From 7 Billion People To 500 Million People – The Sick Population Control Agenda Of The Global Elite

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

The United Nations has officially designated October 31st as 7 Billion Day.  On that day, the United Nations estimates that the population of the earth will hit 7 billion for the very first time.  But instead of celebrating what a milestone 7 billion people represents, the UNPF is focusing instead on using October 31st to raise awareness about “sustainability” and “sustainable development”.  In other words, the United Nations is once again declaring that there are way too many people on the planet and that we need to take more direct measures to reduce fertility.  In recent years, the UN and other international organizations have become bolder about trying to push the sick population control agenda of the global elite.  Most of the time organizations such as the UN will simply talk about “stabilizing” the global population, but as you will see in this article, there are many among the global elite that are not afraid to openly talk about a goal of reducing the population of the world to 500 million (or less).  To you and I it may seem like insanity to want to get rid of more than 90 percent of the global population, but there is a growing consensus among the global elite that this is absolutely necessary for the good of the planet.


As we approach October 31st, dozens of articles are appearing in newspapers all over the globe that are declaring what a horrible thing it is that we are up to 7 billion people.

In fact, it surely is no accident that the United Nations put 7 Billion Day on the exact same day as Halloween.  Perhaps they want to highlight how “scary” it is that we have 7 billion people on the planet, or perhaps they are trying to send us a message by having 7 Billion Day occur on the same day as “the festival of death”.

In any event, it seems like way too much of a coincidence that 7 Billion Day just happens to fall on the same day as Halloween.

Today, “sustainable development” has become one of the key buzzwords that those in the radical environmental movement love to use, but most Americans have no idea that one of the key elements of “sustainable development” is population control.

So what precisely is considered to be an ideal population for the earth by those pushing “sustainable development”?

Well, of course there is much disagreement on this issue, but many are very open about the fact that they believe that the earth should only have 500 million people (or less) on it.

For example, the first of the “new 10 commandments” on the infamous Georgia Guidestones states the following….

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.”

CNN Founder Ted Turner would go even farther….

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First, says that reducing our population down to 100 million is one of his three main goals….

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”

Sadly, this kind of garbage is even being taught at major U.S. universities.  For example, Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka once wrote the following….

I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.

Mikhail Gorbachev thinks that reducing the global population by 90 percent would be just about right….

“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”

But most of the time, the way that the global elite speak of population control is much more “politically correct”.  They tend to use terms such as “sustainable development” and “reduction of fertility rates” and “quality of life” when discussing the need to reduce our population.

As 7 Billion Day has approached, there have been articles popping up in major publications all over the globe that are advocating increased population control measures.  Of course in the western world such measures are always framed as being “voluntary”, but that is the way that they always introduce things like this.  Once enough people get on board with the “voluntary” population control measures they will become “mandatory”.

So now that you are aware of some of the buzzwords that are used, check out what has been written on some of the biggest news websites in the world recently….

Jeffrey D. Sachs, the director of The Earth Institute at Columbia University, recently said the following in an article for CNN….

“The arrival of the 7 billionth person is cause for profound global concern. It carries a challenge: What will it take to maintain a planet in which each person has a chance for a full, productive and prosperous life, and in which the planet’s resources are sustained for future generations?

“How, in short, can we enjoy ‘sustainable development’ on a very crowded planet?”

For Sachs, one of the “keys” to sustainable development is the “stabilization” of the global population….

“The second key to sustainable development is the stabilization of the global population. This is already occurring in high-income and even some middle-income countries, as families choose to have one or two children on average. The reduction of fertility rates should be encouraged in the poorer countries as well.”

In a recent article for the Guardian, Roger Martin stated that all of the problems that humanity is facing would be easier to solve if less people were running around the planet….

“…all environmental (and many economic and social) problems are easier to solve with fewer people, and ultimately impossible with ever more.”

He also says that if we reduce the population, it will mean better lives for all the rest of us….

“On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer people mean better lives.”

But is that really the case?

Of course not.

There has been tremendous human suffering all throughout history.  If we eliminated 90 percent of the global population it would not suddenly usher in some kind of “golden age”.

But many among the global elite are truly convinced that we are spoiling “their planet” and they don’t want so many of us around anymore.  Thanks to technology, they only need a few hundred million people to run their system, and they view the rest of us as “useless eaters”.

This all may sound quite bizarre to many of you, but this is the kind of stuff that is being taught in colleges and universities across the western world.

In fact, you are starting to see an increasing number of people in the western world actually suggest that we adopt a “one-child policy” such as China has.  For example, the following is from an opinion piece that appeared in the National Post….

A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.

The author of the opinion piece believes that such a “one-child policy” would reduce the global population to 3.43 billion by 2075….

The intelligence behind this is the following:

-If only one child per female was born as of now, the world’s population would drop from its current 6.5 billion to 5.5 billion by 2050, according to a study done for scientific academy Vienna Institute of Demography.

-By 2075, there would be 3.43 billion humans on the planet. This would have immediate positive effects on the world’s forests, other species, the oceans, atmospheric quality and living standards.

This is the kind of stuff that a lot of these people sit around and think about all day long.

They are obsessed with death and with reducing the population as rapidly as possible.  They see us as a “plague” that is ravaging the planet, and they believe that by getting rid of us they would actually be saving the earth.

Due to public opinion, population control advocates have to tread lightly in the western world.  But where they can get away with it, they are not afraid to be very forceful.

I have already discussed the horrific one-child policy in China.  As the Epoch Times recently noted, enforcement of this policy can be absolutely brutal….

“Pregnant women lacking birth permits are hunted down like criminals by population planning police in China and forcibly aborted.”

If you don’t believe something like this can ever happen in the western world, you might want to think again.

Limitations on child births are already showing up in popular television shows.  For example, a new show on Fox called Terra Nova portrays the future of the earth as a living hell due to overpopulation.  People in the future can hardly breathe the air due to overwhelming pollution and a strict “two-child policy” is rigidly enforced.

The family featured in Terra Nova is able to go through a portal to a prehistoric world that is 85 million years in the past.  In this “new world”, humans have set up a wonderful new socialist society where everyone is provided for and where “green technology” is helping them to avoid making the “mistakes” of the past.

Unfortunately, socialist utopias such as the one portrayed on Terra Nova only exist in works of fiction.

Instead, what happens most of the time in real life is that the “good intentions” of social planners devolve into absolute tyranny when put into practice.

For example, just check out what a recent National Geographic article said happened when social planners in India tried to aggressively reduce birth rates in India in the 1970s….

The Indian government tried once before to push vasectomies, in the 1970s, when anxiety about the population bomb was at its height. Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and her son Sanjay used state-of-emergency powers to force a dramatic increase in sterilizations. From 1976 to 1977 the number of operations tripled, to more than eight million. Over six million of those were vasectomies. Family planning workers were pressured to meet quotas; in a few states, sterilization became a condition for receiving new housing or other government benefits. In some cases the police simply rounded up poor people and hauled them to sterilization camps.

How would you feel if you were rounded up and hauled off to a sterilization camp?

Sterilization programs (most of the time they are “voluntary”) are in full force all over the globe.  Much of the time they are sponsored and funded by the United Nations.  The global elite are absolutely obsessed with getting women to have less babies.

That is one reason why abortion is so very important to them.

Recently, Al Gore made the following statement regarding population control….

“One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principle ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children have, the spacing of the children.

The elite love to use terms such as “fertility management” and “family planning”, but what they really intend is for there to be less pregnancies and more abortions so that the population will not grow as quickly.

They certainly do not intend to empower women to have more children.

This agenda was also very much reflected when the March 2009 U.N. Population Division policy brief asked this shocking question….

“What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?”

Now who in the world gave the UN the right to be trying to “accelerate fertility decline” for women in poor countries?

But to many in the global elite, trying to get women to have less babies makes all the sense in the world.  In a recent editorial for the New York Times entitled “The Earth Is Full“, Thomas L. Friedman made the following statement….

You really do have to wonder whether a few years from now we’ll look back at the first decade of the 21st century — when food prices spiked, energy prices soared, world population surged, tornados plowed through cities, floods and droughts set records, populations were displaced and governments were threatened by the confluence of it all — and ask ourselves: What were we thinking? How did we not panic when the evidence was so obvious that we’d crossed some growth/climate/natural resource/population redlines all at once?

These people honestly and truly believe this stuff.

Unfortunately, this agenda is even represented in the highest levels of our own government.

Barack Obama’s top science advisor, John P. Holdren, once wrote the following….

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

Holdren also believes that compulsory abortion would be perfectly legal under the U.S. Constitution….

“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

The following are 8 more quotes that show the mindset that a lot of these population control advocates have….

#1 Microsoft’s Bill Gates….

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

#2 U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg….

“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

#3 David Rockefeller….

“The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”

#4 Jacques Cousteau….

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.”

#5 Prince Phillip, the Duke of Edinburgh….

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”

#6 David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club….

“Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”

#7 Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger….

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

#8 Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12….

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”

When you believe that the earth has way too many people, human life becomes cheap, and abortion becomes a way to get rid of undesirables.

According to a recent article in the Daily Mail, thousands of “abnormal” babies are now being selectively aborted in the UK each year….

Thousands of pregnancies were aborted last year for ‘abnormalities’ including 500 for Down’s syndrome, new figures reveal.

In total, there were 2,290 abortions for medical problems with the foetus, with 147 performed after 24 weeks.

In a world that is “overpopulated”, babies that are not “perfect” become more “disposable” than ever.

In fact, the truth is that the population control agenda and the “abortion rights movement” have been inseparably linked for decades.  Those that are obsessed with “overpopulation” view abortion as a very necessary method of birth control, and one of their main goals is to expand access to “reproductive health care” to as many women around the globe as possible.

But in the end, our “voluntary” actions are not going to be nearly enough to reduce the population and most population control advocates realize that.  Many of them are openly calling for a “benevolent” global authority to take charge to lead us through the “necessary” transition that is ahead.

In a previous article, I described the type of world that the radical population control advocates see for our future….

Imagine going to sleep one night and waking up many years later in a totally different world.  In this futuristic world, literally everything you do is tightly monitored and controlled by control freak bureaucrats in the name of “sustainable development” and with the goal of promoting “the green agenda”.  An international ruling body has centralized global control over all human activity.  What you eat, what you drink, where you live, how warm or cold your home can be and how much fuel you can use is determined by them.  Anyone that dissents or that tries to rebel against the system is sent off for “re-education”.  The human population is 90 percent lower than it is today in this futuristic society, and all remaining humans have been herded into tightly constricted cities which are run much like prisons.

This is the endgame for the radical green agenda.  In order to save the earth, they feel as though they must dramatically reduce our numbers and very tightly control our activities.

But is that the kind of a future that anyone would actually want to live in?  Would anyone actually choose to live in a future where bureaucrats micromanage our lives for the good of the environment?

Personally, I think that the 7 billion people on earth would do just fine if they were given a lot more liberty and freedom to live their own lives as they see fit.

But letting people decide how to run their own lives is anathema to those that have bought into the population control agenda of the global elite.

They actually believe that they are smarter than all of the rest of us and that they need to tell us what to do for the good of humanity and for the good of the planet.

This patronizing approach should truly sicken all freedom-loving Americans.

So what do you think of the population control agenda of the global elite?

Please feel free to leave a comment with your opinion below….

  • hognutz

    To all the people advocating population control:

    You first!

    • Nexus789

      Fine….I’ve decided not to breed and population control/management is a good idea.

      It is either some form of control for humanity to live within its means (finite energy, resources, water, etc) or an uncontrolled population collapse.

      The planet is finite and as a concept you don’t seem to get that. Also are you willing to share your resources, or is the whole of the US sharing its resources with the extra hundreds of millions? Most certainly not as those that have will not share.

      • Jeremy

        I’ll leave decisions about sharing resources, and extent of, humanity to God. Rather do that than some government bureaucrat or some wacked out environmentalist.

    • You beat me to it, hognutz!

      • This makes me think about a bumper sticker that had a Mother Theresa quote “Saying there are too many people is like saying there are too many flowers.” I admire her, but what a stupid quote. Any gardener, like myself, will tell you that packing tons and tons of seedlings into a limited space will result in sickly, diseased, over-crowded plants.

        The author says it’s insane to talk about eliminating 90% of the population. I think it’s insane to deny the adverse effects that our mushrooming population has had on the planet. The thing is, WE ALREADY HAVE POPULATION CONTROL. War, disease, famine, basically the competition for resources limits any population,whether rabbits or humans. Humans figured out how to dig up oil and convert that energy into industrial agriculture, thus allowing our population to bloom like a red tide in the past 100 yrs. You can either have population control thru disease, competition, stress and overcrowding, or you can have it some voluntary more humane way like birth control. It’s more humane than famine, even if it is involuntary. NOTE: I’m not supporting mandatory sterilization. There has to be a compromise between “kill everyone” and “more people are good for the planet”. Maybe giving people cash to get fixed? But then only rich people would reproduce. Lottery system? I don’t know. We will never be able to agree on a rational system of population reduction, so we will end up letting the forces of war, famine and disease keep our population in check.

        How can you not see that we are hurting the Earth? We could never sustain these numbers without oil. When it runs out, people will die off and maybe those left will grow up in a culture that teaches them to respect both Our Father in Heaven, and Mother Earth who gives us everything we have. As a nature-loving hippie/conspiracy theorist, I get so frustrated with conservative preppers, libertarians and conspiracy theorists who seem to have no regard for caring for the poor, or for Nature. I’m sorry, I love this blog, but the author is very wrong on this count. This anti-NWO movement needs more nature-loving, anti-racism bleeding hearts to balance it out.
        in fact, I have never written a comment on an online article until today, that’s how pissed off I am by people showing no regard for the other species on our planet, and no regard for common sense or logic. sorry, getting too angry i guess.

        • Michael


          I thought I was advocating for the poor. It is the global elite that want to sterilize them all (or worse).


        • Jeremy

          So if this is humane, who should make these decisions? How would they make these decisions?

        • Blue Canary

          I completely agree Sarah. Mother Earth has provided for countless species for the past 65+billion years. Here the Human SPECIES the supposed smart ones like Jeremy and the rest of top notch thinkers asking “how makes the desicions?” I can answer that for you top notch…You can. WOW…that was so hard. Have a child or two…then stop. Nobody forced you to do a thing did they. No government lottery chose you. It’s called taking responsiblity for your actions. It’s okay to keep deer populations at 150,000 and here people like you sit thinking 7 billion humans is okay. Why do we do that? Is it because it’s a human vs every other species…the only way one can come to that conclusion is we are fighting for the same resources. I just read an article today about an alligator in S.C that was killed because people built a soccer field next to a swamp and some kid kicked the ball into the water. You all sit here crying, the government and the elitest just want to control us…Waa waa… but yet it wasn’t some elitest or politician that pushed it’s weight around it was dumb ass country bumpkin with a rifle. My point is…we are on a rock going nowhere. At this point in history we have nowhere to go when we cross the line of no going back, if we haven’t already. We as a whole need to look past our own brief time on this rock and see what exactly we plan on leaving behind for future species. Open your eyes and look at our closest neighboring planets Venus and Mars a very straight forward look at what our futures hold… We are either gonna kill the planet by turning into a cosmic greenhouse (Venus) or a barren wasteland (Mars) But like I said our time here is brief so like all the generation that had the mindset of well it’s not my problem let the future deal with….The future generation is here guys and gals. I’m not saying don’t have children, I’m just saying we need to be aware and responsible for how many we are having, because there won’t be anything left for anybody elitest included if we maintain the rate. If WE don’t then well the Government will and then the choice won’t be your will it. So use the power to decide your families future before you lose the power.

        • Helen

          You know I tried to have a tubal when I was 18. I couldn’t find a doctor to do it. They all refused stating that I was to young. I was perfectly fine not becoming a mother. I did have 2 children later in life while on birth control! I didn’t skip a pill or anything like that. After my second child was born, the doctor on call refused to perform my tubal stating “I require my patients to be over the age of 25 with 3 or more children”! Correct me if I’m wrong but if you want population control then why such the damn fuss and hassle over having a tubal ligation performed? No doctor would do it for me when I was 18 & the doctor refused even though I was 24 years old. I finally got my tubal performed by another physician that came in on his day off to perform my procedure but here’s my point: they don’t want to do the procedure & I know this for a fact.

        • desiree

          I completely agree with you. when I read this article it made me somewhat angry but mostly sad. You said most of what I felt like saying except; what is sad to me is how most people can’t see a compassionate solution. If you havnt already heard of him you’ve gotta check out Jim Merkel: Radically Simple. There’s a book and a film, he’s a brilliant engineer who used to live in California in a huge house, making lots of money, owning lots of stuff. Now he is living by example on a homestead in Oregon on under $8,000 a year. He is so positive and caring in the way he puts it, “There’s no choice for all the children of the world but to love and care for them…But we need to support a VOLUNTARY agreement to have ON AVERAGE one child families…thru a compassionate program incuding education on the full dynamics of population growth and supporting women’s EDUCATED decision to choose her own level of fertility.” It’s just so logical, compassionate, simple. If you let women make the choice for themselves (especially in third world countries where there are little resources available and women are forced to marry and have as many children as possible) many women will make the right decision to have only one child. Its easy to sit in a comfy, air-conditioned chair in front of your computer and spout angry, negative, narrow minded ideals. But just watch a documentary or two about poverty, or better yet go visit a third world country (hay, theres one really close, it’s called Mexico) and see how women and children suffer and how women aren’t allowed a choice in how many children they have and aren’t given access to birth control. Or even better to open your eyes still, find out about women in the Middle East who are married off against their will as young as 13 and forced to have children, damaging thier urinal tracts. Then they cannot hold in their urine and are shunned from society. Go and see that and then try to say that what Jim Merkel proposes is wrong.

          • Robert Castillo

            I don’t believe in your (western, liberal, elitist, politically correct) compassion. Do you really want resolve this problem? YOU not have children and share YOUR OWN money with the poor third worldist so their children can live with fairness and don’t torment you with those ugly documentaries that makes you want disappear them from this world where 10% (what a coincidence) have 90% of wealth. Don’t be sad, be happy in your fascist (look for eugenics) philosophy.

        • Joseph Robinson

          Well said

  • Gary2

    No matter what the problem is more people make it worse. I never drive to work and say to my self “self-there is not enough traffic, I think we need more people”

    I would love there to be WAY less people, however, I do not know an ethical way to accomplish this. Therefore I have to agree with Michael’s premise that the elites, in addition to not paying their fair share want the poor dead.

    Maybe the rich elites need to be *****************. They should watch the video of his demise. This is what happens to those who keep people down. I am sure they would come around to sharing their wealth fairly quickly.

    I think I agree with the first poster that they who want it should lead by example.

  • optimum

    I don’t see anything wrong with education on birth control, or even standards for having children. I see many parents in the world whom should not be allowed to even have children, and make horrible parents. Now I don’t believe mass sterilization is the answer, but education is never a bad thing. What is the authors answer then to our proven scientifically over populated planet? If it continues like this, good bye civilization and resources as we know it. Are you really ok with that?

  • HeartofShadows

    Hey I actually liked brave new world.
    Population of 1 billion.

  • tommcd

    Check out this podcast from the financial sense news hour about Agenda 21. It explains very clearly what “sustainable development” and Agenda 21 are all about. Dr Michael Coffman leads the discussion:

  • tommcd
  • Population control, or carry on as normal, what a choice. Put simply, 7 billion is not a problem, 7 billion individuals to feed and sustain is not a problem for this planet. The problem is that those 7 billion are humans. Greedy, self obsessed humans. Driven by the need to own and control, we are not a species that looks to make 7 billion work, we run a system that looks to make 1 work, the single self unit, as opposed to the collective.

    This is a major factor in famine, starvation, disease spread and infant mortality rates. We, in reality, dont care about major parts of the world. We point, and say ‘how sad’, but ultimately we do not give a damn. Enforced sterilisation of course sounds horrific, but would that not be preferable to sustaining a system that means the majority of those born into certain countries are doomed to an existence of ‘want’, of struggling for the basics of food and water, before being wiped out by what ever disease decides to camp down in the local region? We might be horrified by the ideas of controlling numbers, but equally we should be horrified with ourselves, for the system we have created and the suffering we encourage with it.

    • As I read the article, I kept thinking that there’s a problem with both alternatives.

      Thanks for offering a perspective that balances out the issue.

  • John

    In 2050 there will be 9 billion people on earth. Bye bye “500 million” doomprophets.

    • A.S.

      2050? Really? I predict by 2020 we will have 10 billion!

  • ScoutMotto

    Personally I think there is way too much government on the planet. Let’s dump the UN.

    @hognutz – very good point. No one will ever take the lead on this concept. Any sane person would rather not be the genocidal example for this day and age. If they are serious about reducing the population, they will have to do it by force.

  • Aurelius 7

    The talk is one thing, the actions are another. The chatter from some people who would like this to happen (such as Gary who frequents this board) is absolutely sickening, but realistically speaking, this is as likely to happen as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad converting to Judaism. We’ll all be baked from World War 54 before they dwindle the population down by 95%.

    • They have already taken massive action to reduce the population and they control many ways to reduce it quickly.

      Bill Gates is pushing for a 90% vaccination rate worldwide, but vaccines are loaded with toxic chemicals and metals, many of which are known to cause serious health problems, sterility, and death.

      They have poisoned our food supply (corn, soy, etc.) with GMO’s, which leads to sterility.

      They can modify weather with HAARP and generate Earthquakes, such as Japan’s 9.1 quake, which created a deadly tsunami that damaged the nuclear reactors and released massive radiation.

      They could introduce a pandemic to wipe out the population quickly.

      They control the IMF and Central Banks in almost every country, meaning they control the economy. With the E.U. and U.S. poised to collapse, our infrastructure will also collapse and MANY people will die from lack of food and water.

      And their puppet Barry keeps pushing wars with Islamic countries, with Syria most likely being the next victim. Pretty soon these Islamic countries will attack Israel, or Israel will attack Iran, both of which would draw the U.S. into the battle… which would draw Russia into the battle… which would… you get the picture.

  • Kevin

    Henry Kissinger once used the phrase “Useless Eaters” to describe some human beings. What is interesting is the lifestyle lived by the advocates of population reduction and their individual use of global resources. Looking at the bigger picture one can see the push towards communism for the masses (of course not them). Here is a pie, this is our LARGE piece, now children you share the rest equally.

  • Tagnut

    Unfortunately these plans by the global elite have been brewing for generations. This is old news to some people (a minority).

  • Thomas

    Great article. I hope that anyone who advocates green energy understands the motives behind the actions of these elites. Forcing Americans to use particular light bulbs and to keep their home temperatures at a certain level is just the tip of the iceberg. These people won’t stop until government controls how many children you have. I say, less government, more freedom! Give me liberty or give me death!

    • The joke’s on us Thomas. The elite have many ways of ‘reducing the population’.

      They pressure people to use Compact Fluorescent Lightbulbs to save energy, but CFL’s have been shown to increase headaches/migraines and cause cancer.

      If they are broken in your house, mercury is released, which is toxic to your body.

      And if they’re not disposed of properly and just thrown in the trash, mercury will be released at the landfills, which makes it way into our drinking water.

      • Jeremy

        But how many people have actually died from these lightbulbs?

        A long way to go to get to 6.5 billion people.

  • Sihaya

    Thanks for this informative article. My stance on the matter is that the vaccination programs, the introduction of GMOs and water fluoridation are part and parcel of a fascist agenda that has been ongoing since Nazi scientists were “recruited” via Operation Paperclip. Eugenics and elitism seem to go together like two eggs in a pan. I also agree that the recent widespread availability of abortion came out of this mindset. In my humble opinion, the number of children one brings into this world should be up to parents, not governments or agencies. That said, I believe people should be just as free to practice birth control and to terminate unwanted pregnancies as to have large families. That is not to say that abortion should in any way be encouraged, but it should be safely available for those instances in which the alternative would be more cruel. If you research the long history of birth control, you will find that it has roots not in the agenda of fascists like Sanger, but in the work of midwives and herbalists. Governments should not dictate these choices any more than they should dictate family size. As someone who understands the nefarious agenda of the power elite, my position on this matter may differ from that of other informed people. Nevertheless, it is based on love of liberty and profound respect for life. Thanks for listening.

    • You are probably too young to remember polio, but I thank God for vaccinations. Watch a video of someone in an iron-lung sometime.

      • Jade

        In those vaccinations are sterilizing agents, the government, that is the ‘elite’, has their hands in everything!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Monk

    The problem isn’t just population but consumption per capita. For example, the U.S. has less than 5 pct of the world’s population but consumes up to 25 pct of world oil production, part of it needed to power up more than one-third of the world’s passenger cars.

    • Kevin

      Problem? That is directly related to a high standard of living. I don’t know about you but I like a high standard of living.

      • Monk

        It’s a problem because even if you decrease global population considerably you will still have overshoot.

  • mondobeyondo

    “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature…”

    Huh?! There’s about 6,500,000,000 people who have something to say about that.

    • Groener

      Not after they are killed by the 500,000,000 who have all the weapons and control all the food.

  • These people beleive in this as they have no other faith/beliefs. Oddly, though, they want others to die or not be born. I say to them, if you wnat us to die off, then, you first!!. Most of them are elitists with great resources that can live long lives. A sort of Calvinism to its logical end. A good program to lsiten to (Met Ahlquist, nice chap)

    • Tim

      Calvinism to it’s logical end? I’m not sure what you’re trying to say. Please elaborate.

  • justadad

    Over population of the Earth is a myth.
    Give everyone on the Earth 1 & 1/2 acres of land to sustain themselves and the current world population would all fit within the land area of Russia (not including its former satellite states)
    Do the math.
    The ruling class is forever creating crises so that it can justify its own existance and grab more money and power.
    Hitler was a great student of Margaret Sanger and her colleagues. We know how that ended.

    • Jeremy

      So we can farm Siberia? LOL. Just kidding.

      • justadad

        I’ve actually been to Siberia and seen the dark rich soil. And, yes, if Canada and Alaska are productive farmlands we could apply the same agriculture techniques in Siberia.
        до свидания

  • DEFCONStudios

    Michael here is additional supporting evidence of the Global Depopulation plan:

    “The US has a shocking conspiracy.” from September 27 to October 1, 1995, the Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachëv Foundation, funded by the United States, gathered 500 of the world’s most important statesmen, economic leaders and scientists, including George W. Bush (he was not the US president at the time), the Baroness Thatcher, Tony Blair, Zbigniew Brzezinski, as well as George Soros, Bill Gates, futurist John Naisbitt, etc., all of the world’s most popular characters, in the San Francisco Fairmont hotel for a high-level round table conference, discussing problems about globalization and how to guide humanity to move forward into the 21st century. the outstanding people of the world in attendance thought that in the 21st century a mere 20% of the world’s population will be sufficient to maintain the world’s economy and prosperity, the other 80% or 4/5 of the world’s population will be human garbage unable to produce new values. The people in attendance thought that this excess 80% population would be a trash population and “high-tech” means should be used to eliminate them gradually.”

    “One of the key parts of this manifesto for this new world is that there should be a population of 500 million people. Now, 500 million people is an enormous reduction from the nearly 7 billion that we’ve got at the moment. That’s pretty much 95% of people who would no longer be on this planet. And 50% is a step towards that, and there’s a reason why they’re doing all of this. There’s a reason why they’re in a hurry. There’s a reason for this insanity.”

    Finally reference the Georgia guide stones which advocate Global depopulation to a population of less than 500 million.



    To you I say, me first? Heck yeah. I have no children, do not want any children, and unless forced or tricked into it somehow, will not have any children.


    Another anti-abortion rant, more or less. While the global elite has schemes undreamed of for control of this, control of that, the truth is, more or less, the world is overpopulated. People complain about rising poverty, rising unemployment which is one road to poverty, scarcity of food with food banks running out of fresh stocks, and somehow, through all of these maladies we get to the conclusion that somehow bringing more babies into the world is the answer? Now I will be the first to say that I have no common cause with the heinous schemes that globalists have in mind, but people should be encouraged to have fewer children. Somehow the amerikan virtue of extremely large families is an anachronism of a past that has little relation to the 21st century and should be forgotten. The world is much more different than those days, not to mention much more dangerous than times past.


    With a neverending string of corrupt governments and societies, endless war, poverty, famine, disease, and rising income inequality around the world, I do not see the logic with bringing more people into it. The evidence, at this point in time, clearly points to people voluntarily having fewer and fewer children. Should world conditions improve where people, by and large, see the value in a peace dividend and those many maladies previously mentioned are largely eliminated, then a case can be made to increase the world population.

    • justadad

      Reed, the world is not overpopulated. According to the U.S.Department of Agriculture the earth can support 19.8 Billion people using “low input agriculture.” That means that number could be possibly doubled or tripled if we used medium or high input agriculture.(60 Billion could be sustained on this planet.)
      The problem is not number of people on the earth.
      The problem is that the people do not want to live on the earth the way the Creator told them to.



        I have to seriously question what your thought processes are in your thinking. With the amerikan empire blowing up half the planet through war, the amerikan led United Nations causing misery and mayhem around the world which is leading to mass starvation, and you want to conclude that over 19.8 billion people can be supported with a planet run by the murderous governments currently in place?

        There is no doubt that technology could be employed that would eliminate the maladies that I listed. My analysis is based on how the world is currently run, not on some theory of what could be. As I said in my response that if current trends are reversed and the ills of the world eliminated, (war, famine, disease, etc.) then a case could be made for increasing world population. Until then, my analysis stands.

        • justadad

          The U.S.D.A. determined those numbers, not I.
          They also came to the same conclusion you came to: it all boils down to the political will of the people.
          No technology or medicine can cure the worst malady on the face of the planet: the darkness of the human heart.
          My last statement still stands, and whether there are only 2 people on the planet or 20 billion, if we don’t acknowledge that we are but stewards to a Higher Being, we are doomed.

      • Gary2

        and you think traffic is bad now and you seriously want more people? Are you sane?

    • Gary2

      I think those shows that highlight large families are sickening.

    • justason

      Ok Mr. Reed, you know, I think I can agree with you that the world is corrupt, but I also think that if you actually had a child, someone who you a responsible for, I think you might have a different opinion about them. I think you might actually start trying to make the world a better place to live in…not just condemning those who have kids, saying that the world is overpopulated. Yes the World is at war with itself but don’t you think that if everyone Stopped looking out for their on selfish ‘wants’ and started to take action for those who they are responsible for, then our priorities might change quite a bit, and there would be so much less corruption?

  • United We Stand For Prosperity

    Population, weather and agriculture – are they related?

    Don’t forget Mr. Turner’s comments.
    Hope ya’ll are paying rapt attention to whats going on in the atmosphere. It seems to me these destructionists behind the environment’s decline are betting that the people are too drugged (by illegal and legal drug pushers) and too dependant on electronic devices for their news and education to observe and pay attention to the real environment.
    Would not be suprized to read in mainstream media in near future
    “GLOBAL WARMING/CLIMATE CHANGE MAY CAUSE WIDESPEAD FAMINE” with little to no acknowledgement of the deliberate manipulation of the atmosphere and disruption of natural weather systems. And if there is some obligatory admittance to geo-engineering it will be portayed as a benevolent means to mediate the so called “climate change”. Anyone that has lived long enough and is paying attention can’t deny the obvious havoc the ramped up atmospheric manipulation is having on our good earth. It wasn’t too long ago that starry nights and sunny skies were quite the norm and you’de know that unless you were born yesterday, so to speak. I suppose what we’ll be told is that earth’s decline is due to too many people using up limited resources, resources that are limited not by unsustainable populations but by the few who hold the keys to the seed vault.
    Look at the history behind some of these people, like Sanger and you will see where they get their narrow minded worldview perception.
    Far from humanitarians or lovers of this beautiful and bountiful world their worldviews speak volumes as followers of the most unGodly-like people that ever roamed this planet.
    The lot of them best described in a word as misanthropists, or in modern parlance, “haters” of their own kind, These dealers-of-death permit the collateral damage of flora and fauna in order to obtain their personal ideology in a world of fewer people. Ought to have their heads examined.
    Thankfully, some mainstream media heads are gently, so as not to step too hard on their masters toes, beginning to discuss that climate change may not be what we’ve been led to believe.
    For those that thought Oh beautiful for spacious skies and amber waves of grain, for purple mountains majesty above the fruited plain exists only on the electronic screen suggest you get to know the writings of Hal Borland, for one.

  • It’s the typical obsession with controlling the “lower orders” — never mind that as standards of living and levels of women’s education and economic empowerment go up, birth rates go down, that doesn’t involve power and authority, so it’s not good enough. The elites are elite only as long as the groundlings are kept in their subordinate places, because to them status is a zero-sum game.

  • S. Wiseman

    When millions of people are killed by wars, civil unrest, the elite get richer. Someone has to die or get laid off for the average worker to get his bonus and pay raise. Someone has to die for the economy to get better and for more “good jobs” to be made available. People have to die for the centralized food distribution systems to make food available to everyone at a low price. That’s the way this sick, twisted economic pyramid scheme is rigged. The bottom tiers always hold up the top layers. The bottom has to die off… game over, repeat. The middle class won’t care that masses of people die off in order for them to enjoy the finer things in life. I hate to be so generalistic. I’m middle class as well. But not for long. The game is rigged to drag me into poverty. There just ain’t enough money in the system and there NEVER will be! Money (FRNs, a created thing) always, always filters its way back to the top to the very ones who created it out of thin air. What people need is freedom. If Chinese citizens had freedom of movement they wouldn’t have population problems. This article is the most disturbing yet.

  • farmdb

    That’s why these vaccines they want to push on our children are so dangerous. We don’t know what they do or what’s in them

  • jackieR

    How about getting of the old and infirm. The drains on society.

    • HecatesMoon

      Those old and infirm lived ways of life we never have. Those old and infirm struggled in ways we never have. They busted their asses, not as a protest to GMO’s or raw milk or government control, but because they HAD to. Those old and infirm worked their fingers to the bone and broke their backs to have what they could get, accumulate what they could. They deserve nothing but the utmost respect for long lives lived, old lessons learned, and the history that comes with them. Pfffffffft!

  • Jimmy

    If any groups can be considered “useless eaters” it’s the political class and the “elite” in this country. Let’s start the ball rolling by sterilizing all politicians and elitists and then impose strict limits on how long they’re allowed to live before being euthanized for obsolescence. See if they sing the same eugenics tune then.

  • Groener

    It is clear that there are too many people, and simply speaking there are not enough jobs for them.

    Having much fewer people will at least reduce the strain borne by the Earth.

    The world did fine when it had 100 million people or so ; and , the people back then were more intelligent than today.

    I wouldn’t really miss 90% of the world’s population. I have no descendants so at least I can say that I didn’t contribute to it.

    • Kevin

      Do you read what you write?

      The world did fine when there were no people too. Personally I care about “The People”.

      You might want to apply for a job with the NWO. You a fan of Pol Pot, Hitler and Stalin?

    • mondobeyondo

      Yeah. And the world was the most pristine when there was only Adam and Eve inhabiting it.

  • Andrea Bain

    Who exactly are the elite you are talking about? Anyway, eugenics is already taking place in Africa; big pharma’s not giving away any medication to help Africans with AIDS. Also Margaret Sander had always been in favour of eugenics. Historically, blankets laced with a smallpox virus was given to native Americans by the British in the 19th century.

  • Joe Milan

    There is no ends to the lengths these power hungry capitalists will go to have it all their own way. Power to the people

  • James Campbell

    Come on now, this is insane and paranoid. It’s conspiracy theoriests like you which make our political environment so toxic.

    I mean, you probably couldn’t show me even ONE time in history where some “elite” in government killed a lot of people because “they” wanted to control people.

    This kind of thing is just terrible hate-mongering from tinfoil hate wearing morons and I…

    Ah screw it, I can’t play the libtard anymore. Yeah, I’m thinking a big plague (or two) could probably accomplish that goal for them. Strange, I could have sworn that kind of thing was mentioned in the last part of some really old book I have sitting on my nightstand at home.

    • Michael

      You almost had me going there for a second ;)


  • Debi Menze

    God will have the final say….after all it is HIS planet!! :)

  • Colin

    To me, this is right wing fringe craziness.

    For the elite to consider reducing our population, first I think they would need to acknowledge that we exist. I think many of them barely acknowledge the existence of anyone who exists outside their circle. Second, for this proposal to work, the elite must be capable of thinking long-term. History has proven again and again that the elite are very lousy at this.

    So, no, I am not buying this.

  • Ron

    Back in 1999 the US Census Bureau projected a US population of 1 Billion by end of this century, I think it will reach a billion more quickly than that. Third World demographics are making the US a 3rd world country and 3rd world countries overpopulate.
    England already is way overpopulated yet through immigration it will add another 25% in a few short years.

    Ask yourself if you look forward, or your children or grandchildren, living in a majority 3rd World nation, with crowding beyond your present understanding and all fighting for food and potable water.

    You don’t have to die to go to hell, hell will be where you are…

  • M

    Take a look at The Venus Project. The whole thing is about ‘sustainable population’ and controlled environment. Horrible!

    • M:

      Yes, my oh my…. By any means, make sure that we don’t do anything sustainable! That would be outright… sensible?

  • U.S. Catholic

    Are the PC’ers (Popluation Controllers) supportive or non-supportive of celibacy for Catholic clergy, nuns, and unmarried laity ?

  • Gay Veteran

    The population is as big as it is because of the Green Revolution and fertilizers. But we’ve just about maxed out the results of the Green Revolution and Peak Oil is staring us in the face.

    So stop condeming people who see the problem (and who are NOT advocating reducing the population by 90%).

    You wrote: “…Sadly, this kind of garbage is even being taught at major U.S. universities. For example, Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka once wrote the following….I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.”

    I didn’t see where Pianka advocated reducing the population by 90%.

  • cam

    This is the most idiotic post yet. 2 Billion people on this earth go to bed hungry every day. We can’t even take care of the people we have on this planet now never mind adding more.

    Food prices are rising rapidly around the world as there are barely enough stocks to keep up. Fisheries are disappearing at an alarming rate. Water shortages are rampant even in the first world USA. We are sitting on the peak oil plateau. The idea that resource depletion and devastation of the environment is not related to how many people are on the planet is straight from Fox News talking points. It lacks common sense.

    And birth control doesn’t “get rid of us”. The “elite” are not unique in recognizing that there is a sustainable level of fertility. It is well documented that the more educated a society is the lower the birth rate even among right wing whackos who think it is their right to consume everything in sight. You advocate that we all should be like “Octomom” while millions starve.

    I suspect that you just write posts like this to get people riled up. Otherwise, I am more worried than ever about the state of our society.

  • KB

    A couple of thoughts: Nature has proven time and time again that when you winnow your genetic diversity options down to only a select few, it is much easier for complete species extinction.

    Second thought is that there are not too many people currently alive…just currently too many of them are selfish idiots who are sucking the life out of the planet all at the same time. A little common sense on how to use resources would go a long way … like stop using the ocean as a garbage can.

    And when they are weaning the population down to 100,000,000, I hope they use India’s and China’s population genetic selective process as a guide…there will be 14 females and 99,999,986 males on the planet. Let’s see how long they last then.

    If we just outlawed technology, we would have enough jobs for everyone. Nothing like hoeing a field or walking 20 miles to church to slim that gut right down, and then we’d be back to natural selection….but oh, no, they want the world to be only 100,000,000 and be totally comfy on top of it.

    • KB:

      How many not insane persons on the planet would vote for outlawing technology (which covers pretty much)? 1 or 2?

      Why not try to act a bit serious?

  • Hyperion

    I’ll bet a ten man **************** team could inflict just the right amount of population control needed on this planet.

  • Pamela

    If anyone wants to know what the elite have in store for the useless eaters you can hear Lindsey Williams latest interviews on where he details their plans for 2012. Enjoy!

  • J.J.

    Nature, or some natural disaster will cull the herd. Modern humans have been extremely lucky, we haven’t seen a VEI 8 volcanic eruption in hundreds of thousands of years. Also, we have not seen an asteroid of 4 mi. in diameter or greater strike the earth for tens of millions of years. If either of these happen, there will likely be fewer than 1 million people left worldwide.

  • callmecordelia1

    The scariest quote in the bunch for me was:

    “The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

    WHO would give the official “okay” for someone to have a child? The egotism that is involved with this thought process is beyond me.

    If there really is a plan to reduce the population by 90%, I’m not sure I would want to be a survivor. Can you imagine the stench and decay that would curse the Earth for years after something like that? Yuck.

  • human7001001001

    this scribbling is too stupid to deserve detailed discussion.

    STOP ” Polluting the Earth with these creatures, who have no future. They have no future! Have you pictured what this planet is going to be like in 40-50 years? It’s going to be a big smoking ball of **********! ” (George Carlin)

  • mondobeyondo

    Think I’m gonna move to Mars.

    • mondobeyondo

      There’s communists there too? ****************. So that’s why they call it the Red Planet.

  • For God

    If you do a little math calculation you will find that you can stick each person in the state of Texas and give them 1200 square feet of land. That is about the average size of a small house in America. That leaves the rest of the planet open. So there really is not a population problem. Most of the citizens have been indocrinated with this propaganda in the public school and it is just crap. All the countries in the world produce more than enough food to supply the entire planet. Quit listening to the lies. God would not put his creation on a planet and then no provide for them. That would be contrary to His nature. The people we see starving in third world countries are not starving because there is not enough food, it is because of their corrupt governments.

    • A.S.

      Amen, brother!

      I went to college in 1992-1996 and even then we were brainwashed with these lies. I even bought into them because what does a college kid know besides what his ultra-liberal brain-dead professors teach him? But who am I to make a war against the powerful elite?

      We should pray that they change their ways. And if not, then pray for protection against their evil ways. G-d willing we will be able to see (and experience) 100 billion people in our time living in peace and prosperity! (G-d says that when the World to Come comes on Earth (not in heaven) each woman will give birth to 10 babies at a time). How’s that a “kick in the head” to all the global elites?

    • “All the countries in the world produce more than enough food to supply the entire planet.”

      Take away all the non-renewable energy and other resources used for producing, storing and transporting food (including gasoline, plastics, fertilizers, insecticides, garbage treatment aso.), and see how much food will be left!

  • Take every human on earth and lay them side-by-side and end to and they’ll cover the entire state of Rhode Island. That’s right…do the math. If the “Ultra-Liberals” think we’re too crowded…then move. Lots of open area in Africa.

  • Bob Marshall

    The aids virus was introduced into Africa and administered by the World Health organization. The aids virus, like the anthrax virus was made in a US DOD lab. Vaccines have been forced on some African citizens in some parts of Africa at gun point.In my town in S.C. we habve sustainable development in many of the apartment complexes.

  • The best way to achieve population control is for all the people who think there are too many people on our world, is for them to take a trip to San Francisco and jump off the Golden Gate Bridge. That way the Sun will truly shine upon their dead ass…. then add the ones left on the list above to your favorite gift list and pray for God to give us an opportunity to **************** them…..preferably from far enough away to avoid splatter……

    Live long and prosper….

  • Mariposa de Oro

    Definitely too many Leftist/Libetards on the plant. A 95% reduction of their number would indeed make the world a better place. You first Libtards.

    • Gary2

      I think the same of people on the right. We would be so much more evolved as a nation with out conservatives holding us back and wanting to have us live like it is the 1800″s.

      I guess we are stuck with each other as I am 100% sure I am correct and you are probably 100% that you are correct. (your wrong BTW :)

      • ************* yourself moron,,,,that would be a great start

  • fatima

    God made the earth for man not man for the earth. If we lived as He intended we would never lack for resources no matter how populated the planet would become. When will these Godless people who think they are soooo smart figure this out.

    • james

      i like your outlook,too bad there aren’t more who see it

  • Okay; some of you folks may have been waiting to hear what “Bible believers” have to say: “The wisdom of this world is foolishness to God.” (1st. Corinthians 3:19.) A lot of the world’s people go to bed hungry every night; but the elitist, godless “solutions” proposed by the deep thinkers of this world are detestable madness. Utter, evil, foolishness. And don’t fret…the way things are going; you won’t need to worry about population control.

  • TruthHunter

    Is it possible that a population control mechanism has already been enacted and is well under way? Rumor has it that GMO crops contain proteins that produce antibodies to sperm. Could this be the cause of the inexplicable drop in teen pregnancy rates? Here’s a story of hamsters going extinct after 3 generations of GMO soy:

  • Jim Parker

    If they do it right, North America could be reduced to New York, California and Mexico City.
    The rest of the country could just go back to nature. Ted Turner would have no need for his 750,000 acres. Europe could decide which countries to eliminate Russia might survive, Kill off everyone outside of Beiging and Shanghai in China. The Rockefeller brothers can shut down their oil empire.
    The elite, who won’t want to die, will need to discover ways to feed themselves. Money isn’t very nutritious. Our perfessors can draw straws to see who gets to migrate to the remaining population centers if any are allowed.
    Use the neutron bomb to eliminate the rest. What a world it would be. Eliminate the middle east where the population explosion continues. Let them eat sand. I wonder how things would be with New York and California already on the rocks. What a bunch of idiots.

  • Muriel

    Is Hitler still alive? Sure sounds like it.

    • My goodness! Hitler? Did he work against overpopulation? From what I know, he (or his party) banned both contraception and abortion!

      It seems like some (the stupidest?) among us just have a strange urge to mention “Hitler”, “racism”, “bigot(ry)” etc. every time they stumple upon something they disagree on or do not understand. No matter what those words actually mean. That irritates me a great deal.

      • matt

        hitler hitler Hitler hitler there i said hitler happy now? he killed millions! hitler was evil! if he banned abortion he made up for it by killing millions! obama is the new hitler and the elites are still killing millions! look in 3rd world countries where there is plenty of food yet the people still starve, thats beyond me!

      • person

        hitler supported the birth of youth. he started Hitler Youth which meant that he could brain wash the youth with his crazy ideas.

  • Excellent synopsis.

    ‘Thanks to technology, they only need a few hundred million people to run their system, and they view the rest of us as “useless eaters”.’ That’s it in a nutshell.

    It is documented fact that it was United States policy to pursue population control in 2nd and 3rd-world countries that contained natural resources valuable to the U.S. – precisely because less people put up less of a fight when they’re taken.

    The whole of population control propaganda is based on Malthusianism, a thoroughly discredited theory.

    • S. Wiseman

      ‘Thanks to technology, they only need a few hundred million people to run their system, and they view the rest of us as “useless eaters”.’
      Yes, that is absolutely correct. The “useless eaters” are at the bottom of the economic pyramid food chain. They are unfundable liabilities and must be eliminated. There is no other way to fund the desired lifestyle of those at or near the top of the pyramid. The beast devours.

  • Mel Kesser

    For those who believe that the earth needs a reduction in its population, God created all of us and there is plenty of room for as many people asn He WILLS.

  • A.S.

    To Quote:

    Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger….

    “The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

    #8 Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12….

    “Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”

    Translation: Kill all Black people in America. If you are of the Black/African race, you will demand the U.S. government to close down and make illegal all activities of Planned Parenthood.

    • Maggott Sanger definatly hated black people, but that won’t be enough for these devouring elitists. For one thing, Blacks are a minority in America. If you’re going to kill 80% or more, you need to kill more than a minority.
      Of course, these fools won’t stop until there are no useless eaters and all they have left is to kill each other, until the last one is standing and falls on his sword. This won’t occur before the methods they use poison and radiate the entire environment so that only their GMO bacteria will survive.
      I guess we can see now why Jesus said that if those days were not shortened, no flesh would survive.
      ~~ Come Lord Jesus ~~

  • Dear Editor,

    May I please have permission to copy and post this article on my website, which contains much related material? See the article below for example.

    The Millennium Development Goals and the Critical Next Step for the Catholic Church

    Thank you

  • edu

    We need to find a balance! People is always talking about right or left and do not realize it is a extreme anyway. The subject is not about whether we need to control population by force or let everyone do whatever they want. The point is to create conscience about you are not a family, a community, a country or a continent. We all are a world and we HAVE TO think not just for ourselves, because is unfair children dying because the ignorance of people who don´t use contraception or mother who want to have their own five child’s family when they could be perfectly happy with two.

    World´s problem is about selfishness, we just think about ourselves, about what we think (without try to see things from another point of view) and not accepting another people´s opinion. People need to investigate and the responsibility of journalist or thinkers is to be BALANCE! NOT PARTIAL TO THE LEFT OR RIGHT!

  • Johnno

    Pray to our Lady of Fatima. She warned us about all that was going to happen. If the world does not change and the Catholic Church does not consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart, the consequences are dire! She warned us about the Annihiliation of Nations! This is precisely what these evil people want! To kill 90% of the population! And the best means to do so will be disease, famine and war!

    “Our Lady of Fatima warned that if Her requests were not heeded, Russia would “spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church. The good will be martyred, the Holy Father will have much to suffer, various nations will be annihilated.” However, in His infinite mercy, God has offered us a way to avoid this terrible punishment. Through the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, we will not only avoid the predicted chastisements, but we will be granted the inestimable gift of peace throughout the world for all mankind.”

    • John

      Why do you need to consecrate Russia? Russia is now again a Christian nation with a great deal of love to the “Bozhe Mati” (the Mother of God). It was a Christian nation for a thousand years. The Communists came and killed 50 million Christians. People Who refused to give up their Christian faith. Russia has been sanctified by the blood of it’s own martyrs.

  • well biggies, rulers of this world, start eliminating yourselves, who do you think you are, why should your lives be more precious than that of ordinary people. You want to decimate the population, well start by eliminating yourselves and let God give life to whoever He intends to.
    Oh evil evil generation, may God’s Mercy and Justice come over you.

  • Jimi

    I went to Vietnam last year. That’s over populated. Every inch of space used. Every thing eaten and consumed. I bet everyone here that thinks we need more people hasn’t left the US.

    Try travelling and then saying we need more people.

    We need less, way less. Makes sense to me. Can’t understand what this write is talking about.

    I live in New Zealand. Hardly anyone here and I like it like that.

    • Jimi:

      Well, I don’t think I have to go there. We see sufficently madness in my country.

      Agricultural areas are still as we speak being “developed”; nonsense Newspeak for “destroyed”. Unneccesary (save for the hated population growth and the greedy merchants) and ugly square concrete blocks placed on farmlands.

      More and more malls nobody needs. And alas, this is called “progress”… Yeah, and 2 plus 2 equals 5!

    • oh I just saw a bunch of photos of vietnam, looks like a lot open space, quite beautiful I might add, did you just stay in the cities? these cities are overcrowded as the people are forced by economics and the like to live there so it may appear to be to many people. they didnt have trees farms and the like? just asking not trying to argue, since I never visited there before.

  • Jimi

    While I am here…the articles such as 10 signs Americans are angrier…

    The reason is because we are all forced to share resources with everyone else. Our standard of living falls lots, theirs rises a tiny bit. Not much we can do. We have to accept it…or go to war.

    So less people means a better standard of living.

    My 2c worth.

    • Jimi:

      What you said.

      Methinks a lot of people haven’t watched (and understood) this:

    • I dont know japan is crowded, shangai, and hong kong (which would imply lower standard of living right) but that is not the case they have a very high standard of living so apparently population numbers is not the problem. also wealth is created it is not finite, trees regrow, animals can be bred grass regrows the sun keeps coming up, the rains usually come soil is replensihed and innovations and technology improves (if allowed to and not hindered by gov/corp interference) so wealth can be redistributed by innovations businesses and technological and scientific discovery not by taking money from one and giving it to another with less. that only destroys wealth creates artificial scarcity and makes it appear that resources are limited. dont forget food is deliberatly destroyed or dumped ot keep prices up as well. our problem is not population numbers but to much misinformation, propaganda and to many people ambitious for power and wealth at others expense to mention only a few.

  • Gosh! What a silly blogpost. There’s no doubt in my mind that overpopulation presently is humanity’s biggest problem. Perhaps the worst problem we’ve ever had.

    I detest those writing nonsense like this blogpost(and many of the comments). We can only hope they simply want people to get upset and see the reactions. Still it’s unpleasant and irresponsible. There may be children reading this, mind you.

    • ShiftAltNumlock

      So lets just burry our heads in the sand, right?

  • Michael Sheehan

    Real stupid. Recent survey. Every man woman and child in the world could fit into the state of Texas.

    • Gary2

      And you would like to live so crowded ? Not me. It is disgusting that the 7th billion was born today.

      • John Swanson

        Gary2 you could change that – jump off a cliff and maybe then you’ll be less disgusted? It has to start somewhere and I think you should lead the way.

  • Michael Sheehan:

    Assuming for the sake of the argument that that’s true; how is that in any way relevant?

  • Noel

    Lets start with David Rockerfeller,Goerge Soros,maybe Obama next.No their is enough room for 70 Billion or how about 700Billion.Get the GREEDY SATANIC people of the planet.However Yahshua will do one day.

  • danielle

    In sub-saharan Africa women have no right to control their fertility and are subject to some of the most extreme types of female circumcision in the world. The lucky ones die in childbirth before their sixteenth birthday and don’t have to endure the agony and humiliation of fistulas, a kind of internal rupture that leaves its victims incontinent and barely able to walk from the pain. These are the women Al Gore hopes to “educate and empower”. As for the “every sperm is sacred” crowd, I read an article (yes, I’ll track it down an cite it within the next 48 hours)where a catholic missionary was telling refugee women that asking a husband with full-blown AIDS to wear a condom is a sin….

    • Thats’s horrible!

      Why only sub-Saharan Africa? I don’t think the circumcisions, er, circumstances are very good in Somalia…

      What about women among Muslims, Gypsies, Amish and Orthodox Jews – do they have any rights? They do have many children, that’s for sure…

      Care to provide a link?

      Well, those having AIDS should definetly not wear condoms… they should not have sex at all. (Except solitary, that is.)

  • Dan

    The Boogie man is coming! Prepare accordingly!

  • choiceandresolve

    I once read if you could bunch everyone in the world in one place, you could put 4 people on a 1/4 acre lot, the total size would be something comparable to Alaska.

    Still think there’s a global food shortage? Or is it crowd control; as in the 1% (if you really want to call them that, the real number is a lot smaller) are getting a little leery what’s going on around them?

    Go on youtube and do a search for “homegrown revolution” Those people were growing something like 6000lbs of produce on a 1/10 of an acre (in the middle of a city). Imagine what a 1/4 would output?

    It’s about control, its always been about control. Full domination, of our lives in every aspect. And 7 billion is too big for them I imagine. Create the fear, and offer the solution.

    Ordo ab Chao Order out of Chaos

  • It seems to me that if we took every billionaire and his family and exterminated them, confiscated all of the money, properties, and insurances and divided the proceeds by the 1/2 million dollars and fifty acres of land, that there would soon be enough land for everyone and businesses would thrive all over the world. I call this the trickle down theory. Those newly rich would do one of two things, squander their newly inherited riches in which the money actually circulates through the world economy, or they will invest it wisely in business and savings, in which, in time they will become billionaires and the cycle can begin again. Also all the taxes on income at any level would have to go to zero to help speed the process of making billionaires. Thus there is a contained population of billionaires and their families and an equitable redistribution of wealth for everyone to enjoy. What you all think gang? Good idea? We could start with Soros, Rockefellers, and company.

  • Jay

    The problem is not too many people. The problem is too many people who have rejected God. That is a self-correcting problem though because God Himself will reduce the population of the world in His own time and in His own way when He has had enough of mans rebellion, just as He did in the days of Noah. He has many more resources at His disposal than just a flood. All you have to do is decide whether you want Gods blessing upon your life, or His wrath.

    • choiceandresolve

      Jay, Amen to that!

      Stay righteous bro

    • John Swanson

      Good one Jay – I couldn’t have said it better:)

    • WARREN

      go jay ,go jay,you got it ,you got it~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JESUS WILL FIX IT.

    • ARMANI

      go mr jay!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AMEN to that:))))))))))

    • Taylor

      Thats right dude you awesome for that ;))))))))

    • jahari

      thats right they have other christiains in this world

  • Richard

    My opinion is that there are way too many people for the planet to support. Throughout history we sually cull the herd with war after war, but now people are living longer and it takes more wars to do that. Is it really so hard to understand that the planet cannot support a large population. The oceans are almost empty, the forests cut down, massive pollution, etc. Do you really need to cut down the last tree, catch the last fish before you realize that overpopulation is a bad thing? What is required is massive population control, sterilization, high taxes on multiple children families. OR we can always expand our forever wars to kill more people. You decide.

    • Chad Walker

      Richard, your comment was pure misanthropy. The planet has survived countless mass extinction events including one that annihilated 99% of ALL species.

      What we need is a societal focus on science and progress. Instead you are calling for horrifying acts of cruelty against human beings. You said that you want to sterilize women and tax the children of large families (which could starve them or kill them). Despicable!

      If you love “the planet” so much more than your humanity then why don’t you just kill yourself and let animals eat you flesh? As long as you continue to live and “drain resources” then you are a dirty hypocrite. The world does not need anymore misanthropes. We have more than enough child murderers and warlords. What we severely lack are the people who value the inherent dignity of human beings above all else.

    • ShiftAltNumlock

      Snip: Is it really so hard to understand that the planet cannot support a large population.

      Says you! Show me your proof that the earth cant support 8 billion. For every article you can dig up, I can match it. You have no idea. You are drinking some form of kool Aid.

      Snip: The oceans are almost empty, the forests cut down, massive pollution, etc. Do you really need to cut down the last tree, catch the last fish before you realize that overpopulation is a bad thing?

      The oceans are almost empty! Really? From where I sit, they look about the same. Hmm, I dont think we are endanger of cutting down the last tree or catching the last fish either. And if we were, it would be because of power brokers such as BP spilling thier crude in the oceans in mass quantity or Nations like Japan who to this day are still pumping fallout into our skies. The problem here is greed and control, not over population.

      Snip: What is required is massive population control, sterilization, high taxes on multiple children families.

      Ok, how about you and all the people that think like you, move to the head of the line.

      I am not claiming to have the answer, but the answer you have come up with is truely horrific and evil to its core.

    • what is advocated by your post is murder, war is murder, war is not a population control method. populations will not over use resources, that only happens with irresonsbilty not numbers of people, food is grown by farmers, trees regrow, oil is replenished (and as new technology is innovated if allowed energy will be cheaper and cleaner) no one in their right mind would deliberatly destroy their own enviroment for a quick fix (except corporations who don’t own the land they use but lease it cheaply who care not about it since they arent dependant on it like a individual property owner would be) no one is planning on cutting down the last tree, you make it sound like every human being outside yourself and the elites are bunch of barbarians who have no semblence of concern for their own enviroment. self righteousness is not a pretty thing.

  • Hefsmaster

    Screw it…

    Done arguing…

    We know what they want.

    We know how they’re doing it…



  • Much of the disagreement over the world’s population comes down to a person’s belief in
    a God who superintends the world or not. The line is drawn that clearly. In the mean time, to
    think 7 billion people is to many is foolishness. As the one commentor stated, the answer will generally be (barring divine intervention) freedom as well as technological progress but more so families that operate as families, taking care of themselves their own – Read more that supports this article and sound thinking at =

    in fact, i am going to recommend this article to them and if you know of more like this, let me know if you would

  • Lorenzo

    soylent green anyone?

  • Yvonne

    Who are these “global elites” and why are we afraid of them?

  • Yvonne

    “Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important.”

    —Former Defense Secretary William S. Cohen
    DoD News Briefing
    Monday, April 28, 1997

  • reb

    I think the planned parenthood line is from knowing that too many children some were “exsposed” like Hansel and Gretel and or set adrift on the Nile to meet their fate, or on the ice sheets and in the surf. Too many children to feed.
    The drought has taken away so much food and so much water. The flooded farm lands will produce nothing. If there was an all out war on us, why not just poison our water systems? Fresh Water is a limited commodity and a very powerful one.

    • ShiftAltNumlock

      They already have poisoned our water supply. It is called Flouride. As for poisoning our food, its called GMO.

  • Yvonne

    i don’t think reducing the population to 500,000,000 is necessary. if you read the Thiaoouba Prophecy it says the solution is:
    -use hydrogen motor to eliminate pollution;
    -eliminate money, politics, religion, loud noise, and drugs;
    -be spiritual and not materialistic. ask our Higher Selves to help us overcome our earthly, materialistic difficulties….
    we could cause a catastrophe and prove to the universe how uncivilized we really, truly are!

    and add don’t overeat and turn high rise offices into apartments = no more homeless to the solution. magnetic high speed rail is also a great idea. we need clean air and wholesome food, not more shots or vaccines. ideally we could have pyramid cities with apartments with balconies with conveyor belts. we could order a sandwich from the pyramid factory and it would be delivered to our balcony on the conveyer belt. we would only work 20 hours a week and the rest of the time would be spent on spiritual development.

    may The Spirit enlighten us all

  • David

    I am sorry to say this as I love the news on this site. I believe in peace, am anti-corporation, pro education, etc. However I believe that there is more than enough evidence to support that the Earth’s population is out of control. With the rich getting richer, 1% and the 99% getting poorer, the fact that the more educated (and the cost of education at it’s ever increasing price becoming an exclusive club for the rich) are having less children-whereby the poor seem to be having ever increasingly more children. Well the outcome is well for lack of a better word-DOOM! To perceive it any other way is to be lying to ourselves. Can earth sustain an unlimited amount of people?
    Where does it stop 8 billion? 10 billion? 20 billion? 100 billion?
    Well I think the psychopaths that rule the world with all there filthy dirty lies, there cabal of genocide, etc. may have this one right.
    I don’t have the solution; though I think education. And I mean free and extreme all around education (which now doesn’t exist unless you are rich) could be the one factor to solving this certain destruction.
    This is a real problem that MUST be addressed by all of us with real solutions less mankind be extinct very soon.
    It isn’t a discussion that people want to have and that is a grave mistake.
    You see all this sugar coating that the media and ourselves spoonfeed each other is why we have the terrible economy, the corrupt governments, blackmail (or?) by Israel, starving populations, genocides, frankenfood…. When we begin to discuss these things en mass our problems can be solved. Population is at the top of our agenda as mankind.
    Thankfully I am gay (don’t even!) and will never have children less God (ha!) intervenes and that would be quite a divine act indeed and on that I think we could all agree and I guarantee that would get everyone talking.

    • ShiftAltNumlock

      David, they may or may not be right. It is their solution that I have a problem with.

    • Us poor souls

      Well sorry for everyone that thinks this planet will even reach more than 8 billion. WW3,starvation,diseases put on us by our own governments,vaccines that will allow super viruses to kill off billions at a time,and all u will have left is the ones who will beg to be controlled. What we see and how we are taught to live our lives is far from freedom. So enjoy your social media, mainstream news, and the garbage that’s on tv. It’s all to keep a sleeping monster sleep and that’s the common man. Look out if he ever woke up to this sad existence. So for the ones who were aborted and the innocent ones that are killed everyday might be the fortunate ones to not have to witness what is truly coming our way real soon. So we the people better wake it up and stand up to our murderous governments. Oh crap that’s right we are to go to work pay your taxes and shut up. Enjoy your day!!!

      • arugula

        Anyone willing to do the hard work of seriously researching can find out all of these very REAL things you speak of …Thank you for knowing what is going on here… I don’t know WHY so many people are so unwilling to face the reality or listen to what these genocidal eugenicists are actively doing right NOW!! Killing millions all over the globe.

  • David

    Also to state that Earth is not overcrowded is VERY VERY irresponsible and treasonous to Earth. Shame on you.

    • John Swanson

      David you are a fool – have you not read the other posts? Where are you getting your information? From the elite? We must remember that not all of us will see the truth – you are one of those that will not – sorry dude:(

    • arugula

      WE are not overpopulated… politicians are taking people’s land, kicking people off farms that DO feed their families : then they crowd them into city slums where they are miserable and starving.

    • Jade

      So what do you suggest??? Just start killing off people!!! What if you are one of them?!?!?!?

  • Leslie

    Necessary to ensure man survives, it appeas so.

    Why is it necessary that mankind survives?

    Nobody has the right to make the decisions on who lives and who dies, but I am sure they will, or will try.

    Does anybody really want to be a survivor, come out of this on the other side?

    I care not for the future of myself but the future of my child.

    I have my own plan, on my own terms, should the shit hit the fan. No fuss, no mess, and I hear it’s actually the best feeling you will ever experience…my only dilema …my child!

    P.S. I bet the prison population will be one of the first to go…watch and see.

    • Dennis the Menace!’

      My bet………”GITMO!”

  • Admiral Dry Rot III

    Elites or not, biology itself does not see status and when the population reaches it’s peak, things will die off. It happens in nature. See this for what it is, and stop pointing fingers. Humanity itself got into this mess and it may need Nature Itself to get it out…and not by implementing “policies” to sugarcoat the real problem.

  • Melfi Kram (Chema)


  • matt

    every one on the earth could live almost comfortably on vancouver island canada which is only 12076 square miles

    do the math: 5280×5280=27878400 square feet in one square miles

    27878400square feet x 12076square miles on vancouver island = 336659558400 which is total number of square feet on vancouver island. divide that by 7000000000 (which is the total population of the world) divide the square footage by the population which gives you about 50 square feet per person.
    now the rest of the world could be used to grow food for the people! wake up people, is earth is not over populated! it can handle us!

    if people all moved to canada or north america it would be a couple acres per person! not per family per person! then we would have lots of space and lots of land to grow food! and we could keep having families as normal! (with ten kids if we choose) so what was that about the earth being overpopulated? the only reason why people starve is because of greed! not because of lack of food!

    this is an elite plan to rule the world and have the world to themselves, and to all those who support it remember you will be one of those who will get killed just like me should the elite say its necessary! in reality you support population reduction you support suicide and murder! support evil!

    the earth is far from being overpopulated! the elites can word things very sneaky making it sound like 7 billion is way too much, but do the math and you could see we have a lot of earth for it! nothing needs to be changed, if anything the change should be us destroying the elite power before they destroy us!

    • Maarten

      Uhmm, your calculations offer people 50 square feet to live on… that’s 5 foot by 10 foot.
      Problems guaranteed i think :-)

      Besides that, it’s not only the space we are talking about.
      7 billion people happen to consume earth’s resources much faster than earth can replenish (fish, forests, oil, gas, iron etcetera, etcetera.) what is so difficult about that understand ?
      Do you really think we will be able to keep on growing like this without severe consequences for the planet and thus ourselves ?

    • Emma

      Yeah? What about the animals? They have as much right here as anyone and obviously they cannot handle our dumb ways from destroying their habitat. I think what you are saying is extremely selfish

      • Jade

        The only ones destroying animal’s habitats is ‘them’, ‘the powers that be’, ‘the elite’, with their money making companies that they are cutting down trees on the edge of the woods to build, just like they are doing by my home!!!!!!!

  • Gabe

    you people are the wackiest bastards I’ve read in a while.

  • Amber Smith

    The scientific proof that the world is not overpopulated and why the advanced technologies of the world are under attack by those funded by the oligarchical financial apparatus of the British Empire and Wall Street. They do want to reduce human population numbers and for those who think this is the gravest problem on the planet, you are right but not in the way that you think. Why shut down the water projects? Why reject nuclear energy? Why make farms in the US primarily corporate farms dictated to right now by cartels such as Monsanto who are busy poisoning people to death. We in the US alone could produce enough food to feed the world, we need to reassert the 1933 Glass Steagall Act, adopt a credit policy as the Third National Bank of the US and begin immediately great projects such as the North American Water and Power Alliance (NAWAPA) and get away from this depraved notion that there are too many people on this planet, if you think that, maybe you can offer to remove yourself, better though would be to discard the British Malthusian criminal thinking behind the Greenie, “Sustainable” movement and go to do what man can do if not hampered by brainwashed zombies.

    Read this to get more perspective and join to impeach or remove Barack Obama, if he starts a war in the middle east by the bait and switch methods his puppet masters on Wall Street and the financial houses of the City of London, we are all not going to be long for this world anyway. There is a line in the sand that has been drawn by HCR (House Concurrent Resolution 107). Insist your Congressman or woman to sign, no more wars without the people of the United States deciding the case. Stop this president from his Nero like drive of destruction! leaflet and call to action paper entitled “The World’s Fast Waning Options”.

    • Jared Pickens

      Where are you? I’d like to marry you

    • arugula

      I love you… a true American with a functioning BRAIN.

      • Jess

        My God. Frankly, I am surprised that your trailer park even provided the bandwidth necessary for you to submit your response.

    • Bongstar420

      Population control is far simpler and more practical at small sizes…large populations are nearly impossible to control

  • Bob Marshall

    Adolf Hitler- Mein Kampf…”The demand that defective people be prevented from propagating equally defective off spring represents the most humane act of mankind.” 1933. abortion was quickly legalized. 1933-1935 there were 500,000 abortions performed in Germany each year.America is adopting policies used in Nazi Germany today.

  • Zaza

    Nobody is talking about murdering people who are alive right now, or at least I hope they aren’t. What we are talking about is proper birth control and discouraging people from having children. And by that I mean ALL people, not certain population groups. I had myself sterilised decades ago, so nobody can accuse me of not practising what I preach.
    Also I notice that many people are talking about sharing the world’s resources more fairly. Well I couldn’t agree more, but we still have to reduce or at least stabilise the human population as well. Imagine a world in which there are no forests, no open spaces, no more nature, no wild animals or birds. A world which is half a concrete jungle and half agricultural land. A world where you’re continually surrounded by hordes of other people, where you can never get away and be alone in the countryside. So far China is the only nation which has had the guts to do something about overpopulation. If we continue to shut our eyes to facts, and refuse to limit our breeding to a maximum of one child, there will come a time when mass sterilisations will be compulsory. But by then, of course, it’ll be too late. As usual.

    • ShiftAltNumlock

      Yes they are talking about murdering people. Cant you read between the lines. Do I need to put some quotes out here from some of these Elite to proove it? And while I cant accuse you of not practicing what you preach, I can tell you that you have no business telling others what to do with their lives. Again, you people have bought into this over population scam just like you did global warming. We are all being controlled. You are a slave to this system and most of you dont even see it. Your reality is false and everything you ever thought you knew is a fat lie. What this all comes down to is control. And they are going to impliment that control via environmentalism (Eugenics)

      • Hypocrisy. You’ve sunk down to the elite level of telling others they are wrong. Where is your solution?

        • Bongstar420

          Elite is by definition above…

          So, if you “sink down,” you are moving away from elite.

      • arugula

        I agree with you 100%, but would LOVE to see some of the quotes you mentioned….. I’d gladly use them….

      • Bongstar420

        Right…because paying them to not breed would be so much less efficient.

    • Agenda 21 is the “elite” plan. I suggest you and other’s not familiar with it read it. There is nothing at all wrong with limiting the GROWTH of families. But murdering people to “REDUCE” population is completely unacceptable. I do not want to burst any one’s ideas of a perfect world and having completely honest and moral leaders, but reality suggests otherwise.

      In fact, for the most part, it is not the “little guy” doing the most damage to the planet. Indeed, it is big Corporations running ram shad all over the place with no real deterrence to “keep a clean ship”.

      In fact, the many incidences like the recent BP one in the Gulf of Mexico comes to mind as “those who destroy the earth”. The many spills and toxic waste dumps and GMO foods and toxic skies above from chemical spraying is completely polluting and looting the earth we ALL have to live in!

      The so called “elite” are no better than anyone else, they just got to where they are for the most part from the “good ol boy” connections they enjoy or the “luck” of having been born the recipient of extreme luxury or title.

      What “they” fail to realize is that more than anyone else, THEY themselves are to blame and are spoiling the earth more so than the average individual while they live luxuriously from practicing profit before responsibility! We didn’t ask for this. There are MUCH better ways and they know it. Clean energy and cleaning products, for example, that are NOT toxic! They have only themselves to blame for destroying the earth!

      • arugula

        rough shod = hard boots for extra rough stomping power

        ram is either a computer term or a male sheep or goat and shad is a fish.

      • Read Agenda 21 People

        This ^^

      • Sean Torres

        please procreate liberally bless you!

      • Sugarsail1

        much easier to blame a faceless corporation than “the little guy” but you do realize that the majority of “little guys” work at those same corporations (they aren’t all out there living off the grid hippy dippy style). And since corporations are merely financially structured groupings of people that generate goods and services that society wants “the little guy” effectively IS the corporation when taken en mass. Sorry to pop your Marxist anti-bourgeoisie bubble, but you owe your life and everything in it to free-enterprise and business, from the energy you depend on that is delivered by the very company BP that you despise for ruining the earth, to the car you drive to the materials that make up your clothes, and your health care. You Marxists are always biting the hand that feeds you.

        • Bongstar420

          I thought Marx proposed communism as the product of capitalism…am I a retard too?

      • Koldunya

        They do all that to kill you off because you are apparently unable to stop breeding like maniacs. You are unable to govern yourselves. They are the lesser evil.
        Why on Earth would you procreate like mad when with modern technology, there’s no need for it.

        • Bongstar420

          The average person hardly stands above Coco the Chimp and yet thinks they are magnitudes above her.

      • Rosalyn

        Limited growth? How about limited government dictating how and when we can live according to the way we are created? If the truth of the Illuminati were made known you would see that this big overpopulation problem and it’s man-made solution has been a big set up. Read Pawns In the Game. A license to give birth? Do not be deceived. What seeds are down as good and necessary now will grow up into a monstrous plant whose bitter fruit you will be forced to accept evil and sorrow beyond your worst nightmare. GTG…time for my NWO re-education class. It’s human nature desensitizing class this week.

    • prettytitty

      wow there were alot of quotes talking about reduing the NOW 7 billion population, not future generations and this is being stated by most forbes un appt authorities and celebrities(people with money and power). And sterilization for you was a choice so lets keep it that way, but you can not play blind to these big names clearly talking about genocide to the lesser population. Who do you think we should eliminate first then is my question……?

    • Run forest Run

      What are you retarded? Did you not read what these people are saying? Read between the lines. Thats exactly what THEY are getting at.

    • arugula

      The truth is that providing family planning and birth control works everywhere they try it.

    • arugula

      They talk openly about ELIMINATING us….. what the hell do you think it means???

      • Bongstar420

        Would that happen if your IQ were above 110 and you weren’t full of BS?

        Not saying that it is, but hypothetically?

    • Emma


    • patriot

      What about the intentional release of diseases among the people. Yes we have cures for them but imagine the damage that could be done before they are brought under control.

    • cyunvwyatt

      You are an idiot. I am glad you cut your nuts off. You don’t deserve to reproduce. For the somewhat intelligent people on here there are 36,794,240,000 acres of viable land on earth. So our population would have to expand by minimal 700% from where we are today to even get close to not having any land left and that would be if each person maintained close to 1 acre. The elite want us dead because they are about to be outed as running a perpetual scam for 1000 years or longer that guaranteed them the power they have. They are just greedy and want it all for themselves and with the awakening of humanity populations will not be controlled off the word of a king or a Oligarch. Hence the Rothschild family will be powerless because in a world of 7billion that you purposefully impoverished 99% for 10 century’s and the truth known that 1% say they own 99% of the world there time is limited. They either kill everyone except the people who helped enslave the master population for centuries or they are disposed of along with all royalty and oligarchs. Its them or us and I choose us!

    • cyunvwyatt

      37 billion acres on earth and no room for 7 billion huh? Because 1% claims to own 99% of that 37 billion is why there is no room. According to you every person should have 30 acres of land and there is no space left. Where is my 30 acres? I could grow my own food and not have to buy poison chemical food from Walmart.

  • John Swanson

    Wow! So many people are OK with killing humans so they can live a better life. Obviously not a Bible reader in the bunch – God designed this world to handle whatever we can throw at it – when he said “be fruitful and multiply” he didn’t give us a number. The earth can and will handle all of us, we are not over crowded, the elite are trying to set this place up as their place, they don’t want us around, only a few as slaves so they can go on as the elite – from the global warming scam to this bull. Can’t you see people that these designers are an evil society, no one should have the power to decide who lives or dies, ever, and no mortal man or woman should ever be allowed that, it is for God only, whether you believe in him or not – he is in charge – the chaos is our doing – not his – keep following these morons with the population reduction agenda and you will be a slave to the elite – if you can’t see that then you are too far gone for any help. I’m hoping for 14 billion people by 2015, the more of us common slaves the less chance the elite has to manipulate us with their agendas – trust in God – if he feels the earth is full he will take care of it – and he alone will do it – sorry but that is how it must be done – no killing babies so we can live better – I live better when I see a newborn – so girls keep putting out the babies and keep the weeds “elite” at bay:)

  • Jaylam

    The “No human is carbon neutal” argument these people roll out is completley absurd. All life is not carbon neutral, not just humans. Every living thing is a chemical factory that consumes one thing as food, and expels something else as waste. To try to make anything “carbon neutal” is to be anti-life. The last time I read any science book, carbon is the basis or key ingredient in life. The argument for population control is also self defeating. Even if we remove God and the sanctity of life from the equation, then it is this very “nature”, “Gaia” the “earth” or whatever you want to call it, that has brought humans forth, so then we are part of the natural progression of nature, not contrary to it as these fools want us to believe.
    So what is at issue here. We can all agree we could be and need to be better stewards of the earth. We must be careful about letting one path to answers monopolize the argument, especially if that path has ulterior motives. The global socialist elite are trying to force their answers on us as the only response (to problems they are in some ways helping to create, how convenient for them). Let us take the words of the wise in this following quote written by Daniel Webster: “Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of power. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.” Read between the lines, this is what this is all about. Saving the earth is secondary and but a vehicle for them to attain their true goals.

    • ShiftAltNumlock

      Good points here. The elite like to create situations or conditions that they already have the solution for. They create a problem (proceived or real). They then wait for the public outcry that they know is going to come. They then offer a solution that was what they wanted to happen all along. (Problem, Reaction, Solution) They do this over and over and over and over again and have done so thru-out history. The gulable public never catches on.

      • arugula

        Yes… Gullble sheep are always voting…. sigh….

        • Jade

          Yes, that is exactly what they are, sheep!!!!!!!

  • David

    Great to see so many people wide awake!
    The evil elite – the bankers,oil companies,satanic vile corporations like Monsanto,and the war mongers and their comfortable country club Bilderberg meetings, PAID for by the host country and yet no accounatabilty only secrecy to hide their evil schemes, They arrogantly dictate to our spineless political class; right wing liberal left wing, is irrelevant, these moral flatworms are bought and paid for.

    Let us take a good look at the people who push population control. None of them poor. They are not our masters people.They must be sidelined and made irreleavant.
    We must fight for ,Strong families and solidarity among ordinary people and SPREAD THE WORD FOLKS EXPOSE THEIR EVIL DESIGNS. What hope have they if everyone knows and simply say NO CAN DO!

    We did not elect them!
    We need decent men and women elected who are proven to be clean. That is NOT members of of secret societies or chairs of pestilence, treasonous
    groups like the CFR, The Trialteral Commission, The Bilderberg Group. Its also high time we ABOLISHED that crock of trash – the UN.

    And lastly PRAY for we are on the side ot the good.
    You my dear people -the vast majority long suffering good and decent, who only want peace,morailty, decency and freedom.No matter what happens..YOU WILL PREVAIL

  • shawn corrigan

    have any of you overpopulation fools actually looked at the planet physically ? sure it is possible to have to many. and sure you can use up finite amounts of anything but the real answer is so far from what these idiots alarmists are trying to scare us with. the truth is that there a massive areas with NO ONE for hundreds of miles. i fly and travel alot. open your eyes and see the massive amounts of open land. is so vast, and traveling to a city is a great relief,to find some nice services is a truly a wonderful treat . years ago it was called progress. i am not against smart use of the resources etc. but this over population b.s. is a huge fraud. a vehicle to use for those who want global communism. it is so obvious, travel the globe and see with your own eyes.

    • Dina Strange

      you are moron.

  • Toby K

    God is not in charge here, mathematics and resource scarcity is, 1+1 has never in the history of the universe equalled more than 2 by any miracle. Keep breeding and won’t have a choice whether to vote for a cull (or a birth control plan)it’ll just happen one day when you run out of water or eat the last chicken. At current rates with the global population doubling every 100 years it is obvious it is unsustainable to not think about others or the planet and its other species is very selfish.
    The problem with humans is they put their rights and the right to life ahead of the sustainability of resources that support it and in every case this leads to an agonising death. You want more of that?
    God would want you to have some self control. And use your brain plus research to analyse the problem and solve it, So would your children and your neighbours and every other being you share this world with. Lastly there is not “loads of space” a so called expert in the UK said that to me pointing at Arable farmland and indicated it could be used for more housing, I prefer food to houses, maybe that’s just silly old me.

    • arugula

      It is not people doing that Toby…… it is the corporations, banks and crooked politicians doing the damage and they know there is enough to go arpound, but only if they quit insisting on taking it ALL of themselves……

    • Nathan Gardley

      You obviously haven’t woken up from the thorough brainwashing that the corporate owned media throws at you. Deep down you know it none of that is true.

    • Emma

      I agree, apart from the god bit

  • Actually I’m looking forward to the end of all life, there is so much evil capitalistic greed on this earth on so many different levels. Each level of this greed’s existence needs more population to draw it’s passive wealth. Yes there needs to be a drop in population but greed needs to be regulated.

    There needs to be a well organised westernised global over-through of all financial and banking systems and related governments pupating entities, so that this new cleaner global model can give back all what has been extracted from the majority of humanity. Meaning all debts would be wiped off, much like a bush fire starts new growth under new global regulations and conditions. There is no other way that human humanity will survive. Hope this message get to all the right people. Can only hope – Good luck.

  • Ravindra H Chaudhari

    All these discussions are taking place in developed & developing countries. The Africans are fast asleep on this issue. There more 5-6 children in a family. The world is helping them to reduce mortality, it’s alright. But keeping them unaware of disastrous consequences of ever increasing world population, will put the entire world, including developed & developing countries, to end.

  • John

    I’m not sure where the author of this article gets the impression that it is only the elite that desire a balance to the planet. I’m just a middle class american but it seems fairly obvious that a population growth without control is a recipe for disaster. What other species on this planet has had an increase in population on the same scale as humans? What does this author find so distatefull about limiting population? If we destroy the planet earlier, the entire human race will suffer…if we take care of our resources then the earth will have billions of years to produce further generations leading to more people haveing been born in the long run than what would happen if we tip the ecosystem past its ability to recover. I can’t help but notice that he offers little explanation about what is so ‘evil’ about slowing down the birthrate. Only global calmity and starvation are likely to bring any real form of population control…the responsible among will likely just be along for the ride.


    • J

      If you give every human being 9 acres of land we would fill up a corner of brazil. There is a God and a devil. They can be discerned because one always lies.

      • Andy

        Actually if you gave every human in the world 9 acres of land you’d need about 30 times the area of brazil.
        Try checking a few simple figures in future before spewing such nonsense.

        • J.I. Smith

          And what would we eat? Food has to be grown, doesn’t it?

          • Themath

            I’m sure there is a conspiracy, there always is. But conspiracy aside, the population cannot maintain this. When people say we can fit into some corner they don’t keep going and say but…the earth is finite and we won’t stay in that corner because we’ll keep breeding like rabbits. The point is that the growth is exponential and unsustainable. No matter what, human population will soon be severely reduced. This within the next 200 years. The human race will be reduced by billions.

          • So can we start with you and all the other numb sculls who don’t even care to research clean, free energy technology suppression?

          • Bongstar420

            Can you show us a single working device?

            If suppression were real, devices would be real, and they would ultimately be unsuppressed as a consequence. Gasoline would be easier to suppress

          • Sugarsail1

            population growth rates have been on the serious decline in most parts of the world over the last few decades and in many developed nations is actually on the decline. Japan is declining, US would be declining if it weren’t for immigration and same with most of Europe. This is a non-problem that is self-regulating that the lefties in the media like to promote to justify their Agenda 21 world domination plan. Notices how they lie and never practice what they preach? Beware.

          • Bongstar420

            Increasing wealth decreases births because they are able to avert unwanted pregnancies and are educated in the means to attain those results. Also, rich people don’t benefit from dozens of children planting corn.

          • Bongstar420

            The Solar System is too small..we are all doomed

          • The land is for food to grow, not for people to be obsessed with the way things look and grow grass on while saying everything is just a theory. Where do you see the word theory mate? I guess you assume free,clean energy technology suppression is just a theory too?

          • Bongstar420

            Surely….as long as the average human has the same capacity as current and lives the same cultures.

            Increase their IQ’s and change their cultures to be “better”

            problem solved

      • Bongstar420

        And most of those 9 acres would be grossly mismanaged and systemic collapse would result. They would pray to gods and spirits as their “solution”

    • Rats, Roaches, Bed Bugs, Termites, Ants Lice There are many.

    • arugula

      John: If they want less of us why are they so dead set against abortion and birth control? They are far darker than they look…. and that is DARK as ebony…

    • Mark

      Your as sick as the Communists. First of all the earth can grow and raise tons more food. But it’s where the usg has paid farmers not to grow food or raise cows or pigs chickens or anything. Or payoffs for not growing hundreds of tons of wheat. China has 3.5 Billion people. He only have 350,000,000 million people. That’s even after all the illegials from all over. God gave us Freedom not Governments. Government only takes away freedoms.

      • Alex Gutierrez

        Ignorant. China has nearly 1.3 billion people, illegals are just the 3% of the U.S. population. I bet you are always asking for help of the government for getting food and surely you don’t event have a job, lazy pig.

        • Sugarsail1

          hahahahah illegals just 3% hahahahah…yeah right, I’m sure they all stepped up to the plate to be counted in the latest census. hahahaha.

    • Stéphane Blouin

      John, you didn’t come up with these ideas on your own, You were mislead to believe the overpopulation myth. What are problematic to the environment are the means of production the Elites uses, not the ammount of people on the planet… The planet could easily sustain many more billions of people… But not in this kind of counter-economic system.

      • Bongstar420

        There is no problem for the “environment”

        There is a problem for our environment.

        This is something that certain kinds of religion are trying to accomplish…making laws which reflect their religion- that the environment is a conscious force with rights that supersede ours.

        • Stéphane Blouin

          If you back off and look at it from a different perspective, we are the problem for the environment. But the cancer for the planet is not so much ”the human race” as biological units, rather the cancer is ideological… Its ideas that incentive people if you will.

          The cancer is ideological. Once we let go of cancerous ideologies like capitalism and socialism and monetary isms… and go back to Nature while still including sustainable technologies, humanity will reach a whole new level of existence.

    • Koldunya

      There’s nothing wrong with 1 child policy, unless you’re a breeding maniac

    • Bongstar420

      Large populations create strong “need” that results in new products that would otherwise not ever happen…Star Trek is “needed” the bigger the population becomes

    • Jai Ilanthea Edourd

      So many people just see the glossy side that they are fed. So having your children given a vaccine which will sterilise them in later life and you and your friends getting cancer due to the additives of the flu vaccines that people will be forced to have doesn’t bother you? 43 chapters of this maybe read a little deeper into this

  • I started reading this article tonight after hearing a guest on Coast-to-Coast talk about a dastardly plan to reduce the world population to 500 million.
    After reading the article, and the ensuing comments over the months, I’m amazed at the ignorance of people who think those of us who are trying to get the world to act even semi-responsibly are characterized as “focused on death” and wanting to come and kill you and your grandmother.
    Whether they do so as paid shills, or are merely proceeding on the basis of propaganda, those who advocate for uncontrolled population growth are helping to hasten the end of all humanity.
    The core basis for opposing population control–responsible, education-based control–is greed, pure and simple. The capitalist machine needs an ever-increasing population to provide labor and markets.
    We could all live healthily and happily with a much smaller population. It’s just that those for whom their profits are never enough, no matter how great, the blinding of the populace is necessary to produce the kind of ignorance that makes people think that the rich are basically good and will, eventually, come up with the idea on their own that helping each person helps all people.
    You might want to reference the teachings of that Jesus fella so many of you clam to follow.

    • Jen

      Will don’t bother mentioning Jesus when you advocate controlling the population. According to Jesus the population is His Kingdom. Believe it or not this world isn’t meant to last forever. There is an end. It is soon. Those who read and believe the Bible know we don’t need to rely on the planet for our survival. God will take care of us. But since so many have taken God out of the equation they think we are on our own to fight for our survival and need to kill each other to make room. That is heathen. According to Jesus God will eventually reap this world separating the “sheep from the goats” The world will be destroyed with fire (the sun) and everyone will be judged. His children who have trusted in Him will be spared not because of any “good deeds” they have done but because of what Jesus did on the cross for us. The Bible says in Revelation the He will create a New Earth where there is no death or births and God himself will be there with us. Everyone who has ever existed on this Earth who has trusted in Christ will populate the New Earth forever and everyone who did not believe will not exist on Earth but in eternal darkness separated from God at a place reserved to punish Satan. I know this sounds like foolishness to those who are lost and rely on their own reasoning which believe it or not no matter how many college degrees a person has NO human reasoning will be enough to save them if they deny God….we need to listen to our creator. Put God and His words into the equation and we have wisdom. Proverbs 9:10 “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom, and knowledge of the Holy One is understanding.” Until then we little human beings are running around in circles no matter how smart we THINK we are.

      • Well said said Jen…besides its not any of our responsibility to save the world when we can’t save ourselves!

        • Maarten

          What are you saying ? That we can just f… up this world, because we’re not responsible ?

  • Dear Readers,

    First and foremost, it is not my intention to criticize the people who do not and cannot understand the good and critical reasons for controlling the uncontrollable population growth rate! The global elite among other proponents of population control do have “a good reason for finding appropriate solutions for nature of the uncontrollable population!” The truth of the matter is many chaos, crimes, poverty issues, physical
    injuries/impairments from third-party liability
    incidents, mental health issues, violence, inattentive/deficient parenting to children, deficient resources for the population as a whole, and so on so forth in our world today are in fact stemmed from the issue of uncontrollable population growth!

    So, I could see the perspective of the elite and I could see the interest, logic, and ethical concern for humanity, for people’s well-being, and for Planet-Earth in terms of having the necessity to implement policies in controlling population for the humanity’s welfare. Think hard and deep about the essence of the issue of uncontrollable growth rate in population and digest the question what good does it really do “if our world cannot and will not provide enough resources, food, etc. to human beings as a whole!” For example, the fact that there are so many starving children and families, especially in Africa that usually shown on TV; perhaps, the parents of these “starving, skinny, and dying children and babies ought to think and acknowledge of the consequences after given birth to the child” IF THE CONDITION IN THIS FAMILY OR RESIDENTIAL AREA ARE NOT
    EQIUP TO PROVIDE FOR THE CHILD OR CHILDREN BEFORE HAVING CHILDREN because they as adults are required to forethought the consequences if they are not any condition to provide a healthy, clean, and normal environment for the child. Since a child is a human being and the fact that this child required constant love, attention, food, shelter, teaching, wisdom, etc. from the parents, the parents truly need to think about the child and the child’s future rather just focusing their own needs, motives, and desires prior to decide to have children!

    Therefore, population control is not designed to deprive people’s freedom and liberty as what some commenters erroneously stated or abused on the concept of population control. Nevertheless, if we disregard the harmful consequences of the overly populated earth and not doing anything to correct the essential problems, it is a sign of “recklessness and dishonor to humanity, to Planet-Earth, and to the future generations as well as the young generation who would be dying soon due to poor nutrition/diseases because their parents have made a bad choice in given them birth to a harsh, violent, and tormenting environment!”

    By Amy LifeStar

    • but what gives them the right or duty to decide how to solve the problems if there is a problem to be dealt with? they are only human too they are not gods with special knowledge and ability over anyone else.

  • Steve Edward

    I don’t see a population problem.

    I see a ‘consumption problem.’

    The planet’s richest populations, about 20%,
    is consuming the resources of about 80% of the planet’s population.

    Reduce the planet’s biggest consumers, i.e. the 20%, and the other 80% of the planet’s population should have no trouble finding an equilibrium with the planet’s resources.

    • Gina

      It’s the same thing. The more people, the more consumption. Sure the poor consume less but what if they have 5 kids and 3 of them grow up to be part of the 20%? Also, with nations like India and China emerging from 3rd world status your 20% will soon be 50%. Do the math.

      • arugula


        Use your head… All ‘they’ would have to do is quit fighting to keep women from getting decent HONEST healthcare, birth control and family planning.

    • Bongstar420

      So the low bar status of our species isn’t to blame?

      I can think of dozens of things that havent happened yet that could have happened centuries ago that are entirely due to how self centered and dumb the average human is (rich people at the front).

  • the united nations estemates that the world population will stableize on its own in the next 20 to 50 years. Don’t be a fear monger

  • HecatesMoon

    Nature finds a way. When we are no longer at sustainable levels, nature will simply not sustain us. When nature determines we are at a sustainable level again, then it will sustain us. There is no intervention necessary. If we chose to intervene based on the idea of not wanting people to suffer by reaching an unsustainable level, the idea is understandable, but there isn’t a person on this earth deserving of the position to decide who should live or die, bear children or no, or how many children a person should have, even if population control was considered with even the truest or kindest hearted intent.
    (I still say, even with allowing nature to control population, that respect to the planet we live on should be a moral obligation though.)

  • Gina

    I don’t understand why when people talk about population control that they automatically think of a mass killing of old people. The most effective way of population control would be implementing a one child policy like China but all over the world. We should start educating our children to think that way. It will work and it will only only save the human population but all the other living creatures on earth. By the way, I am educating my children to think this way NOW.

  • Gina

    500M people seems very low. There are 193 nations and if my math is correct, 500m left would give each nation 25.9 M. The population of California is 37M, and we still have a lot of space inland.

  • I think we should live and let live…and if there is a real conspiracy to eliminate the masses…it doesn’t matter really because
    every one of the 7 billion people on this planet has an appointment with death. So there are no true “elites”!

    • Well said Aaron…and after the appointment with death…the judgement…an opportunity for the “elite” (evil doers and wicked doers) to explain why they attempted to set themselves apart by even suggesting that there is a over population crises. Further suggesting that there is no sovereign God who already knows how large the population is and is not in a panic. But the unGodly are in a panic because they
      do not know or desire the eternal plans and purposes of God. The people who love God’s earth are patient. The people who hate God’s planet are always in a hurry!
      If you want to know who is right about this subject and any other subject under debate…just wait…if you can…

  • marcus

    This is nuts. Humans have a nasty tendency to be selfish and narrow-minded. I do not believe in genocide of any sort. How could modern minds consider such a notion? Nevertheless the rapidity of population increase, especially due to typical human nature, is becoming a problem. Humans cause incredible devastation as they are constantly trying exploit whatever they can, including each other. Conspicuous consumption best describes the western mind-set. The poor of well-developed nations would be considered wealthy in many areas of the world. Society must accept responsibility and act as stewards of this planet rather than always trying to force dominion over it. Although I cannot accept suffering imposed on anyone, I can understand how one might wonder why we don’t try to manage our current population and aim for a reduced future population as well as implement methods for the appropriate use of resources. As long as people are selfish and don’t mind being ignorant – which is the result of our ever distracting world – we’ll have these issues and remain divided on them.

  • Terrence O’Neill

    The question is:

    Who decides?

    The persons with the suggestions must go first.

    The ‘elites’ control the media, and all it talks about is sex – sex- sex — without any mention of FAMILY, the purpose of sex.

    Liars and hypocrites.

  • Alex


  • Maarten

    I think we are mixing up two problems here:

    1) The too fast growing world population
    2) The elite, telling us what to do and how to do it.

    We should all become aware that the population cannot keep on growing on a planet with limited resources. That’s a no brainer.
    So, we should start realizing that we are responsible for that ourselves. Birthcontrol is the only answer for this. No one is planning to kill off billions of people. That is just a theory to make people scared of the elite and hate them. Don’t buy this crap.
    However the second problem is that 40% of all wealth is in hands of just 1 or 2 % (the elite). So, that is for sure a problem that should be solved too. But it has nothing to do with over population. Don’t mix things up. Start thinking about your own role in this whole story about over population instead of pretending to be a victim.

    • Emma


    • Tyler

      This is the best comment so far. Fear is not necessary in this discussion. Reducing population does not require killing people and the idea that the “elite” are trying to annihilate entire populations for the purpose of creating a tyrannical government is a poor argument. Unlike the evidence that the environment is under tremendous strain, there is little to support an elite takeover. A discussion is needed to address the issues our world faces, and reverting to fear over a loss of liberty and mass genocide will not get us any where.

      There is an issue of over concentration of wealth and power that also needs to be addressed. Wealth and power shouldn’t be divided 100% equally, it would be incredibly difficult to implement and is not realistic with human nature. However, reducing the ridiculous gap is definitely realistic and should be implemented as soon as possible. Again, as Maarten stated, entirely seperate issues should not be mixed up and need to be addressed seperately and responsibly.

    • Fighting to live

      Problem is they will NEVER hand over it willingly, like everything in the past it has to be fought for and taken back by force (like all freedom has been in the past, hell even just basic rights had to be fought for) now it is time to fight for it all again.

  • Wendy

    I agree, we must get the human population under control…too many people simply equals too much distruction, living outside natural means and Lord knows leaders in each country can one can only so many people without total melt down of laws…Open your eyes people, we are not saying to stop having children, we are saying LIMIT your children…fertility drugs are causing women to have multiple births where only one would be the typical norm and drug companies are making it so that the elderly live longer…what was wrong when the life expectancy was 70? How many elderly sit in old folks home without family visiting regularly? How many orphaned children sit in state run housing waiting for someone to adopt them? Man needs to employ the same population control standard on the human race as we do any other animal on the planet…

  • Expand into space idiots, instead of eating mcDonalds and being obese, try tackling the last great frontier. Where are the visionaries?
    Yes 7 billion people sitting, eating, facebooking, and crapping is an issue. We have lost our will to have a purposeful existence as one humanity.
    No reason why our greatest resource, humans, shouldnt be put to better use. A lack of vision, a lack of leadership, and the world remaining in the hands of the devil is all why.
    Wake up!!

  • Best way to reduce population is a lottery. There should be a set number of people allowed to pro create per year. Offenders should be sterilized and the child born from flouting the rules adopted. The general public are selfish and think that they are entitled to everything, they need to be forced as you can not reason with a mob who only think about what THEY can get out of something and forget about the damaging effects of their actions.

    If I was told that in order to stabilize the world population, I could not have children then so be it but many people would rather lash out like a small child. Due to the small child mindset of the masses, it would be ideal to reduce as many of these as possible.

    When any other species population becomes too large, we see it as a problem and “cull” that species. Im amazed that we as humans are the most destructive of all inhabitants on the planet yet we don’t have the balls to sort our own numbers.

    • so are you going to fire the first shot then during the culling period for people?

  • Lucio46

    Power corrupts and the powerful think that they can play God with other people lives so that they can have it all for themselves. In all of this there is nothing of the love of God and neighbor because they’ so filled with the 3 fold lusts for power, lust for wealth and the lust of the flesh unrestrained. However great their power may seems, prayer, fasting and returning to God with all our hearts can cast out all their plans of evil into total defeat scattering them into oblivion. Victory belongs to God.

  • Quential

    There will be a major development of re engineered HB1 Vintage 1918 Spanish Flu brought out in it debut starting in January of 2013. This of course is in alignment with the need for enforced health care. And Obama is coincidentally right on track.

    Phase two will be the devastating effects of the flu shots, followed by more arterial chemtrail cocktails. Next will be the campaign of gun control. Weather modifications will be tested with HARRP to effect crops and test the waters. If things do not go as well the economy will be controlled. Folks from the media to education and everything you believe their agenda is not for your best interest but playing as gods the elite have your ass inside and out.

  • Jonathan S.

    This is complete madness. If they want population control, lets just destroy the UN leaders. God told us to replenish the earth and subdue it. REPLENISH. Not destroy. This also destroys life for any future generations hoping and praying to live a good life, run by themselves and not a tyrant. DOWN WITH UN.

    • Dina Strange

      God told you not to spew nonsense.

  • Humanity went from being a species that exists on planet earth to a virus that is rapidly multiplying and spreading, speeding up the killing of out mother earth.
    Genocide IS NOT THE ANSWER. But the only alternative I see, without murdering people, is not having kids for a some generations. I’ll gladly keep from having a kid if it means no one has to be murdered….

    • Anyone got a better idea? Let’s put ideas out on the table folks! Please! Let’s work together to find a solution that isn’t genocide!!

    • while there are corporations who are protected by gov who are destroying the earth in extracting resources irresponsbilty do not confuse that with the average joe who owns a saw mill or a gold mine or individual farmer who grows food as the main culprit of these enviromental problems, or the average home owner who is a working stiff who will gladly make adjustments if needed when they understand the problem in how otmanage their land, and don’t confuse thier ideas of population problems to any actual problems we don’t have a population problem, that is a perceived notion based on propaganda we have a lack of human spread problem. poor management problem, a wealthy elites who want to rule the world problem not a numbers problem.

  • Andrew

    I personally don’t see the evidence for population control what I see is evidence for breeding. The state no matter what country always gets worried when their population drops below replacement. They then actively encourage families to have more children or they encourage immigration. Also if the elite really wanted to reduce the population why is the global population still growing and why do we have fertility clinics that enable couples who cant have children to have. Makes no sense. In the UK the NHS will pay for fertility treatment but you will find it difficult to get sterilized on the NHS depending where you live. That to me does not sound like a reduction policy but a breeding one. And the only reason why they want us to have more children is to increase the countries GDP and so the government will have access to more people to slaughter in their illegal wars. Just have a look at Russia who are now actively encouraging couples to have more children. And why is that because the government has suddenly realised that their population is in free fall and they stand to lose a lot of global influence with a smaller population to back them up.

    • I am thinking maybe genocide is where the pop control is at they are discouraging certain groups from breeding, like africa for example, in this country instead of encouraging you to avoid pregenancy in the first place they just go ahead and pay for abortions, which is a from of genocide or pop reduction if I may use that word. also the fact that the population continues to rise despite less babies in some countries and despite death rates is because of the tenacity of the human spirit, and fact there are just so many of us and so many issues the united nations is trying ot deal with they cannot implement alot of their plans as fast as they would like. they can only do it peice meal.

  • Miss Anthropic

    The human race is similar to MRSA or CRE–bacterial infections that gobble up the flesh of the host body. We have gobbled up mother earth and keep on replicating–like there is no end to her resources. Human populations need to be severely curtailed and controlled. We will not have the political or social “stomach” for it–so the earth itself will do the elimination. I say, “Good!” My dogs know not to poop and pee in their water and feed dishes. Humans are not intelligent enough to figure this out. Any species that stoopid needs to go!

  • roberta4343

    what you describe is arrogance, one of the tools satan uses to control humans, the united nations, rulers and the like have no more right to dictate the rights of another then anyone else. they cannot take away rights, all they can do is violate them.and I believe their real reason for doing this is to many humans to control, (as if a farmer has to many cows to control) and they justify it in their minds into believing their own lies, humans could do fine if allowed to spread out and use their noggings to come up with innovations and other things to help make hte earth a better place to be, the trouble is we have wicked people(sinfulness that goes along with it), and satan and death standing in the 127:1 indicates that we need devine guidance and help to achieve a truly paradise for everyone living, this earth is quite capable of handling double the populaton with ease if you can get satan, sin and death out of the way. but people have got to want Gods kingdom (rulership over hte earth) dan 2:44

  • Lace

    I can hardly believe what I’m reading. People’s hearts have become so hardened. I have four beautiful children. They are my world. Each one blesses my life everyday. I’m horrified at the thought of taking away some one’s ability to have a child, that will love and cherish it. Children are a blessing, and abortion is murder of the very most innocent. In America we are supposed to be free. However in an effort to be “green” more and more of that freedom is being taken away. Save trees and kill the babies. God help us when good is called evil and evil good. Read your Bible people. If you don’t know Jesus as your Savior now is the time. If people would come back to God and have morals again, then there wouldn’t be “unwanted” births. There sure wouldn’t be crazies wanting to “decrease” the population by various horrific, in my opinion, ways. By the way, I promise they don’t intend on including themselves in the population decrease. Selfishness at its worst! Plan and simple, Jesus is the answer. Not abortion.aka-murder. Not sterilization.

    • Michael Mcghee

      Your four children are causing more problems for the planet than a fleet of Hummer’s. They aren’t a blessing, or a miracle. They are the result of a chemical reaction and one that’s becoming a huge problem because people like you are too ignorant to actually see the big picture.

      Let’s see what God does when the world is packed with 30 billion people and no resources to go around. I’m sure we’ll all be living a joyous life at that point, right?

      • Bril

        he’s going to feed 5,000 with a couple loafs of bread and 2 fish,just as he did years ago.God said be fruitful and multiply and anything that contradicts the word of God is of the devil

        • Jade

          You said that exactly right!!!!!!! If you read what I wrote before I started reading others comments you will see I said the exact same thing about being fruitful and multiplying, and I didn’t think to put in the part about anything going against it being the devil, so true, very well said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • arugula

        Bot only are you woefully UNinformed and rude… you are a fool.

      • Jade

        By that time God will probably take His people home and let miserable people like you suffer in the hell you have made for yourself, children are a blessing, you however are not, and God will take the children before any of us, because they are innocent and without sin!!!!!!! And you are the one who is a chemical reaction, I sure hope you have NEVER reproduced because I feel so sorry for that child and/or children!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        • Michael Mcghee

          I won’t be reproducing for the reasons I stated above. That doesn’t make me an awful or heartless human being.

          I may adopt later in my life when I’m in a position to provide a stable upbringing and I’m fairly certain I’d be an awesome parent, at least I’d always try to be.

          You’re also correct about me being a chemical reaction, as are you; that was my point.

          • AngelQ

            If you believe that human beings are just “chemical reactions”, you have missed the point of being born. With people like you, there doesn’t need to be a devil. You and your kind will suffice. God help us…

          • Dina Strange

            wow, another severely brainwashed idiot.

    • Emma

      The bible and god isn’t real wake up.

      • Jade

        Guess we’ll be finding that out soon since we’re all going to die soon anyway!!!!!!!

    • Jade

      Everything you said is so true!!!!!!! I have 3 gorgeous boys who I adore, and I know God gave them to me and my husband for a reason! Two and a half years ago, two and a half years before I read this, my husband made me aware of ‘the powers that be’, they are satan’s menion’s, I keep learning more and more about what their plans are for us and the things they are up to to try to eliminate us, this is one of them!!! We are living in end times, it says everything that is going on right now and with this in Revelations, maybe not in these words, but we as Christians can read between the lines!!! I hope you are preparing your children for it, because I am!!!!!!!! God bless you and your children and family!!!!!!!

      • Dina Strange

        God didn’t give you anything for a reason, u had sex and that’s how it happened. God has nothing to do with it.

    • Dina Strange

      Having 4 kids is being extremely selfish on your part. Don’t you think a tiger wants to keep her baby that is being killed coz people like you want to take tiger’s territory for resources. Don’t you think orangutans that are being killed for palm oil to use in your soap, don’t want to have their kids which are killed to make you soap.

      You dumb woman, wake up. And leave Jesus out of this…brainwashed nonsense.

  • In answer to Johnboy below….there is absolutely nothing wrong with “Limiting” population growth. That is reasonable, however the point you are completely missing is “limiting population growth” is not what “they” have in mind. If you were paying attention, “they” want to “REDUCE” the already existing population. And in case you still haven’t a clue wtf that means, it means “kill, murder, maim, starve, nuke, flood out, destroy” by any means possible in which “they” can get away with.

    What part of “Reduce” the population do you not understand?

    Go read further on their “methods” of reduction…or better yet, open your eyes. It is a fact that most wars and both sides are funded by the same “they” group discussed here. And here we are now in 2013 with wars and rumors of wars….false flags everywhere, and legislation already passed and on the books to lock up and “detain” anyone who opposes the NWO. Best study up and catch up then perhaps you might see. Just look around. NDAA “indefinite detainment” of citizens, and “re-education” or worse? All laws currently passed have followed the near exact same wording and implementation as Hitler…because it worked so well.

    The CDC has been exposed storing plastic caskets for what is coming and DHS has recently purchased nearly 2 BILLION rounds of Ammo, tanks and weapons of war. DHS for your information is a DOMESTIC department. They have also acquired new “Paper Practice Targets” via LET INC. that are labeled “No-More-Hesitation” and “Non-Traditional Targets” which are young pregnant armed American women, CHILDREN and grandma and grandpa in “Residential” settings.

    Further, “they” are planning a global economic collapse that will make the 1930’s look like a picnic. Hence, they themselves are hoarding food, medicines and water reservoirs in their “hideouts” below known as D.U.M.B.S. and have collected and provided for storage every seed known to men nicknamed the “doomsday vault”. Who do you suppose has access to these seeds for future use? Most certainly not you and I.

    As Rockefeller stated in a secret meeting many years ago among the “Bilderberg” crowd, he thanked the Washington Post and NYTimes big boys in attendance for keeping secret their plans all these forty years from the public, for which they are deeply grateful. Go look up the quotes of globalist “elite” Also read the Report from Iron Mountain, once it was exposed as a so called “hoax”…however, with the passage of time you will see it rings of much truth. No, the limiting of population growth in and of itself is not such a bad thing, especially in the “targeted” areas of the elite wherein they are working to extraction of all the minerals and wealth, Africa and Ethiopia and now Afghanistan as well where are our US Military is guarding the “opium” production…look to history of the “opium wars” and look to history to know where all the new laws on the books could very lead us if left unchecked.

    Hence, ‘they” want America disarmed, while it is being “fundamentally changed” and prepared for the rise of their NWO. Apparently “they” are planning for much destruction, death and opposition once the rest of the populace wakes up to all the lies, as they are now armed to the teeth and massive military movement and buildup has been reported throughout the country.

    • Michael Mcghee

      You do realise that by limiting the number of children that people can have you will ultimately reduce the world’s population, right? That’s the whole point.

  • In reply to John below, I agree there may not be anything wrong with “limiting” population growth in certain instances, to a degree.

    However, these same people do not stop at just “limiting” population GROWTH. In many instances they speak of “REDUCING” population. And in some cases claim they desire to see 90 to 95% reduction of worldwide population.

    So what part of the meaning of REDUCING Population do you not understand? Or do you agree with them?

    These people’s ideas and meanings can be clearly understood by reading all their statements which can be found easily online by searching for globalist or elite quotes or quotes of the new world order.

    Or perhaps their real meaning and intentions can be more readily understood by deciphering the content of the murals of the Denver “New World” International Airport?

    For instance, some murals clearing depict dead children, dead animals, forest on fire and gargoyles or monsters coming out of suitcases. In present day terms, in this uncommon age and reign of “terror” what more could be depicted from the suitcases? Dirty bombs perhaps? Along with the military man wearing a gas mask and holding a scimitar or sword. This is no conspiracy theory, you can actually look these murals up for yourself and draw your own conclusions.

    Or perhaps the thoughts of Prince Phillips statements, like many other’s attending the secret globalist meetings are more clearly understood– “If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a KILLER VIRUS to LOWER/REDUCE human population levels.”

    The language is clear. And rather disturbing.

    • Michael Mcghee

      Limiting the number of children people can have will, in time, reduce the population by the amounts spoken about. These people aren’t talking about murdering six and a half billion people, they’re talking about the prolonged limitation of children allowed and the reduction in the worlds population that will come from that.

  • Incorrigible_Cynic

    If you’re one of the Ruling Elite™ in this future world, it looks like you would have The Good Life™ all sewn up.

    It would be much living in the days of feudalism, when the untold numbers of serfs served the every whim of aristocrats and monarchs.
    “It’s good to be the king.”

  • don

    This is why there’s a push in america to get rid of guns so that when the slaughter starts the perpetrators wont have to worry about getting shot….

  • don

    This earth belongs to God and God told us to be fruitful and mutiply and fill the earth…its in the first chapters of Genesis in the Bible…God wants people

  • They are already in the process of this plan, they are enhancing GMO’s in our food and medicine so we are less efficient than we used to be. There are nasty viruses they are toying with that seem to have the capability to kill multitudes of people and the only reason they haven’t put the viruses into use is because they cannot control it once it gets out. I agree, the world needs to die, we’ve over stayed our welcome.

  • One Fact that No one can run away from is … ” MAN ” is the Highest populated Number of any Animal or creature on the Planet. Even …Ants.
    So deal with it. or Don’t.

  • einstein

    1) That there will be a large-scale
    reduction in global human numbers over the next two or three centuries appears
    to be inevitable.
    2) The primary issue seems to be whether this process will be
    under conscious human control and (hopefully) relatively benign, or whether it
    will turn out to be unpredictably chaotic and (perhaps) catastrophic.

    3) We must
    begin our new manner of thinking about this critically important global issue
    now, so that Einstein’s prescient and legitimate concerns about human and
    civilizational survival into the 21st century and beyond may be addressed as
    rapidly, fully, and humanely as possible.

  • JD

    The Author of the article is an ignorant fool.

    • arugula

      Unfortunately it is YOU who the extremely fact deficent fool. Open your eyes!!!!

    • Emma

      Agreed he is a dumb idiot

  • heartless

    im all in favour of population control . I would go further and curtail aid programs to third world countries and help them to die quicker .maybe reintroduce malaria .

    • arugula

      You are vile and the world would be better with less people who think as you do and more of the hoi polloi.

  • Markus V.

    The world population is the total number of living humans on Earth. As of today, it is estimated to number 7.087 billion by the United States Census Bureau (USCB). The USCB estimates that the world population exceeded 7 billion on March 12, 2012. According to a separate estimate by the United Nations Population Fund, it reached this milestone on October 31, 2011. (Source: Wikipedia).

  • Theognostos

    Are these ‘people’ follow the direction of their bosses who work behind the scenes. The real reason for population reduction is that when it happens (WWIII is coming) the Nefelim will have an easier time of taking over control of the surface of the planet when they come out of the Tartara. Pray and work to have things happen as in the Apokalypsis of John for Salvation of Humanity. They will have their wars, but God the Father and His Son Jesus are also watching and they have a Fiery Holy Spirit with them less anyone forgets.

  • Candi

    Overpopulation is not the problem, arrogance and avarice is. The people clamoring the most for population control are those who have the most resources and they don’t want to share. Would Bill Gates give up his 60 foot swimming pool and 66,000 sqft mansion to reduce his “carbon footprint?” Would he kill or sterilize his three children to ensure that population levels stay low? Did he sterilize himself? Would Al Gore give up his private jet for the good of the planet and take up biking to all of his speaking arrangments instead? These people calling for the extermination of the existing population and the lowering of the birthrate are nothing but arrogant hypocrites who think that we, the common people, are “useless eaters” taking up the resources only deserved by the ultra rich.

    I also agree with a previous comment saying that overconsumption is the problem as well. There is no need for every American citizen to own their own or multiple cars or for over 5 million miles of US territory to be covered in asphalt. Why do we need a mega mall and mini-mart on every street corner? Why do we need to buy new clothes every few months even though our old ones are just fine? Why do so many decent things end up in the landfills instead of being recycled or freecycled? Why are we taught that happiness only comes from material wealth instead of a growing relationship with Jesus Christ and caring for our fellow man? The amount of people that our plant can sustain can be greatly increased without the loss of human life or that of other species if we would learn to work with nature instead of dominating and destroying it.

    • Seth

      We are supposed to have “dominion” over the EARTH. But not dominion over each other! We SHOULD master nature (together, seeking mutual benefit!), but not try to dominate other human beings.

  • JLJohnson

    Controlled sterilization is a perfect way to keep a check with out-of-control population growth. You should have a minimum income and education requirement before allowed to have children. It’s the answer to the strain on our natural resources and the strain on our government and social resources.

    • arugula

      You probably don’t even realize it, but you are a genuine fascist.

  • cabouthillier

    Iron poisoning, GMO foods, vaccines, radiation & copper depletion are the means for population extermination.

    Iron is NOT a nutrient; it is a poison that replaces copper and accumulates in multiple locations of the body,
    destroying the vascular system & organs, and accelerating aging.

    Iron is accumulating due to iron, iron uptake facilitators and copper depleters that have been added to the
    food and water supply.

    GMO foods were created to increase iron availability.

    Vaccines contain nano-particle size parasites, termed “viruses”, that thrive and replicate in the presence
    of iron deposits.

    Radiation, such as Wi-Fi, vibrates blood proteins, breaking off the loosely bound iron, resulting in vascular
    damage and accelerating iron deposition.

    These chemical, biological and radiation poisons work together to decrease lifespan & birth rate.

    The iron poisoned population has a lifespan that is now over 50 years less than the healthy segment.

    The poisoners enjoy secretly exterminating the population, and think that by decreasing the real population below
    200 million, they can change the set times and beat their MAKER.

    I encourage you to read:

    C.A. Bouthillier

    • Pradeep

      What about our blood cells, which need iron in order to function properly?

  • Barnz

    I’ve been dreaming & wishing that somehow the worlds human population lost approx 90% of its inhabitants. I am in total agreement w/ the elites on this one. How can anyone not be? There are way too many of us, everywhere. Just go on google maps & zoom in on places like the Amazon rain forest & what should be a tiny town, is instead a sprawling huge city already. My heart sank when I seen such things. I value the life of an endangered animal more than that of a human life. I would rather save the last lion in Africa instead of every lion hunter in the world combined.

    We need a global plague that will spread fast & fierce, One wi/ no cure in site. One that will ravage the human population back down to a sustainable number such as the desired 500 milliion. The Elites have the money, power & resources to make this happen,, so make this happen! & fast.

  • Alfredo

    The planet is not being destroyed by the 99 percent, but the 1 percent on the other hand are the ones who make bad decisions that lead to global destruction. The elite have been doing this for centuries through wars, causing diseases, instigating famines, and now they may be able to control the weather to cause natural disasters. In other words, the 1 percent are worried that we (the 99 percent) would eventually figure out this grand scam. This is why they are attempting to brainwash us to accept this new genocide against ourselves in order to bring down the world’s population. The sheeple of the world need to start waking up to this threat!

    • Ivanov

      I’m sorry, I noticed a distinct lack of any actual evidence behind the noise of your tinfoil hat crinkling.

  • wollfb

    i don’t care what the so-called ELITE say: the simple truth is that the world is choking on humans. population control is absolutely necessary. The first step is the muzzle the foul roman catholic church’s ban on contraception.

  • Liam

    Population control needs to happen. And not just through a 1 child policy, and not from the state. The people need to willingly conclude that most of them are in excess. And they need to accept that they need to die. That COUNTRIES as a thing need to die. One country (not the USA, they need to go), no religion, strict laws enforcing birth control, and a stagnant 400 million. Humans are only allowed to live in certain urbanised areas, as well. We’re taking up WAY more space than we need, and honestly 5% of the world’s surface is enough. Let the forest reclaim the land that was taken from it. These things NEED to happen for humanity’s survival as a species, and at some point soon the people, not the bureaucrats, need to make the decision.

    • Parfait

      So you’re suggesting that we euthanise the majority of our species for the “greater good”? That’s how it comes across.

  • Wesker

    This article just proves how completely ignorant (and dare I say stupid) some people are.
    The fact that the population is increasing this rapidly IS a serious problem, and it’s only going to speed up. Obviously more people are being created, who in turn are going to create more people, etc etc.
    We are killing the Earth. We are using up more and more land and dumping more and more garbage into the ocean.Then of course there’s the disgusting people who are completely delusional and think humans are at the top of the food chain and go hunting for “fun.” Yeah, slaughtering animals is awesome, right? Too bad more and more species are becoming extinct because of us, not just from killing them directly but from destroying their homes.

    And don’t even get me started on the gross people in the USA that breed more and more because the government will support them while they sit at home unemployed creating more and more useless degenerates.

    • arugula

      Baloney… what our gov’t is doing is deliberately with holding true information about women’s health issues, withholding birth control AND family planning… THEY are responsible for the extra babies… and everyone with two brain cells to rub together knows how badly Africa is used as disposable guinea pigs and abused by the larger developed nations….. You have the wrong angle on this one…

  • Lychee

    This author seems to put more value on the average person’s right to a “good life” than what actually benefits the planet and the animals on it. Where the hell do you come off in thinking that we are irrefutably the most important creatures alive? Left to our own devices, we have managed to destroy so much. Yes, population management is important. It is harder to be qualified to adopt a dog than to have a child, and the vast majority of people shouldn’t be having children – leave alone numerous children. The global elite are probably so because they’ve got half the brains to see that this is necessary. Go study the material you are condemning, and perhaps you’ll see that defending humanity is incredibly selfish.

  • Kelzy

    I hate to say this but it seems that the more intelligent comments argue that population control is necessary and justify claims with real examples (finite natural resources, etc). All the other comments fail to justify the reason for no population control and simply state it is some sort of “elite” conspiracy. I hate to agree with the basic comments I’ve read- more people+ finite space = one big problem. What no one really mentioned was that having more children also implies less resources for each child and presumably less financial solvency. Therefore, if resources do become limited, your children will be fighting for resources from the wealthy (who can arguably control things like WATER- which is already happening in many places around the world). So in the end, they (wealthy) will be better off anyhow because of basic financial well-being and the power it brings them. So to say that they will “control” you now is silly. If they don’t control you now they will in time when YOU run out of resources to support five children and they can still afford it. I also daresay that most people advocating for some form of population control might be better off than most, but perhaps that is because, they value education. Most people work hard to become successful and usually this means intense research, prioritizing education and a pro-active, long term approach to all things in life. Just take a look at some of the “anti-population control” comments and all the spelling errors within them. Sorry, I had to say it. Someone mentioned the government promoting children through welfare- I can certainly see this point. This also promotes more uneducated children entering the system. Interestingly, the more educated women choose to have fewer children. This will become a problem when most people left on the planet will be “easier” to control since they will also presumably be uneducated. Again, the wealthy, intellectual is ahead yet again. So I don’t think you can just blame it all on the wealthy. I say take charge of your own life, become more educated, take charge of your life and maybe you will see things from their perspective. Rather than victimize the “elite,” think of population control as a benefit for the mass. If we don’t do anything about it, nature will slowly take away our resources and the poor will end up fighting or paying for the resources we take for granted now. If we don’t voluntarily want control that is one thing. Eventually the decision won’t be ours to make.

  • Pavoir

    Over-population is an issue because there’s only a finite amount of live-able space on the Earth, and a finite amount of resources to maintain that life. While I wouldn’t advocate such a reduction of population, and while I am totally against forced-abortion, there are some valid points to be taken into consideration here- it’s easy to write people off as “global elite” and argue from an “us” and “them” viewpoint, but the world isn’t always that simple.

    A much better solution would be using resources in order to improve the quality of life and provide education to those who require it, and take away child benefits that people receive after having two/three children (as in, they do not receive additional benefits for additional children). People opting for smaller families is, as pointed out, correlated with higher quality of living standards. The issue we have is that many people are having kids, and do not have the funds or resources to care for them themselves. If they are required by their religion to reproduce then perhaps the religion can pay for it. You would see the Church and other religious bodies change their stance if they were required to pay for the children born from their advocation.

    I don’t want my, or anyone else’s grandkids to have to fight a resource war because everyone’s chosen to be a hedonist. Neither do I want them to live in a dystopian world but these are not the only two options.

  • scott

    just whatever you do don’t get any shots for preventive measures!!!! read bill gates article stating that vaccinations will help decrease the population!!!! ugh makes me sick!! no more flu, small pox, meningitis shots!!!!!!!! screw walgreens advertisements!!!

  • judge77

    Why Is this some kind of sad thing??? Most people are polluting our workforce as well with dishonesty, sabotage and personality disorders. Who would miss them??

  • BaRoN

    There is no need for discussion, oil is ending, doesnt matter if you believe it or not, it is a finite source that we use almost 20 million barrels a day, i dont even understand why people even discuss something so obvious..

    Its ending and when it really stops flowing…

    we wont be able to produce fertilizers and insecticides,

    we wont be able to use vehicles to work all those farm lands,

    we wont be able to distribute the little food we produced to cities hundreds miles away,

    we wont be able to produce drugs like antibiotics or insulin,

    %100 of medical care depends on plastic byproducts, there will be none,

    there will be no electricity…

    Some idiots says they will obtain power from nuclear, solar or wind when oil is gone, and i ask them;

    how will you produce coppers from mines without vehicles,

    how will you insulate that copper without plastic to produce electrical wires

    how will you produce even the simplest electronic devices to control any kind of power plant without oil byproducts,

    %90-95 of earth population will starve to death or die from diseases, its inevitable.

    • Will Depp

      Are you an idiot? There are many other sources of power, wind, solar,hydro, nuclear, natural gas, we will use these other sources of energy and we should be doing more now to get us off oil.

  • Emma

    This is a stupid article. Population control is vital and if we don’t do anything about we will all be killed anyway from our own stupidity to the environment and the planet. So what is it? Continuing with poverty and making animals extinct as well as us? Or reduce our population and save the planet? Because to me, all life on earth is more important than just the lives of humans.

  • Jonathan schmidt

    What people seem to not understand is the possibility that the earth is young. If you believe in evolution then population control is a big concern and people are not worth a thing. There is really no purpose to life. What I what would like to know is who is going to volunteer to die? This idea is extremely dangerous and usually leads to forceable extermination. Hitler, Pol pot and Mal sa tung all shared this philosophy. The fifty million babies being aborted every year are being forceably exterminated they have no choice.

    • Will Depp

      A fetus is not a human, it’s not human till it is born. Even the Bible considered a child in the womb as property. One instance in bible a fight occurs, the woman loses her baby….the guy who did it pays a fine, at that time taking a live meant death, but not for killing a fetus as it was not considered human. Folks should stop worrying about fetus’s and take care of the living. These pro-lifers are the same ones who have no problem with executing a person. If you call yourself pro life than go help a life. Stay out of another persons reproduction, it none of your business.

  • Jade

    These people are satan’s menion’s, control is what it is all about for them!!! What does THEE Lord Thy God, OUR Father say, be fruitful and multiply!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And what gives anyone the right to terminate a life because ‘we’ think that life is less than perfert????????????????????? Abortion is murder!!!!!!! And it is not ‘our’ choice to decide who lives or dies, that decision has always belonged to our Father, He, and He alone decides when it is a person’s time to go back to him, and a fetus is a person, look into it!!!!!!!

    • Will Depp

      Another moron Bible thumping fool. I say we get rid of all of them 1st.

  • Jade

    So you hate yourself more than anything in the world then?!?!?!? HOW SAD!!!!!!!

  • Ozguy33

    There is no reason to reduce fertility although I can see governments doing that as they love control of everything but that would spike HUGE rebellions of basic human rights, limiting children to 2 children a family is the way to go. Also change the economy and get realistic. Our whole economy is built on growth, until BUSINESSES and CORPORATIONS and our whole economy change this will remain a HUGE problem. Change that and everything will follow.

  • Mike

    Another middle class guy here who sees the need to reduce the population for the good of the planet. It is the only way. Anyone who thinks we can keep going with 9 billion once our dwindling natural resources are gone is kidding them selves.

  • michael10sley

    Being 63, I worry for my grandchildren and their future children in an overpopulated world. Something needs to be done to relieve population pressure on the world’s ecosystem or my great grandchildren may be the last humans on Earth..
    China recently stated they were ‘easing’ the one child policy. India has no restrictions on birth numbers and no adequate training or resources to develop a workable population stability program.
    If every country would voluntarily agree to a one child policy (with training for men and women so they understand the reason for such a policy) then populations would gradually diminish over time and the sustainability problem would disappear, especially with good management of natural resources and habitat protection for _all animals.
    The world’s people would be fed and housed, they would be healthier and live longer, our resources wouldn’t be jeopardized, and the precious animals we’re losing would be protected and managed properly.
    The recent findings of NASA point to humans not being able to survive in a space environment for long periods so sending the willing to other solar systems is not feasible.
    We are stuck here on Earth and we need to do a much better job of protecting and maintaining it for the future of human life. The animals could take care of themselves if we weren’t around as they did in the past, which means that _we are the problem that needs solving.
    This is a global problem and every country needs to be involved in making contributions toward a humanitarian solution.

  • a

    I agree with reducing the population. Mo people, Mo problems


  • John

    It is idiots like the writer of the article and the clown with the corner of Brazil coment that will help continue the accelerated decline and extinction of the human race. It will take care of itself, the great coming die off.

  • Anonymous

    I live in an underpopulated country where a significant percentage of its citizens is on welfare, and receives extra payments per child up til four children. The core of the capital city is prosperous, clean, and bright, but most of the suburbs are full of violent crime, drugs (cheap derrivatives of cocaine that ruin the brain), and disfunctional family relationships. Education is fractured and inadequate – think 40+ children to a class, and teaching methods that are poor and antequated. Strikes are common, as a result of wages failing to keep up with inflation. Many parents are often of the type that let their children run out of the supermarket into the parking lot while they blithely push their shopping carts… people who have multiple children with different partners and rarely get married. Mindless consumption is encouraged. People subsist on junk items from the supermarket. Able-bodied men and women, who are supposed to be doing cleanup chores in exchange for welfare payments, just stand around drinking tea and chatting rather than picking up the immense amount of plastic garbage that accumulates in the streets – streets that often show in city halls as paved, but remain unpaved due to theft of public funds. I’ve seen a lot of infrastructure progress at the national level (highways, etc.) with this government, and it’s nice to know that people are no longer picking through the garbage to feed themselves (welfare does have a place while the economy recovers), but the condition – mental and social – of the population in the suburbs of the larger cities scares me. Recent looting of supermarkets for electronics, etc. involved thousands of individuals, and was coordinated by local police. Food wasn’t stolen – flatscreen TVs were. This is not a generation of productive, self-actualized, thoughtful human beings – it is a generation of weakened and dependent individuals who need the state to survive – in exchange for votes. I am the type of person who believes in the potential greatness of human beings, but that greatness needs to be encouraged and nurtured. Having a bunch of babies unconsciously can be destructive. People should be taught to be thoughtful about bringing lives into this world. Every baby, every child needs adequate nutrition AND education. Ignorant and illiterate parents cannot home-school their children. The American and European realities are not representative of most of the world (although not for much longer). The issue of population vis-a-vis human well-being is a very complex issue and there are no simple answers. Think things through, people. PLEASE!

  • Corbeaubleu

    As a caring, peaceful person who helps others as much as I can, doing good deeds and giving much of myself as often as possible, I want the survival and success of my species.
    However, as human being who has been living on and loving this beautiful planet for many years, I absolutely believe that the human population must be reduced by billions of individuals, and very soon. We cannot go on.
    We have forfeited our rights as a species in many ways, here are a few big ones: by eradicating thousands of other species that had fought to survive (like us) for eons, by destroying entire ecosystems, by genetically changing species for our own use, (including our own), by altering delicate environmental balances (such as actually diverting immense reserves of fresh water from certain latitudes to others), by polluting the air, soil and waters of the Earth (plastic “continent” in the middle of the Pacific and other seas), also our atmosphere is now 25 percent more opaque than in the 1970s!, by painfully abusing other species for often absolutely ridiculous and self serving reasons (one example: rabbits forced to smoke in the 50s, 60s, 70s… and forced to have chemicals dripped in their eyes), We destroy immense, oxygen giving, forests just to eat beef!!! Honestly…There are thousands upon thousands more examples of the ways we are abusing our planet, war for instance… and so it is simple, we, humans, have got to go. Soon. VERY SOON. I am happy to know that in time the planet will heal and start over, without us. Another species of animal, bacteria or plant, or maybe even virus will dominate and take over. And it is terribly sad that we will be gone, we had such potential and such fantastic dreams… and I think that our demise will be terrible, we will pay dearly for our actions… I am disgusted by humanity but love the individual. The Georgia stones are absolutely on the right track.

  • Geoff

    I honestly don’t see an issue with reducing the population. Because medicine and destroying and stealing other specie’s habitats and prey to still provide food and consumption for ourselves is destroying the ecosystem.

    Though doing it through things like creating healthcare systems to kill off the sick and such is obviously wrong. Though to control how many children a single person can have and I would rather take the ‘loss of freedom to have 15 children’ than the government just not telling me or tricking me by creating pandemics or healthcare systems to kill us off.

    People always seem to complain about the idea of losing the freedom to fertility, so I suppose we all have to suffer in a much more horrible way that isn’t as obvious.

  • Christian David Tenorio Rodríg

    Truly there is a big problem of overpopulation and we’re killing out all other species. I guess we should reduce our population at least to 1 billion people, but I quite agree with them. I don’t have offspring and I’m thinking about getting sterilized. Anyway, I have health problems that don’t want to pass to future generations, but I guess the future is very dark, so why would anyone bother having more children? There’s actually plenty of us, and we’d be better off being less.

  • Dina Strange

    The DUMBEST article, ever. Btw, i support elites trying to reduce population to save the earth. I like planet earth. I don’t want to see it destroyed by too many humans. and yes….historically many women considered babies as burden and used any means of contraceptives to not have children.

    So yeah…i think we need to reduce population and increase other species on earth. 200 species go extinct everyday due to human population. too many humans are not good for the planet. we need to not only think about our reproduction but reproduction of other species.

  • samcarmx

    No doubt modern medicine–vaccines, antibiotics, over-aggressive hygiene, and the like–has created the monster of overgrowth of population and has allowed people who otherwise would not have lived to the age of puberty to live, to the detriment as well of the biological sturdiness of humanity. What seems like a humanitarian good turns out to be a humanitarian nightmare. That is the price you pay for sentimentalist idealisms that are unintelligent when viewed as to their effects in the long run.

    Population control without coercion implies awareness and a spirit of sacrifice. The Cheyenne considered that to have more than one child every 7 years cheated the child of a proper upbringing and endangered the tribe’s welfare owing to overpopulation. They were a very disciplined people. We are very chaotic and individualistic people. I don’t think people are prepared to discipline themselves for the good of all. Personally, I also think abortion after the 6th-8th week is utter barbarism. I think any abortion is barbarism if undertaken for reasons other than the mother’s life, decisive defects of the fetus, cases of rape and incest. I think forced sterilization is utter barbarism. But then, we are barbarians despite our technical sophistication. We are stupidly destroying the ecological balances necessary to live in the long run. Our industrial-banking elites have no intelligence at all in this respect, their greed is all-consuming.

    No doubt we are in a real fix, and probably only a divine intervention will set things right again. The Bible on the latter days does not paint a cheerful picture, and the same holds for other religious traditions. I don’t think the god of technology will save us–it got us into this mess, but of course to say that is heresy these days. Science and technology and “development” and “progress” are the real religion and hope of people. They don’t see the Faustian bargain implied in our civilization, and that it is a case of having opened Pandora’s box. Think also of the myth of Icarus or the tale of the Soceror’s apprentice. Those kinds of human wisdom have gone by the board. No one pays them the slightest interest, assuming they even know about them to begin with. People are too busy shopping, watching “the game” on their wall-sized TV’s, or playing some mindless video game, or on Facebook, and other incredibly foolish illusions. We resemble nothing less than the Titanic just before plowing into the iceberg.

  • Will Depp

    I agree, 500 million would be best. We need to stop the population growth, we can’t sustain 7 billion.

  • Will Depp

    I think you a fuxxing idiot! I agree we need to get a check on population….eliminate morons like you would be a good way to start.

  • Jimmy o

    As a 31 year old white guy with a college education who came from a house full of alcoholism I completely agree with this article. I am no where close to being “elite” and I firmly believe we need far less people in this world. Visualize being able to live wherever you wish on this planet. Visualize being able to wake up every day and not have to go to work… but actually want to go to work because you only have to work a minimal amount of hours to sustain yourself and the other people on this planet. If you want to live on a beach and wake up and watch the sunrise from your bedroom every morning you can. If you want to live on the side of a mountain… go for it. This planet is “heaven” and we are destroying it. The only reason so many of us live in unsavory places and have to slave away until the day we die is because there are too many of us. We should all be able to live in places that are paradise and not have to worry about working just to buy food, pay mortgage, or pay rent.

  • Jimmy o

    As a 31 year old white guy with a college education who came from a
    house full of alcoholism I completely agree with this article. I am no
    where close to being “elite”, I am also as liberal as they come and I firmly believe we need far less
    people in this world. My mindset for several years has been that I will never have kids unless I am a millionaire. So many of us waste our short time on this world working meaningless jobs that drain us of our energy and vitality as well as our potential just so we can have enough money to survive. Visualize being able to live wherever you wish on
    this planet. Visualize being able to wake up every day and not have to
    go to work… but actually want to go to work because you only have to
    work a minimal amount of hours to sustain yourself and the other people
    on this planet. If you want to live on a beach and wake up and watch
    the sunrise from your bedroom every morning you can. If you want to
    live on the side of a mountain… go for it. This planet is “heaven”
    and we are destroying it. The only reason so many of us live in
    unsavory places and have to slave away until the day we die is because
    there are too many of us. We should all be able to live in places that
    are paradise and not have to worry about working just to buy food, pay
    mortgage, or pay rent.

  • Jonah Hurley

    Well, I a little disgusted by this. 90% of the world’s population? that might mean we might have at least 10% chance that you will live.

  • Jonah Hurley

    I mean, we should at least execute the ones who have done bad deeds, like very bad by a punishable reason like “Murder”

  • Kate

    There are far too many people on this planet using far too many resources. What about the other species? Don’t they deserve to live here too? What gives humans the right to destroy their habitats? I think a 90% population reduction is a good idea. If the elite don’t do it (which I’m not saying I support), it will happen naturally as the earth falls out of balance from overpopulation. It’s already happening anyways. Look at all the human conflict on earth today… it wouldn’t exist if there weren’t so many unnecessary human beings competing for same limited resources. Overpopulation kills everyone and everything.

  • Jim

    Here’s the issue, yes you could fit more people on the planet, a lot more, but you have to realize that everyone is working towards the same thing for the most part… “retirement” in a nice place along the coast. We have a planet that is absolute paradise and we destroyed by blindly following what everyone else is doing. Religion is total bullshit. What the original “prophets” were saying was to live in harmony with nature. We didn’t do that. Empires rose and fell over and over again in the past because they outgrew their resources and had to go and invade other countries to get more food etc. What everyone really wants is freedom, freedom to go anywhere and do anything they want. We can’t do that in this current environment. Right now it’s not a question of fitting more people on the planet its the fact that our greenhouse gas emissions have created a “vacuum” tube of a planet. Unless we could all go back to living off the land tomorrow we can’t stop a massive die off anyway. Life could be anything we want it to be on this planet. Our current system now is just one big experiment gone wrong. Don’t fear death and this thought of lower populations won’t get to you. We’re all slaves right now anyway, whether you realize it or not. There is no god coming to save you, no religion. God is, was, always will be our planet, our environment. We’ve destroyed it.

  • SapientNode

    Ok so what then is the solution. In theory I like the idea where everyone just does whatever they want and lives as they wish too. In practice if you gave everyone equal wealth today and set them out into the forests and natural resources we would become a world of barbaric tribes almost overnight. With dead trees contaminated water and raping and pillaging.

    I definitely do not condone forcing an equilibrium but what the hell are we going to do now. By 2050 the low estimates are that we will be at a population of 10 billion +. What is that going to look like. Try a whole lot more india homeless camps everywhere around the globe surrounding posh skyscrapers with a few wealthy people in them. Meanwhile there will some reasonable people out in natural environments building self sufficiency but they will be threatened by roving gangs.

    We have reached a point of no return not because of the population but because the collective psychology is ill equipped to think in a large scale systemic way. Most people will still do what is best for them elites, impoverished or the middle class. This problem we face is purely a psychological one. And as far as I can tell we are racing ever faster like lemmings psychopaths over the cliff.

    The elites are hardly the problem. They have been allowed to run amok for centuries upon centuries by people who would rather tend to their gardens chickens and tavern chats. And if you think some type of large scale elite program will be implemented you are mistaken. Because they would never be able to agree on what to do and if you remove consumers from a debt based economy there is no more economy. And if only the wealthy have dollars in the future the people will trade something else instead. As far as the soldiers who guard the elites. Well we will have to see if the common people will turn on their own in servitude to the elite programs.

  • Anderson Williams


    JOIN THE ILLUMINATI CALL (+2348107106668) OR (
    Are you a business man or woman, political, musician, student,
    the you want to be rich, famous, powerful in life, join the Illuminati brotherhood cult today and get instant rich sum of. 1million dollars
    in a week, and a free home. any where you choose to live in this world and also get 10,000,000 U.S dollars monthly as a salary…


    1. A Cash Reward of USD $500,000 USD
    2. A New Sleek Dream CAR valued at USD $300,000 USD
    3.A Dream House bought in the country of your own choice
    4. One Month holiday (fully paid) to your dream tourist destination.
    5.One year Golf Membership package
    6.A V.I.P treatment in all Airports in the World
    7.A total Lifestyle change
    8.Access to Bohemian Grove
    9.Monthly payment of $1,000,000 USD into your bank account every month as a member
    10.One Month booked Appointment with Top 5 world Leaders and Top 5 Celebrities in the World.
    If you are interested call the agent now (+2348107106668) OR ( for immediately initiation..,

  • michelle

    WARNING! WARNING!! WARNING!!! If you do not want to join the Illuminati do not read this message. Rules * You must be above 18 years of age. * You must have full access to the internet. * You must not discuss the secret of the Illuminati to anyone. * We are not interested in anyone who has obtained their knowledge about the Illuminati based on what they%u2019ve HEARD from Mass Media (News or Performing Arts), Conspiracy Theorists (Amateur or Professional Authors or Speculators), Internet Rumors, or other HERESY. * Once you join the Illuminati within one week of your membership you will achieved the greatest goal in life and also have wealth and fame. * No one discard the message of the GREAT ILLUMINATI if discarded the person will be tormented both day and night. * Failure to compel to the order and rules of the GREAT ILLUMINATI shall see your fame and riches taken back. * The money ALWAYS flows TOWARDS Illuminati members…And AWAY from NON Illuminati members… One of the rules of the Illuminati is “We don’t talk about the Illuminati” so I can’t say too much about it here. If you are truly interested and get back to me via email? or call +2349034677610 Do not play mind games

  • BobBently

    Why is this a “sick solution”? I personally feel that this culling of the herd is the most important issue of our time. This plan has to move forward & can’t just be a “plan”. This needs to happen yesterday.

  • Feli Jubatus

    I see a lot of people blaming the corporations; and I don’t even know what the elite has to do with the real problem we’re facing.

    So I’m Venezuelan, I’m a socialist piece of land, where you can’t talk about corporations because they don’t come here, they don’t make ads here, they can’t brainwash you, and we have the same problem over here (apart of politics), too many people.

    Venezuela has plenty of free land without people living in, however it’s a bad idea to destroy the natural places for farming with are protected by the law and that’s punishable, that reduces the amount of space for people quite a lot; so well, would you destroy roraima for farming to feed more people?… no way! Actually studies show that the land of most forest (and others natural places) here is really poor and not good for farming, including Amazonas as well, too much nutrients in the first earth layer, to little deep inside, the equilibrium these trees have is amazing.

    So many places are not even good for farming, not even living, some can be so hot that the only use I can think is to put a solar energy plant, but that’s not the point.

    So anyway people tend to live in central points, as usual, that’s the effect of every society; this causes serious fights in here for living, there are too many people and not enough jobs, schools, , don’t say it’s a political issue, there are way more jobs than there used to be in the past, there are just even more people!

    (where I live currently) The average poor families used to be around 30 people 70 years ago (yes that much), 40 years ago it was 7 people, nowadays is 4, at least where I live currently… and 40 years ago the crime factor was none, zero, seriously.

    And now the crime rate is ridiculous, and that rise started before chavez; why? because there is less richness and there’s not enough to share!… I can’t share my water, I can’t share my gas, I can’t share my food. Worst, because electricity factories such as guri were designed years ago, they can’t deal with this amount of people, causing shrinkages.

    And who the hell wants to do farming today anyway? everyone wants to be an engineer, a doctor, an admin, etc…. yeah better start building robots to do farming then. woops, they need electricity.

    So yes, socialism has made this worse, but that’s just a result of getting overpopulated. I bet our middle class great-great grandpas that had enough money to raise 30+ children didn’t expect us to be in this situation.

    now I expect responses talking about the socialist guvernment, I’d just say, it’s bs, the government can suck so much, and I agree that they’re terrible, but even if you put the most capitalist president, I’ll bet he/she can’t solve the amount of noise, fights, resource lack, space lack, lines, pollution, etc…

  • Keith Greig

    Here we go 1984 just a bit late. The uber rich living and breeding as they want. The simply fact is that we have already passed the point of no return ecologically speaking. The rich just want to control the earth, their biggest masturbation fantasy of All. I am just waiting for the ” False Flag ” event to end all ” False Flag ” events. One thing is sure, there will NOT be a referendum on population control.

  • Alex Gutierrez

    Give an acre to every human, and only north America will be needed to hold all the people in the world. We always want to live in crowded cities with all the commodities to the reach of our hands. More than 50% of the earth soil can be cultivated and no one should suffer from hunger ever.

  • Sugarsail1

    I used to work with an environmentalist type that always complained about overpopulation. He had five kids. If these guys were willing to take one for the team by not having kids or killing themselves, I might take them more seriously, instead they just sound like Hitler is back in town, only now instead of the “Jewish problem” we have the “human problem”. Great, here we go again!

  • Miguel Garza

    Did you at least read what you wrote?
    7 billon people on this planet will not do it “just fine” even there we are not talking about 7 billons, we are gonna have a 11 billon poeple peak.
    And even if we reach a big crisis, nobody is gonna monitoring you 24/7, you are gonna be totally free to do anything legal you want to do, but having childs will be ilegal soon without governament permission

    Sorry my bad english, is not my native language

  • Bongstar420

    Yet they aren’t willing to pay people to not have children…

    Nor are they willing to encourage these people to enhance their performance…

    Nor are they willing to encourage a completely space faring society.

  • SweetSharron

    The global elitists are talking about depopulation of the planet through genocide and death panels and squads. They are not talking about slowly letting the planet die off over the centuries by reducing child birth… they are talking about killing billions of people right now and then in the future implementing strict and forced sterilization and abortion rules and methods, and allowing pregnancy only when it is approved by a government panel. Mandatory child vaccinations and mandatory adult vaccinations are being ordered to cause disease and plague and eliminate humans. The FEMA camps and millions of deep coffins stacked up behind the FEMA camps are there to accomplish this genocide. Safe cities are housing the selected group of people the government wants to maintain as “slaves” to care for the needs of elitists. Jade Helm (2015) is not a military exercise. It is an attack on the population of the United States in order to depopulate it.

  • Malthus

    Do you really believe that there is a conspiracy for the world’s elite to wipe out the teeming multitudes? Get a grip and stop watching the old James Bond movies. However, just remember that if the world population was suddenly reduced by even 3 billion, the world would still be overpopulated, but would not be as technologically advanced as it now is. If you don’t think so, then why not invite about 50 hindus and chinese to come share your dwelling with you. It’s all good and well that the author lives in the wealthiest country of the world. And also remember, infant, that the more people there are the less “liberties” there are for those people. More numbers=less freedom!

  • Michael Rinella

    Read Mike Davis’s book Planet of Slums. The species has got to grow up and start to plan its future. End of story.

    • John Say

      Or try reading Julian Simon’s “The Ultimate Resource” and learn that the worst thing that man can do is turn over to some elite the power to collectively plan the future.

      There have been malthusian progrostications since long before Malthus.
      None have ever proven true. That is not accident. It is the threat of scarcity that drives us toward abundance.

  • Salman Muhammad

    i support “depopulation” plan. Salute them.

  • Robinsoneun

    What IS NOT being said is JUST WHO DO YOU HAVE IN MIND to MURDER OFF? Because you’re not saying it, I WILL. THIS PLAN OF YOURS will MURDER ALL of the PEOPLE of COLOR, FIRST.THEN the sick, old and non-skilled. HITLER was not SO CRAZY and We will be FOLLOWING HIM.

  • PandaGamer

    Unfortunately, socialist utopias here don’t work in fact. It remains permanently and irreversibly unclear and uncertain and vague for all of eternity. We would be all doomed before heat death comes to the Universe.

  • Henry White

    People make life difficult for their self , we are in the world were every thing is in control , i was living a life of poverty and pains, i never new there was a life be young that, but right now i enjoyed every dividend of life , am rich , famous , powerful,i live a life with out no stress, but all this was a surprise , for any body who want riches famous and power,then you have the chance to do that, join the illuminati today to get $25000 every 3 days and $1000000 monthly membership blessing contact the following email.
    or +13365067946
    we don,t patronize people to join,. we only want you to rule your world and be free from oppression

  • lisa

    i came across this “article” by chance and I am shocked by the ignorance of who wrote it.

  • Its despicably tyrannical, Fascist gone sickeningly oppressive on slow-kill murderous levels, far from humane run by manic tyrannical deranged killers and they’re in fact utilizing satellites, UAV hoverers (all equipped with high powered WIFI Microwaves) and cell towers (using everyone’s cellphones on whistleblowers and truth tellers) with slow/soft kill agonizing direct energy weapons (extremely painful and lethal) releasing over 8,000 more drones, 30,000 possibly with agonizing nano-sensors, and chemtrails (laden with lithium, depleted uranium, metals, nano particulates) and SKYNET run by an vicious terminating computer on a global scale.

  • Ian

    There should be a law no breeding and if you do, then you pay double the tax there was a stupid government in Australia who handed out baby bonuses and so all the lower scum bred because they did not have to work, but collect a vast amount of money paid by the hard working tax payers, these breeders are the ones who should be ashamed of themselves Then you have employers having to pay maternity leave because some woman decides to help overpopulate the world. If you can’t stop them then all males should be castrated all over the world and that would allow the population to thin out, rather than just wipe out people yet then again the globalists believe they are God and have a right to get rid of us useless eaters, there are many so called useless eaters who have done great things on this planet, like saved lives, helped humanity much more than those reptilian blood sucking parasites who have never ever worked in their lives, they are the useless eaters and it is them who should be deleted off this planet. Then you have baby farming where women can not accept the fact that they will never have children so a primitive desire to breed. There are thousands of babies who have lost their parents in wars adopt them. There are to many of us and it will be hunger games reality because the way the world is now at any moment millions of fish could die in the oceans crops unable to grow because of lack of water. but this world is full of selfish people, never mind they are the ones who will be left behind.

  • Becky Wright

    so I suggest that everyone who wants population control step to the front of the line for termination. That would make you a hero and start lowering the population.

  • T Hal

    I find nothing wrong with advocating human population control. A planet of nearly 8-billion entitled beings feeling each of us should be able to do what we want and not caring about the consequences on other beings that share the planet with us is not what we all think is either “good” or sustainable. If we cannot drastically change human behavior, and it doesn’t seem to me to be a likely endeavor, then drastically decrease the number of humans behaving as humans do.

  • dB

    I agree that there are too many people on the planet and that it can only lead to disaster. However, the overpopulation is almost entirely coming from asian and african countries; those are the countries where they must cut their fertility rates drastically. The western world, with our low birth rates must do the opposite.
    As it is, whites are already a minority in the world. And with the current mass immigration by non-whites into all and only into white countries, whites are now facing their extinction.
    Therefore, I say that what must be done is that all importation of non-whites into our countries must stop, those who are here must be encouraged to go back to their countries of origin or at least separate from us so that we can continue to thrive and be able to protect ourselves, our children and our future, as well as our culture and languages from this mass invasion. As it is, our own birth rates are low because all those foreigners are such a burden on taxpayers that we can’t afford to have more kids. That’s not right.
    The third world needs to take drastic action in cutting down their populations. Taking them into our countries is not the solution and it will only lead to our own destruction. We must shut our borders and we must start having more of our own babies.
    The third world has to learn to deal with their own problems, we have our own to deal with and one of them is to be free from the burden of bailing them out at our own expense.
    So essentially yeah, shut the borders, protect them at all costs, send foreigners back to where they came, and let them deal with reducing their own overpopulations.
    I know it’s not pc, but that’s what needs to happen if the west and its native peoples (i.e. White Europeans) are to survive.