12 Signs That The United States And China Are Moving Toward War

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

War Peace Sign - Public DomainIf the United States and China are supposed to be such “great friends”, why are both sides acting as if war is in our future?  Thanks to events in the South China Sea and the blatant theft of the personal information of millions of U.S. government workers, tensions between the United States and China are the highest that they have been in decades.  Most Americans typically assume that a real, actual shooting war between the U.S. and China could never possibly happen, but as you will see below the Chinese are actually spending a lot of time and money preparing for precisely such a conflict.  In fact, the Chinese are working feverishly to develop new offensive weapons systems that would only be used in such a war.  Of course it is extremely unlikely that a military conflict between our two nations will happen in our immediate future, but without a doubt we are moving in that direction.  And this is how wars typically happen – things build up over a period of time before they finally reach a breaking point.  Just think about what took place between the United States and Japan in the lead up to our war with them.  There were years of diplomatic troubles before Japan finally made the decision to launch a “surprise” attack on Pearl Harbor.  Right now, I believe that we are moving into a similar period of diplomatic trouble with China.  Initially, this will likely affect our trade relationship with the Chinese, but ultimately it could be much more than that.  The following are 10 signs that the United States and China are moving toward war…


#1 China’s moves in the South China Sea have greatly angered Obama administration officials.  Some of the islands that China has grabbed are also claimed by Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan, Brunei and the Philippines.  The United States is bound by treaty to defend the Philippines in any conflict with China, and Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam are all slated to be parties to the new super secret global trade treaty that Obama is currently negotiating.  The following comes from Business Insider

China’s reclamation of more than 2,000 acres of land on disputed islands and atolls in the South China Sea since last year has raised international alarm over its territorial ambitions. Washington took the unusual step last month of publicizing a U.S. military surveillance flight that showed the massive scale of China’s island-building.

China says the islands are its sovereign territory, but Washington argues that the continuation of building work and militarization of the islands could enflame complex territorial disputes with China’s neighbors, with whom the U.S. is seeking to forge closer ties while preserving freedom of navigation in sea lanes crucial for world trade.

#2 In China, there is talk that a war may be necessary to defend China’s interests in the South China Sea.  In fact, a newspaper that is a mouthpiece for the Communist Party actually stated that war with the United States “is inevitable” if the U.S. continues to insist that the Chinese must halt activities on those islands…

Coinciding with the publication of the white paper, an editorial in The Global Times – a tabloid newspaper mouthpiece for the ruling Communist Party – issued a warning to the US to halt its protests over the South China Sea.

Last week, China’s foreign ministry revealed it had lodged a complaint with the US over an American spy plane that flew over parts of the disputed archipelago.

The article read: “We do not want a military conflict with the United States, but if it were to come, we have to accept it.”

It added that China should “carefully prepare” for the possibility of war with Washington and that “if the United States’ bottom line is that China is to halt activities, then a US-China war is inevitable in the South China Sea”.

#3 The theft of the information of up to 14 million federal workers is being described as “an act of war“.  At this point, the Obama administration appears convinced that this horrible act was committed by the Chinese government

Cybersecurity is another source of acrimony that’s up for discussion, given fresh urgency by the massive security breach that led to the theft of personal information of as many as 14 million current and former U.S. federal employees. The Obama administration believes that China’s government, not criminal hackers, was responsible for the breach that included detailed background information on military and intelligence personnel.

China has denied involvement in the break-in and says it is also a victim of cyberattacks.

So was China behind this theft?

Perhaps we will never know for sure, but without a doubt this incident has raised tensions between the two nations.

And as tensions continue to increase, it is likely that the cyber espionage being committed by both sides will only get worse.  Ian Bremmer, the founder of Eurasia Group, recently told Business Insider that he believes that a “virtual war” between our countries has already begun…

We should be very clear: China is at virtual war with the United States, and the threat is far higher than that of terrorism, which gets the lion’s share of attention — and, in the post-9/11 world, funding.”

#4 China recently conducted a series of massive military exercises that simulated an attack against Taiwan.  Since the U.S. is committed to protecting Taiwan, a real conflict of this nature would almost certainly involve the United States.  The following comes from an article that was posted on janes.com

In a new analysis by Richard Fisher and James Hardy, IHS Jane’s reports that “A series of Chinese military exercises between late May and early June showcased the ability of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to project land, air, and naval power into the area around Taiwan.”

The exercises demonstrated the People’s Liberation Army’s plan to use civilian ships during emergencies to help boost its forces.

“To compensate for the relatively small size of its formal naval amphibious transport fleet the PLA has co-funded construction of a large number of ferries used by civilian companies. They will be made available to the PLA during emergencies and are a frequent element in civil-military transport exercises,” Fisher and Hardy write.

#5 According to Paul Joseph Watson, thousands of Chinese merchant ships are being retrofitted for military purposes.  The only possible conflict in which the Chinese military would need “thousands of merchant ships” would be a war with the United States…

China is set to retrofit thousands of merchant ships for military purposes so they can be used in the event of a war, another disturbing indication of growing tensions between Beijing and Washington.

Shipping industry publication TradeWinds reveals that China is preparing a new fleet of “war-ready ships” to serve as “a reserve military logistics wing” in the event of a naval conflict.

The new policy will apply to “containerships, ro-ros, multipurpose ships, bulkers and other ships,” with shipbuilders receiving a government subsidy to pay for the cost of making the vessels “militarily useful.”

#6 The Chinese have developed a “carrier killer” missile which was specifically designed to destroy U.S. aircraft carriers.  There are some that have suggested that these new missiles may have made U.S. aircraft carriers obsolete

Nevertheless, some have suggested that the DF-21D has rendered the supercarrier obsolete. While it depends on how we use the term “obsolete,” it’s probably too early to make that claim. China has expended vast time and resources determining how to kill US carriers, which suggests that the Chinese military takes carrier capabilities seriously. Moreover, the number of countries with both the interest and technical capability to develop the system of systems necessary to operate an ASBM is probably limited to two for the foreseeable future, with only Russia joining China.

#7 The Chinese now have the capability of equipping their nuclear missiles with MIRV warheads.  According to Bill Gertz, this has significantly equalized the balance of power between the U.S. and China…

China carried out a long-range missile flight test on Saturday using multiple, independently targetable reentry vehicles, or MIRVs, according to U.S. defense officials.

The flight test Saturday of a new DF-41 missile, China’s longest-range intercontinental ballistic missile, marks the first test of multiple warhead capabilities for China, officials told the Washington Free Beacon.

China has been known to be developing multiple-warhead technology, which it obtained from the United States illegally in the 1990s.

However, the Dec. 13 DF-41 flight test, using an unknown number of inert maneuvering warheads, is being viewed by U.S. intelligence agencies as a significant advance for China’s strategic nuclear forces and part of a build-up that is likely to affect the strategic balance of forces.

#8 Of much greater concern than the MIRV warheads are the new hypersonic glide vehicles that China has developed.  These ultra-high-speed missiles are capable of carrying nuclear warheads and represent a huge threat to the United States

China recently conducted the second flight test of a new, ultra-high-speed missile that is part of what analysts say is Beijing’s global system of attack weapons capable of striking the United States with nuclear warheads.

The latest test of the new hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) known as Wu-14 took place Aug. 7 at a missile facility in western China, said U.S. government officials familiar with details of the test reported in internal channels.

#9 The Chinese Navy is building a series of extremely quiet ballistic missile submarines.  These subs could potentially creep up to our coastlines and rain nuclear missiles down on us within just a few minutes.  The following comes from an article by Bill Gertz

The Chinese Navy has deployed three ballistic missile submarines at sea capable of striking the United States with nuclear missiles, the commander of the U.S. Northern Command said Tuesday.

Adm. William Gortney, the commander, said the submarines are a “concern” and will be able to strike the United States when fully deployed with missiles and warheads.

The missile submarines are deployed in the South China Sea at a base on Hainan Island, according to a defense official.

#10 The Chinese have developed submarine-based nuclear missiles that could potentially reach all 50 states from the waters of Hawaii

China could soon target the United States with sea-based nuclear weapons as it is reinforcing its submarines with long-range nuclear ballistic missiles, a US congressional report has found.

China’s military is set to acquire a reliable, hard-to-destroy sea-based nuclear deterrent, with a dozen JL-2 missiles that are being mounted on its JIN class submarines, according to a report submitted to Congress by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission.

The missiles have a strike range of around 7,350 km, meaning they can reach all 50 US states if they are launched from waters west or east of Hawaii.

#11 At a time when the U.S. military is actually shrinking, Chinese military spending is increasing each year by double digits

China’s government in March announced a 12.2 percent increase in military spending to $132 billion. That followed last year’s 10.7 percent increase to $114 billion, giving China the second-highest defense budget for any nation behind the U.S., which spent $600.4 billion on its military last year.

#12 The Chinese military is not the only one preparing for a war between our two nations.  It turns out that the U.S. military has been conducting military exercises that are specifically geared toward simulating a conflict with China.  The following comes from the BBC

Watching the US Navy close up like this, it is hard not to be slightly awed. No other navy in the world has quite the same toys, or shows them off with the same easy charm.

But as I stand on the deck filming my report on how “the US is practising for war with China”, I can see my host from the Navy public affairs office wincing.

You get used to hearing the PR rhetoric: the US Navy “is not practising for war with any specific country”. But the US Navy has not assembled two whole carrier battle groups and 200 aircraft off the coast of Guam for a jolly, either. This is about practising what the Pentagon now calls “Air Sea Battle”.

It is a concept first put forward in 2009, and it is specifically designed to counter the rising threat from China.

Like I said, a war between the United States and China is not going to happen in our immediate future.

But it would be a grave mistake to assume that it could never happen.

Over in China, their military operates under the assumption that a war between the two superpowers will definitely take place at some point, and the Chinese are working feverishly to figure out ways that they can come out on top in such a conflict.

Yes, the Chinese have become exceedingly wealthy selling us goods.  In the process, we have lost thousands of businesses, millions of jobs and we now owe the Chinese more than a trillion dollars.  The Chinese never intended to have a balanced and fair trading relationship with us, because it has always been their plan to emerge as the sole, dominant superpower on the entire planet.

Once our debt-fueled economy collapses, the Chinese won’t have too much use for us anymore.  Instead, we will just be a barrier in the way of their goal of total global domination.

If you don’t think that the Chinese view us in this manner, just read some of the white papers produced by the Chinese government and the Chinese military.  They do not consider us to be a “friend” at all.  Rather, they consider us to be an enemy that must ultimately be vanquished.

Sadly, most Americans seem to assume that the global community is just one big, happy family these days.

In the end, we will likely pay a very great price for being so naive.

  • K

    As I said the other day. war would also make a great distraction, if their economy continues downward. If you add things up. World wide, we are in for some very bumpy years.

  • Richard

    It’s always, “the Chinese this, the Chinese that”, isn’t it? Do you really think this is the kind of article the Chinese would write when talking about impending war with America?
    Try this: write another article on this subject and pretend you’re CHINESE and write it from their point-of-view.
    You’ll start getting very uncomfortable. Don’t worry, it’s not fleas….

    • IsReal

      They torture dogs to make the meat taste good, they’re brutal over there.

      • Listen, torturing any living thing is ghastly, but the US surely leads the world in torturing animals meant for food. Yes we adore our canine pets, but eating one of God’s creatures is as egregious as eating any other of them.

        • Alicecroft Dragan

          This is true, & I HATE to say this, but… God DID put certain Animals to be Eaten, so we can survive. (Even though, “I” myself don’t & WON’T EAT red meat or any at all) but, we DON’T go around EATING, “cats or Dogs man!” Any meat, “I” think…is bad for us anyway! So…..

      • Gay Veteran

        any worse than our korporate farms?

      • Alicecroft Dragan

        YES! that’s Right! those people, it’s like, they aren’t HUMAN! hey! they get rid of females when they’re born & keep the males! those monsters over there are really Horrible! they’re a disgrace!!

        • folgers22

          I’m not a Sino-lover, but your statements are ridiculous. If you’re going to attack the Chinese for preferring males and engaging in the savage practice of infanticide under their 1 Child Policy, just remember our own people seem to have a problem with starving their kids to death, leaving them to die in cars, throwing babies in trash cans, and setting babies on fire.

    • Alicecroft Dragan

      Are you defending those Monsters? cause they aren’t worth defending! those ass wipes are OUT of they’re freaking minds!! I can’t stand them! cause the way they are towards animals…Eating cats & dogs?! Don’t think so! I can’t stand Asians!! >_<

  • kfilly

    I just have to comment on a few things. War would make an excellent distraction for the powers that be. It would essentially be like a repeat of World War with different players involved, and it would hide the bankers criminality. The Russians had a plan to deal with entire U.S. navy fleets. They would have nuked them. They kept track of where they where at all times. It would have taken one ICBM to sink a large segment of our navy. I think China would do something similar. It would be a great equalizer on that front. Yes, I would not sign up for our military. Speaking of which, the statist puppet editor from the National Journal, Ron Fournier, just wrote a wonderful peice about making service to the country mandatory for 18-28 year olds. I suggest he and the criminal politicians put their kids up first. If they don’t, their kids may have been enlisted for a different war a lot closer to home.

    • IsReal

      WWIII would be the end.

  • JRs

    In other words, the US is going to start yet another unjust war thousands of miles away. And it’s not just China the US is antagonizing, There is a whole bunch of other countries such as Russia, Iran, N. Korea, Venezuela they are aiming at destroying. I know I won’t be joining the US army.

    • IsReal

      It’s actualy God coordinating all this behind the scenes. God’s judgment is coming to America, repent and turn to Him. Become a citizen of His Kingdom before it’s too late for you.

      • Annie8749

        If you could use extra paycheck on the side in the range of $50-$300 each day for doing basic jobs at your home for few hours every day then this may interest you…

    • Gay Veteran

      hey! no war profits without war

  • DJohn1

    I have often speculated about a territorial war between our country and China in my posts. Most often started with the sinking of an American Naval Vessel in the waters between China and Taiwan.
    In my opinion they have all ready won! That is what is so silly about it.
    They have destroyed us economically with retail goods so cheap no one can compete with them, not even the Japanese or South Koreans.
    So the question really is why go to war?
    They are destroying their own financial rewards.
    The country represents the largest population on the planet.
    All they really have to do is raise the bar. That means start raising the value of their currency against every other currency in the world. This effectively makes their goods more expensive to buy.
    Industrially we cannot compete with them.
    The obvious answer is they will want to bring their population here in company stores to avoid shipping costs from China.
    Canada has vast amounts of unoccupied territory mainly because of the nature of the Tundra and the excessive amount of water in the soil. Despite tax breaks to have children, it is terribly under populated at this time.
    The temperatures of Canada are part of the problem with the majority of people around the major water shipping areas.
    China might be eyeing that territory for its own use.
    What would make a whole lot more sense to me would be to quit building weapons all together.
    If they want to fight let them fight the ISIS people for the oil.
    After all they are supposedly without religion. That makes them the enemy as far as ISIS is concerned. I suggest China is likely to go Christian. But other religions also come into play.
    Why destroy a good portion of the planet in an attempt to steal what is really yours for the taking financially?
    I think what we are really dealing with here is power brokers in the form of military. The merchant class has all ready taken over a good portion of the world. So going to war really does not make sense.

    • IsReal

      Yuu lost me on the ISIS section and thereafter. Communist China Christian?

      • DJohn1

        It is forbidden fruit to be a Christian in China. Therefore a lot of people are likely to become Christian and hide it from authorities.
        ISIS is a rapid cancer in the region, growing by leaps and bounds even though the violence has little to do with the base religion. I am suggesting it is an ideal target for a nation like China to invade and use up a lot of rebellious youth. What it is all about is the oil producing land. While the ISIS has a reputation for being fearsome fighters they are no match for an organized army like China’s is likely to be.
        IN the world barnyard, we are the nation to beat. Which is unfortunate. I would like us to remove ourselves as a target for all the world’s barnyard alphas attempting to get ahead. That means going neutral and that is almost too late to do.
        China needs land to expand into. Much of the land they own is useless.
        Taiwan is a thorn in their side, being so close to mainland China.
        I suggest we re-locate Taiwan’s people somewhere not so close to China. That is a project few can afford to do. So there is likely to be a war over this place with China. If you compare the costs of war against the costs of relocating the people, I think the relocation is a much better deal. It is also a lot less bloody.

        No matter where they relocate to Taiwan will thrive. They are an industrious people. They originally fled mainland China. China would have to offer them wholesale pardons for it to work at all. Don’t see that happening either.

    • folgers22

      Not very likely. Look up their decades-long war on Falun Gong and their attempts to ban Christmas. Oh, and their ongoing war against the Uighur Muslims.

  • Robert

    Chinese proverb: “the slapped face never forgets.” China has been slapped hard over the centuries. No more. Never again. Were I Chinese I would despise the Japanese who inflicted unspeakable atrocities on the Chinese. For years China endured colonial occupation including by the US. Never again. The Chinese for decades have trained in our best universities. Many remained in the US. I suspect that most Chinese consider themselves Chinese first and Americans last. Family ties are rarely trumped by citizenship. It is sad that we have not developed better ties with Russia and China rather than wasting time with Japan and other countries which drain us.

  • IsReal

    The late Pastor David Wilkersen propheized about his vision of seeing the U.S. attacked and destroyed with nuclear submarines. It will be God’s judment for our country’s lack of turning back to God, i.e., repentance. God allows these things to happen when a nation has turned against Him especially.

    The term “immediate future” is cloudy at best. If the U.S. economy collapses at the end of the year, China and Russia could make their move.

    • folgers22

      Why would China attack us? They stand far more to gain by trading with us. Their entire nation has risen off trade with us. If China ended trade with us, their economy would probably collapse overnight. They’re so intertwined with us, they can’t live well without us. They know we have them out-classed militarily, but as long as they don’t go to war, they can run circles around us. What China has planned for us is more likely to be a program of intense hacking and intellectual property theft, selling as much junk to us as possible, and using their holdings of our debt to mess with us. Also, they’ve got their own internal structural problems that make them more likely to be worried about civil war and/or economic collapse than a foreign war.

  • Gay Veteran

    American neo-cons wants China and Russia to be American vassals.
    ain’t gonna happen

  • So then, as individual citizens, what shall we do?

  • GetReal4U2

    Sadly, most Americans seem to assume that the global community is just one big, happy family these days…
    get ready for the new UN global mandates…in…you guessed it…September…

    • Joan Camara


  • Priscilla

    Get 90 bucks a day for working on-line from your home for couple of hrs /day… Get regular payment weekly… All what is required is a personal computer, access to the web, and also a little spare-time…

  • folgers22

    While I consider China a threat, allow me to point out something. We fear the PRC, but there is one important point that I think we ignore.

    Historically speaking, China has no history of aggression outside of what they consider their historical boundaries going back a few thousand years. They’re brutal and aggressiive in their sphere of influence, but they have no history of expansion beyond their traditional region. Instead, they’re focused on business and strategic alliances, which don’t require military investment overseas, merely new ways to aquire resources and trade partners.

    That’s important. Notice how many nations our military is in worldwide? How many nations would you say China is in militarily? For all the threat they appear to offer us, they really aren’t a world military power. We’re in over 100 nations and fighting or supporting fighting in multiple nations. China can score some shots off us on that issue-there aren’t Chinese troops and bases in 100+ nations.

    When you compare how they interact with the world and how we interact with the world, we can appear more violent and dangerous than they do. That is going to hurt us more and more as the world turns to China as a trading power.

    • Gay Veteran

      the business of China is business
      the business of America is war

      • Patricia56988

        If you are searching for extra income averaging 50-300 bucks a day for doing an online job on your computer from home for 3-4 hrs a day then read more here…

    • eleanore.mcr

      If you are in need for extra money of about $50 to $300 daily for doing an online job from your couch at home for 3-4 h each day then try this…

  • Joan Camara

    Oh no, I won’t be able to buy all those thousands of “made in china” wonderful products from wally world anymore? Oh nooooooo…

  • smooze

    We are at war with Eastasia and have always been at war with Eastasia…Eurasia has always been our ally…

  • Gay Veteran

    compare China and U.S. in the 21st century, how many nations have they waged war on?

    China: ZERO!

    U.S.: Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Syria, I’m sure I’ve forgotten some