The Rapture Verdict Seed Vault Get Prepared Now Preppers Blueprint Life strawBeginning Of The End
Gold Buying Guide: Golden Eagle Coins

Recent Posts

Archives

Food for liberty
Michael and Meranda The Watch

Michael & Meranda’s New Television Show

Legacy Water

Cell Phones Are Cooking Our Reproductive Organs And Causing An Epidemic Of Cancer

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

Cell Phones - Public DomainIs your cell phone keeping you from having kids and slowly killing you at the same time? Most people have no idea that one of the greatest threats to their health may be something that they are willingly carrying around with them all day long.  A brand new study has just come out that shows that men that carry around cell phones in their pockets continually are much less fertile than other men. Of course we have known that cell phone use has some very nasty consequences for our health for a very long time. As you will see below, studies have shown that there is a very clear link between cell phone use and cancer. But even after learning all of these things, most people just continue to use their cell phones normally. Most people believe what they want to believe, and most people don’t want to believe that cell phone use is harmful.

One of the most respected news sources in the UK has reported on the new study that I just mentioned above. The following is an excerpt from that article

The study – by highly respected specialists – found that sperm levels of men who kept their phones in their pocket during the day were seriously affected in 47 percent of cases compare to just 11 percent in the general population.

Professor Martha Dirnfeld, of the Technion University in Haifa, said: “We analysed the amount of active swimming sperm and the quality and found that it had been reduced.

We think this is being caused by a heating of the sperm from the phone and by electromagnetic activity.”

It doesn’t take a genius to figure this out.

If you put an electronic device next to your reproductive organs day after day, of course it is going to have an effect.

Other studies that were conducted previously have come up with similar results. Here is just one example

Men who carry a cellphone in their pants pocket may harm their sperm and reduce their chances of having children, a new review warns.

The research team analyzed the findings of 10 studies that examined how cellphone exposure may affect male fertility. Among men with no exposure to cellphones, 50 percent to 85 percent of their sperm had a normal ability to move towards an egg.

That fell by an average of 8 percent among men exposed to cellphones. Similar effects were seen for sperm viability, which refers to the proportion of sperm that were alive, according to the study published June 9 in the journal Environment International.

So what should we do?

Well, if you want to have kids you might want to quit carrying around your phone in your pocket

Professor Gedis Grudzinskas, a fertility consult ant St George’s Hospital London and in Harley Street said: ” Men need to think about their well being and try to stop being addicted to their phones.

“If you wear a suit to work put the mobile in your chest pocket instead of close to your testes. It will reduce the risk of your sperm count dropping or dropping so much.”

In addition to cooking our reproductive organs, cell phones have also been linked to cancer by many studies.

One study that was headed up by Igor Yakymenko caused quite a stir when it was released in 2015

Yakymenko’s meta-study — basically a study of hundreds of other studies — reveals many findings of previous researchers into how radiofrequency from your phone can damage DNA.

That damage can add up over time and cause a variety of health problems, like cancer, headaches, fatigue and even skin problems.

For example, using your phone for just 20 minutes a day for five years increased the risk of one type of brain tumor threefold, and using the phone an hour a day for four years upped the risk of some tumors three to five times, Yakymenko said.

And of course other previous studies had found similar things. The following comes from Natural News

In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer officially classified RFR as a “possible carcinogen.” This came a year after the international Interphone study found that people who used a cell phone for ten years were 40 percent more likely to develop brain tumors. The risk was 400 percent higher among those who started using phones before the age of 20. Decade-long cell phone users were also more likely to develop parotid gland tumors and 300 percent more likely to develop acoustic nerve tumors.

Cancer rates are absolutely exploding in the western world, and more than $100,000,000,000 is spent on cancer drugs each year.

Cell phones certainly are not entirely to blame for this explosion of cancer.  The truth is that we are systematically being poisoned by our food, our water, our vaccines and our air.  Electromagnetic radiation is all around us, and our environment is becoming more toxic by the day.

If you are an American, there is a 1 in 3 chance that you will get cancer during your lifetime.  If you are a man, the odds are closer to 1 in 2.

But back in the 1940s, only one out of every 16 Americans developed cancer.

In the 1970s, it was one out of every ten Americans.

So what has changed?

Almost all of us know someone that is battling cancer right now, and this epidemic is getting worse with each passing year.  It is a silent plague that is slowly crippling our nation, and the medical industry is making a killing off of our pain and misery.  For much more on all of this, please see my previous article entitled “The Big Business Of Cancer: 100 BILLION Dollars Was Spent On Cancer Drugs Last Year Alone“.

Because our environment has become so incredibly toxic, there are no easy solutions to this crisis.

But one thing that we can all do is to stop carrying around cell phones in our pockets all day long.

That is a start at least.

Sadly, most people will not even make this one small change.

Like I said earlier, most people believe what they want to believe, and most people want to believe that their cell phones are not doing any significant harm to them.

  • James

    But back in the 1940s, only one out of every 16 Americans developed cancer.

    In the 1970s, it was one out of every ten Americans
    So what has changed?

    Well, first look at life expectancy in 1940 and 1970, then tell me which generation is healthier.
    What’s changed is that people are growing old enough for pesky chromosome 3 to go flip on you

  • James

    That is a start at least.

    Sadly, most people will not even make this one small change.

    But people are getting colonoscopies, prostate exams, and mamograms

  • James

    Almost all of us know someone that is battling cancer right now, and this epidemic is getting worse with each passing year. It is a silent plague that is slowly crippling our nation, and the medical industry is making a killing off of our pain and misery. For much more on all of this, please see my previous article entitled “The Big Business Of Cancer: 100 BILLION Dollars Was Spent On Cancer Drugs Last Year Alone“.

    People spend 100 billion on cancer drugs. That is nothing compared to the US economy. Also, if you see the profit margins of BMS/Pfizer, they are similar to S&P 500 average

    • watchmannonthewall

      I have friend who has used an earphone and mouthpiece for many years, hours each day. He recently developed a cancer stretching from his ear through his jaw and to the front of his mouth in the tissue and bone.
      Imaging showed an incredible picture of the cancer hot spots in the exact shape of the entire ear/mouthpiece he wore imprinted on his face and jaw.
      I don’t doubt these little devices have serious effects for those who constantly use and carry them. Maybe not for everyone, but certainly for some. Who knows the percentages? Who has been using them for 10+ years and how long does it take to show up? Use at your own risk.

      • James

        Ok, a strawman.
        Can we get on back to cancer drug spending?

        • watchmannonthewall

          How would you handle having cancer? We are looking at essential oils and diet. Do you have other suggestions?
          Once a person finds they have cancer, as my wife did, it may be quite late in the day to start looking at alternatives. People are scared at that point and want to follow the “experts” advice, whose is the only advice of which they have awareness. What is your solution?

          • James

            Don’t panic, find the survival rate. If it is super low such as stage IV brain cancer, just screw life and try to enjoy the rest.
            However, if it is something like stage I prostate cancer I would recomend
            Monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and surgery

            Sure, do whatever quack medicine you want as long as there are no serious drug interactions.

  • James

    Yakymenko’s meta-study — basically a study of hundreds of other studies — reveals many findings of previous researchers into how radiofrequency from your phone can damage DNA.

    That damage can add up over time and cause a variety of health problems, like cancer, headaches, fatigue and even skin problems.

    For example, using your phone for just 20 minutes a day for five years increased the risk of one type of brain tumor threefold, and using the phone an hour a day for four years upped the risk of some tumors three to five times, Yakymenko said.

    A meta-analysis without a single RCT?
    Garbage

  • James

    In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer officially classified RFR as a “possible carcinogen.” This came a year after the international Interphone study found that people who used a cell phone for ten years were 40 percent more likely to develop brain tumors. The risk was 400 percent higher among those who started using phones before the age of 20. Decade-long cell phone users were also more likely to develop parotid gland tumors and 300 percent more likely to develop acoustic nerve tumors.

    Possible is they key word.
    Also, life does not exist in a vaccum and it only found correlation but did not identify causation

  • BeenThere

    The statistics for cancer increasing over the last few decades is not a “smoking gun” pointing at cellphones. In the same decades since cellphones came in we have hugely increased stress (a big cause of cancer). More toxic additives in our food. The same in our houses. (Bug sprays, deodorizers etc etc). Radio Frequency radiation is non ionizing. That is it does not affect tissue cells other than heating them. This has been proven over the years since the invention of Radar during the war. It is more likely the stress from being “under the thumb” of your corporate boss, that you wear the cellphone for so he can hassle you 24×7, is killing you than the minute amount of power radiated by the device.

  • Robert

    Perhaps it is a blessing that those addicted to electronic media not be able to procreate. As for cancer, there seems to be no end to things that cause it.

  • DJohn1

    The problem with cancer is there are a whole book load of causes.
    Yet the cures are still in the middle ages of medicine.
    All except the money needed to treat cancer of course.
    And as long as there is money to be made from people’s misfortune there will not be a cure or cures for the various cancers out there.
    The ideal way of curing cancer would be to incorporate the cure with the immune system of the individual and pinpointing the cancer as a foreign body needed to be excised. That would work on the microscopic level and no surgeon can work that small yet.
    With the use of computers, micro surgery is only a matter of time before it happens.
    Things like stitching limbs back onto people would then become possible. Though they are doing a lot of that now.
    I think the industry needs motivation to get a cure for any cash cow disease out there. And so far no one has come up with that motivation.
    Cell phones have been found to cause a lot of problems out there with some of it proven and some of it not.
    For instance some have traced the cell phone as a villain in the reduction of bees.
    Nothing will change. Unless it comes right down to whether or not we survive on this planet or not. Because those in the know also know a lot of money is involved in keeping this industry going.

    • Hyakkidouran

      It’s easy to dream up theories on what “miracles” could be done with unlimited technology and knowledge, but those are in nature limited by money.
      Your “super surgeon” would need very expensive equipment to perform what you speak about. Working on the nano scale can only be done with very accurate machines that cost a fortune.
      The surgeon himself would be a highly trained specialist, and being just human, he would want a reward for his hard work : a huge salary.

      At least you rightfully criticises the current scam of the health industry, but the solution you suggest basically requires the money grab to continue in order to gather the ressources necessary to achieve it.

    • James

      All except the money needed to treat cancer of course.

      And as long as there is money to be made from people’s misfortune there will not be a cure or cures for the various cancers out there.

      No! If any company could cure cancer, they would win the nobel prize and have a best seller drug, as in think (Lipitor+Sovaldi+Plavix+Prozac)*10

    • James

      Yet the cures are still in the middle ages of medicine.

      That is why people in the middle ages had such long life expectanticies

    • James

      The ideal way of curing cancer would be to incorporate the cure with the immune system of the individual and pinpointing the cancer as a foreign body needed to be excised. That would work on the microscopic level and no surgeon can work that small yet.

      With the use of computers, micro surgery is only a matter of time before it happens.

      Things like stitching limbs back onto people would then become possible. Though they are doing a lot of that now.

      (Umm, it is happening now and BMS/Merck are getting rich off their PD-1 inhibitors

    • James

      I think the industry needs motivation to get a cure for any cash cow disease out there. And so far no one has come up with that motivation.
      The motivation is millions of cancer patients and their insurance companies that are willing to pay piles of money for effective treatments

  • K

    While I can not testify, to how well they work. There are shielded cellphone holsters available. When I had to carry a cellphone for work. I always used a belt holster for it. So let’s see. We carry cellphones, in pants pockets. Because we do not think about it. We drink water full of chemicals. Because we do not think about it. And we eat heavily processed foods. Because we do not think about it. Perhaps the basic problem. Is we have a society with a lack of ability to think.

  • Tatiana Covington

    Stop using them, idiots.

  • chucky beston

    cooking your nuts maybe. I don’t have one.

  • brotherjohnf

    Don’t use a cell phone, don’t plan to.

    • salt

      What if something happens on a hike?

  • RedSky

    Thinking seriously of ditching mine. Most tablets are able to download phone apps now that work very well with WiFi. This is still an electronic device but it is not 3G or 4G. It seems that there are a bunch of different devices now for VOIP besides just MagicJack which works pretty well and costs only $35.00/yr, unlimited.

  • Mistanick

    The original story shows a non-scientific correlation among 100 or so men and problems with reproductive organs among them. This not a scientific study.

    For instance, how many of these men slept near a smart meter, frequently used microwave ovens or even have a microwave that has door seals that leak, live near cell phone towers, get frequent x rays, etc, etc. So many factors not touched in that story or this one.

    Yes, cancer on the uptick but there are so many known causes that cause it, chiefly diet and chemicals around us. Sodium nitrite in lunch meat and hot dogs?

    Getting hyped up about cell phones believing this will make one safer is a false sense of security and very foolish.

  • ILIA TOLI

    Very simple. Carry the phone in airplane mode. This doesn’t do anything. Then turn it on when you need to check stuff. Keeping it all the time on is practically very stupid.

  • joseph24642

    Perfect weapon of mass destruction. Promote it as a communication device. Then make it smarter and smarter…