dog shampoo we got from our vet, and for a really awful tape sample I got free in the mail. You just need an Amazon account to post reviews.

      When someone DOES buy the item that they’re reviewing from Amazon it’ll say “verified purchase”. Not even half of the reviews will ever be “verified purchase”.

      Having said that, Amazon removed hundreds of NON-reviews because they were just insults, gendered slurs, and defamation, with ZERO review content. Literally Ѧ55holes gathered on reddit, joked about what they should write, then “brigaded” her review section with mean, nasty garbage having naught to do with her book.

      “Brigading” is when men or boys find something done by a woman and leave hundreds or thousands of intentionally bad reviews for the express purpose of destroying her. They did it to Megyn Kelly (without reading her book or watching her show), they did it to Amy Schumer (without watching her as-of-yet not-released comedy special), and they did it to the 2016 “female” Ghostbusters film (without having seen it because the thousands of 1 votes preceded the movie’s release by two weeks).

      I haven’t — and won’t — read any Clinton book, whether pro- or anti-, and I don’t care about how good her book is/isn’t. But some of the Amazon “reviews” which got deleted relied almost solely upon the C word, the B word, how sxxually unappealing she was, how fat/old/stupid/cowlike/etc., she was, and how much they hoped Dismal Donald would flipflop yet again and decide to actually prosecute her. THESE were the one-star “reviews”, which weren’t reviews whatsoever! They deserved to be removed.

      • stellap

        I tried to leave a review, just to see if I could. I got a message that I could not review her book unless I was a Verified Purchaser. Apparently reviewing vacuum cleaners is not the same as reviewing Hillary.

        • “I tried to [troll the shizz out of Clinton], just to see if I could”

          Ahem. So much for your ability to pay attention to current topics…

          She has obviously made herself a lightening rod over the last few decades, and Amazon has also made abundantly clear that they are tired of deleting the troll comments which in no way, shape, or form qualify as “reviews”. Hence the ABSOLUTE LEAST they could ask of REVIEWERS is to have REVIEWED the book they are supposedly leaving a REVIEW for.

          Learn a new word today: REVIEW.

          • stellap

            No, I actually didn’t plan to write anything; I wanted to see if it was possible. It was not. So everything you say above about Amazon reviews in this case is invalid. That is the point. Try to follow along. Logic is your friend.

            It isn’t the job of Amazon (or you) to decide what is a valid
            review, and what is not.

  • Chapman

    Amazon pulls all kinds of shenanigans with its reviews. I’ve even left glowingly positive reviews for books that Amazon claimed were “biased.” Apparently, their psychic abilities enabled them to divine that i was the writer’s husband, wife, child, or best buddy.

    As a result, I know longer purchase books (or anything else) from Amazon. I’m happy to put forth a little effort to avoid sponsoring an enemy.

    • Thoughtwrite

      Now that makes sense. I wouldn’t put it past any online business to publish “good” reviews… as a matter of advertising to sell the item.

      • Chapman

        Amazon is not run by psychics. If they continue purging positive reviews because they deem them “too positive,” they should just admit their own bias and close their review section altogether.

    • Neon

      This webpage author still supports the enemy.

  • MEP325

    Clinton is a mentally disturbed creep that needs to just shut up and go away already. 512 pages of deranged rantings and finger pointing can be summed up in one word: HILLARY- Hillary happened. She is so blinded by her arrogance and stupidity that she cannot accept it was HER that many people did not like. People saw her for what she is; a corrupt, lying fraud with no substance and would do and say anything to get elected. Thank God she was not elected

  • Truthpatriot2017

    Go to Amazon and Flag the 5 star reviews as Inappropriate and the give your reason…because they deleted negative reviews…biased…

    • Jason

      Amazon reminds me of Natural News where they don’t typically approve comments that have a different point of view from the article.

  • Mtpage

    Can we stop talking about this junk and start talking about the Deep State. All the politicians are just puppets of the Intelligence Community. As long as we are focusing on politicians, they win!!!

    • Paul Patriot

      Very good point. I recommend readers of this Blog checkj of Hagmann & Hagmenn (podcasts, etc) they have even mention Michael.

      They have many guests talking about the deep state. It is not for the faint of heart though, there are some her wicked things happening and conspiring.

  • TheRunningMan

    She is evil…and the forces of evil collude with her.

  • Joe Doe

    I have a new title for her book: Politician Zero memories of nothing.

  • mleblanc138

    Run, it’s the Clinton algae.

  • Manual Stevens

    What is harder for HRC to understand is even though she lost the election, many of her voters have switched to Pres. Trump since then. Many realize she & Obama are not as

    • “many of her voters have switched to Pres. Trump since then”

      Wow. Well, on this planet, many of those who believed Snake Oil Donald’s tall tales have publicly renounced their vote and wished they could trade it for former Secretary of State Clinton.

      I don’t use Twitter, but you can look up the hashtag #trumpregrets to see thousands of voters who express great sorrow and regret at having gotten duped. And you can check their own Twitter “timelines” to see that up until he became popular vote loser Electoral College recipient, they were PRO-DONALD all the way.

      • stellap

        He will win reelection unless they run Oprah for President.

        • See, people keep saying he’ll win re-election, but I’m fairly certain people behind bars are prohibited from even running.

          I haven’t looked it up, so maybe I’m wrong about the prison thing.

  • Ray from BC

    Running the link through the Fakespot analyzer show that it is all bogus… they give a F with 88.1% for fake review grade.
    Analysis overview
    – Our engine has analyzed and discovered that 11.9% of the reviews are reliable.
    – Interesting tidbit: the most used word by reviewers is her.
    – How are reviewers describing this item?
    most, american, political, here and lost.
    – Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there is high deception involved.

    • LOL, I just checked that… it turns out the reviews which Fakespot spotted were the ANTI-Clinton ones. Here’s what you left out from your copy/paste:

      Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there is high deception involved.
      Reviews summary
      The real reason hillary lost is that she ran her 2016 election the same way the clinton’s have run their entire lives – like a gang of lying cheating chicago political thugs

      The difference is this time, we all finally saw behind the curtain

      If hillary clinton was worthy as a leader, had any moral compass
      whatsoever, she would have gone on a stage, held up a printout of the donna brazile email and proclaimed i am not going to take advantage

  • Blue Eyed Guy

    And just like all her other books I’ll see them at the local Goodwill in a month or two.

  • Abe

    I checked out the first Amazon page of HitLIARy’s ratings on her wonderful book!
    Of the 11 comments, there was one 5, Zero 4’s, Zero 3’s 5 2’s, and 5 1’s. This in my book averages out to 1.7272727272.
    The Question is “What happened”?
    The answer is HitLIARy Clinton!
    Any Questions?
    I suspect this book will be cheaper than a roll of toilet paper soon!

  • Isaac

    Hillary deserved to lose.


    @Donald J. Trump

    You said there will be no amnesty.

    It is a HALF-BAKED KNUCKLE HEAD idea to let the “dreamers” just stay in the country even with no citizenship or green card. The dreamers are staying in the country illegally and they should be KICKED OUT. Other countries don’t put up with the crap of allowing illegals to stay.

    Why should “anchor babies” get citizenship?!

    By getting rid of many illegals there will be more job prospects for real Americans.

    • “Why should “anchor babies” get citizenship?!”

      Hey now — four out of five of Crooked Donald’s (kn)own children are anchor babies!

      • stellap

        Their mothers were LEGAL immigrants. And their father was a citizen. Sort of like Obama.

  • Tatiana Covington

    Let’s rename it “My Crap”.

  • Amazon did not remove reviews from people with Verified Purchases. What they DID remove were sentences consisting entirely of “WOOOOO #MAGA, YOU B!TCH!” and “Why won’t this c_nt just die”, etc. These are not reviews. Did someone purchase the book so that they could write their proud disgust, then return the book immediately? Yes. Were there any REVIEWS removed? No.

    Also, I would love to have your Internet connection, buddy. For you to write all the way from whatever universe you live in over here to Earth is amazing. See, over here on Earth former Secretary of State Clinton is hated more than the three dudebros you mentioned all put together. On this planet, former Secretary of State Clinton has had THIRTY LONG YEARS of bad press and witch-hunting. GW? They call him a dope and call it a day. Cheney? They call him the most powerful man in the White House (for those eight years) and call it a day.

    Crooked Donald???? COME THE BLEEP ON. Despite having fallen into bankruptcy more times than most people have ever owned a car, despite refusing to show his income or income taxes, despite being on tape discussing his penchant for sxxual assault, despite his many divorces, despite his four anchor babies, despite his sick p∊rving on underaged girls (backstage at teen beauty pageants, plus the little girl at the elevator, etc.), despite his blatant support of ηazis, despite his mob ties, despite… lol, TONS MORE EVIL, he got a free pass in the press from day one. Is he hated by AMERICAN PATRIOTS? YES. But even with American Patriots voting for other candidates and American Patriots begging for his financial and moral shenanigans to be investigated, we get nothing. The only “hate” Crooked Donald gets is lip service. He isn’t torn down like women are. I have yet to hear anyone start campaigns about how old, fugly, and unfuςκable any of the above men are. I dislike former Secretary of State Clinton for political reasons; regrettably she was still the far better candidate in the race of two, but the DECADES of hate she’s had thrust upon her guaranteed she would never win, even with the vast majority of Americans preferring her.

    • stellap

      The self-delusion is strong with you, isn’t it?

      • {MIRROR.JPG}

        Since you couldn’t dispute any of the facts, you lower yourself to the ad hom. I think we both agree that was your best option.

        • stellap

          There were no facts. Just opinions. I, on the other hand, provided several facts, which you have ignored. The mirror comment doesn’t apply here.

          Everything I said about Bill Clinton is a matter of record (facts). What I said about President Donald Trump is also fact.

          The last paragraph I wrote is my opinion. I labeled it as such. You, on the other hand, spew crap and call it facts. Anybody reading this exchange of ours can see that very easily.

          • False. “I, on the other hand, provided several facts, which you have ignored. The mirror comment doesn’t apply here.”

            Interesting, as the “mirror” response was to your “The self-delusion is strong with you, isn’t it?”, wherein you and you alone magically see “several facts” within your fact-free ad hom.

            “You, on the other hand, spew crap and call it facts. Anybody reading this exchange of ours can see that very easily.”
            Again, false. Anybody reading this exchange will see that you contradicted yourself and misrepresented me and my post. Thanks for that.

          • stellap

            No point in trying to convince you to make any sense at all. I hope you wake soon from your delusions.

          • lol, now you’re just blatantly demanding I show that you’re barking at your mirror again.

          • stellap

            Poor baby. Losers are losers. Get used to it

          • Oh, make no mistake — I’ve gotten used to you.

            But it doesn’t mean I like it. It just means I’m inured to it.