9-Year-Old Boy Has A Vision Of An Asteroid Hitting The Atlantic And A Nuclear War Involving The United States

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

Did God give a 9-year-old boy a vision of the future of America?  Last night, my wife pulled me aside and strongly urged me to watch part of an amazing video that she had found on YouTube.  I was quite tired at the time, but I agreed to watch it because I could tell from my wife’s expression that she had found something special.  And without a doubt, what I am about to share with you does appear to be extraordinary.  A grandmother known as “A Daughter of The Highest King” on YouTube came across a dry erase board that her 9-year-old grandson had been drawing on, and the things that he had been drawing were so unusual that she decided to ask him about them.

 

Well, it turns out that this little boy had been trying to draw a picture of things that were shown to him in a vision.  When he received this vision he was in bed, but he was not asleep at the time.  He told his grandmother that in his vision he was standing in space and looking down at the Earth, and it appears that he may have been shown things that are coming in the future.  If you would like to watch the entire video, you can find it on YouTube here.

When I started watching this little boy describe his vision, one thing immediately jumped out at me.  He said that he saw a giant asteroid that appeared to be “flaming hot red” coming toward the Earth.

As it got very close, he said that it appeared to break up into pieces and strike multiple locations, but according to him the main impact seems to have happened in the Atlantic Ocean.

When this little boy said that I was absolutely startled, because my wife and I have been collecting dreams and visions of a giant asteroid that is going to strike the Atlantic Ocean for many years.  In fact, my wife has collected more than 100 of these dreams and visions.  Many have seen that the asteroid breaks up into multiple pieces before it hits, and that the impact in the Atlantic Ocean causes an enormous tsunami that will be hundreds of feet high.  When this gigantic tsunami slams into the east coast of the United States at an extremely high speed, the devastation that will be caused will be almost too horrible for words.

As you can see in the video, this little boy is not even allowed on the Internet, and so he probably has never even heard about any of these dreams and visions.  But his description of the vision that he was given matches up perfectly with what dozens of other prominent men and women of God have received over the years.

And of course the Bible tells us that someday a giant object will plunge into the ocean.  The following is what Revelation 8:8-9 says in the Modern English Version

8 Then the second angel sounded, and something like a great mountain, burning with fire, was thrown into the sea. A third of the sea became blood, 9 a third of the living creatures in the sea died, and a third of the ships were destroyed.

After the asteroid strikes, this 9-year-old boy was shown nuclear missiles flying all over the world, and many of them hit the United States.

Once again, this fits perfectly with what other men and women of God have been shown.  The great tsunami on the east coast comes first, and after that a nuclear conflict involving the United States happens.

In his vision this young boy was also shown “giant people with goat horns” roaming around.  Some have suggested that these could be demons on the Earth during the Great Tribulation, while others have suggested that what he saw may have been Nephilim.

We do know that things will get quite wild here on this planet during the Tribulation period.  I have always said that it is going to be crazier than the most insane science fiction movie that Hollywood can possibly come up with, and this youngster may have gotten a small glimpse of what life will be like during that time.

He also saw the planet breaking apart in various areas and a “giant crack in the middle of America”.  I have been warning about the great “megaquake” that is coming to the New Madrid fault zone for many years, but it is not clear from the video if that is exactly what he saw.

But I certainly do believe that this vision was from the Lord, and this would be perfectly consistent with Scripture.  In the Book of Joel, we are told that our sons and our daughters will prophesy in the last days.  This is what Joel 2:28-29 says in the Modern English Version

And it will be that, afterwards, I will pour out My Spirit on all flesh; then your sons and your daughters will prophesy, your old men will dream dreams, and your young men will see visions. 29 Even on the menservants and maidservants in those days I will pour out My Spirit.

Could this vision be a very small part of the fulfillment of that ancient prophecy that was given to the prophet Joel?

God is not sending us these warnings to frighten us.

Rather, God is sending us these warnings so that we will not be afraid.

God wants us to know that He knows everything that is going to happen in advance, He has a plan, He has everything under control, and He is not going to abandon us.

Yes, the most challenging times in all of human history are coming.  But for the people of God it will be the greatest chapter of all as multitudes come into the Kingdom even in the midst of all the shaking.

You were born for such a time as this, and now is the time for all of us to become the people that God created us to be.

  • glenn caron

    Act_2:17 “And it shall be in the last days, says God, I will pour out of My Spirit upon all flesh. And your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams.

    • ” So was the grandmother right? Was that a vision of the tribulation?”

      – – – – SPONSORED LINK —- “Do you have a paypal and want to earn extra income?”
      See this site if you qualify- – – –
      IPT.PW/2tllBp

    • Iʹve jцƽτ rec℮iטed ɑ paycһecĸ f०ᴦ lɑsт mංnth f๐ᴦ $11κ܁۔܁ l eaᴦned it by ԁօιոg s૦ме siмple ſre℮ǀɑnce joᏏѕ fᴦ੦rn һome for 3-4 һoᴜrs/eacһ daү ᴛhɑᴛ i ɡօт froм cᴏrnραny l ſסцnd oռ tһе iπᴛerᴨet and ᴛհey ϱaiᏧ ʍ℮ ſᴏr ıᴛ $੧Ƽ/һ൦սrIy۰.۔ Ꭺnd if i cαn d໐ it ƽo ᴄɑn ყoц,try it oυt here›˃ NUBR.CO/cVU2Ak

  • tacoma

    There is no need to invoke 9 year old with supposed vision from god. History provides a definitive guide to the fate of the U.S.A.

    Since the end of WW2 the U.S. have built itself into the biggest military and economic empire the world have ever seen. Bigger than the Mongol empire of 12-13th century, bigger than the British empire at its peak.

    America’s economic empire have declined much since 2000, busted up by its own policies and actions. But its military might essentially remains. Today, not a single war ship, war plane see a setting Sun, like the old British empire. They are all over the world. Only one piece of the American empire today remains – the military.

    Here’s the historical fact, a historical certainty really: all military empires blew themselves up in an final act of hubris and war. No exception.

    The Mongol empire, after conquering China and Asia to central Europe, launched two massive naval invasions on Japan. But it’s entire naval force (150,000 men, 2000 vessels) got wiped out and Mongol never recovered. China then kicked the Mongols out for good. The same thing happened to end the Spanish empire – its Spanish armada invasion force of 600 ships sunk by lowly bankrupt England. And of course we can still remember how the Britannia British empire ended – by two World Wars which busted up its grand naval fleets of 750 warships and 60 million lives along the way.

    The American empire today is the world first and only nuclear armed military empire. It sees itself as policeman of the world, accuser of anything it does not like, defender of anything it likes, with impunity. It just elected a leader of startling hubris. Therefore history demands it will end in a grand nuclear holocaust for the ages.

    No exception.

    • Joan Camara

      You don’t believe in God, and have no interest in the “fairy tale” bible, right?

    • poor eunuch

      russia has a Satan 2 missile that can blow up texas

      Satan 2 super-nuke!

    • watchmannonthewall

      I agree with your assessment of the future of our nation, unfortunately! Too many proud and arrogant people who will never examine their beliefs and see where such beliefs lead; spectacular destruction!

  • Kate Clark

    So was the grandmother right? Was that a vision of the tribulation?

  • joanofark06

    Revelation 8:11

    And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter.

  • poor eunuch

    The Bible seems to indicate only 1 person on Earth with vision capability at a time.
    It says in the days when Hannah wanted a baby there was no open vision

    but now days anyone gets a vision? Just like the “community of prophets”
    I was raised in church so i know when something seems off!

    • krinks

      Check them for accuracy and you’ll see that so many of them are fake/false they are not worth listening to ever.

    • Daniel Ireton

      Acts2:17, Joel 2:28 pour my spirit on all ( more then one ) flesh.
      Sons and daughters prophesy ( plural , more then one )
      Young men (plural/many) shall have visions.
      Old men (plural/many) shall have dreams

    • Daniel Ireton

      No open vision is connected to the fact that no one was teaching sound doctrine in that period of the bible….the high priests eyes where even dimmed… No open vision means in that portion that isreal had no active relationship with God

  • Respectfully

    God wants us to know that certain parables and riddles found in the Bible shouldn’t be taken so literal. The big red fire ball is God’s glory being released on this earth, and it will fill His believers with the Holy Spirit and His presence. The fire landing in the water represents, the “stirring of the waters”, which will release a healing power that will spread to the countries bordering it. The tsunami represents a baptizing in the Holy Spirit, which will produce a ripple of healing, flooding the east coast, washing away the crimes and corrupt committed by the Washington politicians. When the word mountain is mentioned in the Bible, it represents God’s government. His government will descend and reign on this earth, and authority will be given to His manifested sons. The sea of blood represents the blood of Jesus washing His people free. The great shaking, and splitting of the continent, represents a great revival of God’s people, an awakening. Signs and wonders will appear, and supernatural gifts will be given to the believers. The third of the living creatures with horns, represent the third of the Angels that were thrown out of Heaven along with Lucifer. The missiles represent the Host of Heaven (God’s army), being released by the manifested sons of God. Their purpose is to clear out the demonic, truly making it “on earth as it is in heaven.”

  • algol2000

    “Give your life to the LORD and lets go home”

    I like this video. However, those who think that they will magically disappear in the “rapture” are mistaken. All throughout history, men and women who followed Christ were murdered. It will remain this way till the end of the age. Nevertheless, those who endure to the end shall receive much honor and glory as their reward. The higher the price paid, the higher the reward!

    • krinks

      1 Thess 4: ‘caught up’ to be with the Lord when the Lord comes FOR his Saints . ‘Caught up’ = rapture

      End of Rev: The Lord comes WITH his Saints.

      Two separate events.

      • algol2000

        Ok. But can you cite where Jesus said that? There will be no “caught up” except after the tribulation when Jesus returns. Besides, why do you believe Saul who received “revelation” and do not believe mohammad? Did they not both operate under the same method?

        • aliswell

          No, Muhammad was never a prophet. Please read The People vs Muhammad to learn the truth about him. It is very well researched and documented book.

          • algol2000

            We can say the same thing about Saul of Tarsus

          • jaxon64

            So your stance is that Almighty God has allowed His scriptures and message to man to be corrupted. That the Bible is not divinely inspired and that only the 4 gospels or ” the red letters” in the Bible are true–sounds like a new religion you got going on–maybe you can join the Mormon’s, Jehovah’s witnesses, moonies and even the catholics—the words of the Bible are just garbage to them also.

          • algol2000

            Look at the first page of your bible, and you will discover who wrote and published it. Money is a very powerful agent. What version(s) do you use?

          • Paul Patriot

            Incorrect. To classify mohammed, in the same category as inspiration as Paul the apostle, borderlines on blasphemy.

            The unconverted saul did murder Christians……until heMET Jesus. He then became Paul, a Christian……and the persecution/murder stopped.

            That cannot be said about the “prophet” mohammed, as his entire ideology involves the continual persecution and murder of Jews and Christians and anyone else(infidel, lgbt, atheists, etc) who will not accept the “religion of peace”

          • algol2000

            “He then became Paul, a Christian.”

            Who changed his name to “Paul a Christian”?

            Besides, it was not the habit of Jesus to secretly appoint his disciples while he walked the earth because of the law of witnesses, and Saul NEVER MET Jesus while he walked the earth even though they were contemporaries.

            Would you let in a known serial killer into your home simply because he claimed to be “saved” and changed his name?

          • watchmannonthewall

            The Gentiles changed his name to Paul. They didn’t want any Jewish influences in their practices. It was just another way to claim the New Covenent was different than the Old, when in reality the only difference is that instead of God’s Law being written on tablets of stone, they were to be written on the flesh of our heart to be lived out properly, just as Jesus taught! (Ez 11:19-20 and Romans 2:29, as taught by Paul!)

            As for secretly appointing disciples, scripture prophesies that Judas’ position would be given to another (Ps 109:8 and Acts 1:20). The issue, one which has been debated for centuries, is whether the disciples were ever given the authority to select the one who would take Judas’ apostleship after his betrayal, as Peter encouraged in Acts 1:15-26, or whether God had reserved that action to Himself. We all understand that the character of Peter was to be impetuous. Was he doing that here?

            I believe the later and that Paul was a “chosen” vessel, by God, foreordained to fulfill the ministry of taking the gospel to the Gentiles. We should not be surprised the devil would do everything possible to subvert, apostasize Paul’s teachings as the Gentile Church has done, or, on the other hand, to cause others to completely reject anything having to do with Paul in scripture, as you and many others I’m aware of have done..

            Both outcomes suit the devil in marshalling resistance towards God’s Word!!

          • algol2000

            The gentiles called him Paul because they wanted none of the doctrine of Jesus, but to simply continue in their pagan ways. If he were genuine, the name change would have come from Jesus himself.

            An apostle MUST HAVE learned from Jesus while he was here on earth. This is a requirement for apostleship. And Saul of Tarsus (who loves to boast that he is an “apostle”) cannot rightly call himself that

        • krinks

          1 Thess 4 -Apostle Paul who spoke to the Lord face to face on the road to Damascus. Mohammed didn’t.

          • algol2000

            “Apostle” saul NEVER spoke to Jesus face to face, therefore he was never an :apostle” because he NEVER served him while he walked the earth. I can classify “apostle” Saul with Mohammad who got “inspired” to murder others, such as is the case with Stephen.

          • watchmannonthewall

            I have to disagree with your conclusions about Paul. He did speak to the Lord face to face (1 Cor 15:8 & Gal 1:11-12), but mankind (read religious leaders), have twisted his words to mean things he never said nor ever intended. Many today think he was a false prophet, falsely!

            If one reads everything he said and already has a good understandiing of the religious doctrines being followed by those of the 1st century, i.e., the “Oral Law” taught by the Pharisees with which they influenced other sects within Judeah, then one will find Paul completely agrees with the ENTIRE OT.

            He even claimed this before Felix in Acts 24:13-15 where he states, while on trial, “But this I admit to you that, according to the Way which they [the Jews] call a sect, I do serve the God of our fathers, BELIEVING EVERYTHING that is in accordance with the Law and that is written in the Prophets.”

            For one to hold Paul taught against God’s Law, he had to be lying when he said this. Right? If he is a liar, why should we believe anything he said unless it serves our own, fleshly, purpose (we can do what we want and God is OK with it)?

            Unfortunately most like to dissect Paul, by twisting his words instead of undertanding the ideas and concepts plainly expressed in his writings, claiming he taught against God’s Law despite plain NT evidence he completely followed the OT Law, including the offering of sacrifices at the Temple some 25-28 years after the resurrection of Mesiah (Acts 21:23-26). He didn’t oppose the Father’s Law but lived it out properly, even as Jesus did, and taught others to do the same after his conversion, even as Jesus did!

            In fact he even pointed out the fact men were already slandering him in Romans 3:8 by claiming he taught disobedience against God’s Law (“doing evil”) so that good (grace) could result. The doctrine today is the same!

            The pattern revealed in scripture is that just as Jesus condemned the Pharisees for not following Mose’s Law while claiming they were (John 5:45-47 an 7:19), and informed them Moses would be a witness for the Proscecution by testifying against them in the Judgment (aligning himself with the Word of God which is the DA), Paul will also be at the Judgment to testify against those of today who claim he taught they didn’t have to obey God’s Law! He will also be a witness for the Prosecution!

            He will be quoting from the same Word of God to contradict their position that they quote from to support their false doctrines. It’s one Book and it never contradicts itself, if you use the entire Book!!!

            We are encouraged, by Paul, to, “Study to show ourselves approved unto God, workmen that need not to be ashamed, [as we] rightly divide the Word of Truth.”

            Whatever has been done will be done. There is nothing new under the sun. The Gentiles have done the exact same things today with Paul’s writings that the Jews of Jesus’ day did with Moses’. Both are equally guilty! Both will have the same outcome! The ground before the cross is level as we have all committed the exact same sins!!

          • algol2000

            Thank you for your reply, but why are you comparing Saul to Jesus here? Jesus is the one to be followed not Saul, and no, Saul can never replace Jesus, despite his volumes of lies.

            1. Did they see a bright light or not?
            2. What is the greatest commandment in the law, love of man or love of God?
            3. Is an idol nothing in this world or not?
            4. Must we obey the authorities because “they are appointed by god”?
            5. If we choose to have a different opinion or teach things contrary to Saul’s message are we “accursed”?
            6. Do real believers appeal to rome for protection, and does rome protect such a one (real disciple of Jesus)?

            7. Do we need to obey the instructions of Jesus, or do we discard the law and simply lay claim on “faith”? Saul was teaching lawlessness by saying that Abraham believed and it was counted unto him for righteousness. Did Asimply believe (Saul’s claim), or did he attempt to sacrifice his son (Jame’s claim) and thus was counted worthy of the promise because of his deeds?

          • watchmannonthewall

            Perhaps I am comparing Paul to Jesus to show that Paul did exactly as Jesus did??

            John, the apostle Jesus loved, said we are to walk in the same way Jesus walked or the Truth, God’s Word, is not in us (1 John 2:3-4). Did Paul walk this way? Of course he did!! The Truth was in him!

            You say that we are to listen to Jesus and not to Paul, as I have pointed out on this blog on a number of occasions (Deut. 18:15-19 as fulfilled according to Peter in Acts 3:19-25), but if Paul DID and TAUGHT the same things as Jesus did and taught, shouldn’t we also pay attention to Paul’s teachings as he confirms what Jesus lived and taught?

            My comments are intended to be instruction to those who do NOT listen to Jesus, as Paul obviously did, as well as instruction to those who would claim Paul taught a DIFFERENT gospel than Jesus did, as many today also falsely claim!! Do you?

            BOTH parties are incorrect and need to to be properly instructed…or rebuked!! I agree with nearly all you have said, but scripture teaches differently than your position concerning Paul! Don’t confuse God’s people!!

            Paul encouraged others to follow after him as he followed after Christ! If one can demostrate Paul did not follow after Christ then it becomes evident Paul is a false teacher and is not to be esteemed among God’s people. This, in fact, was the reason the Jews attempted to have him killed!! It is evident fron the scriptures Paul was a true prophet and apostle of God and His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ!

          • algol2000

            I have listed above a 7-count charge against Saul of Tarsus. Please can you attempt to refute them? Do not side-line the charges!

            Besides, I insist that Saul inserted himself by order from rome in order to destroy what Jesus taught. Saul(who changed his name to Paul to hide his murderous past) should not be followed. He is an imposter and a murderer of truth.

          • watchmannonthewall

            Your evidence, please. Simply saying you do not accept anything written by Luke because he was a companion of Paul is not evidence, it is an opinion.

            There is simply nothing I could ever say to refute your opinions since you have already dismissed the 13 books of the NT written by Paul as being authoritative in a disciple’s life and the two books written by Luke. We can add the two books written by Peter since he must have been deluded by Paul’s influence to admonish the believers to whom he was writiing, in 2 Peter 3:14-17, to make sure they didn’t fall into the error of lawless men who wrestled with Paul’s epistles in an attempt to make them say Paul taught lawlessness to God’s people.

            Since Peter informed his writers Paul DIDN’T teach LAWLESSNESS, but you testify Paul did, you can’t trust anything Peter wrote either. Now we are down to just 12 authoritative books of the NT, 11 if you think Paul wrote Hebrew’s, that you might possibly consider valid writings or instructions for God’s disciples. Again, I am well aware there are a number of people out there that have this opinion! I do not mind speaking out against such heresy!

            My God is pretty well able to ensure His Word doesn’t get as corrupted as some seem to think; that we need to reduce the NT by half to get to just the “books of Truth”. Those who actually follow the Law know the 9th commandment and that God considers it an abomination for one to break it! (Prv. 6:16-19) Yet, some still do not fear God, even among those who claim to speak for Him!
            Unbelievable! Note how belief or unbelief is actually lived out before others. Each is not simply a mental assent to an asserted fact.

            Abraham believed God and it was counted to him as righteousness, just like Paul said! What he did not say, but James more or less did, is, “Now it came about after these things, that God TESTED Abrahm, and said to him, ‘Abraham!’ And he said, ‘Here I am.’ And He said, ‘Take now your son, your only son, whom you love, Issaac, and go to the land of Moriah; and offer him there as a burnt offering…'” (Gen 22:1-2) God tested Abraham’s faith, as the writer of Hebrews 11:17-19 testified. Was that writer Paul?

            Just because Paul didn’t specifically write about God testing Abraham in his faith doesn’t mean Paul did not understand the same thing James did. Supposedly he had the entire TaNaK memorized. It is the Greek mentallity that wants every little jot and tittle neatly wrapped up and presented so one doesn’t have to think about principles and concepts (which is why so many Christians are on the wrong track. They are Greeks instead of Hebrews!!).

            Frankly, God doesn’t work that way!! The God of freedom expects His people to exercise the liberty they’ve been given by using the mental and intellectual capacities He has given them by choosing to follow their faith in His Word with appropriate action! The living out of our faith in God’s Word is what proves it, our faith, even exists!!

          • algol2000

            Please read the books written by Saul, the evidence are all there, if you will care to pay attention. “Apostle” Saul, the teacher of lawlessness was no servant of Jesus the Christ.

          • watchmannonthewall

            I find it amazing that you actually believe Paul suffered so much for the sake of his lies while claiming it was for the sake of Christ. If he lived as you say, the Jews had every right, even an obligation, to attempt to kill him. (Deut 13:1-11) Is that your position? They made the same claim about Jesus and Stephen, that they made about Paul, that they all attempted to change Moses’ Law. Were they right about Paul but wrong about the other two, or do you misunderstand the NT scriptures, as Peter warned?

            Paul’s writings are filled with allusions and quotes from the TaNaK. Saul/Paul understood the OT better than anyone alive today does. He also understood the heresies of the Pharisees with their adhereance to the Oral Law, a development which began in the later part of the second century BC, which they taught and which he followed during his early years, and which he lived out better than his peers (Gal. 1:13-17 & Phil. 3:2-11).

            Understand that since there is only one word in Greek that corresponds to the word “law”, “nomos”, one must determine from the context whether Paul is speaking of the Oral Law or God’s Mosaic Law. Following the Oral Law will bring death to God’s people but “doing” God’s Law will bring life, as taught by Moses over and over!! I believe you have attempted to point this out also!

            For example, when Paul writes in Phil. 3:6 and 9 that he was “blameless with regard to the “Law”, and he did not have “a righteousness of my own derived from the Law” he was speaking of the Pharisees Oral Law not the Mosaic Law. He was blameless with regard to their man “made-up” law and gave up the righteousness that law supposedly gave him! The same thing goes on today with regard to many Christians! They follow their pastor’s “made-up” law, just as Peter warned against, with regard to Paul’s teachings, instead of just doing God’s Law.

            How do we know that Paul was speaking of the Oral Law in this passage? Because God’s Law is righteousness according to David (Ps. 119:142, since God is righteous, what He commands His people to do can only be righteous), and according to Moses in Deut. 4:8. Two Biblical witnesses that agree establish facts! The Mosaic Law can’t be righteous in the OT and then unrighteous in the NT, can it? Its originator in both was God!! I’m pretty sure you agree with this position, yes?

            We also know Paul wrote that all have sinned, therefore are unrighteous. How then could he claim to be righteous apart from God’s Law in Philippians? Abraham was “blameless” before God because he obeyed all of God’s Torah, His instructions, as were John the Baptist’s parents. (Gen. 26:5, Luke 1:7) Scriptural proof people who obey God’s Word are righteous!! OT and NT.

            We also know Paul spoke against those who went about seeking to establish their OWN righteousness instead of submitting themselves to the righteousness, the Law, of God. (Romans 10:1-3). He was referring to the Pharisees and their followers in this passage. They persecuted him throughout all of his travels.

            Since the Philippians passage indicates he left his old doctrine, way of living, behind when he met Messiah and God’s Law is righteous, this means he adopted a new, a God commanded, way of living. He began to keep God’s Law instead of the Oral Law to which he had been dedicated.

            Later he wrote, “For NOT the hearers of the Law are justified before God, but the DOERS of the Law will be justified.” (Romans 2:13) The Pharisees read from the Law of Moses while in the synagogue but then went out and practiced their own version of it, which is why Jesus told his followers to listen to them when they sat in the seat of Moses, but not to do the practices they did upon leaving the seat. (See also Acts 15:21).

            For Paul, only God’s Law was to be followed as testified by James in Acts 21:24. “Walking orderly” is a euphamism for “walking in the Law”. See also Paul’s admonishment against walking “disorderly” in Thess 3:6-15. As I stated at the beginning of our thread, if one does not know anything about 1st century Pharisaical practices, “doing” the Oral Law, which they then claimed WAS the Mosaic Law, one will be totally confused as to what Paul taught and to what he was opposed.

            If we accept the OT as completely authoritative in our lives, as our foundation for life, and we study it, we will soon learn that Paul was completly committed to the authentic Law of Moses, not the man made law of Moses the Pharisees taught. He eventually paid the ultimate price for his commitment to it.

            It was those who opposed him that wanted to add to and take away from Moses, just as they opposed Jesus in Jerusalem. Both faced opposition from the same exact people and doctrines, one within Jerusalem and one away from it!! The Pharisees had access to the synagogues throughout the Roman Empire. The language used by the gospel writers about the opposition within Jerusalem is different than that used by Luke or Paul, but the outcome is exactly the same.

            The Pharisees were the “Circumsision Party”, believing one had to be circumcised to be a full member of the community. However, note in Acts 15 even some Jewish believers still believed the same and Paul rebuked Peter in Galatians for aligning himself with their man-made traditions. This gives us insight as to the confusion that existed even within the “elect” at the time! Paul helped to set proper doctrine and eliminate the leaven within the elect. He was the person with the necessary backgound to oppose the pharisees.

            Today, it is the devil using foolish men, who often have letters behind their names, and who are lead away of their own lusts (lawlessness), that have developed and taught lies about Paul and influenced others in their assessment of what Paul supposedly taught. Come out from among them and be separate. Shalom!

          • algol2000

            Saul did not “suffer so much”. He was protected by Rome when his cover was busted. He even had a whole band of roman soldiers watching over him.

            Can you please name another disciple that was so loved by roman authorities that he earned their protection?

          • ן mαкe ȣ5 do|laᴦs рer һouᴦ foᴦ w໐ᴦĸinᶃ aт hom℮. | neѵer ᴛh໐ᴜght it vvαѕ ρ௦sѕiᖯle Ꮟut мy friend earnѕ $10ϰ oո ᴍ௦tһΙу bɑsiƽ w०rκıπƍ thӏs јoᏏ aռᏧ she shoᴡеᏧ ᴍe һow۰ Тhe рoᴛentiɑ1 ѡіth tհis ıƽ еndlesƽ۰܂܁ SHRTY.LINK/UQAVGJ

          • algol2000

            Read your bible again. Saul was a tool of rome who got special protection when his cover got blown. Why mention the portrayed gods in detail about the ship he sailed in? Saul was a charlatan just like many self-styled “reverends” and “apostles” today.

    • Mlady_Raka

      The Rapture is an event… and it will take place…. PRAY THEN that you may be found worthy to ESCAPE all the things that are to come upon the earth…and to stand before the Son of Man… Luke 21:36

      • algol2000

        This passage does not indicate that any rapture will take place! Besides, why should I believe a protege of “apostle” saul of tarsus?

        • Paul Patriot

          What is your problem with Paul?????

          He did see Jesus, his life was RADICALLY changed, and he penned a large portion of the Holy Spirits revelation which is know as the New Testament.

          ANSWER: Paul can rightfully be called an apostle because he fulfilled the same three basic requirements the specially-selected twelve original disciples met. After the death of Judas, the church (totaling about 120) met in Jerusalem to decide who among them would be uniquely qualified to replace him (Acts 1). Those to be considered for this awesome responsibility had to have been personally called by Christ, taught by him directly for several years, and seen him alive after his resurrection (Acts 1:17, 22, 25).

          Saul of Tarsus, whose name would later be changed to Paul, was initially a zealous persecutor of those who believed Christ was the Messiah (Acts 9). While traveling to Damascus in 33 A.D., three years after Jesus was resurrected, he was was miraculously confronted by the Lord and brought to repentance (verses 3 to 6). While he stayed in Damascus, a believer named Ananias received a vision that revealed why Paul was called and chosen to ultimately take on the responsiblity of an apostle.

          • algol2000

            Then ananias conveniently disappeared afterwards. Or is this the same ananias and saphira that “died by the hand of the holy spirit”? Beware of antichrists and their prophets.

  • For the naysayers: The crack that the boy drew was the Montana to Florida Lineament. There is no way that he could have had prior knowledge of this. Absolutely astounding. I believe the boy’s testimony is true.

  • pissedlizard كافر ‏

    Its a kid with an imagination who just happens to have a mee-maw that thinks he is “special”.

    • Mlady_Raka

      Amazing what conclusions denial will produce…

      • pissedlizard كافر ‏

        No, just an adult with kids who have the same kind of imagination and say similar things. They are not prophets, sooth-Sayers or messiahs. They are children that have friends and watch movies that are EXACTLY like the scenario this kid says. I’ll tell you what, you listen to every kid with an imagination for 1 week and see how far it gets you. You have to take them as literally as you are taking this kid. I’ll go back to being an adult and check the mass of predictions that are wrong on this and similar sites — FOR ENTERTAINMENT. I suggest you do the same.

    • Jim Davis

      And unfortunately for the rest of us granny knows who to upload a video. Back in the day, no one outside of the bingo parlor and her knitting circle would have heard this tyke talk about his scribblings.

      • poor eunuch

        What’s really bad is if u have to live with granny. At least she’s only seasonal. Soon it will be 100 & I have to wear shirt when she’s around unless locked in my room. So hot without T & not even summer yet.

        • Jim Davis

          Good God! The bots are upon us!

          • s a

            I noticed you only leave a disparaging reply when you think it’s me leaving a comment. When I use other names and other kinds of comments you reply normally.

  • chris

    The Russians have a huge nuclear weapon with multiple warheads that is apparently capable of destroying an entire country. If that missile split into its multiple warheads just before impact that would look similar to an ‘asteroid’ breaking apart, possibly. Maybe it’s a first strike weapon which somehow the USA causes to crash into the Atlantic followed by by sides launching thousands of weapons at each other. Or maybe it is a genuine metallic-type asteroid which by sheer bad luck actually triggers WW3 by convincing the USA defences it is an incoming Russian missile.
    An object hurtling through the Earths atmosphere from space would burn up like a fiery asteroid. Maybe its the International Space Station which crashes and pollutes the ocean with radioactivity.
    The young lad may well have had a genuine vision but then again with his grandmother being known as a ‘Daughter of the Highest King’ you have to consider that he may have been influenced.

    • poor eunuch

      Yeah, people tend to dream about what they’ve thought about so your last sentence is probably right.

    • OldPa57

      We are all children of the Highest King. She is merely expressing the truth. Along with her love and faith in the Lord our God.

      • jaxon64

        Are we all the “children of God?'”
        John 1:12 11He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. 12But to all who did receive Him, to those who believed in His name, He gave the right to become children of God — 13children born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but born of God

        When one obeys the gospel, he or she becomes a child of God. In this way, one becomes a member of God’s spiritual household, or family. There are rights, privileges and blessings in the family, but there are also responsibilities. One of those responsibilities is to be true and loyal to our Father in every circumstance even when the world does not like it much. The Father’s love is just too great to betray or despise. “See how great a love the Father has bestowed on us, that we would be called children of God; and such we are. For this reason the world does not know us, because it did not know Him. “ (1 John 3:1).

  • Betty

    A year ago April 2016 I had a dream very similar. I will never forget seeing the destruction of our world, from way above.

  • JP Newman

    and what’s the best way for humanity to avoid wars?? ignorants to stop being ignorants…

  • A.S.

    When Noah came out of the ark, God promised to never destroy the world ever again. That applies to asteroids, nukes and earthquakes. I don’t think the boy’s “daydreams” were anything but just that. Ask him for a year. Ask him for the current location of the asteroid using astronomical terms. If it was a vision then he would be given the current location of the asteroid so that various space programs across the earth can track it and blow it out of earth’s path before it gets even near Mars. I would not put too much thought into this.

    • A.S.

      Furthermore, let’s assume it was a “vision,” I doubt even an adult will remember the location of all the X’s and +’s. Nothing more than a wild imagination. Like I said above, ask him for the current location of the asteroid using astronomical terms.

  • needahbeh

    This crap has been circling the internet for years… hasn’t happen yet!

    • Jim Davis

      And its been circling TV and radio for decades an in print for centuries. We will always be in The End Times as long as someone is willing to pay to hear about it.

  • jim

    How many of these dreams/visions occurred after the movie “The Day After Tomorrow” came out?

  • Mart1963

    In the book of Daniel there also is a large rock that crashes into the 10 toes made of Iron and clay which is symbolic of the last kingdom, the UN. The 10 toes represent the 5 permanent members of the UN security council and the 5 non permanent members of the UN security council who run the UN. The Iron and clay are symbolic of our modern society which is made up of reinforced concrete which is made by mixing a clay type of substances i.e. concrete which is poured over Iron. The Greek kingdom was represented by Brass and the Roman kingdom was represented by Iron as they were the substances that defined those kingdoms.

    Revelation tells us of a Beast that was is not and will come again, this Beast was democracy which was birthed in the Greek kingdom, which fell to the Roman political system and this Beast of Democracy has come again through the United Nations which requires all countries to be democratic countries to join.

    Revelation also describes it as a 7 headed beast with 10 horns. The 7 heads are the 4 permanent members Russia China England and France with 4 heads as France is part of the EU which is run by 4 presidents. The 10 horns represent the 10 non permanent members of the UN who have 5 acting and 5 in training.

    The woman that rides the UN Beast is the US, the woman (Statue of Liberty) looks over the UN Beast Headquarters in New York city.

    After this God’s kingdom on Earth will come into being after all those who were raptured are returned with Christ after the wicked have been destroyed.

    • Zlatko Milanovic

      Rapture doctrine did not exist before John Darby invented it in 1830 AD. Before it “popped into John Darby’s head” no one had ever heard of a secret rapture …

      • Mart1963

        There probably is no rapture for you as it is only for God’s elect.

        Matthew 24:29-31New International Version (NIV)
        29 “Immediately after the distress of those days

        “‘the sun will be darkened,
        and the moon will not give its light;
        the stars will fall from the sky,
        and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.

        30 “Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory.31 And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.

        • Zlatko Milanovic

          So, you think Darby was a Prophet??? He wasn’t. That is not traditional, Apostolic Christianity.

  • Zlatko Milanovic

    The kid just had a bad dream; probably watching the History Channel with his grandpa, one of those UFO or end of the world shows.
    The boy is not a prophet, sometimes a dream is just a dream. Good grief.

  • Had Enough

    With all the crap on TV and video games, it’s no wonder this kid is having nightmares.

  • Woᴦk over ιnt℮rn℮τ f໐r two−ƽi╳ hourƽ ໐ϖ ԁαiǀγ baѕᎥƽ, g ɑndeτ ρaγmeոt abᴏυt Ιᴋ⁃Зĸ ೦w neeᴋǀy baƽis܁mσrе ab  L℮arnංцt it Ꮒere˃ GET.LC/EpfyG

  • algol2000

    The “Jesus” that Saul claimed to have seen on the way to damascus was a pie in the sky. God does not work that way to make conversions of murders in secret. God requires repentance BEFORE anyone can gain his confidence. God will not override another man’s freewill.

    • krinks

      Read your Bible. The other Apostles never disputed Paul’s clam as one of their own. Funny that you know today what they didn’t know then.

      • algol2000

        Read your bible, no other “apostle” got converted by experiencing a pie in the sky.

      • algol2000

        Yes, since the owners of the bible ensured that Saul’s “gospel” will fill 90% of the content of the “new” testament, is there any room to write against Saul? But we have hints that he was not friends with the true apostles. Did he not publicly rebuke Peter and James at different times, and cursed those who will permit anyone teaching a message different from his own?

        Now, don’t mention that 1 Peter supports Saul. Read the whole text and you will discover that that single line was inserted by an overzealous scribe.

        Saul was no servant of Jesus and his recorded DEEDS (crafty (murderous) fellow that I am I caught you with guile) betrays him. Pay attention to the DEEDs and not the claims.

        • krinks

          You seem to know what the Apostles in their day didn’t not to mention a lack of knowledge that most of us are Gentiles so naturally letters to the Gentile would be more prevalent. This should bother you but interestingly it doesn’t.

          • algol2000

            The power of God is demonstrated, not by “letters” but by mighty deeds. If the disciples had obeyed Christ to leave Jerusalem after they had been endowed with the gift of tongues of many nations, “apostle” Saul would not have happened upon them. But alas, they were busy playing church and “apostle”, forming bogus hierarchies of “leadership”, that Christ warned them against. No wonder Stephen was more blessed than the rest, and no wonder Saul the son of satan singled him out for destruction.

          • krinks

            Poppycock. Peter is one of his letters called himself a fellow elder who said not to preach from compulsion.

          • algol2000

            Good. Please tell how how Peter, an unlearned fellow who could not even write in his own language learned to speak and write Greek.

          • krinks

            The Bible and the letters there in were not originally written in Greek.

          • algol2000

            Pray, tell me the “original” language that the “new testament” was written in, especially Saul’s gospels ?

          • krinks

            Aramiac was the language of the people.

            Hebrew was the language of the Temple.

            Greek was the language of commerce.

          • algol2000

            I will have to stop here. I think we can all do with a little more research. Too many languages exception!